PreprintCited by 83Parallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesInterconnection Networks and SystemsEmbedded Systems Design Techniques

Dissecting the Graphcore IPU Architecture via Microbenchmarking

Open access
Jia, Zhe, Tillman, Blake, Maggioni, Marco, Scarpazza, Daniele Paolo·2019·arXiv

Abstract

This report focuses on the architecture and performance of the Intelligence Processing Unit (IPU), a novel, massively parallel platform recently introduced by Graphcore and aimed at Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) workloads. We dissect the IPU's performance behavior using microbenchmarks that we crafted for the purpose. We study the IPU's memory organization and performance. We study the latency and bandwidth that the on-chip and off-chip interconnects offer, both in point-to-point transfers and in a spectrum of collective operations, under diverse loads. We evaluate the IPU's compute power over matrix multiplication, convolution, and AI/ML primitives. We discuss actual performance in comparison with its theoretical limits. Our findings reveal how the IPU's architectural design affects its performance. Moreover, they offer simple mental models to predict an application's performance on the IPU, on the basis of the computation and communication steps it involves. This report is the natural extension to a novel architecture of a continuing effort of ours that focuses on the microbenchmark-based discovery of massively parallel architectures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1912.03413

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resource-efficient computing devices that require less natural resources to build and use can be seen as an obvious gain in environmental impacts, and different hardware platforms are being developed as alternatives to GPUs and CPUs.

    “Resource-efficient computing devices that require less natural resources (energy, water, raw materials) to build and use can be seen as an obvious gain in terms of environmental impacts, and different hardware platforms are being developed towards this end as an alternative to GPUs and CPUs, which represent the current status quo of AI computing hardware [61, 62].”

    From From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate (2025) · cites this paper as [61]

    The paper studies the Graphcore IPU as an alternative computing platform and reports in §5.1 (Matrix Multiplication; page unavailable) that one IPU was more energy-efficient than a V100 GPU on the tested matrix-multiplication workloads. It does not establish that such devices require less water or raw materials to build, or that they deliver an overall environmental gain. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2][2] Z. Jia, M. Maggioni, J. Smith, and D. P. Scarpazza, 'Dissecting the NVidia Turing T4 GPU architecture via microbenchmarking,' 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.07486 - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jia, Z., Tillman, B., Maggioni, M., & Scarpazza, D. P.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2992192853
Cited by
83
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Interconnection Networks and Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Embedded Systems Design Techniques
Keywords
microbenchmarking, massively parallel architectures, memory organization, collective communication, matrix multiplication, convolution, performance modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review