PreprintCited by 844Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataStochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Adaptive Federated Optimization

Open access
Reddi, Sashank, Charles, Zachary, Zaheer, Manzil, Garrett, Zachary, Rush, Keith, Konečný, Jakub, Kumar, Sanjiv, McMahan, H. Brendan·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Federated learning is a distributed machine learning paradigm in which a large number of clients coordinate with a central server to learn a model without sharing their own training data. Standard federated optimization methods such as Federated Averaging (FedAvg) are often difficult to tune and exhibit unfavorable convergence behavior. In non-federated settings, adaptive optimization methods have had notable success in combating such issues. In this work, we propose federated versions of adaptive optimizers, including Adagrad, Adam, and Yogi, and analyze their convergence in the presence of heterogeneous data for general non-convex settings. Our results highlight the interplay between client heterogeneity and communication efficiency. We also perform extensive experiments on these methods and show that the use of adaptive optimizers can significantly improve the performance of federated learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2003.00295

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MPC approaches to private information retrieval break down into computational PIR, in which a single party can execute the entire server side, and information theoretic PIR, in which multiple non-colluding parties are required to execute the server side.

    “MPC approaches to PIR break down into two main categories: computational PIR (cPIR), in which a single party can execute the entire server side of the protocol [286], and information theoretic PIR (itPIR), in which multiple non-colluding parties are required to execute the server side of the protocol [121].”

    From Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [121]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Debraj Basu, Deepesh Data, Can Karakus, and Suhas Diggavi. Qsparse-local-SGD: Distributed SGD with quantization, sparsification and local computations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 14668-14679, 2019.
  2. Aaron Defazio and Léon Bottou. On the ineffectiveness of variance reduced optimization for deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.04529 , 2018. · arXiv
  3. H. Brendan McMahan and Matthew J. Streeter. Adaptive bound optimization for online convex optimization. In COLT The 23rd Conference on Learning Theory , 2010b.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reddi, S., Charles, Z., Zaheer, M., Garrett, Z., Rush, K., Konečný, J., Kumar, S., & McMahan, H. B.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008187686
Cited by
840
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 233 · 2023: 222 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
federated learning, adaptive optimization, FedAvg, AdaGrad, Adam, yogis, convergence analysis, non-convex optimization, client heterogeneity, communication efficiency, distributed learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review