The DOI matches its DataCite record; 171 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Learning for Deepfakes Creation and Detection: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
Deep learning has been successfully applied to solve various complex problems ranging from big data analytics to computer vision and human-level control. Deep learning advances however have also been employed to create software that can cause threats to privacy, democracy and national security. One of those deep learning-powered applications recently emerged is deepfake. Deepfake algorithms can create fake images and videos that humans cannot distinguish them from authentic ones. The proposal of technologies that can automatically detect and assess the integrity of digital visual media is therefore indispensable. This paper presents a survey of algorithms used to create deepfakes and, more importantly, methods proposed to detect deepfakes in the literature to date. We present extensive discussions on challenges, research trends and directions related to deepfake technologies. By reviewing the background of deepfakes and state-of-the-art deepfake detection methods, this study provides a comprehensive overview of deepfake techniques and facilitates the development of new and more robust methods to deal with the increasingly challenging deepfakes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Remarkably, deepfakes can even be employed to generate counterfeit satellite earth images with military implications (Nguyen et al. 2019).”
From Deepfakes: current and future trends (2024) · cites this paper as Nguyen et al. 2019
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“A review of deep RL approaches developed for solving cyber-security problems can be found in Nguyen et al. (2019), including autonomous intrusion detection techniques and multiagent game theory simulations for defense strategies.”
From Deepfakes: current and future trends (2024) · cites this paper as Nguyen et al. (2019)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.244 · Cited by 23,602
Labaca-Castro, R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40442-0_9 · Cited by 21,119
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering
Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., & Philbin, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298682 · Cited by 15,267
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
(1995) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.1995.466933 · Cited by 13,117
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bin Guo, Yasan Ding, Lina Yao, Yunji Liang, and Zhiwen Yu. The future of false information detection on social media: New perspectives and trends. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53 (4):1-36, 2020.
- Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, and Léon Bottou. Wasser- stein generative adversarial networks. In International Confer- ence on Machine Learning, pages 214-223. PMLR, 2017.
- Diederik P Kingma and Prafulla Dhariwal. Glow: genera- tive flow with invertible 1× 1 convolutions. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 10236-10245, 2018.
- Marissa Koopman, Andrea Macarulla Rodriguez, and Zeno Geradts. Detection of deepfake video manipulation. In The 20th Irish Machine Vision and Image Processing Conference (IMVIP), pages 133-136, 2018.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices
Li, B., Qi, P., Liu, B., Di, S., Liu, J., Pei, J., Yi, J., & Zhou, B. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3555803 · Cited by 612
Deep learning: systematic review, models, challenges, and research directions
Khoei, T. T., Slimane, H. O., & Kaabouch, N. (2023) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-023-08957-4 · Cited by 501
Deepfake detection using deep learning methods: A systematic and comprehensive review
Heidari, A., Jafari Navimipour, N., Dag, H., & Unal, M. (2024) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1520 · Cited by 349
Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities
Kaur, A., Noori Hoshyar, A., Saikrishna, V., Firmin, S., & Xia, F. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10810-6 · Cited by 214
Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon
Juefei-Xu, F., Wang, R., Huang, Y., Guo, Q., Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-022-01606-8 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., Huynh-The, T., Nahavandi, S., Nguyen, T. T., Pham, Q.-V., & Nguyen, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Pusan National University (KR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 223
- Pages
- 103525-103525
- ISSN
- 1077-3142 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1909.11573
- OpenAlex
- W4288102863
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 173
- Citations by year
- 2026: 88 · 2025: 138 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 30.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Computer Vision and Image Understanding (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- deepfakes, deepfake detection, deepfake generation, synthetic media, video forgery, image tampering, deep learning applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
