DeepRacer: Educational Autonomous Racing Platform for Experimentation with Sim2Real Reinforcement Learning
Open accessAbstract
DeepRacer is a platform for end-to-end experimentation with RL and can be used to systematically investigate the key challenges in developing intelligent control systems. Using the platform, we demonstrate how a 1/18th scale car can learn to drive autonomously using RL with a monocular camera. It is trained in simulation with no additional tuning in physical world and demonstrates: 1) formulation and solution of a robust reinforcement learning algorithm, 2) narrowing the reality gap through joint perception and dynamics, 3) distributed on-demand compute architecture for training optimal policies, and 4) a robust evaluation method to identify when to stop training. It is the first successful large-scale deployment of deep reinforcement learning on a robotic control agent that uses only raw camera images as observations and a model-free learning method to perform robust path planning. We open source our code and video demo on GitHub: https://git.io/fjxoJ.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Domain randomization and dynamics randomization methods focus on introducing perturbations in simulation environments with the aim of making agents less susceptible to mismatches between simulation and reality.
“Domain randomization and dynamics randomization methods focus on introducing perturbations in the simulation environments with the aim of making the agents less susceptible to the mismatches between simulation and reality [30], [38], [40].”
From Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [30]
Cites
Domain randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world
Tobin, J., Fong, R., Ray, A., Schneider, J., Zaremba, W., & Abbeel, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2017.8202133 · Cited by 3,124 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Methods include adding noise in dynamics [23], [2] and imagery [12], [52], learning model ensembles [53], [54], adding adversarial noise [25], [55] and assessing simulation bias [24].”
BackgroundRobust adversarial reinforcement learning
Pinto, L., Davidson, J., Sukthankar, R., & Gupta, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.02702 · Cited by 507 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Methods include adding noise in dynamics [23], [2] and imagery [12], [52], learning model ensembles [53], [54], adding adversarial noise [25], [55] and assessing simulation bias [24].”
BackgroundJames, S., Wohlhart, P., Kalakrishnan, M., Kalashnikov, D., Irpan, A., Ibarz, J., Levine, S., Hadsell, R., & Bousmalis, K. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01291 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Protecting against evaluation overfitting in empirical reinforcement learning
Whiteson, S., Tanner, B., Taylor, M. E., & Stone, P. (2011) · 2011 IEEE Symposium on Adaptive Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning (ADPRL) · doi:10.1109/adprl.2011.5967363 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Survey
Zhao, W., Queralta, J. P., & Westerlund, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci47803.2020.9308468 · Cited by 941 · see citing works
- Authors
- Balaji, B., Mallya, S., Genc, S., Gupta, S., Dirac, L., Khare, V., Roy, G., Sun, T., Tao, Y., Townsend, B., Calleja, E., Muralidhara, S., & Karuppasamy, D.
- Affiliations
- Amazon (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1911.01562
- OpenAlex
- W2985533531
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- autonomous driving, sim-to-real transfer, deep reinforcement learning, monocular camera, reality gap, model-free reinforcement learning, path planning, robot control, distributed training, end-to-end learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
