PreprintCited by 27Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Architecture-Aware Synthesis of Phase Polynomials for NISQ Devices

Open access
de Griend, Arianne Meijer-van, Duncan, Ross·2020·arXiv

Abstract

We propose a new algorithm to synthesise quantum circuits for phase polynomials, which takes into account the qubit connectivity of the quantum computer. We focus on the architectures of currently available NISQ devices. Our algorithm generates circuits with a smaller CNOT depth than the algorithms currently used in Staq and tket, while improving the runtime with respect the former.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2004.06052

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Matthew Amy, Parsiad Azimzadeh & Michele Mosca (2018): On the controlled-NOT complexity of controlled- NOT-phase circuits. Quantum Science and Technology 4(1), p. 015002, doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aad8ca. · DOI
  2. Matthew Amy & Vlad Gheorghiu (2020): staq-A full-stack quantum processing toolkit. Quantum Science and Technology 5(3), p. 034016, doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab9359. · DOI
  3. Matthew Amy, Dmitri Maslov & Michele Mosca (2014): Polynomial-Time T-Depth Optimization of Clifford+T Circuits Via Matroid Partitioning. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 33(10), pp. 1476-1489, doi:10.1109/TCAD.2014.2341953. · DOI
  4. Bob Coecke (2010): Quantum picturalism. Contemporary Physics 51(1), pp. 59-83, doi:10.1080/00107510903257624. · DOI
  5. Bob Coecke & Aleks Kissinger (2017): Picturing Quantum Processes: A First Course in Quantum Theory and Diagrammatic Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316219317. · DOI
  6. Alexander Cowtan, Silas Dilkes, Ross Duncan, Alexandre Krajenbrink, Will Simmons & Seyon Sivarajah (2019): On the Qubit Routing Problem. In Wim van Dam & Laura Mancinska, editors: 14th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2019), Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) 135, Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany, pp. 5:1-5:32, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2019.5. Available at http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/ volltexte/2019/10397. · DOI
  7. Alexander Cowtan, Silas Dilkes, Ross Duncan, Will Simmons & Seyon Sivarajah (2020): Phase Gadget Synthesis for Shallow Circuits. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 318, pp. 213-228, doi:10.4204/eptcs.318.13. · DOI
  8. Christopher M. Dawson, Andrew P. Hines, Duncan Mortimer, Henry L. Haselgrove, Michael A. Nielsen & Tobias J. Osborne (2005): Quantum Computing and Polynomial Equations over the Finite Field Z2. Quantum Info. Comput. 5(2), p. 102-112, doi:10.26421/QIC5.2-2. · DOI
  9. Richard M. Karp (2010): Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems, pp. 219-241. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68279-0_8. · DOI
  10. Aleks Kissinger & Arianne Meijer-van de Griend (2020): Cnot circuit extraction for topologically-constrained quantum memories. Quantum information & computation 20(7-8), pp. 581-596, doi:10.26421/QIC20.7-8-4. · DOI
  11. Patel K.N., Markov I.L. & Hayes J.P. (2008): Optimal synthesis of linear reversible circuits. Quantum Information and Computation 8(3&4), pp. 282-294, doi:10.26421/qic8.3-4-4. Available at https://cir. nii.ac.jp/crid/1360294647045719424. · DOI
  12. Beatrice Nash, Vlad Gheorghiu & Michele Mosca (2020): Quantum circuit optimizations for NISQ architec- tures. Quantum Science and Technology 5(2), p. 025010, doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab79b1. · DOI · Paper page
  13. John Preskill (2018): Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 2, p. 79, doi:10.22331/q- 2018-08-06-79. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Seyon Sivarajah, Silas Dilkes, Alexander Cowtan, Will Simmons, Alec Edgington & Ross Duncan (2021): T|ket : A Retargetable Compiler for NISQ Devices. Quantum Science and Technology 6(1), p. 014003, doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab8e92. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Mathias Soeken, Giulia Meuli, Bruno Schmitt, Fereshte Mozafari, Heinz Riener & Giovanni De Micheli (2020): Boolean satisfiability in quantum compilation. Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society A-Mathematical Physical And Engineering Sciences 378(2164), p. 20190161, doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0161. Available at http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275628. · DOI
  16. Robert Wille, Lukas Burgholzer & Alwin Zulehner (2019): Mapping Quantum Circuits to IBM QX Architec- tures Using the Minimal Number of SWAP and H Operations. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Design Automation Conference 2019, DAC '19, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1-6, doi:10.1145/3316781.3317859. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Bujiao Wu, Xiaoyu He, Shuai Yang, Lifu Shou, Guojing Tian, Jialin Zhang & Xiaoming Sun (2023): Optimization of CNOT circuits on limited-connectivity architecture. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, p. 013065, doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013065. · DOI
  18. Alwin Zulehner, Alexandru Paler & Robert Wille (2019): An Efficient Methodology for Mapping Quantum Circuits to the IBM QX Architectures. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 38(7), pp. 1226-1236, doi:10.1109/TCAD.2018.2846658. t|ket Nash Proposed Qubits count depth time count depth time count depth time 9 1444.30 1142.75 0.117s 836.45 422.75 0.186s 575.40 318.65 0.038s 16 4565.50 3846.85 0.362s 2480.10 629.95 1.121s 1818.75 499.85 0.168s 25 9240.80 8004.30 0.905s 4724.60 711.55 4.269s 3673.35 627.50 0.609s 36 14761.20 13074.70 1.863s 7866.50 788.75 13.198s 6211.55 739.30 2.072s 49 24291.45 21651.35 3.867s 11920.00 886.60 36.099s 9592.70 875.40 6.484s 64 27632.10 24473.65 5.462s 16960.45 975.30 82.994s 13750.00 1017.30 17 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
de Griend, A. M.-V., & Duncan, R.
Affiliations
  • Cambridge Quantum Computing (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
394
Pages
116-140
ISSN
2075-2180 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016020519
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum circuit synthesis, NISQ devices, qubit connectivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review