t|ket⟩: a retargetable compiler for NISQ devices
Open accessAbstract
We present t | ket ⟩, a quantum software development platform produced by Cambridge Quantum Computing Ltd. The heart of t | ket ⟩ is a language-agnostic optimising compiler designed to generate code for a variety of NISQ devices, which has several features designed to minimise the influence of device error. The compiler has been extensively benchmarked and outperforms most competitors in terms of circuit optimisation and qubit routing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At a fixed gate error, RCS is not a scalable route to quantum supremacy at large N.
“It was recently proven [65] that at a fixed gate error, RCS is not a scalable route to quantum supremacy at large N”
From A Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor (2023) · cites this paper as [65]
Cites
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830 · see citing works
Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer
Shor, P. W. (1997) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539795293172 · Cited by 8,472 · see citing works
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720 · see citing works
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For qubits, this linear resource management is justified by the no-cloning [50] and no-deleting [51] theorems.”
MethodA variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552 · see citing works
Quantum Algorithm for Linear Systems of Equations
Harrow, A. W., Hassidim, A., & Lloyd, S. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.150502 · Cited by 3,325 · see citing works
Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 · Cited by 2,932 · see citing works
A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.4028 · Cited by 1,789 · see citing works
Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits
Aaronson, S., & Gottesman, D. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052328 · Cited by 1,515 · see citing works
Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor
Kandala, A., Temme, K., Corcoles, A. D., Mezzacapo, A., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1040-7 · Cited by 870 · see citing works
Fundamentals of Algebraic Graph Transformation
Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K., Prange, U., & Taentzer, G. (2006) · doi:10.1007/3-540-31188-2 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
PennyLane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations
Bergholm, V., Izaac, J., Schuld, M., Gogolin, C., Ahmed, S., Ajith, V., Alam, M. S., Alonso-Linaje, G., AkashNarayanan, B., Asadi, A., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.04968 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Strategies for quantum computing molecular energies using the unitary coupled cluster ansatz
Romero, J., Babbush, R., McClean, J. R., Hempel, C., Love, P. J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aad3e4 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Validating quantum computers using randomized model circuits
Cross, A. W., Bishop, L. S., Sheldon, S., Nation, P. D., & Gambetta, J. M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032328 · Cited by 704 · see citing works
Toward the first quantum simulation with quantum speedup
Childs, A. M., Maslov, D., Nam, Y., Ross, N. J., & Su, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1801723115 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling
Wallman, J. J., & Emerson, J. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.052325 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
OpenFermion: the electronic structure package for quantum computers
McClean, J. R., Rubin, N. C., Sung, K. J., Kivlichan, I., Bonet-Monroig, X., Cao, Y., Dai, C., Fried, E., Gidney, C., Gimby, B., et al. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab8ebc · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Benchmarking an 11-qubit quantum computer
Wright, K., Beck, K. M., Debnath, S., Amini, J., Nam, Y., Grzesiak, N., Chen, J.-S., Pisenti, N. C., Chmielewski, M., Collins, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13534-2 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Hybrid quantum-classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and determination of excited states
McClean, J. R., Kimchi-Schwartz, M. E., Carter, J., & de Jong, W. A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.042308 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Interacting quantum observables: categorical algebra and diagrammatics
Coecke, B., & Duncan, R. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/4/043016 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Self-citationDirect Fidelity Estimation from Few Pauli Measurements
Flammia, S. T., & Liu, Y.-K. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.230501 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Quantum Computers Can Search Arbitrarily Large Databases by a Single Query
Grover, L. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.4709 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
ProjectQ: An open source software framework for quantum computing
Steiger, D. S., Häner, T., & Troyer, M. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-01-31-49 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Noise-Adaptive Compiler Mappings for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers
Murali, P., Baker, J. M., Javadi-Abhari, A., Chong, F. T., & Martonosi, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems · doi:10.1145/3297858.3304075 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Cluster-state quantum computation
Nielsen, M. A. (2006) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/s0034-4877(06)80014-5 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
The Heisenberg Representation of Quantum Computers
Gottesman, D. (1998) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · Cited by 385 · see citing works
An Efficient Methodology for Mapping Quantum Circuits to the IBM QX Architectures
Zulehner, A., Paler, A., & Wille, R. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2018.2846658 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Impossibility of deleting an unknown quantum state
Kumar Pati, A., & Braunstein, S. L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/404130b0 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computing
Rudolph, T. (2017) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/1.4976737 · Cited by 350 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Superconducting and ion-trap-based quantum processors are now available from multiple commercial companies [10–14], while other technologies such as photonics are not far behind [15, 16].”
BackgroundIEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic
(2019) · doi:10.1109/ieeestd.2019.8766229 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Strawberry Fields: A Software Platform for Photonic Quantum Computing
Killoran, N., Izaac, J., Quesada, N., Bergholm, V., Amy, M., & Weedbrook, C. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-03-11-129 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Open Quantum Assembly Language
Cross, A. W., Bishop, L. S., Smolin, J. A., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.03429 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Universal quantum circuit for two-qubit transformations with three controlled-NOT gates
Vidal, G., & Dawson, C. M. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.010301 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Polynomial-Time T-Depth Optimization of Clifford+T Circuits Via Matroid Partitioning
Amy, M., Maslov, D. A., & Mosca, M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2014.2341953 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Characterizing large-scale quantum computers via cycle benchmarking
Erhard, A., Wallman, J. J., Postler, L., Meth, M., Stricker, R., Martinez, E. A., Schindler, P., Monz, T., Emerson, J., & Blatt, R. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13068-7 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Efficient learning of quantum noise
Harper, R., Flammia, S. T., & Wallman, J. J. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0992-8 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Software Mitigation of Crosstalk on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers
Murali, P., Mckay, D. C., Martonosi, M., & Javadi-Abhari, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems · doi:10.1145/3373376.3378477 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Cartan decomposition of SU(2n) and control of spin systems
Khaneja, N., & Glaser, S. J. (2001) · Chemical Physics · doi:10.1016/s0301-0104(01)00318-4 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Toffoli network synthesis with templates
Maslov, D., Dueck, G. W., & Miller, D. M. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2005.847911 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Automated optimization of large quantum circuits with continuous parameters
Nam, Y., Ross, N. J., Su, Y., Childs, A. M., & Maslov, D. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0072-4 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Jensen-Shannon divergence as a measure of distinguishability between mixed quantum states
Majtey, A. P., Lamberti, P. W., & Prato, D. P. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.052310 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Demonstration of Fidelity Improvement Using Dynamical Decoupling with Superconducting Qubits
Pokharel, B., Anand, N., Fortman, B., & Lidar, D. A. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.220502 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Graph-theoretic Simplification of Quantum Circuits with the ZX-calculus
Duncan, R., Kissinger, A., Perdrix, S., & van de Wetering, J. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-06-04-279 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationConventions for quantum pseudocode
Lab., N. (. S. L. A. N., Knill, E., & USDOE, W. (1996) · doi:10.2172/366453 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Reducing the number of non-Clifford gates in quantum circuits
Kissinger, A., & van de Wetering, J. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.022406 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Quantum phase estimation of multiple eigenvalues for small-scale (noisy) experiments
O’Brien, T. E., Tarasinski, B., & Terhal, B. M. (2019) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aafb8e · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Phase Gadget Synthesis for Shallow Circuits
Cowtan, A., Dilkes, S., Duncan, R., Simmons, W., & Sivarajah, S. (2019) · QPL · doi:10.4204/eptcs.318.13 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationA software methodology for compiling quantum programs
Häner, T., Steiger, D. S., Svore, K. M., & Troyer, M. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aaa5cc · Cited by 171 · see citing works
PyZX: Large Scale Automated Diagrammatic Reasoning
Kissinger, A., & van de Wetering, J. (2020) · Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.4204/eptcs.318.14 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Green, A. S., Lumsdaine, P. L., Ross, N. J., Selinger, P., & Valiron, B. (2013) · ACM SIGPLAN Notices · doi:10.1145/2499370.2462177 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
ScaffCC: Scalable compilation and analysis of quantum programs
Javadi-Abhari, A., Patil, S. R., Kudrow, D., Heckey, J., Lvov, A., Chong, F. T., & Martonosi, M. (2014) · Parallel Computing · doi:10.1016/j.parco.2014.12.001 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
On the Qubit Routing ProblemPreprint
Cowtan, A., Dilkes, S., Duncan, R., Krajenbrink, A., Simmons, W., & Sivarajah, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.tqc.2019.5 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationFull-stack, real-system quantum computer studies: architectural comparisons and design insights
Murali, P., Linke, N. M., Martonosi, M., Abhari, A. J., Nguyen, N. H., & Alderete, C. H. (2019) · Proceedings of the 46th International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1145/3307650.3322273 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Leung, N., Abdelhafez, M. R., Koch, J., & Schuster, D. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.042318 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Ball, H., Biercuk, M. J., Carvalho, A. R. R., Chen, J., Hush, M., de Castro, L. A., Li, L., Liebermann, P., Slatyer, H. J., Edmunds, C., et al. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abdca6 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Basic circuit compilation techniques for an ion-trap quantum machine
Maslov, D. A. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa5e47 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Extracting Success from IBM’s 20-Qubit Machines Using Error-Aware Compilation
Nishio, S., Pan, Y., Satoh, T., Amano, H., & Meter, R. V. (2020) · ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3386162 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Fermion-to-qubit mappings with varying resource requirements for quantum simulation
Steudtner, M., & Wehner, S. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aac54f · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Rewriting Measurement-Based Quantum Computations with Generalised Flow
Duncan, R., & Perdrix, S. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14162-1_24 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citationA volumetric framework for quantum computer benchmarks
Blume-Kohout, R., & Young, K. C. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-11-15-362 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Non-Gaussian noise spectroscopy with a superconducting qubit sensor
Sung, Y., Beaudoin, F., Norris, L., Yan, F., Kim, D. K., Qiu, J. Y., von Lüpke, U., Yoder, J., Orlando, T. P., Gustavsson, S., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11699-4 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Circuit Transformations for Quantum ArchitecturesPreprint
Childs, A. M., Schoute, E., & Unsal, C. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.tqc.2019.3 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Partial Compilation of Variational Algorithms for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Machines
Gokhale, P., Ding, Y., Propson, T., Winkler, C., Leung, N., Shi, Y., Schuster, D., Hoffmann, H., & Chong, F. T. (2019) · IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) · doi:10.1145/3352460.3358313 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Shorter Stabilizer Circuits via Bruhat Decomposition and Quantum Circuit Transformations
Maslov, D., & Roetteler, M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2018.2825602 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
A Case for Variability-Aware Policies for NISQ-Era Quantum ComputersPreprint
Tannu, S., & Qureshi, M. K. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.10224 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Generators and relations for n-qubit Clifford operators
Selinger, P. (2015) · Logical Methods in Computer Science · doi:10.2168/lmcs-11(2:10)2015 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
A language and hardware independent approach to quantum–classical computing
McCaskey, A. J., Dumitrescu, E. F., Liakh, D., Chen, M., Feng, W., & Humble, T. S. (2018) · SoftwareX · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2018.07.007 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Hopper, G. M. (1952) · ACM National Meeting · doi:10.1145/609784.609818 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Optimization of Clifford circuits
Kliuchnikov, V., & Maslov, D. A. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.052307 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
A finite presentation of CNOT-dihedral operators
Amy, M., Chen, J.-X., & Ross, N. J. (2016) · QPL · doi:10.4204/eptcs.266.5 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Two-Qubit Circuit Depth and the Monodromy Polytope
Peterson, E. C., Crooks, G. E., & Smith, R. S. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-03-26-247 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Optimising Clifford Circuits with Quantomatic
Fagan, A., & Duncan, R. (2019) · Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.4204/eptcs.287.5 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum Circuit Compilation: An Emerging Application for Automated Reasoning
Venturelli, D., Minh, N., O’Gorman, B., Frank, J., Rieffel, E. G., Booth, K. E. C., Nguyen, T. L., Narayan, P., & Nanda, S. (2019) · Cited by 29 · see citing works
A Graphical Approach to Measurement-BasedQuantum Computing
Duncan, R. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646296.003.0003 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationAn analytical decomposition protocol for optimal implementation of two-qubit entangling gates
Blaauboer, M., & de Visser, R. L. (2008) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/39/395307 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Efficient characterization of correlated SPAM errorsPreprint
Sun, M., & Geller, M. R. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.10523 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Structured Cospans.Preprint
Baez, J. C., & Courser, K. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Optimizations in C++ Compilers
Godbolt, M. (2019) · Queue · doi:10.1145/3371595.3372264 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor
Moses, S. A., Baldwin, C. H., Allman, M. S., Ancona, R., Ascarrunz, L., Barnes, C., Bartolotta, J., Bjork, B., Blanchard, P., Bohn, M., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041052 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics
Bauer, C., Davoudi, Z., Balantekin, A. B., Tanmoy Bhattacharya, A., Carena, M. S., de Jong, W. A., Draper, P., El-Khadra, A. X., Gemelke, N., Hanada, M., et al. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.027001 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Qulacs: a fast and versatile quantum circuit simulator for research purpose
Suzuki, Y., Kawase, Y., Masumura, Y., Hiraga, Y., Nakadai, M., Chen, J., Nakanishi, K. M., Mitarai, K., Imai, R., Tamiya, S., et al. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-10-06-559 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Distributed quantum computing: A survey
Caleffi, M., Amoretti, M., Ferrari, D., Illiano, J., Manzalini, A., & Cacciapuoti, A. S. (2024) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110672 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
The bitter truth about gate-based quantum algorithms in the NISQ era
Leymann, F., & Barzen, J. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abae7d · Cited by 228 · see citing works
MQT Bench: Benchmarking Software and Design Automation Tools for Quantum Computing
Quetschlich, N., Burgholzer, L., & Wille, R. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-07-20-1062 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Machine Learning of Noise-Resilient Quantum Circuits
Cincio, L., Rudinger, K., Sarovar, M., & Coles, P. J. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010324 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
QNLP in Practice: Running Compositional Models of Meaning on a Quantum Computer
Lorenz, R., Pearson, A., Meichanetzidis, K., Kartsaklis, D., & Coecke, B. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.14329 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Filtering variational quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization
Amaro, D., Modica, C., Rosenkranz, M., Fiorentini, M., Benedetti, M., & Lubasch, M. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac3e54 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Review of Distributed Quantum Computing: From single QPU to High Performance Quantum Computing
Barral, D., Cardama, F. J., Díaz-Camacho, G., Faílde, D., Llovo, I. F., Juane, M. M., Vázquez-Pérez, J., Villasuso, J., Piñeiro, C., Costas, N., et al. (2025) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100747 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Shaydulin, R., Li, C., Chakrabarti, S., DeCross, M., Herman, D., Kumar, N., Larson, J., Lykov, D., Minssen, P., Sun, Y., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adm6761 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Heim, B., Soeken, M., Marshall, S., Granade, C., Roetteler, M., Geller, A., Troyer, M., & Svore, K. M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-020-00245-7 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
A verified optimizer for Quantum circuits
Hietala, K., Rand, R., Hung, S.-H., Wu, X., & Hicks, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3434318 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Optimal layout synthesis for quantum computing
Tan, B., & Cong, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Computer-Aided Design · doi:10.1145/3400302.3415620 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Scaling of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm on superconducting qubit based hardware
Weidenfeller, J., Valor, L. C., Gacon, J., Tornow, C., Bello, L., Woerner, S., & Egger, D. J. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-12-07-870 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
A case study of variational quantum algorithms for a job shop scheduling problem
Amaro, D., Rosenkranz, M., Fitzpatrick, N., Hirano, K., & Fiorentini, M. (2022) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-022-00123-4 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Quantum Natural Language Processing: Challenges and Opportunities
Guarasci, R., Pietro, G. D., & Esposito, M. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12115651 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Farrell, R. C., Chernyshev, I. A., Powell, S. J. M., Zemlevskiy, N. A., Illa, M., & A, M. J. S. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.054513 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Topological order from measurements and feed-forward on a trapped ion quantum computer
Iqbal, M., Tantivasadakarn, N., Gatterman, T. M., Gerber, J. A., Gilmore, K., Gresh, D., Hankin, A. M., Hewitt, N., Horst, C. V., Matheny, M., et al. (2024) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01698-3 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
TEQUILA: a platform for rapid development of quantum algorithms
Kottmann, J. S., Alperin-Lea, S., Tamayo-Mendoza, T., Cervera-Lierta, A., Lavigne, C., Yen, T.-C., Verteletskyi, V., Schleich, P., Anand, A., Degroote, M., et al. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abe567 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Quantum support vector machines for classification and regression on a trapped-ion quantum computer
Suzuki, T., Hasebe, T., & Miyazaki, T. (2024) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-024-00165-0 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Quantum Software Development Lifecycle
Weder, B., Barzen, J., Leymann, F., & Vietz, D. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05324-5_4 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Qubit-Reuse Compilation with Mid-Circuit Measurement and Reset
DeCross, M. P., Chertkov, E., Kohagen, M., & Foss‐Feig, M. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041057 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
The Quantum software lifecycle
Weder, B., Barzen, J., Leymann, F., Salm, M., & Vietz, D. (2020) · doi:10.1145/3412451.3428497 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
QFAST: Conflating Search and Numerical Optimization for Scalable Quantum Circuit Synthesis
Younis, E., Sen, K., Yelick, K., & Iancu, C. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce52317.2021.00041 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Quartz: superoptimization of Quantum circuits
Xu, M., Li, Z., Padon, O., Lin, S., Pointing, J., Hirth, A., Ma, H., Palsberg, J., Aiken, A., Acar, U. A., et al. (2022) · ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI) · doi:10.1145/3519939.3523433 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
TEQUILA: a platform for rapid development of quantum algorithms
Kottmann, J. S., Alperin-Lea, S., Chaney, S., Kesibi, M., Curnow, N. G., Solo, B., Tsilimigkounakis, G., Zendejas-Morales, C., Izmaylov, A. F., Aspuru‐Guzik, A., et al. (2021) · RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Pulser: An open-source package for the design of pulse sequences in programmable neutral-atom arrays
Silvério, H., Grijalva, S., Dalyac, C., Leclerc, L., Karalekas, P. J., Shammah, N., Beji, M., Henry, L.-P., & Henriet, L. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-01-24-629 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Paulihedral: a generalized block-wise compiler optimization framework for Quantum simulation kernels
Li, G., Wu, A., Shi, Y., Javadi-Abhari, A., Ding, Y., & Xie, Y. (2022) · International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) · doi:10.1145/3503222.3507715 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Quantum machine learning of large datasets using randomized measurements
Haug, T., Self, C. N., & Kim, M. S. (2023) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/acb0b4 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
QFaaS: A Serverless Function-as-a-Service framework for Quantum computing
Nguyen, H. T., Usman, M., & Buyya, R. (2024) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2024.01.018 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Quantum computational quantification of protein–ligand interactions
Kirsopp, J. J. M., Di Paola, C., Manrique, D. Z., Krompiec, M., Greene‐Diniz, G., Guba, W., Meyder, A., Wolf, D., Strahm, M., & Muñoz Ramo, D. (2022) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.26975 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
RetractedConstrained quantum optimization for extractive summarization on a trapped-ion quantum computer
Niroula, P., Shaydulin, R., Yalovetzky, R., Minssen, P., Herman, D., Hu, S., & Pistoia, M. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20853-w · Cited by 59 · see citing works
The NISQ Analyzer: Automating the Selection of Quantum Computers for Quantum Algorithms
Salm, M., Barzen, J., Breitenbücher, U., Leymann, F., Weder, B., & Wild, K. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64846-6_5 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Foundations for Near-Term Quantum Natural Language ProcessingPreprint
Coecke, B., de Felice, G., Meichanetzidis, K., & Toumi, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.03755 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Suppressing Quantum Circuit Errors Due to System Variability
Nation, P. D., & Treinish, M. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.010327 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Integrating quantum computing resources into scientific HPC ecosystems
Beck, T. L., Baroni, A., Bennink, R. S., Buchs, G., Pérez, E. A. C., Eisenbach, M., da Silva, R. F., Meena, M. G., Gottiparthi, K., Groszkowski, P., et al. (2024) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2024.06.058 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Optimal Qubit Assignment and Routing via Integer Programming
Nannicini, G., Bishop, L. S., Günlük, O., & Jurcevic, P. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3544563 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
MorphQ: Metamorphic Testing of the Qiskit Quantum Computing Platform
Paltenghi, M., & Pradel, M. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00202 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Best Approximate Quantum Compiling Problems
Madden, L., & Simonetto, A. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3505181 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
AutoComm: A Framework for Enabling Efficient Communication in Distributed Quantum Programs
Wu, A., Zhang, H., Li, G., Shabani, A., Xie, Y., & Ding, Y. (2022) · IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) · doi:10.1109/micro56248.2022.00074 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Advancing hybrid quantum–classical computation with real-time execution
Lubinski, T., Granade, C., Anderson, A., Geller, A., Roetteler, M., Petrenko, A., & Heim, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.940293 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Qubit Mapping and Routing via MaxSAT
Molavi, A., Xu, A., Diges, M., Pick, L., Tannu, S., & Albarghouthi, A. (2022) · 2022 55th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) · doi:10.1109/micro56248.2022.00077 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Machine Learning Optimization of Quantum Circuit Layouts
Paler, A., Sasu, L. M., Florea, A.-C., & Andonie, R. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3565271 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Alignment between initial state and mixer improves QAOA performance for constrained optimization
He, Z., Shaydulin, R., Chakrabarti, S., Herman, D., Li, C., Sun, Y., & Pistoia, M. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00787-5 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Application-Motivated, Holistic Benchmarking of a Full Quantum Computing Stack
Mills, D., Sivarajah, S., Scholten, T. L., & Duncan, R. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-03-22-415 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationVariational Inference with a Quantum Computer
Benedetti, M., Coyle, B., Fiorentini, M., Lubasch, M., & Rosenkranz, M. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.044057 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Equivalence Checking of Quantum Circuits With the ZX-Calculus
Peham, T., Burgholzer, L., & Wille, R. (2022) · IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/jetcas.2022.3202204 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Compiler Optimization for Quantum Computing Using Reinforcement Learning
Quetschlich, N., Burgholzer, L., & Wille, R. (2023) · ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) · doi:10.1109/dac56929.2023.10248002 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Quantum Circuit Optimization and Transpilation via Parameterized Circuit Instantiation
Younis, E., & Iancu, C. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce53715.2022.00068 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Compiling Quantum Circuits for Dynamically Field-Programmable Neutral Atoms Array Processors
Tan, D. B., Bluvstein, D., Lukin, M. D., & Cong, J. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-03-14-1281 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Qiskit Experiments: A Python package to characterize and calibrate quantum computers
Kanazawa, N., Egger, D. J., Ben‐Haim, Y., Zhang, H., Shanks, W., Aleksandrowicz, G., & Wood, C. J. (2023) · The Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.05329 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Synthesizing Quantum-Circuit Optimizers
Xu, A., Molavi, A., Pick, L., Tannu, S., & Albarghouthi, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3591254 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Multi-Neutrino Entanglement and Correlations in Dense Neutrino Systems
Illa, M., & A, M. J. S. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.221003 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Demonstrating Bayesian quantum phase estimation with quantum error detection
Yamamoto, K., Duffield, S., Kikuchi, Y., & Ramo, D. M. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013221 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Relaxed Peephole Optimization: A Novel Compiler Optimization for Quantum Circuits
Liu, J., Bello, L., & Zhou, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the CGO/Proceedings of the ... CGO · doi:10.1109/cgo51591.2021.9370310 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Realization of quantum signal processing on a noisy quantum computer
Kikuchi, Y., Keever, C. M., Coopmans, L., Lubasch, M., & Benedetti, M. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00762-0 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Dahlberg, A., van der Vecht, B., Donne, C. D., Skrzypczyk, M., Raa, I. T., Kozlowski, W., & Wehner, S. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac753f · Cited by 41 · see citing works
LEAP: Scaling Numerical Optimization Based Synthesis Using an Incremental Approach
Smith, E., Davis, M. G., Larson, J. M., Younis, E., Oftelie, L. B., Lavrijsen, W., & Iancu, C. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3548693 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
MQT QMAP: Efficient Quantum Circuit Mapping
Wille, R., & Burgholzer, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 International Symposium on Physical Design · doi:10.1145/3569052.3578928 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Mundada, P., Barbosa, A., Maity, S., Wang, Y., Merkh, T., Stace, T. M., Nielson, F. F., Carvalho, A. R. R., Hush, M., Biercuk, M. J., et al. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.024034 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Lao, L., & Browne, D. E. (2022) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Computer Architecture/Proceedings · doi:10.1145/3470496.3527394 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Distributing circuits over heterogeneous, modular quantum computing network architectures
Andrés-Martínez, P., Forrer, T., Mills, D., Wu, J.-Y., Henaut, L., Yamamoto, K., Murao, M., & Duncan, R. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad6734 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationClifford Circuit Optimization with Templates and Symbolic Pauli Gates
Bravyi, S. B., Shaydulin, R., Hu, S., & Maslov, D. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-11-16-580 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Application-motivated, holistic benchmarking of a full quantum computing stack
Mills, D., Sivarajah, S., Scholten, T. L., & Duncan, R. (2021) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationDisCoPy: Monoidal Categories in Python
de Felice, G., Toumi, A., & Coecke, B. (2021) · Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.4204/eptcs.333.13 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Grammar-aware sentence classification on quantum computers
Meichanetzidis, K., Toumi, A., de Felice, G., & Coecke, B. (2023) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-023-00097-1 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Scalable Optimal Layout Synthesis for NISQ Quantum Processors
Lin, W.-H., Kimko, J., Tan, D. B., Bjørner, N. S., & Cong, J. (2023) · Design Automation Conference · doi:10.1109/dac56929.2023.10247760 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Investigating the effect of circuit cutting in QAOA for the MaxCut problem on NISQ devices
Bechtold, M., Barzen, J., Leymann, F., Mandl, A., Obst, J., Truger, F., & Weder, B. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acf59c · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Mapping Quantum Circuits to Modular Architectures with QUBO
Bandić, M., Prielinger, L., Nüßlein, J., Ovide, A., Rodrigo, S., Abadal, S., van Someren, H., Vardoyan, G., Alarcón, E., Almudéver, C. G., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce57702.2023.00094 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Software-Hardware Co-Optimization for Computational Chemistry on Superconducting Quantum Processors
Li, G., Shi, Y., & Javadi-Abhari, A. (2021) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Computer Architecture/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/isca52012.2021.00070 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Optimal qubit mapping with simultaneous gate absorption
Tan, D. B., & Cong, J. (2021) · International Conference on Computer Aided Design · doi:10.1109/iccad51958.2021.9643554 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
A Generic Compilation Strategy for the Unitary Coupled Cluster AnsatzPreprint
Cowtan, A., Simmons, W., & Duncan, R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.10515 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationSchmid, L., Locher, D. F., Rispler, M., Blatt, S., Zeiher, J., Müller, M., & Wille, R. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad33ac · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Modelling carbon capture on metal-organic frameworks with quantum computing
Greene‐Diniz, G., Manrique, D. Z., Sennane, W., Magnin, Y., Shishenina, E., Cordier, P., Llewellyn, P. L., Krompiec, M., Rančić, M. J., & Ramo, D. M. (2022) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-022-00155-w · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Not All SWAPs Have the Same Cost: A Case for Optimization-Aware Qubit Routing
Liu, J., Li, P., & Zhou, H. (2022) · IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) · doi:10.1109/hpca53966.2022.00058 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Quantum algorithms with local particle-number conservation: Noise effects and error correction
Streif, M., Leib, M., Wudarski, F., Rieffel, E. G., & Wang, Z. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.042412 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Reducing the CNOT Count for Clifford+T Circuits on NISQ Architectures
Gheorghiu, V., Huang, J., Li, S. M., Mosca, M., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2022.3213210 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Predicting Good Quantum Circuit Compilation Options
Quetschlich, N., Burgholzer, L., & Wille, R. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Software (QSW) · doi:10.1109/qsw59989.2023.00015 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Bandić, M., Almudéver, C. G., & Feld, S. (2023) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-023-00124-1 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Revisiting the Mapping of Quantum Circuits: Entering the Multi-core Era
Escofet, P., Ovide, A., Bandić, M., Prielinger, L., van Someren, H., Feld, S., Alarcón, E., Abadal, S., & Almudéver, C. G. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3655029 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum simulation of the one-dimensional wave equation
Wright, L., Keever, C. M., First, J. T., Johnston, R., Tillay, J., Chaney, S., Rosenkranz, M., & Lubasch, M. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043169 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Automating the Comparison of Quantum Compilers for Quantum Circuits
Salm, M., Barzen, J., Leymann, F., Weder, B., & Wild, K. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87568-8_4 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Shuttling for Scalable Trapped-Ion Quantum Computers
Schoenberger, D., Hillmich, S., Brandl, M., & Wille, R. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2024.3513262 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Maronese, M., Moro, L. D., Rocutto, L., & Prati, E. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89746-8_2 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Architecture-Aware Synthesis of Phase Polynomials for NISQ Devices
de Griend, A. M.-V., & Duncan, R. (2020) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · doi:10.4204/eptcs.394.8 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationA Quantum Natural Language Processing Approach to Musical Intelligence
Miranda, E. R., Yeung, R. W. K., Pearson, A., Meichanetzidis, K., & Coecke, B. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13909-3_13 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Quantum Circuit Compiler for a Shuttling-Based Trapped-Ion Quantum Computer
Kreppel, F., Melzer, C., Millán, D. O., Wagner, J., Hilder, J., Poschinger, U., Schmidt‐Kaler, F., & Brinkmann, A. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-11-08-1176 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Tackling the Qubit Mapping Problem with Permutation-Aware Synthesis
Liu, J., Younis, E., Weiden, M., Hovland, P., Kubiatowicz, J. D., & Iancu, C. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce57702.2023.00090 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
NISQ Quantum Computing: A Security-Centric Tutorial and Survey [Feature]
Chen, F., Jiang, L., Müller, H. A., Richerme, P., Chu, C., Fu, Z., & Min, Y. (2024) · IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcas.2024.3349665 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
HamLib: A library of Hamiltonians for benchmarking quantum algorithms and hardware
Sawaya, N. P. D., Marti-Dafcik, D., Ho, Y., Tabor, D. P., Bernal, D. E., Magann, A. B., Premaratne, S., Dubey, P. K., Matsuura, A. Y., Bishop, N. C., et al. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-12-11-1559 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Qubit Routing Using Graph Neural Network Aided Monte Carlo Tree Search
Sinha, A., Azad, U., & Singh, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i9.21231 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Noisy gates for simulating quantum computers
Bartolomeo, G. D., Vischi, M., Cesa, F., Wixinger, R., Grossi, M., Donadi, S., & Bassi, A. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.043210 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Benchmarking quantum computer simulation software packages: State vector simulators
Jamadagni, A., Läuchli, A. M., & Hempel, C. (2024) · SciPost Physics Core · doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.7.4.075 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Limiting the Search Space in Optimal Quantum Circuit Mapping
Burgholzer, L., Schneider, S., & Wille, R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-06770-8_11 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Quetschlich, N., Burgholzer, L., & Wille, R. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3673241 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Elsharkawy, A., To, X.-T. M., Seitz, P., Chen, Y., Stade, Y., Geiger, M., Huang, Q., Guo, X., Ansari, M. A., Mendl, C. B., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3743149 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Yamamoto, K., Manrique, D. Z., Khan, I. T., Sawada, H., & Ramo, D. M. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.033110 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Improving Quantum Computation by Optimized Qubit Routing
Wagner, F., Bärmann, A., Liers, F., & Weissenbäck, M. (2023) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10957-023-02229-w · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Graphical structures for design and verification of quantum error correction
Chancellor, N., Kissinger, A., Zohren, S., Roffe, J., & Horsman, D. C. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acf157 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sivarajah, S., Dilkes, S., Cowtan, A., Simmons, W., Edgington, A., & Duncan, R.
- Affiliations
- Cambridge Quantum Computing (United Kingdom) (GB)
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sivarajah, Seyon
- Dilkes, Silas
- Cowtan, Alexander
- Simmons, Will
- Edgington, Alec
- Duncan, Ross
- Venue
- Quantum Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2020-11-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 014003
- ISSN
- 2058-9565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3013348036
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 69 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 16 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 20.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Quantum Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- quantum compiler, NISQ devices, quantum circuit optimization, qubit routing, noise mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review