The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Machine Unlearning
Abstract
Once users have shared their data online, it is generally difficult for them to revoke access and ask for the data to be deleted. Machine learning (ML) exacerbates this problem because any model trained with said data may have memorized it, putting users at risk of a successful privacy attack exposing their information. Yet, having models unlearn is notoriously difficult. We introduce SISA training, a framework that expedites the unlearning process by strategically limiting the influence of a data point in the training procedure. While our framework is applicable to any learning algorithm, it is designed to achieve the largest improvements for stateful algorithms like stochastic gradient descent for deep neural networks. SISA training reduces the computational overhead associated with unlearning, even in the worst-case setting where unlearning requests are made uniformly across the training set. In some cases, the service provider may have a prior on the distribution of unlearning requests that will be issued by users. We may take this prior into account to partition and order data accordingly, and further decrease overhead from unlearning. Our evaluation spans several datasets from different domains, with corresponding motivations for unlearning. Under no distributional assumptions, for simple learning tasks, we observe that SISA training improves time to unlearn points from the Purchase dataset by 4.63x, and 2.45x for the SVHN dataset, over retraining from scratch. SISA training also provides a speed-up of 1.36x in retraining for complex learning tasks such as ImageNet classification; aided by transfer learning, this results in a small degradation in accuracy. Our work contributes to practical data governance in machine unlearning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Methods like SISA (Bourtoule et al., 2020) aim to reduce the cost of retraining from”
From Generative AI and intellectual property: a systematic literature review of possible issues and mitigations (2026) · cites this paper as Bourtoule et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- Y. Liu, K. K. Gadepalli, M. Norouzi, G. Dahl, T. Kohlberger, S. Venugopalan, A. S. Boyko, A. Timofeev, P. Q. Nelson, G. Corrado, J. Hipp, L. Peng, and M. Stumpe, "Detecting cancer metastases on gigapixel pathology images," arXiv, Tech. Rep., 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.02442 · arXiv
- M. X. Chen, B. N. Lee, G. Bansal, Y. Cao, S. Zhang, J. Lu, J. Tsay, Y. Wang, A. M. Dai, Z. Chen et al., "Gmail smart compose: Real-time assisted writing," arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00080, 2019. · arXiv
- X. He, J. Pan, O. Jin, T. Xu, B. Liu, T. Xu, Y. Shi, A. Atallah, R. Her- brich, S. Bowers et al., "Practical lessons from predicting clicks on ads at facebook," in Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Data Mining for Online Advertising. ACM, 2014, pp. 1-9.
- S. Shalev-Shwartz et al., "Online learning and online convex optimiza- tion," Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 107-194, 2012.
- A. Mantelero, "The eu proposal for a general data protection regulation and the roots of the 'right to be forgotten'," Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 229-235, 2013.
- S. Shastri, M. Wasserman, and V. Chidambaram, "The seven sins of personal-data processing systems under gdpr," USENIX HotCloud, 2019.
- M. Fredrikson, S. Jha, and T. Ristenpart, "Model inversion attacks that exploit confidence information and basic countermeasures," in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM, 2015, pp. 1322-1333.
- N. Carlini, C. Liu, U. Erlingsson, J. Kos, and D. Song, "The secret sharer: Evaluating and testing unintended memorization in neural net- works," in Proceedings of the 28th USENIX Conference on Security Symposium. USENIX Association, 2019.
- C. Dwork, A. Roth et al., "The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy," Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 211-407, 2014.
- K. Chaudhuri, C. Monteleoni, and A. D. Sarwate, "Differentially private empirical risk minimization," Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, no. Mar, pp. 1069-1109, 2011.
- M. Abadi, A. Chu, I. Goodfellow, H. B. McMahan, I. Mironov, K. Talwar, and L. Zhang, "Deep learning with differential privacy," in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM, 2016, pp. 308-318.
- Y. Cao and J. Yang, "Towards making systems forget with machine unlearning," in 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE, 2015, pp. 463-480. [Online]. Available: https: //ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7163042/
- M. Kearns, "Efficient noise-tolerant learning from statistical queries," Journal of the ACM (JACM), vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 983-1006, 1998.
- B. Nelson, M. Barreno, F. J. Chi, A. D. Joseph et al., "Exploiting machine learning to subvert your spam filter," in Proceedings of the 1st Usenix Workshop on Large-Scale Exploits and Emergent Threats. USENIX Association, 2008.
- B. I. Rubinstein, B. Nelson, L. Huang, A. D. Joseph, S.-h. Lau, S. Rao, N. Taft, and J. D. Tygar, "Antidote: Understanding and defending against poisoning of anomaly detectors," in Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, 2009.
- B. Biggio, B. Nelson, and P. Laskov, "Poisoning attacks against support vector machines," arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.6389, 2012. · arXiv
- M. Kearns, "Thoughts on hypothesis boosting," Unpublished manuscript, vol. 45, p. 105, 1988.
- T. Bertram, E. Bursztein, S. Caro, H. Chao, R. C. Feman et al., "Five years of the right to be forgotten," in Proceedings of the Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2019.
- A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, "Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks," in Advances in neural infor- mation processing systems, 2012, pp. 1097-1105.
- N. P. Jouppi, C. Young, N. Patil, D. Patterson, G. Agrawal, R. Bajwa, S. Bates, S. Bhatia, N. Boden, A. Borchers et al., "In-datacenter performance analysis of a tensor processing unit," in 2017 ACM/IEEE 44th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1-12.
- S. Shalev-Shwartz and S. Ben-David, Understanding machine learning: From theory to algorithms. Cambridge university press, 2014.
- L. G. Valiant, "A theory of the learnable," in Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing. ACM, 1984, pp. 436-445.
- Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, "Deep learning," nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436-444, 2015.
- D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, "Learning repre- sentations by back-propagating errors," nature, vol. 323, no. 6088, pp. 533-536, 1986.
- R. D. Cook and S. Weisberg, "Characterizations of an empirical influ- ence function for detecting influential cases in regression," Technomet- rics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 495-508, 1980.
- P. W. Koh and P. Liang, "Understanding black-box predictions via in- fluence functions," in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70. JMLR. org, 2017, pp. 1885-1894.
- B. Kim, C. Rudin, and J. A. Shah, "The bayesian case model: A gen- erative approach for case-based reasoning and prototype classification," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2014.
- J. H. Saltzer and M. D. Schroeder, "The protection of information in computer systems," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 1278- 1308, 1975.
- C. Dwork, "Differential privacy," Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security, pp. 338-340, 2011.
- K. Chaudhuri and C. Monteleoni, "Privacy-preserving logistic regres- sion," in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2009, pp. 289-296.
- C. Guo, T. Goldstein, A. Hannun, and L. van der Maaten, "Cer- tified data removal from machine learning models," arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03030, 2019. · arXiv
- A. Golatkar, A. Achille, and S. Soatto, "Eternal sunshine of the spotless net: Selective forgetting in deep networks," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, pp. 9304-9312.
- A. Ginart, M. Y. Guan, G. Valiant, and J. Zou, "Making AI forget you: Data deletion in machine learning," CoRR, vol. abs/1907.05012, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.05012 · arXiv
- J. Dean, G. Corrado, R. Monga, K. Chen, M. Devin, M. Mao, M. Ran- zato, A. Senior et al., "Large scale distributed deep networks," in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2012.
- T. Ben-Nun and T. Hoefler, "Demystifying parallel and distributed deep learning: An in-depth concurrency analysis," ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 52, no. 4, p. 65, 2019.
- T. G. Dietterich, "Ensemble methods in machine learning," in Interna- tional workshop on multiple classifier systems. Springer, 2000, pp. 1-15.
- S. Shalev-Shwartz, Y. Singer, N. Srebro, and A. Cotter, "Pegasos: Primal estimated sub-gradient solver for svm," Mathematical programming, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 3-30, 2011.
- N. Shazeer, A. Mirhoseini, K. Maziarz, A. Davis, Q. Le, G. Hinton, and J. Dean, "Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer," arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06538, 2017. · arXiv
- J. Snell, K. Swersky, and R. Zemel, "Prototypical networks for few-shot learning," in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017, pp. 4077-4087.
- Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, "Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86, pp. 2278 -2324, 12 1998.
- Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire, "A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting," Journal of computer and system sciences, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 119-139, 1997.
- D. Opitz and R. Maclin, "Popular ensemble methods: An empirical study," Journal of artificial intelligence research, vol. 11, pp. 169-198, 1999.
- R. Shokri, M. Stronati, C. Song, and V. Shmatikov, "Membership inference attacks against machine learning models," in 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE, 2017, pp. 3-18.
- O. Vinyals, C. Blundell, T. Lillicrap, D. Wierstra et al., "Matching networks for one shot learning," in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2016, pp. 3630-3638.
- C. O. Sakar, S. O. Polat, M. Katircioglu, and Y. Kastro, "Real-time prediction of online shoppers' purchasing intention using multilayer perceptron and lstm recurrent neural networks," Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 6893-6908, 2019.
- Y. Netzer, T. Wang, A. Coates, A. Bissacco, B. Wu, and A. Ng, "Reading digits in natural images with unsupervised feature learning," NIPS, 01 2011.
- R. E. Schapire, "A brief introduction to boosting," in Ijcai, vol. 99, 1999, pp. 1401-1406.
- H. Schwenk and Y. Bengio, "Boosting neural networks," Neural com- putation, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1869-1887, 2000.
- S.-J. Huang, R. Jin, and Z.-H. Zhou, "Active learning by querying infor- mative and representative examples," in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2010, pp. 892-900.
- C. Baykal, L. Liebenwein, I. Gilitschenski, D. Feldman, and D. Rus, "Data-dependent coresets for compressing neural networks with applications to generalization bounds," CoRR, vol. abs/1804.05345, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05345 · arXiv
- O. Sener and S. Savarese, "Active learning for convolutional neural networks: A core-set approach," arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.00489, 2017. · arXiv
- C. Tan, L. Yu, J. B. Leners, and M. Walfish, "The efficient server audit problem, deduplicated re-execution, and the web," in Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. ACM, 2017, pp. 546-564.
- R. S. Wahby, Y. Ji, A. J. Blumberg, A. Shelat, J. Thaler, M. Walfish, and T. Wies, "Full accounting for verifiable outsourcing," in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM, 2017, pp. 2071-2086.
- S. T. Setty, R. McPherson, A. J. Blumberg, and M. Walfish, "Making argument systems for outsourced computation practical (sometimes)." in NDSS, vol. 1, no. 9, 2012, p. 17.
Cited by
Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging
Kaissis, G. A., Makowski, M. R., Rückert, D., & Braren, R. F. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0186-1 · Cited by 1,676
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networks
Golatkar, A., Achille, A., & Soatto, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00932 · Cited by 394
Mixed-Privacy Forgetting in Deep Networks
Golatkar, A., Achille, A., Ravichandran, A., Polito, M., & Soatto, S. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00085 · Cited by 125
Golatkar, A., Achille, A., & Soatto, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58526-6_23 · Cited by 122
Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganography
Motwani, S., Baranchuk, M., Strohmeier, M., Bolina, V., Torr, P., Hammond, L., & Witt, C. D. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-2336 · Cited by 106
Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning
Sekhari, A., Acharya, J., Kamath, G., & Suresh, A. T. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.03279 · Cited by 99
PUMA: Performance Unchanged Model Augmentation for Training Data Removal
Wu, G., Hashemi, M., & Srinivasa, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i8.20846 · Cited by 61
Learning with Selective Forgetting
Shibata, T., Irie, G., Ikami, D., & Mitsuzumi, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/137 · Cited by 47
Arnaudo, A., Coppola, R., Morisio, M., Vetrò, A., Borghi, M., Raso, R., & Khan, B. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3928 · Cited by 2
Selective Forgetting: A Graph-Based Memory Framework for Long-Term LLM Agents
Rusu, T., Khanzadeh, S., & Alalfi, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.28978
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourtoule, L., Chandrasekaran, V., Choquette-Choo, C. A., Jia, H., Travers, A., Zhang, B., Lie, D., & Papernot, N.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- arXiv
- 1912.03817
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review