Optimal Protocols in Quantum Annealing and QAOA Problems
Open accessAbstract
Quantum Annealing (QA) and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) are two special cases of the following control problem: apply a combination of two Hamiltonians to minimize the energy of a quantum state. Which is more effective has remained unclear. Here we analytically apply the framework of optimal control theory to show that generically, given a fixed amount of time, the optimal procedure has the pulsed (or "bang-bang") structure of QAOA at the beginning and end but can have a smooth annealing structure in between. This is in contrast to previous works which have suggested that bang-bang (i.e., QAOA) protocols are ideal. To support this theoretical work, we carry out simulations of various transverse field Ising models, demonstrating that bang-anneal-bang protocols are more common. The general features identified here provide guideposts for the nascent experimental implementations of quantum optimization algorithms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When the total time T is large, bang-bang QAOA suffers from proliferation of local minima in the control parameters, making it difficult to find optimal or near-optimal QAOA parameters.
“It was also shown that when the total time T is large, bang-bang QAOA suffers from the proliferation of local minima in the control parameters, rendering it difficult to find optimal or near-optimal QAOA parameters.”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Brady et al., 2020
The numerical-results discussion (p. 4) says false minima appeared rare in the authors’ gradient-descent searches, but does not make that finding about QAOA. Appendix E (p. 10) says control and time constraints can make traps more likely; neither passage establishes that local minima proliferate in bang-bang QAOA as total time grows or make its parameters difficult to optimize. Searches for “local minima” and long-time QAOA optimization found no passage addressing that specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes.
Blum, E. K., Pontryagin, Boltyanskii, Gamkrelidze, & Mishchenko (1963) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2312867 · Cited by 4,260 · see citing works
The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes
Bellman, R., Pontryagin, L. S., Boltyanskii, V. G., Gamkrelidze, R. V., Mishchenko, E. F., Trirogoff, Κ. N., & Neustadt, L. W. (1965) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911909 · Cited by 4,212 · see citing works
Optimal control theory : an introduction
Kirk, D. E. (1970) · Cited by 2,948 · see citing works
Introductory Lectures on Convex Optimization
Nesterov, Y. E. (2004) · Applied optimization · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8853-9 · Cited by 2,734 · see citing works
Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model
Kadowaki, T., & Nishimori, H. (1998) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.58.5355 · Cited by 2,339 · see citing works
Khaneja, N., Reiss, T., Kehlet, C., Schulte-Herbrüggen, T., & Glaser, S. J. (2005) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2004.11.004 · Cited by 1,854 · see citing works
Optimal control theory: An introduction
Levine, W. S. (1972) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1972.1100008 · Cited by 1,631 · see citing works
Whither the Future of Controlling Quantum Phenomena?
RABITZ, H. A., de Vivie‐Riedle, R., Motzkus, M., & Kompa, K. L. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5467.824 · Cited by 1,150 · see citing works
Observation of a many-body dynamical phase transition with a 53-qubit quantum simulator
Zhang, J., Pagano, G., Hess, P. W., Kyprianidis, A., Becker, P., Kaplan, H., Gorshkov, A. V., Gong, Z.-X., & Monroe, C. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24654 · Cited by 1,079 · see citing works
Self-citationZhou, L., Wang, S.-T., Choi, S., Pichler, H., & Lukin, M. D. (2020) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.021067 · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Control of quantum phenomena: past, present and future
Brif, C., Chakrabarti, R., & Rabitz, H. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/7/075008 · Cited by 911 · see citing works
Generation and manipulation of Schrödinger cat states in Rydberg atom arrays
Omran, A., Levine, H., Keesling, A., Semeghini, G., Wang, T. T., Ebadi, S., Bernien, H., Zibrov, A. S., Pichler, H., Choi, S., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax9743 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Quantum search by local adiabatic evolution
Roland, J., & Cerf, N. J. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.042308 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Control of quantum phenomena: past, present and futurePreprint
Brif, C., Chakrabarti, R., & RABITZ, H. A. (2010) · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing
Qiang, X., Zhou, X., Wang, J., Wilkes, C. M., Loke, T., O’Gara, S., Kling, L., Marshall, G. D., Santagati, R., Ralph, T. C., et al. (2018) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0236-y · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Quantum optimal control theory
Werschnik, J., & Gross, E. K. U. (2007) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/40/18/r01 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Bounds for the adiabatic approximation with applications to quantum computation
Jansen, S., Ruskai, M.-B., & Seiler, R. (2007) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2798382 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Sufficient Conditions for the Optimal Control of Nonlinear Systems
Mangasarian, O. L. (1966) · SIAM Journal on Control · doi:10.1137/0304013 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Quantum Computing by an Optimal Control Algorithm for Unitary Transformations
Palao, J. P., & Kosloff, R. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.188301 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Quantum Supremacy through the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
Farhi, E., & Harrow, A. W. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.07674 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Optimal control theory for unitary transformations
Palao, J. P., & Kosloff, R. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.062308 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Unsupervised Machine Learning on a Hybrid Quantum Computer
Otterbach, J. S., Manenti, R., Alidoust, N., Bestwick, A., Block, M., Bloom, B., Caldwell, S., Didier, N., Fried, E. S., Hong, S., et al. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.05771 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Quantum approximate optimization of the long-range Ising model with a trapped-ion quantum simulator
Pagano, G., Bapat, A., Becker, P., Collins, K. S., De, A., Hess, P. W., Kaplan, H. B., Kyprianidis, A., Tan, W. L., Baldwin, C., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2006373117 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Self-citationEntanglement Entropy for the Long-Range Ising Chain in a Transverse Field
Koffel, T., Lewenstein, M., & Tagliacozzo, L. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.267203 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Optimal Control of Light Pulse Storage and Retrieval
Novikova, I. V., Gorshkov, A. V., Phillips, D. F., Sørensen, A. S., Lukin, M. D., & Walsworth, R. L. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.243602 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationBounds for the adiabatic approximation with applications to quantum computationPreprint
Jansen, S., Ruskai, M. B., & Seiler, R. (2006) · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Optimizing Variational Quantum Algorithms Using Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle
Yang, Z.-C., Rahmani, A., Shabani, A., Neven, H., & Chamon, C. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.021027 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Robust Optimal Quantum Gates for Josephson Charge Qubits
Montangero, S., Calarco, T., & Fazio, R. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.170501 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Photon storage in Λ -type optically dense atomic media. IV. Optimal control using gradient ascent
Gorshkov, A. V., Calarco, T., Lukin, M. D., & Sørensen, A. S. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.043806 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum approximate optimization is computationally universalPreprint
Lloyd, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.11075 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Singularities of quantum control landscapes
Wu, R.-B., Long, R., Dominy, J., Ho, T., & RABITZ, H. A. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.013405 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Optimal control of Majorana zero modes
Karzig, T., Rahmani, A., von Oppen, F., & Refael, G. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.201404 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Bao, S. L., Kleer, S., Wang, R., & Rahmani, A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.062343 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Cooling through optimal control of quantum evolution
Rahmani, A., Kitagawa, T., Demler, E., & Chamon, C. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.043607 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Quantum Annealing: a journey through Digitalization, Control, and hybrid Quantum Variational schemesPreprint
Mbeng, G. B., Fazio, R., & Santoro, G. E. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08948 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Searching for quantum optimal control fields in the presence of singular critical points
Riviello, G., Brif, C., Long, R., Wu, R.-B., Tibbetts, K. M., Ho, T., & RABITZ, H. A. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.013404 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Optimal control of Rydberg lattice gases
Cui, J., van Bijnen, R., Pohl, T., Montangero, S., & Calarco, T. (2017) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa7daf · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Searching for quantum optimal controls under severe constraints
Riviello, G., Tibbetts, K. M., Brif, C., Long, R., Wu, R.-B., Ho, T., & RABITZ, H. A. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.043401 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Bang-bang control as a design principle for classical and quantum optimization algorithms
Bapat, A., & Jordan, S. P. (2019) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic19.5-6-4 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationApplication of Pontryagin's minimum principle to Grover's quantum search problem
Lin, C., Wang, Y., Kolesov, G., & Kalabic, U. V. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.022327 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Quantum adiabatic optimization without heuristicsPreprint
Jarret, M., Lackey, B., Liu, A., & Wan, K. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04686 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Quantum Control Landscapes Are Almost Always Trap FreePreprint
Russell, B., RABITZ, H. A., & Wu, R.-B. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.06198 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [17]C. Brif, R. Chakrabarti, H. Rabitz, New Journal of Phys. , Vol. 12 (2010).
- [20]N. Khaneja, T. Reiss, C. Kehlet, T. Schulte-Herbr¨ uggen, S. J. Glaser, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 172, pp. 296-305 (2005).
- [23]M. Grace, C. Brif, H. Rabitz, I. A. Walmsley, R. L. Kosut, D. A. Lidar, Journal of Physics B 40 , 9 (2009).
- [25]A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, A. S. Zibrov, H. Pichler, S. Choi, J. Cui, M. Rossignolo, P. Rembold, S. Montangero, T. Calarco, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, M. D. Lukin, Science , Vol. 365, 6453, pp. 570-574 (2019).
- W. Hess, H. B. Kaplan, A. Kyprianidis, W. L. Tan, C. Baldwin, L. T. Brady, A. Deshpande, F. Liu, S. Jordan, A. V. Gorshkov, C. Monroe, arXiv:1906.02700 (2019). · arXiv
- [30]O. L. Mangasarian, J. SIAM Control , Vol. 4, No. 1 (1966).
- [37]L. Zhou, S. Wang, S. Choi, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, arXiv:1812.01041 (2018). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 1,726 · see citing works
A review on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and its variants
Blekos, K., Brand, D., Ceschini, A., Chou, C.-H., Li, R.-H., Pandya, K., & Summer, A. (2024) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.03.002 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Koch, C. P., Boscain, U., Calarco, T., Dirr, G., Filipp, S., Glaser, S. J., Kosloff, R., Montangero, S., Schulte-Herbrüggen, T., Sugny, D., et al. (2022) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-022-00138-x · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Quantum Algorithm Implementations for Beginners
Jayakumar, A., Adedoyin, A. A., Ambrosiano, J. J., Anisimov, P. M., Casper, W., Chennupati, G., Coffrin, C., Djidjev, H. N., Gunter, D., Karra, S., et al. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3517340 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Theory of overparametrization in quantum neural networks
Larocca, M., Ju, N., García-Martín, D., Coles, P. J., & Cerezo, M. (2023) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-023-00467-6 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era and beyond
Callison, A., & Chancellor, N. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.010101 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Prospects for quantum enhancement with diabatic quantum annealing
Crosson, E., & Lidar, D. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00313-6 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Parameter concentrations in quantum approximate optimization
Akshay, V., Rabinovich, D., Campos, E., & Biamonte, J. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.l010401 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Counterdiabaticity and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm
Wurtz, J., & Love, P. J. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-01-27-635 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz on Maximum k-Vertex Cover
Cook, J., Eidenbenz, S., & Bärtschi, A. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce49297.2020.00021 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Introduction to theoretical and experimental aspects of quantum optimal control
Ansel, Q., Dionis, E., Arrouas, F., Peaudecerf, B., Guérin, S., Guéry-Odelin, D., & Sugny, D. (2024) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ad46a5 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Alignment between initial state and mixer improves QAOA performance for constrained optimization
He, Z., Shaydulin, R., Chakrabarti, S., Herman, D., Li, C., Sun, Y., & Pistoia, M. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00787-5 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Lu, Y., & Yang, J. (2024) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2024.100663 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Short-depth QAOA circuits and quantum annealing on higher-order ising models
Pelofske, E., Bärtschi, A., & Eidenbenz, S. (2024) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00825-w · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Training saturation in layerwise quantum approximate optimization
Campos, E., Rabinovich, D., Akshay, V., & Biamonte, J. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.l030401 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Optimizing quantum annealing schedules with Monte Carlo tree search enhanced with neural networks
Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Lee, C., Zhang, S., & Hsieh, C. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00446-y · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Two-parameter counter-diabatic driving in quantum annealing
Prielinger, L., Hartmann, A., Yamashiro, Y., Nishimura, K., Lechner, W., & Nishimori, H. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.013227 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Energetic Perspective on Rapid Quenches in Quantum Annealing
Callison, A., Festenstein, M. Z., Chen, J., Nita, L., Kendon, V. M., & Chancellor, N. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010338 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Quantum approximate optimization algorithm with adaptive bias fields
Yu, Y., Cao, C., Dewey, C., Wang, X., Shannon, N., & Joynt, R. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023249 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Quantum approximate optimization for hard problems in linear algebra
Borle, A., Elfving, V. E., & Lomonaco, S. J. (2021) · SciPost Physics Core · doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.4.4.031 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-Healing of Trotter Error in Digital Adiabatic State Preparation
Kovalsky, L. K., Calderon-Vargas, F. A., Grace, M., Magann, A. B., Larsen, J. B., Baczewski, A., & Sarovar, M. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.060602 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Spectral analysis of product formulas for quantum simulation
Yi, C., & Crosson, E. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00548-w · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Analytical framework for quantum alternating operator ansätze
Hadfield, S., Hogg, T., & Rieffel, E. G. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aca3ce · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Understanding domain-wall encoding theoretically and experimentally
Berwald, J., Chancellor, N., & Dridi, R. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0410 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Coopmans, L., Luo, D., Kells, G., Clark, B. K., & Carrasquilla, J. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020332 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Quantum algorithms for scientific computing
Au-Yeung, R., Camino, B., Rathore, O., & Kendon, V. M. (2024) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad85f0 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Optimal Control for Quantum Optimization of Closed and Open Systems
Venuti, L. C., D’Alessandro, D., & Lidar, D. A. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.054023 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Duncan, C. W., Poggi, P. M., Bukov, M., Zinner, N. T., & Campbell, S. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/j8c7-v2hd · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Mean-Field Approximate Optimization Algorithm
Misra-Spieldenner, A., Bode, T., Schuhmacher, P., Stollenwerk, T., Bagrets, D., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.030335 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Variationally scheduled quantum simulation
Matsuura, S., Buck, S., Senicourt, V., & Zaribafiyan, A. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.052435 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Application of Pontryagin's maximum principle to quantum metrology in dissipative systems
Lin, C., Ma, Y., & Sels, D. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.042621 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Sack, S. H., Medina, R. A., Kueng, R., & Serbyn, M. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.062404 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Leakage Reduces Device Coherence Demands for Pulse-Level Molecular Simulations
Asthana, A., Liu, C., Meitei, O. R., Economou, S. E., Barnes, E., & Mayhall, N. J. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.064071 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Programming physical quantum systems with pulse-level control
Smith, K. N., Ravi, G. S., Alexander, T., Bronn, N. T., Carvalho, A. R. R., Cervera-Lierta, A., Chong, F. T., Chow, J. M., Cubeddu, M., Hashim, A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.900099 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Feedback-based quantum algorithms for ground state preparation
Larsen, J. B., Grace, M., Baczewski, A., & Magann, A. B. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033336 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Parameter-setting heuristic for the quantum alternating operator ansatz
Sud, J., Hadfield, S., Rieffel, E. G., Tubman, N. M., & Hogg, T. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.023171 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Grover-QAOA for 3-SAT: quadratic speedup, fair-sampling, and parameter clustering
Zhang, Z., Paredes, R., Sundar, B., Quiroga, D., Kyrillidis, A., Dueñas‐Osorio, L., Pagano, G., & Hazzard, K. R. A. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad895c · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Matarèse, B. F. E., & Purushotham, A. D. (2025) · Quantum Reports · doi:10.3390/quantum7010009 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Quantum approximate optimization algorithm: a review study and problems
Abualigah, L., AlNajdawi, S., Ikotun, A. M., Forestiero, A., Gul, F., Ezugwu, A. E.-S., Jia, H., Zare, M., Mahajan, S., & Alshinwan, M. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-13925-3.00007-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Success of digital adiabatic simulation with large Trotter step
Yi, C. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.052603 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Sawaya, N. P. D., Schmitz, A. T., & Hadfield, S. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-09-14-1111 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Diabatic quantum annealing for the frustrated ring model
Côté, J., Sauvage, F., Larocca, M., Jonsson, M., Cincio, Ł., & Albash, T. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acfbaa · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Customized Quantum Annealing Schedules
Khezri, M., Dai, X., Yang, R. L., Albash, T., Lupaşcu, A., & Lidar, D. A. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.17.044005 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Mixer-phaser Ansätze for quantum optimization with hard constraints
LaRose, R., Rieffel, E. G., & Venturelli, D. (2022) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-022-00069-x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Achieving fast high-fidelity optimal control of many-body quantum dynamics
Jensen, J. H. M., Møller, F., Sørensen, J. J., & Sherson, J. F. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.052210 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Standard quantum annealing outperforms adiabatic reverse annealing with decoherence
Passarelli, G., Yip, K.-W., Lidar, D. A., & Lucignano, P. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.032431 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Warm-started quantum sphere decoding via reverse annealing for massive IoT connectivity
Kim, M., Venturelli, D., Kaewell, J., & Jamieson, K. (2022) · ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom) · doi:10.1145/3495243.3560516 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Benchasattabuse, N., Bärtschi, A., García-Pintos, L. P., Golden, J. K., Lemons, N., & Eidenbenz, S. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.062411 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Deep learning optimal quantum annealing schedules for random Ising models
Hegde, P. R., Passarelli, G., Cantele, G., & Lucignano, P. (2023) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ace547 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Lewalle, P., Zhang, Y., & Whaley, K. B. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020366 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Improved Metaheuristics with Machine Learning Enabled Medical Decision Support System
Althubiti, S. A., Escorcia‐Gutierrez, J., Gamarra, M., Soto-Díaz, R., Mansour, R. F., & Alenezi, F. S. (2022) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2022.028878 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Robustness of variational quantum algorithms against stochastic parameter perturbation
Rabinovich, D., Campos, E., Adhikary, S., Pankovets, E., Vinichenko, D., & Biamonte, J. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042426 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Quantum-Based Maximum Likelihood Detection in MIMO-NOMA Systems for 6G Networks
Urgelles, H., García‐Roger, D., & Monserrat, J. F. (2024) · Quantum Reports · doi:10.3390/quantum6040036 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Predicting topological entanglement entropy in a Rydberg analogue simulator
Mauron, L., Denis, Z., Nys, J., & Carleo, G. (2025) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02944-3 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Sun, Z., Wang, Y., Cui, J., & Fan, H. (2023) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/acb22c · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Li, X. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41688-z · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Binary Control Pulse Optimization for Quantum Systems
Fei, X., Brady, L. T., Larson, J. M., Leyffer, S., & Shen, S. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-01-04-892 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationAssessing the performance of quantum annealing with nonlinear driving
Soriani, A., Nazé, P., Bonança, M. V. S., Gardas, B., & Deffner, S. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.052442 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
High-speed train timetable optimization based on space–time network model and quantum simulator
Xu, H.-Z., Chen, J., Zhang, X., Lu, T.-E., Gao, T., Wen, K., & Ma, Y. (2023) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-023-04170-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Shirai, T., & Togawa, N. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2024.3376721 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
State preparation of lattice field theories using quantum optimal control
Araz, J. Y., Bhowmick, S., Grau, M., McEntire, T. J., & Ringer, F. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.034506 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Progress towards Analytically Optimal Angles in Quantum Approximate Optimisation
Rabinovich, D., Sengupta, R., Campos, E., Akshay, V., & Biamonte, J. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10152601 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Rapid quantum approaches for combinatorial optimisation inspired by optimal state-transfer
Banks, R. J., Browne, D. E., & Warburton, P. A. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-02-13-1253 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Benchmarking quantum annealing with maximum cardinality matching problems
Vert, D., Willsch, M., Yenilen, B., Sirdey, R., Louise, S., & Michielsen, K. F. L. (2024) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2024.1286057 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Toward a Theory of Phase Transitions in Quantum Control Landscapes
Beato, N., Patil, P., & Bukov, M. (2025) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/27nn-cb3t · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Exact Floquet flat band and heating suppression via two-tone drive protocols
Banerjee, T., Choudhury, S., & Sengupta, K. (2025) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/adfd07 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Zhao, R.-S., Cheng, T., Wang, R., Fan, X., & Ma, H. (2024) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad4629 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Petri Net Modeling for Ising Model Formulation in Quantum Annealing
Nakamura, M., Kaneshima, K., & Yoshida, T. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11167574 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The quantum annealing gap and quench dynamics in the exact cover problem
Irsigler, B., & Graß, T. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-01-18-624 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Pulse-based variational quantum optimization and metalearning in superconducting circuits
Wang, Y., Ding, Y., Cárdenas-López, F. A., & Chen, X. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.024009 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Silicide-based Josephson field effect transistors for superconducting qubits
Vethaak, T. D. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/182d9d63zfd33z4091za9c2z840e3751fe66 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Fighting Exponentially Small Gaps by Counterdiabatic Driving
Grabarits, A., Balducci, F., & del Campo, A. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/tgzt-dy3h · Cited by 5 · see citing works
On constant-time quantum annealing and guaranteed approximations for graph optimization problems
Braida, A., Martiel, S., & Todinca, I. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac8e91 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Quantum computing in the automotive industry: survey, challenges, and perspectives
Arshad, M. W., & Lodi, S. (2025) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-025-07573-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
de Lima, E. F., Fernandes, M. E. F., & Castelano, L. K. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.032454 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Computing the lowest eigenstate of tight-binding Hamiltonians using quantum walks
Varsamis, G. D., & Karafyllidis, I. G. (2022) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749922500125 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Limits of Short-Time Evolution of Local Hamiltonians
Moosavian, A. H., Kahani, S. S., & Beigi, S. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-06-27-744 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Improving the efficiency of quantum annealing with controlled diagonal catalysts
Hattori, T., & Tanaka, S. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/vff6-cf7c · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Deep unfolded local quantum annealing
Arai, S., & Takabe, S. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043325 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Bhattacharya, P., & Verma, A. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29654-3.00012-0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Feedback-based optimally controlled quantum states
Brady, L. T., & Hadfield, S. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.062406 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationDepth scaling of unstructured search via quantum approximate optimization
Campos, E., Rabinovich, D., & Uvarov, A. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012428 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Robustness of optimal quantum annealing protocols
Funcke, N., & Berberich, J. (2024) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad7b6b · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Quantum walk in a reinforced free-energy landscape: Quantum annealing with reinforcement
Ramezanpour, A. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.012418 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Open-system modeling of quantum annealing: theory and applicationsPreprint
Yip, K.-W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.25549/usctheses-c89-443939 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Wang, K., Wang, S., Chen, Q., Qiao, X., Ma, H., & Qiu, T. (2024) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-024-04512-9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ranjan, A., Silver, D., Patel, T., Chickmagalurnanjun, B., & Tiwari, D. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3771573 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Co-designed counterdiabatic quantum optimization on a photonic quantum processor
Shang, X.-W., Chen, X., Hegade, N. N., Lan, Z.-F., Tang, H., Dou, J.-P., Li, X.-K., Peng, Y.-Q., Solano, E., & Jin, X. (2026) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/7gl4-zrh6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Switching Time Optimization for Binary Quantum Optimal Control
Fei, X., Brady, L. T., Larson, J. M., Leyffer, S., & Shen, S. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3670416 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, Y., Sun, Z., Wang, H., Shi, K., Li, J., Liu, C. X., & Ma, H. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad7b6f · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Optimal control theory for maximum power of Brownian heat engines
Chen, J.-F., & Quan, H. T. (2024) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.110.l042105 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Qubit-efficient quantum combinatorial-optimization solver
Sundar, B., & Dupont, M. (2026) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/s5jv-jh24 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Noise effects on diabatic quantum annealing protocols
Salatino, G., Matzler, M., Scocco, A., Lucignano, P., & Passarelli, G. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/x9hw-xhvj · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Time-optimal single-scalar control on a qubit of unitary dynamics
Lin, C., Ding, Q., Boufounos, P. T., Ma, Y., Wang, Y., Sels, D., & Chien, C.-C. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.042602 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Comparison of C# and Qiskit Runtimes on K-Means Clustering
Szatmáry, K. S., & Kozlovszky, P. M. (2023) · IEEE International Conference and Workshop Óbuda on Electrical and Power Engineering (CANDO-EPE) · doi:10.1109/cando-epe60507.2023.10418018 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Optimal control in nearly adiabatic two-level quantum systems via time-dependent resonance
Suzuki, T. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.l050201 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Learning parameter curves in feedback-based quantum algorithms
Perez, V. P., Grace, M., Arenz, C., & Magann, A. B. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/pgbz-zm8h · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Liliopoulos, I., Varsamis, G. D., & Karafyllidis, I. G. (2025) · Emergence, complexity and computation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81097-8_4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Fast chiral resolution with optimal control
Stefanatos, D., Thanopulos, I., & Paspalakis, E. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/fkmb-b4k4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Estimation of optimal control for two-level and three-level quantum systems with bounded amplitude
Li, X. (2023) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/acf803 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brady, L. T., Baldwin, C. L., Bapat, A., Kharkov, Y., & Gorshkov, A. V.
- Affiliations
- Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 070505-070505
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2003.08952
- OpenAlex
- W3012851713
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 17
- FWCI
- 7.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0019139, DESC0019449)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum annealing, quantum approximate optimization algorithm, optimal control, bang-bang control, transverse-field Ising model, quantum optimization algorithms, optimal control protocols
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
