The DOI matches its DataCite record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Next-Generation Topology of D-Wave Quantum Processors
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents an overview of the topology of D-Wave's next-generation quantum processors. It provides examples of minor embeddings and discusses performance of embedding algorithms for the new topology compared to the existing Chimera topology. It also presents some initial performance results for simple, standard Ising model classes of problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In both Ref.48 and Ref. 57, NQS approaches are only used close to the critical point.”
From Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation (2025) · cites this paper as [57]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Since e iτ H is not a local operator that we can easily evaluate on our variational wave function, in practice we have to approximate the full unitary propagator, which can be done in several ways 57,137,138 .”
From Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation (2025) · cites this paper as [57]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Cited by 45,134 · cited 2×
“• Simulated annealing: a standard heuristic algorithm that exploits thermal excitations to search a classical energy landscape and relax upon a minimizing solution [13].”
BackgroundMethodExchange Monte Carlo Method and Application to Spin Glass Simulations
Hukushima, K., & Nemoto, K. (1995) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.1143/jpsj.65.1604 · Cited by 2,223
Graph Minors. II. Algorithmic Aspects of Tree-Width
Robertson, N., & Seymour, P. (1986) · J. Algorithms · doi:10.1016/0196-6774(86)90023-4 · Cited by 1,872 · cited 1×
“One measure of the complexity of a graph is its treewidth [3].”
BackgroundBucket Elimination: A Unifying Framework for Reasoning
Dechter, R. (1999) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(99)00059-4 · Cited by 763 · cited 1×
“For example, the minimum energy of an Ising model defined on a graph of treewidth t with n vertices can be found in time O ( n 2 t ) using dynamic programming [4].”
MethodAlgorithmic Aspects of Tree Width
Reed, B. (2003) · doi:10.1007/0-387-22444-0_4 · Cited by 320
Error-corrected quantum annealing with hundreds of qubits
Pudenz, K. L., Albash, T., & Lidar, D. A. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4243 · Cited by 204
A Complete Anytime Algorithm for Treewidth
Gogate, V., & Dechter, R. (2004) · Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.4109 · Cited by 180 · cited 1×
“the minima as system size increases. We consider instead a Hamze de-Freitas Selby (HFS) greedy descent method [17, 15], using Nrandom trees of treewidth 14, determined by the minimum-degree heuristic [18]. We perform an exact minimization over variables in a randomly selected tree, and iterate until energy no longer d…”
MethodFast clique minor generation in Chimera qubit connectivity graphs
Boothby, T., King, A. D., & Roy, A. (2015) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-015-1150-6 · Cited by 171
Self-citationZero-temperature quantum phase transition of a two-dimensional Ising spin glass
Rieger, H., & Young, A. P. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.4141 · Cited by 165
Katzgraber, H. G., Hamze, F., & Andrist, R. S. (2014) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.4.021008 · Cited by 145
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [6][6] Hans L. Bodlaender and Arie M.C.A. Koster. Treewidth computations I. Upper bounds. Information and Computation , 208(3):259275, 3 2010. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 311
Quantum solutions for densest k-subgraph problems
Calude, C. S., Dinneen, M. J., & Hua, R. (2020) · Journal of Membrane Computing · doi:10.1007/s41965-019-00030-1 · Cited by 10
A molecular computing approach to solving optimization problems via programmable microdroplet arrays
Guo, S.-Y., Friederich, P., Cao, Y., Wu, T. C., Forman, C. J., Mendoza, D., Degroote, M., Cavell, A. C., Krasecki, V. K., Hickman, R. J., et al. (2019) · Matter · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.10250897 · Cited by 13
“This inspired several quantum and classical devices, including the D-Wave quantum annealer (25–27), the coherent Ising machine (28, 29), the recently-introduced Fujitsu-led application-specific CMOS-based digital annealer (30), and even more recently, the Toshiba simulated bifurcation algorithm…”
MethodLayout-Aware Embedding for Quantum Annealing Processors
Pinilla, J. P., & Wilton, S. J. E. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20656-7_7 · Cited by 10
Noise dynamics of quantum annealers: estimating the effective noise using idle qubits
Pelofske, E., Hahn, G., & Djidjev, H. N. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/accbe6 · Cited by 12
“1 device has roughly 5000 hardware qubits in a topology called Pegasus depicted in Figure 2 (bottom row) [51, 52].”
BackgroundWroński, M., Burek, E., & Leśniak, M. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing · doi:10.1109/tetc.2024.3474856 · Cited by 12
“Grain 128 and Grain 128a ciphers’ coefficients in their QUBO matrix Q are within the range [ − 40 , 64 ] for quadratic monomials and within the range [1,64] for linear monomials.”
Computational complexity of three-dimensional Ising spin glass: Lessons from D-wave annealer
Zhang, H., & Kamenev, A. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/3bkn-v5rd · Cited by 6
“The Pegasus architecture [78], denoted by P M , was used for various system sizes.”
Annealing-Assisted Column Generation for Inequality-Constrained Combinatorial Optimization Problems
Kanai, H., Yamashita, M., Tanahashi, K., & Tanaka, S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3486768 · Cited by 14
“For instance, the D-Wave Advantage [45] can handle more than 5000 qubits as a sparse graph and 177 logical spins as a clique.”
BackgroundA Formulation of Structural Design Optimization Problems for Quantum Annealing
Key, F., & Freinberger, L. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12030482 · Cited by 10
“The latter is based on the so-called Pegasus architecture [22], which consists of a lattice of physical qubits and connections between pairs of them.”
BackgroundBlack Box Optimization Using QUBO and the Cross Entropy Method
Nüßlein, J., Roch, C., Gabor, T., Stein, J., Linnhoff-Popien, C., & Feld, S. (2022) · International Conference on Conceptual Structures · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.12510 · Cited by 12
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Advance Problem-Solving with Quantum Annealers
Ayanzadeh, R. (2020) · Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) · doi:10.13016/m28hdb-uoun · Cited by 5
“2 Pegasus topology of the D-Wave Advantage where curved blue lines, long red lines and short red lines are internal, external and odd couplers, respectively [30].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTutorial: calibration refinement in quantum annealing
Chern, K., Boothby, K., Raymond, J., Farré, P., & King, A. D. (2023) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2023.1238988 · Cited by 11
“To make the embedding search faster, we raster-scan across 2 × 2 blocks of unit cells in the QPU’s Pegasus graph [16], then greedily construct a large set of non-intersecting embeddings.”
MethodSelf-citationNakano, K., Tsukiyama, S., Ito, Y., Yazane, T., Yano, J., Kato, T., Ozaki, S., Mori, R., & Katsuki, R. (2023) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies11050143 · Cited by 11
Quantum annealing for microstructure equilibration with long-range elastic interactions
Sandt, R., Bouar, Y. L., & Spatschek, R. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33232-w · Cited by 10
Quantum annealing for the adjuster routing problem
Mori, N., & Furukawa, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1129594 · Cited by 12
Quantum and quantum-inspired optimization for solving the minimum bin packing problem
Bozhedarov, A. A., Usmanov, S. R., Salakhov, G. V., Boev, A. S., Kiktenko, E. O., & Fedorov, A. K. (2024) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2701/1/012129 · Cited by 8
Many-body quantum sign structures as non-glassy Ising models
Westerhout, T., Katsnelson, M. I., & Bagrov, A. A. (2023) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-023-01388-6 · Cited by 7
A Method for Reducing Time-to-Solution in Quantum Annealing Through Pausing
Zielewski, M. R., & Takizawa, H. (2022) · International Conference on High Performance Computing in Asia-Pacific Region (HPC Asia) · doi:10.1145/3492805.3492815 · Cited by 10
Yu, S., & Nabil, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2021.730685 · Cited by 13
“The next generation of D-Wave devices (D-Wave Advantage) has an improved connectivity with the Pegasus graph of degree 15 [37], but was not available for testing as of writing time.”
BackgroundParallel in time dynamics with quantum annealers
Jałowiecki, K., Więckowski, A., Gawron, P., & Gardas, B. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70017-x · Cited by 12
Advanced Quantum Annealing Approach to Vehicle Routing Problems with Time Windows
Holliday, J., Blount, D., Osaba, E., & Luu, K. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.24285 · Cited by 10
“This quantum computer is equipped with 5,554 working qubits and over 35,000 couplers, organized in a Pegasus topology [20].”
Scalable Quantum-Inspired Optimization through Dynamic Qubit Compression
Tran, C., Tran, Q.-B., Son, H., & Dinh, T. N. (2024) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.18571 · Cited by 10
“The latest quantum annealer from D-Wave features fewer than 6000 flux qubits arranged, in a Pegasus topology (Boothby et al. 2020).”
Dziubyna, A. M., Śmierzchalski, T., Gardas, B., Rams, M., & Mohseni, M. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.23.054049 · Cited by 10
An approach of a quantum-inspired document ranking algorithm by using feature selection methodology
Bhagawati, R., & Subramanian, T. (2023) · International journal of information technology · doi:10.1007/s41870-023-01543-w · Cited by 10
“Pegasus has a fixed described structure in which each qubit is connected with other fifteen qubits [56].”
BackgroundFastHare: Fast Hamiltonian Reduction for Large-scale Quantum Annealing
Thai, P. D., Thai, M. T., Vu, T. N., & Dinh, T. N. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce53715.2022.00030 · Cited by 10
Chukwu, U., Dridi, R., Berwald, J., Booth, M., Dawson, J., Le, D., Wainger, M., & Reinhardt, S. P. (2020) · 2020 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) · doi:10.1109/hpec43674.2020.9286230 · Cited by 9
Lee, S., Lim, Q. J., Ross, C., Lee, E., Han, S., Kim, Y., Peng, Z., & Kim, S. (2024) · IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine · doi:10.1109/map.2024.3498695 · Cited by 10
“As of the time of the crafting of this article, the D-Wave Advantage 4.1 quantum processing unit (QPU) [6] hardware show-cases 5,640 functional qubits intricately connected through a sparsely connected Pegasus topology and a technique called minor embedding [27].”
InfluentialCouzinié, Y., Nishiya, Y., Nishi, H., Kosugi, T., Nishimori, H., & Matsushita, Y. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.032416 · Cited by 6
FPIM: Field-Programmable Ising Machines for Solving SAT
Jagielski, T., Manohar, R., & Roychowdhury, J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.01569 · Cited by 9
“Prior chip-based approaches towards this goal focussed on mapping problems onto a fixed connectivity topology such as Chimera and Pegasus [13] and King’s graphs [15, 6].”
MethodParallel circuit implementation of variational quantum algorithms
Cattelan, M., Yarkoni, S., & Lechner, W. (2025) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-025-00982-6 · Cited by 8
Leveraging Quantum Annealer to identify an Event-topology at High Energy CollidersPreprint
Kim, M., Ko, P., Park, J.-H., & Park, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.07806 · Cited by 9
“…can reach the moment of O (10 − 12 ) seconds after big-bang, the realm of “quantum universe”, Nature will reveal its secrets when we face it with quantum technologies. squeeze performance in this limited situation, Advantage has a connectivity structure among qubits, called as Pe-gasus graph [32].”
BackgroundHidden Hypergraphs, Error-Correcting Codes, and Critical Learning in Hopfield Networks
Hillar, C. J., Chan, T., Taubman, R., & Rolnick, D. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23111494 · Cited by 4
“More generally, many NPcomplete and NP-hard problems can be formulated as finding energy minima in Lenz-Ising models [38], with practical applications leveraging quantum devices [39].”
BackgroundStartup Qilimanjaro—towards a European full-stack coherent quantum annealer platform
Canivell, V., Forn-Díaz, P., García-Sáez, A., & Sagastizabal, R. (2021) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-021-00094-y · Cited by 8
“The quantum annealing market has existed for over a decade, with current quantum an-nealers consisting of superconducting devices containing a few-thousand qubits [3].”
BackgroundA Hybrid Framework Using a QUBO Solver For Permutation-Based Combinatorial OptimizationPreprint
Goh, S. T., Gopalakrishnan, S., Bo, J., & Lau, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.12767 · Cited by 9
“Unlike D-Wave that requires the problem to be embedded in a Chimera graph ([7] or (more recently) PEGASUS graph [8], DA has the advantage that it works with a fully connected graph; in [9], the scaling advantage of all-to-all connectivity was discussed.”
BackgroundA quantum annealing approach to ionic diffusion in solids
Utimula, K., Ichibha, T., Prayogo, G. I., Hongo, K., Nakano, K., & Maezono, R. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86274-3 · Cited by 10
Mapping NP-Hard Problems to Restricted Adiabatic Quantum ArchitecturesPreprint
Mooney, G. J., Tonetto, S. U. Y., Hill, C. D., & Hollenberg, L. C. L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.00249 · Cited by 3
“t [26]. Most experimental investigations of AQC have thus far been conducted on devices from D-Wave Systems [8], a Canadian company which recently announced a 5000-qubit programmable quantum annealer [27]. Although quantum speedup on their devices has not been conclusively demonstrated, they have successfully exhibite…”
BackgroundQuantum annealing for inverse kinematics in robotics
Salloum, H., Savin, S., Kholodov, Y., Ryzhakov, G., Farina, M., & Oseledets, I. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-34346-z · Cited by 8
Conditioned quantum-assisted deep generative surrogate for particle-calorimeter interactions
Toledo-Marín, J. Q., Gonzalez, S., Jia, H., Lu, I., Sogutlu, D., Singh, A., Gay, C., Paquet, E., Melko, R. G., Fox, G., et al. (2025) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01040-x · Cited by 3
“NoticethattheRBMdataarebinaryvectorssuchthateachelementcan takethevalueof0or1,whereasthequbitscanhavevalues − 1or1.”
Advantage of Pausing: Parameter Setting for Quantum Annealers
Izquierdo, Z. G., Grabbe, S. R., Idris, H., Wang, Z., Marshall, J., & Rieffel, E. G. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.054056 · Cited by 12
“ing to a Pegasus graph [55], as shown in the bottom panel of Fig.”
MethodInter-generational comparison of quantum annealers in solving hard scheduling problems
Pokharel, B., Izquierdo, Z., Lott, P. A., Strbac, E., Osiewalski, K., Papathanasiou, E., Kondratyev, A., Venturelli, D., & Rieffel, E. (2021) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-023-04077-z · Cited by 8
Locally suppressed transverse-field protocol for diabatic quantum annealing
Fry-Bouriaux, L., O'Connor, D., Feinstein, N., & Warburton, P. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.052616 · Cited by 8
“Finally we note that commercial annealers do not yet offer the ability to control the transverse fields of the qubits independently[44].”
BackgroundDynamic Topology Reconfiguration of Boltzmann Machines on Quantum Annealers
Liu, J., Yao, K.-T., & Spedalieri, F. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22111202 · Cited by 8
“Future work may consider how to adapt these findings to new generations of hardware, such as the Pegasus architecture announced by D-Wave that features 15 connections per qubit and 5000 qubits [24].”
BackgroundEigenvalues of Ising connection matrix with long-range interaction
Litinskii, L., & Kryzhanovsky, B. (2020) · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2020.124929 · Cited by 8
“However, for artificial spin systems with couplers, such as the ones used for quantum annealing (see for example [9]), our results with a finite number of coordination spheres can be viewed as exact.”
BackgroundExploring Embeddings for MIMO Channel Decoding on Quantum Annealers
Marosits, Á., Tabi, Z. I., Kallus, Z., Vaderna, P., Gódor, I., & Zimborás, Z. (2021) · Infocommunications journal · doi:10.36244/icj.2021.1.2 · Cited by 8
“Furthermore, we present a comparative analysis focusing on embedding efficiency using the topologies of both the D-Wave 2000Q Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) of 2000 qubits and the recently released D-Wave Advantage platform based on a 5000-qubit QPU [14].”
MethodExponential speed-up of quantum annealing via n-local catalysts
Anonymous (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/hnzj-j7kt · Cited by 7
“[34].”
An advanced hybrid quantum tabu search approach to vehicle routing problems
Holliday, J., Osaba, E., & Luu, K. (2025) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-026-00375-8 · Cited by 7
“The hybrid algorithms we tried and the one heuristic we tried ran much faster but always found sub-optimal solutions.”
Distributed hybrid quantum-classical performance prediction for hyperparameter optimization
Wulff, E., Amboage, J. P. G., Aach, M., Gislason, T., Ingolfsson, T. K., Ingolfsson, T. K., Pasetto, E., Delilbasic, A., Riedel, M., Sarma, R., et al. (2024) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-024-00198-5 · Cited by 7
“The D-Wave Advantage system uses a Pegasus (Boothby et al. 2020) topology graph.”
Saida, D., Yamanashi, Y., Hidaka, M., Hirayama, F., Imafuku, K., Nagasawa, S., & Kawabata, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2021.3106776 · Cited by 9
“As a prime example, commercial quantum annealers from D-Wave Systems provide opportunities to map optimization problems into a 5000-qubit system [15].”
BackgroundPicking Efficient Portfolios from 3,171 US Common Stocks with New Quantum and Classical SolversPreprint
Cohen, J., & Alexander, C. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.01308 · Cited by 7
Improved Boltzmann machines with error corrected quantum annealing
Li, R. Y., Albash, T., & Lidar, D. A. (2019) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01283 · Cited by 7
“[56] Kelly Boothby, Paul Bunyk, Jack Raymond, and Aidan Roy, Next-Generation Topology of D-Wave Quantum Processors, Tech.”
BackgroundSolving Larger Optimization Problems Using Parallel Quantum Annealing
Pelofske, E., Hahn, G., & Djidjev, H. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.12165 · Cited by 7
“Figure 2 shows the disjoint clique minor embeddings on the Pegasus connectivity graph of sizes ranging from two 100-vertex clique embeddings to twelve 50-vertex clique embeddings.”
BackgroundInfluentialImproving Quantum Annealing Performance on Embedded Problems
(2020) · Supercomputing Frontiers and Innovations · doi:10.14529/jsfi200403 · Cited by 6
“While Pegasus architecture QPUs [5] will increase both the number of qubits and qubit connectivity, embedded problems may still be challenging, as they often require numerous variables due to one-hot encoding of integer variables.”
BackgroundInfluentialBarrows, F., Pelofske, E., Sathe, P., Caravelli, F., & Nisoli, C. (2025) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-026-02847-6 · Cited by 6
“These QPUs are described by coupler connectivity graphs known as Pegasus [68, 69] and Zephyr [70].”
Effectiveness of Hybrid Optimization Method for Quantum Annealing Machines
Kikuchi, S., Togawa, N., & Tanaka, S. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.15544 · Cited by 6
“…32/64 bits SA GPU Coherent Ising machine [43] 100,000 Complete 2 bits − Laser, FPGA D-Wave 2000Q [13] 2,048 Chimera − QA SQUID D-Wave Advantage [44], [45] 5,627 Pegasus − QA SQUID SQA: Simulated Quantum Annealing, MA: Momentum Annealing, PT: Parallel Tempering, bSB: ballistic SB, dSB: discrete…”
Pomeroy, C., Pramov, A., Thakrar, K., & Yendapalli, L. (2025) · Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.15063 · Cited by 6
“This paradigm has been realized in practical hardware via systems like the D-Wave Advantage, which uses thousands of superconducting qubits [4, 5].”
Finite-temperature criticality through quantum annealing
Teza, G., Campaioli, F., Avesani, M., & Raz, O. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75348-3 · Cited by 6
“Since the ferromagnetic Ising model is invariant under such transformations (upon appropriate decoding), this procedure preserves physical observables while averaging over residual hardware biases 39 .”
Quantum-compliant users scheduling optimization in joint transmission mobile access networks
Volpe, D., Cirillo, G., Fantini, R., Boella, A., Mondo, G., Graziano, M., & Turvani, G. (2024) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-024-04471-1 · Cited by 6
“Current quantum annealers natively encode and solve Ising problems, so a QUBO problem can be solved by translating it into an Ising one —according to (14)—and handling the partial connectivity of the backend with minor embedding techniques [18].”
Vodeb, J., Diego, M., Vaskivskyi, Y., Logarić, L., Gerasimenko, Y. A., Kabanov, V. V., Lipovšek, B., Topič, M., & Mihailovic, D. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49179-z · Cited by 9
Hybrid Classical–Quantum Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Solving Integer Linear Problems
Sanavio, C., Tignone, E., & Ercolessi, E. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e26040345 · Cited by 6
“In Section IV we first discuss the issues related to directly solve the integer linear problems via unrestricted algorithm on the quantum hardware.”
BackgroundQuantum radio astronomy: Quantum linear solvers for redundant baseline calibration
Renaud, N., Rodr'iguez-S'anchez, P., Hidding, J., & Broekema, P. C. (2023) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2024.100803 · Cited by 6
“The new Pegasus connection graph of next-generation D-Wave chip allow for 15 connections per qubits and therefore decreases the need for duplication of logical variables (Boothby et al., 2020).”
Benchmarking Metaheuristic-Integrated QAOA Against Quantum Annealing
Mazumder, A. R., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2023) · Sai · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62269-4_42 · Cited by 6
“Once the QUBO model was created using the DWAVE API [22], it was converted to the form of a binary quadratic model and then run on the Quantum Annealing Sampler.”
MethodShirai, T., & Togawa, N. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2024.3376721 · Cited by 9
“The quantum annealing hardware embeds a maximum of 180 spins on a complete graph [33].”
BackgroundMapping state transition susceptibility in quantum annealing
Pelofske, E. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.013224 · Cited by 3
“Importantly, these three Isings are natively embeddable onto the D-Wave Pegasus Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) topology [55, 89, 90].”
BackgroundQuAnt: Quantum Annealing with Learnt Couplings
Benkner, M. S., Krahn, M., Tretschk, E., Lähner, Z., Moeller, M., & Golyanik, V. (2022) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.08114 · Cited by 6
“For larger problems with n = 32 , we can use D-Wave’s Pegasus architecture [5], which has more intercon-nections (qubit couplings) between its K 4 , 4 unit cells than Chimera.”
MethodOptimization on Large Interconnected Graphs and Networks Using Adiabatic Quantum Computation
Padmasola, V., & Chatterjee, R. (2022) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749923500260 · Cited by 6
Quantum orders in the frustrated Ising model on the bathroom tile lattice
Hearth, S. N., Morampudi, S., & Laumann, C. (2022) · Physical review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.195101 · Cited by 6
Tennant, D., Dai, X., Martinez, A. J., Trappen, R., Melanson, D., Yurtalan, M. A., Tang, Y., Bedkihal, S., Yang, R., Novikov, S., et al. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00590-8 · Cited by 6
Constraint Solving by Quantum Annealing
Codognet, P. (2021) · International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops (ICPPW) · doi:10.1145/3458744.3473364 · Cited by 8
“According to [54], which uses the formulas of [7], the maximal fully connected hardware (complete graph topology) that can be simulated on the D-Wave Advantage is for 182 logical qubits (with maximal chain lengths of 17) and 64 logical qubits on the D-wave 2000X (also with maximal chain length of 17).”
MethodSadayappan, P., Chamberlain, B., Juckeland, G., Ltaief, H., Bertino, E., & Meuer, H. (2020) · ISC High Performance · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50743-5 · Cited by 6
Quantum and Quantum-Inspired Optimisation in Transport and Logistics: A Systematic Review
Liu, P., Parkinson, S., & Best, K. (2025) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities8060206 · Cited by 5
“Chain overhead consumes qubits and, if chain strengths are not tuned correctly, can degrade solution quality; although the higher degree of Zephyr reduces the average chain length, the effective instance size still falls to only a few thousand binary variables for most transport encodings [71,72].”
Hybrid Quantum-Classical Optimization of the Resource Scheduling Problem
Christeson, T., Ullah, M. H., Arabnya, A., Khodaei, A., & Fan, R. (2025) · Next Research · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.00733 · Cited by 5
“The Pegasus topology supports 16 couplers per qubit [48], meaning dense, highly connected problems require careful embedding to avoid qubit fragmentation.”
InfluentialEmbedding-aware noise modeling of quantum annealing
Jeong, S.-G., Mai, D. C., Noh, D.-I., Pham, Q.-V., & Hwang, W.-J. (2025) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-026-05293-z · Cited by 5
“Thesetopologiesdefinehowlogicalproblem graphscanbeembeddedintothephysicalhardware.”
Analysis of D-Wave Topologies with k-Hop-Based Graph Metrics
Bíró, C., & Kusper, G. (2025) · Quantum Reports · doi:10.3390/quantum7020017 · Cited by 4
“…research has typically employed classical graph metrics such as degree centrality, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, eigenvector centrality, and clustering coefficients to evaluate quantum computing topologies, including D-Wave’s Chimera, Pegasus, and Zephyr architectures [49,50,67–69].”
Hamiltonian formulations of centroid-based clustering
Seong, M., & Park, D. K. (2025) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2025.1544623 · Cited by 5
“[42], showing how the fully connected graph is mapped onto the limited qubit connectivity of the quantum hardware.”
Osaba, E., Miranda-Rodríguez, P., Oikonomakis, A., Petric, M., Ruiz, A., Bock, S., & Kourtis, M. (2025) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/cec65147.2025.11042978 · Cited by 5
“This computer boasts 5,616 qubits and over 35,000 couplers arranged in a Pegasus topology [9].”
Designing unit Ising models for logic gate simulation through integer linear programming
Tsukiyama, S., Nakano, K., Parque, V., Ito, Y., Kato, T., Kawamata, Y., & Ii, K. (2024) · International Journal of Parallel Emergent and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1080/17445760.2024.2438043 · Cited by 5
“This parameter λ , known as chain strength in D-Wave quantum annealers, must be chosen with a sufficiently high value to ensure that the quantum annealing process identifies solutions where a = a ′ as viable.”
Quantum computing and the stable set problem
Krpan, A., Povh, J., & Pucher, D. (2024) · Optim. Methods Softw. · doi:10.1080/10556788.2025.2490639 · Cited by 5
Pelofske, E., Bärtschi, A., & Eidenbenz, S. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.01657 · Cited by 5
“[51, 52], native embeddings of 127 qubit heavy-hex lattices onto P 16 Pegasus graphs [55–57] were created, so we can use these tiled embeddings to embed the Ising model in question onto the current D-Wave Pegasus graph devices.”
MethodATOM: An Efficient Topology Adaptive Algorithm for Minor Embedding in Quantum Computing
Ngo, H. M., Kahveci, T. M., & Thai, M. (2023) · ICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc45041.2023.10279010 · Cited by 5
“The reason is that [15] embedding methods in Chimera topology may be translated to Pegasus topology without modification, because Chimera”
MethodCoreset of Hyperspectral Images on a Small Quantum Computer
Otgonbaatar, S., Datcu, M., & Demir, B. (2022) · IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium · doi:10.1109/igarss46834.2022.9884273 · Cited by 5
“where zi, zj are called logical variables, and Qij includes a bias term hi and the interaction strength of the logical variables gij [16].”
BackgroundMethodImplementation of a Multiple Target Tracking Filter on an Adiabatic Quantum Computer
McCormick, T. M., Osborn, B. R., Angle, R. B., & Streit, R. L. (2022) · IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) · doi:10.1109/aero53065.2022.9843451 · Cited by 6
Kryzhanovsky, B., & Litinskii, L. B. (2020) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/abbc4e · Cited by 5
“However, for artificial spin systems with couplers, such as the ones used for quantum annealing (see for example [14]-[20]), the obtained expressions are exact.”
BackgroundReinforcement Quantum Annealing: A Quantum-Assisted Learning Automata Approach
Ayanzadeh, R., Halem, M., & Finin, T. W. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.00234 · Cited by 5
“The current generation of the D-Wave quantum annealer (the Chimera architecture) includes more than 2,000 qubits and about 6,000 couplers, while the next generation (the Pegasus topology of the Advantage) will include more than 5,000 qubits and about 40,000 couplers 11 .”
BackgroundMinimizing polynomial functions on quantum computersPreprint
Dridi, R., Alghassi, H., & Tayur, S. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.08270 · Cited by 5
Dikopoulos, E., Hsu, Y.-T., Wormald, L., Tang, W., Datsko, B., Zhang, Z.-Y., & Flynn, M. P. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2025.3603786 · Cited by 4
“The drawbacks include hardware limitations such as sparse, local qubit connectivity, which limits scalability (e.g., D-Wave’s Pegasus graph architecture [20]), limited coherence times [21], which constrain the duration of quantum e ff ects, and high qubit error rates [22].”
Probabilistic Computing Optimization of Complex Spin-Glass Topologies
Hasselgren, F., Al-Hasso, M. O., Searle, A., Tindall, J., & Leyen, M. V. D. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.23419 · Cited by 4
“This process involves a randomly generated lattice dimerized at each point, and then subjected to a rewiring of the edges to fit the Pegasus architecture [17,71].”
Quantum Annealing for Realistic Traffic Flow Optimization: Clustering and Data-Driven QUBO
Rusnáková, R., Chovanec, M., & Gazda, J. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3709100 · Cited by 1
“Most of the computational effort is classical and can therefore be offloaded to high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructure, while the optimization stage is handled by specialized solvers.”
A Programmable and Reconfigurable CMOS Analog Hopfield Network for NP-Hard Problems
Mathews, P. O., & Hasler, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2024.3480958 · Cited by 5
“Fixed sparse architectures like the Chimera [14], Pegasus [15], and King’s Graphs [16] allow for efficient sparse problems to be mapped but exacerbate inefficiencies when more dense connectivity is required [17].”
On the Transfer of Knowledge in Quantum Algorithms
Villar-Rodríguez, E., Osaba, E., Oregi, I., Romero, S. V., & Ferreiro-Vélez, J. (2026) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.70211 · Cited by 5
“In contrast to QA, gate-based quantum computing, inspired by classical logic gates, operates by driving the quantum system within Hilbert space through a finite sequence of unitary gates, enabling universal computation.”
Zade, A. A., Sugisaki, K., Werner, M., Palacios, A., Riu, J., Nogué, J., García-Sáez, A., Riera, A., & Prasannaa, V. S. (2025) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06858-0 · Cited by 5
An encoding of argumentation problems using quadratic unconstrained binary optimization
Baioletti, M., & Santini, F. (2024) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-024-00186-9 · Cited by 4
“As expected, the overhead produced by the embedder constantly increases with the number of arguments n .”
InfluentialAnalyzing the effectiveness of quantum annealing with meta-learning
Pellini, R., & Dacrema, M. F. (2024) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-024-00179-8 · Cited by 6
“Minor embedding is an NP-Hard problem but polynomial-time heuristic algorithms are available (Choi 2008; Cai et al. 2014; Boothby et al. 2020) 3 .”
CHARME: A Chain-based Reinforcement Learning Approach for the Minor Embedding Problem
Ngo, H. M., Khoi, N. D. H., Vu, M. N., Jeter, T. R., Kahveci, T., & Thai, M. T. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3763244 · Cited by 5
“The space of embedding orders which are permutations of the set 𝑆 with the prefix 𝑂 𝐴 . modification, since Chimera is a subgraph of Pegasus [3].”
Henke, K., Pelofske, E., Kenyon, G. T., & Hahn, G. (2025) · npj Unconventional Computing · doi:10.1038/s44335-025-00028-2 · Cited by 2
“We denote v i ( t + 1) as the updated membrane potential for neuron i at time t + 1.”
Solving the N-Queens Puzzle by a QUBO Model with Quadratic Size
Tsukiyama, S., Nakano, K., Ito, Y., Yazane, T., Yano, J., Kato, T., Ozaki, S., Mori, R., & Katsuki, R. (2023) · International Symposium on Computing and Networking - Across Practical Development and Theoretical Research · doi:10.1109/candar60563.2023.00015 · Cited by 4
“The D-Wave Advantage can handle QUBO models with a 5760-node Pegasus graph [15].”
MethodProjected Stochastic Gradient Descent with Quantum Annealed Binary Gradients
Krahn, M., Sasdelli, M., Yang, F. F., Golyanik, V., Kannala, J., Chin, T.-J., & Birdal, T. (2023) · British Machine Vision Conference · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.15128 · Cited by 4
“This seemingly simple question calls for a reconsideration of our training algorithms, due to an important distinction between classical optimisation and the state-of-the-art quantum annealers (QA), such as the D-Wave Advantage [10, 18] 1 .”
Posiform planting: generating QUBO instances for benchmarking
Hahn, G., Pelofske, E., & Djidjev, H. N. (2023) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2023.1275948 · Cited by 4
“In particular, the physical qubits across currently existing D-Wave generations use connections determined by Chimera, Pegasus, or Zephyr graphs [29, 30].”
MethodAll-to-all reconfigurability with sparse Ising machines: the XORSAT challenge with p-bits
Aadit, N. A., Nikhar, S., Kannan, S., Chowdhury, S., & Çamsarı, K. Y. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.08748 · Cited by 4
Pelofske, E., & Nisoli, C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.10927 · Cited by 3
“The D-Wave devices used in this study have coupler hardware graphs known as Pegasus [33, 34] and Zephyr [35].”
A comprehensive benchmark of an Ising machine on the Max-Cut problem
Shaglel, S., Kirsch, M., Winkler, M., Münch, C., Walter, S., Schinkel, F., & Kliesch, M. (2025) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ae7823 · Cited by 3
“This marks a substantial improvement over the earlier Pegasus-based Advantage system [37].”
SpinGlassPEPS.jl: Tensor-network package for Ising-like optimization on quasi-two-dimensional graphs
Śmierzchalski, T., Dziubyna, A. M., Jalowiecki, K., Mzaouali, Z., Pawela, L., Gardas, B., & Rams, M. (2025) · SoftwareX · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102257 · Cited by 3
“Figure 4: Problems defined on Chimera, Pegasus, and Zephyr graphs [11, 25, 12, 26], employed in the past and current D-Wave quantum annealers, can be mapped to the Potts Hamiltonian on king’s graph upon grouping 8, 24, and 16 spins, respectively.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Boothby, K., Bunyk, P., Raymond, J., & Roy, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2003.00133
- OpenAlex
- W3006807815
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum annealing, graph topology, minor embedding, embedding algorithms, Ising model, quantum annealing hardware
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review