CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 808Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 443 of the 456 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Programmable Quantum Simulations of Spin Systems with Trapped Ions

Open access
Monroe, C., Campbell, W. C., Duan, L. -M., Gong, Z. -X., Gorshkov, A. V., Hess, P., Islam, R., Kim, K., Linke, N., Pagano, G., Richerme, P., Senko, C., Yao, N. Y.·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1912.07845arXiv 1912.07845
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Laser-cooled and trapped atomic ions form an ideal standard for the simulation of interacting quantum spin models. Effective spins are represented by appropriate internal energy levels within each ion, and the spins can be measured with near-perfect efficiency using state-dependent fluorescence techniques. By applying optical fields that exert optical dipole forces on the ions, their Coulomb interaction can be modulated to produce long-range and tunable spin-spin interactions that can be reconfigured by shaping the spectrum and pattern of the laser fields, in a prototypical example of a quantum simulator. Here we review the theoretical mapping of atomic ions to interacting spin systems, the preparation of complex equilibrium states, the study of dynamical processes in these many-body interacting quantum systems, and the use of this platform for optimization and other tasks. The use of such quantum simulators for studying spin models may inform our understanding of exotic quantum materials and shed light on the behavior of interacting quantum systems that cannot be modeled with conventional computers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1912.07845

Cites

443 of 443 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 456 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Cetina, M, L. N. Egan, C. A. Noel, M. L. Goldman, A. R. Risinger, D. Zhu, D. Biswas, and C. Monroe (2020), 'Quantum gates on individuallyaddressed atomic qubits subject to noisy transverse motion,' arXiv:2007.06768 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  2. Floquet, Gaston (1883), 'Sur les ´ equations diff´ erentielles lin´ eaires ` a coefficients p´ eriodiques,' in Annales scientifiques de l' ´ Ecole normale sup´ erieure , Vol. 12, pp. 47-88.
  3. Gattringer, Christof, and Christian B. Lang (2010), Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice (Springer).
  4. Gong, Zhe-Xuan, Michael Foss-Feig, Spyridon Michalakis, and Alexey V. Gorshkov (2014b), 'Persistence of locality in systems with powerlaw interactions,' arXiv:1401.6174v1. · arXiv
  5. Ohira, Ryutaro, Shota Kume, Kyoichi Takayama, Silpa Muralidharan, Hiroki Takahashi, and Kenji Toyoda (2020), 'Confinement and retrieval of local phonons in a trapped-ion chain,' arXiv:2003.03962. · arXiv
  6. Olmschenk, S, K. C. Younge, D. L. Moehring, D. N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, and C. Monroe (2007), 'Manipulation and detection of a trapped yb[sup +] hyperfine qubit,' Phys. Rev. A 76 (5), 052314.
  7. Pino, J M, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, M. S. Allman, C. H. Baldwin, M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, K. Mayer, C. RyanAnderson, and B. Neyenhuis (2020), arXiv:2003.01293 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  8. Ruster, T, C. T. Schmiegelow, H. Kaufmann, C. Warschburger, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. G. Poschinger (2016), 'A long-lived zeeman trappedion qubit,' Applied Physics B 122 (10), 254.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Monroe, C., Campbell, W. C., Duan, L. M., Gong, Z. X., Gorshkov, A. V., Hess, P., Islam, R., Kim, K., Linke, N., Pagano, G., Richerme, P., Senko, C., & Yao, N. Y.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
93
Issue
2
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1912.07845
arXiv
1912.07845
OpenAlex
W2994877072
Cited by
806
References
456
Citations by year
2026: 110 · 2025: 194 · 2024: 163 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 4
FWCI
44.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
trapped ions, quantum simulation, spin systems, one-dimensional spin chain, quantum computing, nonequilibrium dynamics, qubit scaling, topological phases, ion spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review