Cited by 2,439Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Pvt v2: Improved baselines with pyramid vision transformer

Open access
Wang, Wenhai, Xie, Enze, Li, Xiang, Fan, Deng-Ping, Song, Kaitao, Liang, Ding, Lu, Tong, Luo, Ping +1 more·2022·Computational Visual Media

Abstract

Transformers have recently lead to encouraging progress in computer vision. In this work, we present new baselines by improving the original Pyramid Vision Transformer (PVT v1) by adding three designs: (i) a linear complexity attention layer, (ii) an overlapping patch embedding, and (iii) a convolutional feed-forward network. With these modifications, PVT v2 reduces the computational complexity of PVT v1 to linearity and provides significant improvements on fundamental vision tasks such as classification, detection, and segmentation. In particular, PVT v2 achieves comparable or better performance than recent work such as the Swin transformer. We hope this work will facilitate state-of-the-art transformer research in computer vision. Code is available at https://github.com/whai362/PVT .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41095-022-0274-8

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. He, K. M.; Gkioxari, G.; Dollár, P.; Girshick, R. Mask R-CNN. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2980-2988, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, W., Xie, E., Li, X., Fan, D.-P., Song, K., Liang, D., Lu, T., Luo, P., & Shao, L.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Sensetime (China) (CN)
  • Department of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Inception Institute of Artificial Intelligence (AE)
Corresponding author
Wang, Wenhai
Venue
Computational Visual Media
Published
2022-09
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
415-424
ISSN
  • 2096-0433 (ISSN-L)
  • 2096-0662
OpenAlex
W3175515048
Cited by
2,439
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 513 · 2025: 728 · 2024: 629 · 2023: 430 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 14
FWCI
156.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational Visual Media (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61672273, 61832008, BK20160021)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
Pyramid Vision Transformer, vision transformer, computational complexity reduction, image classification, object detection, semantic segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review