The DOI matches its DataCite record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Semi-supervised Graph Attentive Network for Financial Fraud Detection
Open accessAbstract
With the rapid growth of financial services, fraud detection has been a very important problem to guarantee a healthy environment for both users and providers. Conventional solutions for fraud detection mainly use some rule-based methods or distract some features manually to perform prediction. However, in financial services, users have rich interactions and they themselves always show multifaceted information. These data form a large multiview network, which is not fully exploited by conventional methods. Additionally, among the network, only very few of the users are labelled, which also poses a great challenge for only utilizing labeled data to achieve a satisfied performance on fraud detection. To address the problem, we expand the labeled data through their social relations to get the unlabeled data and propose a semi-supervised attentive graph neural network, namedSemiGNN to utilize the multi-view labeled and unlabeled data for fraud detection. Moreover, we propose a hierarchical attention mechanism to better correlate different neighbors and different views. Simultaneously, the attention mechanism can make the model interpretable and tell what are the important factors for the fraud and why the users are predicted as fraud. Experimentally, we conduct the prediction task on the users of Alipay, one of the largest third-party online and offline cashless payment platform serving more than 4 hundreds of million users in China. By utilizing the social relations and the user attributes, our method can achieve a better accuracy compared with the state-of-the-art methods on two tasks. Moreover, the interpretable results also give interesting intuitions regarding the tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Semi-supervised approaches exploit partial labels but are constrained by the quality and distribution of labels.”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SemiGNN [68] uses hierarchical attention over metapathdefined subgraphs for fraud detection”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SemiGNN [68] introduces a semi-supervised graph attention network designed for fraud detection in financial systems. It leverages both labeled and unlabeled nodes and incorporates hierarchical attention over metapath-based subgraphs. This makes it well-suited for access fraud scenarios where only partial labels are available and fraud behaviors differ across user roles and access types.”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Operational environments further demand reliability, interpretability, and maintainability [68].”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1×
“In our model SemiGNN, we randomly initialize parameters and optimize the model with Adam [14].”
MethodXGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 · Cited by 54,569 · cited 1×
“• Xgboost [28]: It is a tree-based model, which is very”
BackgroundSemi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.02907 · Cited by 24,853 · cited 3×
“• GCN [24]: It is a deep graph neural network and each node’s embedding is ensembled by its own embedding”
BackgroundMethodVeličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.10903 · Cited by 12,107
node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks
Grover, A., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939754 · Cited by 10,926 · cited 1×
“DeepWalk [16] and Node2vec [17] propose to use the random walk and skip-gram to learn the node representations.”
MethodDeepWalk: online learning of social representations
Perozzi, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Skiena, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623732 · Cited by 10,123
LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embedding
Tang, J., Qu, M., Wang, M., Zhang, M., Yan, J., & Mei, Q. (2015) · Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2736277.2741093 · Cited by 5,416 · cited 6×
“LINE [18] and SDNE [19] propose explicit objective functions for preserving first-and second-order proximity.”
MethodInfluentialMultimodal Deep LearningPreprint
Akkus, C., Chu, L.-Y., Djakovic, V., Jauch-Walser, S., Koch, P., Loss, G., Marquardt, C., Moldovan, M., Sauter, N., Schneider, M., et al. (2011) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.04856 · Cited by 3,745 · cited 2×
“Through several layers of non-linear functions to map the raw data into the high-level semantic space, it is easier to correlate multiview data [27].”
BackgroundStructural Deep Network Embedding
Wang, D., Cui, P., & Zhu, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939753 · Cited by 2,845 · cited 1×
“LINE [18] and SDNE [19] propose explicit objective functions for preserving first-and second-order proximity.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning Convolutional Neural Networks for GraphsPreprint
Niepert, M., Ahmed, M., & Kutzkov, K. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.05273 · Cited by 2,315 · cited 1×
“Recently, graph convolution network based methods are very popular [24], [25].”
MethodDong, Y., Chawla, N. V., & Swami, A. (2017) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098036 · Cited by 2,295 · cited 2×
“Then some further works like Metapath2vec [22] , HNE [23] are proposed to consider both the network topology”
BackgroundCao, S., Lu, W., & Xu, Q. (2015) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/2806416.2806512 · Cited by 1,609 · cited 1×
“Some further works [20], [21] use the matrix factorization to factorize high-order relation matrix.”
MethodAsymmetric Transitivity Preserving Graph Embedding
Ou, M.-D., Cui, P., Pei, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhu, W.-W. (2016) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939751 · Cited by 1,343 · cited 1×
“Some further works [20], [21] use the matrix factorization to factorize high-order relation matrix.”
MethodSelf-citationData mining for credit card fraud: a comparative study
Bhattacharyya, S., Jha, S., Tharakunnel, K., & Westland, J. C. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.008 · Cited by 1,108 · cited 2×
“Commonly, these methods first extract statistical features from different aspects like user’s profiles and historical behaviours and then use some classical classifiers like SVM [9], treebased methods [10] or neural networks [7], [8] to decide fraud or not.”
BackgroundMethodData Mining techniques for the detection of fraudulent financial statements
Kirkos, E., Spathis, C., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.016 · Cited by 760 · cited 2×
“[8] selects some personal variables regarding the financial distress, debt structure, need for continuing growth, accounts receivable and totally uses a 27-dimensional vector as the input to the decision tree, neural network and bayesian belief network.”
BackgroundMethodHeterogeneous Network Embedding via Deep Architectures
Chang, S.-Y., Han, W., Tang, J.-L., Qi, G.-J., Aggarwal, C., & Huang, T. S. (2015) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783296 · Cited by 631 · cited 2×
“Then some further works like Metapath2vec [22] , HNE [23] are proposed to consider both the network topology”
BackgroundDetection of financial statement fraud and feature selection using data mining techniques
Ravisankar, P., Ravi, V., Rao, G., & Bose, I. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.006 · Cited by 564 · cited 4×
“[9] extracts some statistic features about assets, liabilities, incomes, debt and sales and uses a multi-layer feedforward network to do financial statement fraud detection.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHeterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Malicious Account Detection
Liu, Z., Chen, C., Yang, X., Zhou, J., Li, X., & Song, L. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3269206.3272010 · Cited by 435 · cited 3×
“Then some following methods start to use graph embedding to incorporate the user interactions [5], [6].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationA Recursive Partitioning Decision Rule for Nonparametric Classification
Friedman (1977) · IEEE transactions on computers · doi:10.1109/tc.1977.1674849 · Cited by 424 · cited 1×
“Specifically, financial scenario also concerns about the KS [15], which is a metric to measure the risk differentiation of the model.”
BackgroundTransaction aggregation as a strategy for credit card fraud detection
Whitrow, C., Hand, D. J., Juszczak, P., Weston, D., & Adams, N. M. (2009) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-008-0116-z · Cited by 337 · cited 1×
“Therefore, a great number of literatures have been studied on different types of the fraud, like financial statement fraud [7]– [9], credit card fraud [10], [11], insurance fraud [12], [13]”
BackgroundReal Time Credit Card Fraud Detection using Computational Intelligence
Quah, J. T. S., & Sriganesh, M. (2007) · 2007 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.093 · Cited by 335
Robust and Scalable Graph-Based Semisupervised Learning
Liu, W., Wang, J., & Chang, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2012.2197809 · Cited by 203 · cited 1×
“Our work is also related to the graph-based semi-supervised learning (GSSL) method [26].”
BackgroundHu, B.-B., Zhang, Z.-Q., Shi, C., Zhou, J., Li, X.-L., & Qi, Y. (2019) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301946 · Cited by 159 · cited 3×
“Then some following methods start to use graph embedding to incorporate the user interactions [5], [6].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationA Review of Data Mining-Based Financial Fraud Detection Research
Yue, D.-M., Wu, X.-D., Wang, Y.-F., Li, Y., & Chu, C. (2007) · International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/wicom.2007.1352 · Cited by 123 · cited 1×
“These methods make prediction mainly based on the statistical features of a certain user and use classical classifiers like logistic regression, neural networks to do classification [2]–[4].”
MethodStrategies for detecting fraudulent claims in the automobile insurance industry
Viaene, S., Ayuso, M., Guillén, M., Gheel, D. V., & Dedene, G. (2007) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.08.005 · Cited by 109 · cited 1×
“Therefore, a great number of literatures have been studied on different types of the fraud, like financial statement fraud [7]– [9], credit card fraud [10], [11], insurance fraud [12], [13]”
BackgroundA genetic algorithm approach to detecting temporal patterns indicative of financial statement fraud
Hoogs, B., Kiehl, T. R., LaComb, C., & Şentürk, D. (2007) · Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag. · doi:10.1002/isaf.284 · Cited by 82 · cited 1×
“These methods make prediction mainly based on the statistical features of a certain user and use classical classifiers like logistic regression, neural networks to do classification [2]–[4].”
MethodA Bayesian dichotomous model with asymmetric link for fraud in insurance
Bermúdez, L., Pérez, J. M., Ayuso, M., Gómez, E., & Vázquez, F. (2008) · Insurance Mathematics and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.08.002 · Cited by 77 · cited 1×
“Therefore, a great number of literatures have been studied on different types of the fraud, like financial statement fraud [7]– [9], credit card fraud [10], [11], insurance fraud [12], [13] and so on.”
BackgroundIntelligent Financial Fraud Detection Practices: An Investigation
West, J., Bhattacharya, M., & Islam, M. R. (2014) · Security and Privacy in Communication Networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23802-9_16 · Cited by 48 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, rule-based methods are easy to be attacked [1].”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [3][3] Quah, Jon TS, and M. Sriganesh. 'l 35.4 (2008): 1721-1732. -
- [7][7] Bose, I., and J. Wang. 'Data mining for detection of financial statement fraud in Chinese Companies.' International joint Conference on e-Commerce, e-Administration, e-Society, and e-Education. International Business Academics Consortium (IBAC) and Knowledge Association of Taiwan (KAT), 2007. -
- [21][21] Cao, Shaosheng, Wei Lu, and Qiongkai Xu. 'Grarep: Learning graph representations with global structural information.' Proceedings of the 24th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, 2015. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection With Deep Learning
Ma, X., Wu, J. X., Xue, S., Yang, J. Y., Zhou, C., Sheng, Q. Z., Xiong, H., & Akoglu, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3118815 · Cited by 939
“com/FraudDetection/FRAUDRE SemiGNN [111] Python Tensorflow Static Attributed Graph https://github.”
MethodEnhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsters
Dou, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, L., Deng, Y., Peng, H. M., & Yu, P. S. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3411903 · Cited by 738
Pick and Choose: A GNN-based Imbalanced Learning Approach for Fraud Detection
Liu, Y., Ao, X., Qin, Z., Chi, J., Feng, J., Yang, H., & He, Q. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3449989 · Cited by 536
“Semi-GNN [39] is a semi-supervised GNN model with hierarchical attention mechanism for explainable fraud prediction.”
BackgroundMethodRethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detection
Tang, J.-H., Li, J.-J., Gao, Z.-C., & Li, J. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.15508 · Cited by 467
“That is, (1) applying attention mechanisms to correlate different neighbors through various views (Wang et al., 2019a; Cui et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021a), (2) using the resampling strategy to aggregate neighborhood information selectively (Dou et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; 2021b), (3) designing…”
MethodAlleviating the Inconsistency Problem of Applying Graph Neural Network to Fraud Detection
Liu, Z., Dou, Y., Yu, P. S., Deng, Y., & Peng, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3397271.3401253 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D., Lin, J., Cui, P., Jia, Q., Wang, Z., Fang, Y., Yu, Q., Zhou, J., Yang, S., & Qi, Y.
- Affiliations
- Ant Group (China) (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 598-607
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2003.01171
- OpenAlex
- W3009901425
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 16
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- financial fraud detection, graph attention networks, semi-supervised learning, hierarchical attention, interpersonal relationships, user characteristics, interpretable prediction, Alipay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
