PreprintCited by 67Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataMachine Learning and Data ClassificationStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

Multi-Participant Multi-Class Vertical Federated Learning

Open access
Feng, Siwei, Yu, Han·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving paradigm for training collective machine learning models with locally stored data from multiple participants. Vertical federated learning (VFL) deals with the case where participants sharing the same sample ID space but having different feature spaces, while label information is owned by one participant. Current studies of VFL only support two participants, and mostly focus on binaryclass logistic regression problems. In this paper, we propose the Multi-participant Multi-class Vertical Federated Learning (MMVFL) framework for multi-class VFL problems involving multiple parties. Extending the idea of multi-view learning (MVL), MMVFL enables label sharing from its owner to other VFL participants in a privacypreserving manner. To demonstrate the effectiveness of MMVFL, a feature selection scheme is incorporated into MMVFL to compare its performance against supervised feature selection and MVL-based approaches. Experiment results on real-world datasets show that MMVFL can effectively share label information among multiple VFL participants and match multi-class classification performance of existing approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2001.11154

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [Li et al. , 2017] Jundong Li, Kewei Cheng, Suhang Wang, Fred Morstatter, Robert P Trevino, Jiliang Tang, and Huan Liu. Feature Selection: A Data Perspective. ACMComput. Surv. , 50(6):1-45, 2017.
  2. [Smith et al. , 2017] Virginia Smith, Chao-Kai Chiang, Maziar Sanjabi, and Ameet S Talwalkar. Federated multi-task learning. In NeurIPS , pages 4424-4434, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, S., & Yu, H.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004117333
Cited by
66
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Keywords
vertical federated learning, multi-class classification, multi-view learning, privacy-preserving machine learning, feature selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review