The DOI matches its DataCite record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Much Position Information Do Convolutional Neural Networks Encode?
Open accessAbstract
In contrast to fully connected networks, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) achieve efficiency by learning weights associated with local filters with a finite spatial extent. An implication of this is that a filter may know what it is looking at, but not where it is positioned in the image. Information concerning absolute position is inherently useful, and it is reasonable to assume that deep CNNs may implicitly learn to encode this information if there is a means to do so. In this paper, we test this hypothesis revealing the surprising degree of absolute position information that is encoded in commonly used neural networks. A comprehensive set of experiments show the validity of this hypothesis and shed light on how and where this information is represented while offering clues to where positional information is derived from in deep CNNs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Last but not least, the relative positional encodings cannot work equally well as the absolute ones, because the image recognition task still requires absolute position information (Islam et al., 2020), which the relative positional encodings fail to provide.”
From Conditional Positional Encodings for Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as Islam et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., & Yuille, A. L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2017.2699184 · Cited by 22,392
Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., & Yuille, A. L. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.00915 · Cited by 22,392
Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks
Zeiler, M. D., & Fergus, R. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 · Cited by 15,839
(2010) · Cited by 14,134
DeepFace: Closing the Gap to Human-Level Performance in Face Verification
Taigman, Y., Yang, M., Ranzato, M., & Wolf, L. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.220 · Cited by 6,542
Lipton, Z. C. (2018) · Queue · doi:10.1145/3236386.3241340 · Cited by 5,427
Learning Deconvolution Network for Semantic Segmentation
Noh, H., Hong, S., & Han, B. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.178 · Cited by 4,422
Dynamic Routing Between Capsules
Sabour, S., Frosst, N., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.09829 · Cited by 4,167
Global contrast based salient region detection
Cheng, M., Zhang, G., Mitra, N. J., Huang, X., & Hu, S. (2011) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995344 · Cited by 3,084
Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization
Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B., & Vinyals, O. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.03530 · Cited by 2,838
The Secrets of Salient Object Segmentation
Li, Y., Hou, X., Christof Koch, A., Rehg, J. M., & Yuille, A. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.43 · Cited by 1,401
Learning to Detect Salient Objects with Image-Level Supervision
Wang, L., Lu, H., Wang, Y., Feng, M., Wang, D., Yin, B., & Ruan, X. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.404 · Cited by 1,344
Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning
Zeiler, M. D., Taylor, G. W., & Fergus, R. (2011) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126474 · Cited by 1,293
Amulet: Aggregating Multi-level Convolutional Features for Salient Object Detection
Zhang, P., Wang, D., Lu, H., Wang, H., & Ruan, X. (2017) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.31 · Cited by 913
Predicting Human Eye Fixations via an LSTM-Based Saliency Attentive Model
Cornia, M., Baraldi, L., Serra, G., & Cucchiara, R. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2018.2851672 · Cited by 604
Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape
Baker, N., Lu, H., Erlikhman, G., & Kellman, P. J. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006613 · Cited by 371
ReNet: A Recurrent Neural Network Based Alternative to Convolutional NetworksPreprint
Visin, F., Kastner, K., Cho, K., Matteucci, M., Courville, A. C., & Bengio, Y. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1505.00393 · Cited by 285
EML-NET: An Expandable Multi-Layer NETwork for saliency prediction
Jia, S., & Bruce, N. D. B. (2020) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2020.103887 · Cited by 170
Self-citationUnsupervised Discovery of Nonlinear Structure Using Contrastive Backpropagation
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., Welling, M., & Teh, Y. (2006) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_76 · Cited by 133
Liu, N., & Han, J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Vijay Badrinarayanan, Alex Kendall, and Roberto Cipolla. Segnet: A deep convolutional encoderdecoder architecture for scene segmentation. TPAMI , 2017.
- Md Amirul Islam, Mrigank Rochan, Neil DB Bruce, and Yang Wang. Gated feedback refinement network for dense image labeling. In CVPR , 2017.
- Md Amirul Islam, Mahmoud Kalash, and Neil DB Bruce. Revisiting salient object detection: Simultaneous detection, ranking, and subitizing of multiple salient objects. In CVPR , 2018.
- Sen Jia and Neil DB Bruce. Richer and deeper supervision network for salient object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.02425 , 2019. · arXiv
- Nian Liu, Junwei Han, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Picanet: Learning pixel-wise contextual attention for saliency detection. In CVPR , 2018.
- Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In ICCV , 2017.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pvt v2: Improved baselines with pyramid vision transformer
Wang, W., Xie, E., Li, X., Fan, D.-P., Song, K., Liang, D., Lu, T., Luo, P., & Shao, L. (2022) · Computational Visual Media · doi:10.1007/s41095-022-0274-8 · Cited by 2,439
RoFormer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding
Su, J., Ahmed, M., Lu, Y., Pan, S., Bo, W., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.127063 · Cited by 1,957
Lin, T., Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Qiu, X. (2022) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.10.001 · Cited by 1,422
Vision Transformers for Single Image Dehazing
Song, Y., He, Z., Qian, H., & Du, X. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2023.3256763 · Cited by 1,317
Alias-Free Generative Adversarial NetworksPreprint
Karras, T., Aittala, M., Laine, S., Härkönen, E., Hellsten, J., Lehtinen, J., & Aila, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.12423 · Cited by 1,302
Metadata
- Authors
- Islam, M. A., Jia, S., & Bruce, N. D. B.
- Affiliations
- Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
- Vector Institute (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2001.08248
- OpenAlex
- W2995426144
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 19
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- positional information, convolutional neural networks, spatial representation, local filters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
