CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 16

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset

Wang, Lucy Lu, Lo, Kyle, Chandrasekhar, Yoganand, Reas, Russell, Yang, Jiangjiang, Burdick, Doug, Eide, Darrin, Funk, Kathryn, Katsis, Yannis, Kinney, Rodney, Li, Yunyao, Liu, Ziyang, Merrill, William, Mooney, Paul, Murdick, Dewey, Rishi, Devvret, Sheehan, Jerry, Shen, Zhihong, Stilson, Brandon, Wade, Alex, Wang, Kuansan, Wang, Nancy Xin Ru, Wilhelm, Chris, Xie, Boya, Raymond, Douglas, Weld, Daniel S., Etzioni, Oren, Kohlmeier, Sebastian·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2004.10706arXiv 2004.10706
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (CORD-19) is a growing resource of scientific papers on COVID-19 and related historical coronavirus research. CORD-19 is designed to facilitate the development of text mining and information retrieval systems over its rich collection of metadata and structured full text papers. Since its release, CORD-19 has been downloaded over 200K times and has served as the basis of many COVID-19 text mining and discovery systems. In this article, we describe the mechanics of dataset construction, highlighting challenges and key design decisions, provide an overview of how CORD-19 has been used, and describe several shared tasks built around the dataset. We hope this resource will continue to bring together the computing community, biomedical experts, and policy makers in the search for effective treatments and management policies for COVID-19.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2004.10706

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Sabber Ahamed and Manar D. Samad. 2020. Informa- tion mining for covid-19 research from a large vol- ume of scientific literature. ArXiv, abs/2004.02085. · arXiv
  2. Q. Chen, Y. Peng, and Z. Lu. 2019. Biosentvec: cre- ating sentence embeddings for biomedical texts. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), pages 1-5.
  3. Arman Cohan, Sergey Feldman, Iz Beltagy, Doug Downey, and Daniel S. Weld. 2020. Specter: Document-level representation learning using citation-informed transformers. In ACL.
  4. Radu Crisan-Dabija, Cristina Grigorescu, Cristina Al- ice Pavel, Bogdan Artene, Iolanda Valentina Popa, Andrei Cernomaz, and Alexandru Burlacu. 2020. Tuberculosis and covid-19 in 2020: lessons from the past viral outbreaks and possible future outcomes. medRxiv. · DOI
  5. Luis Espinosa-Anke and Steven Schockaert. 2018. SeVeN: Augmenting word embeddings with unsu- pervised relation vectors. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguis- tics, pages 2653-2665, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  6. M. Fathi, Khatoon Vakili, Fatemeh Sayehmiri, Abdol- rahman Mohamadkhani, M. Hajiesmaeili, Mostafa Rezaei-Tavirani, and Owrang Eilami. 2020. Prog- nostic value of comormidity for severity of covid- 19: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. In medRxiv.
  7. Yang Han, Victor O.K. Li, Jacqueline C.K. Lam, Peiyang Guo, Ruiqiao Bai, and Wilton W.T. Fok. 2020. Who is more susceptible to covid-19 infec- tion and mortality in the states? medRxiv. · DOI
  8. Torsten Hothorn, Marie-Charlotte Bopp, H. F. Guen- thard, Olivia Keiser, Michel Roelens, Caroline E Weibull, and Michael J Crowther. 2020. Rela- tive coronavirus disease 2019 mortality: A swiss population-based study. In medRxiv.
  9. Shubhi Kaushik, Scott I. Aydin, Kim R. Derespina, Pre- rna Bansal, Shanna Kowalsky, Rebecca Trachtman, Jennifer K. Gillen, Michelle M. Perez, Sara H. Sosh- nick, Edward E. Conway, Asher Bercow, Howard S. Seiden, Robert H Pass, Henry Michael Ushay, George OforiAmanfo, and Shivanand S Medar. 2020. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in chil- dren (mis-c) associated with sars-cov-2 infection: A multi-institutional study from new york city. The Journal of Pediatrics.
  10. Yuxiao Liang and Pengtao Xie. 2020. Identifying ra- diological findings related to covid-19 from medical literature. ArXiv, abs/2004.01862. · arXiv
  11. Ryan McDonald, Georgios-Ioannis Brokos, and Ion Androutsopoulos. 2018. Deep relevance ranking using enhanced document-query interactions. In EMNLP.
  12. Mark Neumann, Daniel King, Iz Beltagy, and Waleed Ammar. 2019. ScispaCy: Fast and robust models for biomedical natural language processing. In Pro- ceedings of the 18th BioNLP Workshop and Shared Task, pages 319-327, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  13. Iolanda Valentina Popa, Mircea Diculescu, Catalina Mihai, Cristina Cijevschi-Prelipcean, and Alexandru Burlacu. 2020. Covid-19 and inflammatory bowel diseases: risk assessment, shared molecular path- ways and therapeutic challenges. medRxiv. · DOI
  14. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence- BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT- networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natu- ral Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 3982-3992, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Kirk Roberts, Tasmeer Alam, Steven Bedrick, Dina Demner-Fushman, Kyle Lo, Ian Soboroff, Ellen Voorhees, Lucy Lu Wang, and William R Hersh. 2020. TREC-COVID: Rationale and Structure of an Information Retrieval Shared Task for COVID- 19. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Ocaa091. · DOI
  16. Minjoon Seo, Jinhyuk Lee, Tom Kwiatkowski, Ankur Parikh, Ali Farhadi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2019. Real-time open-domain question answering with dense-sparse phrase index. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics, pages 4430-4441, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  17. Zhihong Shen, Hao Ma, and Kuansan Wang. 2018. A web-scale system for scientific knowledge explo- ration. In Proceedings of ACL 2018, System Demon- strations, pages 87-92, Melbourne, Australia. Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  18. Ellen Voorhees, Tasmeer Alam, Steven Bedrick, Dina Demner-Fushman, William R Hersh, Kyle Lo, Kirk Roberts, Ian Soboroff, and Lucy Lu Wang. 2020. TREC-COVID: Constructing a pandemic informa- tion retrieval test collection. SIGIR Forum, 54.
  19. Kuansan Wang, Zhihong Shen, Chiyuan Huang, Chieh- Han Wu, Yuxiao Dong, and Anshul Kanakia. 2020. Microsoft academic graph: When experts are not enough. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1):396- 413.
  20. Kuansan Wang, Zhihong Shen, Chiyuan Huang, Chieh- Han Wu, Darrin Eide, Yuxiao Dong, Junjie Qian, Anshul Kanakia, Alvin Chen, and Richard Rogahn. 2019. A review of microsoft academic services for science of science studies. Frontiers in Big Data, 2.
  21. Xuan Wang, Xiangchen Song, Yingjun Guan, Bangzheng Li, and Jiawei Han. 2020. Compre- hensive named entity recognition on cord-19 with distant or weak supervision. ArXiv, abs/2003.12218. · arXiv
  22. Leigh Weston, Vahe Tshitoyan, John Dagdelen, Olga Kononova, Kristin Persson, Gerbrand Ceder, and Anubhav Jain. 2019. Named Entity Recognition and Normalization Applied to Large-Scale Information Extraction from the Materials Science Literature. · DOI
  23. Sally Yaacoub, Holger J Schünemann, Joanne Khabsa, Amena El-Harakeh, Assem M Khamis, Fatimah Chamseddine, Rayane El Khoury, Zahra Saad, Layal Hneiny, Carlos Cuello Garcia, Giovanna Elsa Ute Muti-Schünemann, Antonio Bognanni, Chen Chen, Guang Chen, Yuan Zhang, Hong Zhao, Pierre Abi Hanna, Mark Loeb, Thomas Piggott, Marge Reinap, Nesrine Rizk, Rosa Stalteri, Stephanie Duda, Karla Solo, Derek K Chu, and Elie A Akl. 2020. Safe management of bodies of deceased per- sons with suspected or confirmed covid-19: a rapid systematic review. BMJ Global Health, 5(5). · DOI
  24. Xinyi Zheng, Doug Burdick, Lucian Popa, and Xin Ru Nancy Wang. 2020. Global table extractor (gte): A framework for joint table identification and cell structure recognition using visual context. ArXiv, abs/2005.00589. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L. L., Lo, K., Chandrasekhar, Y., Reas, R., Yang, J., Burdick, D., Eide, D., Funk, K., Katsis, Y., Kinney, R., Li, Y., Liu, Z., Merrill, W., Mooney, P., Murdick, D., Rishi, D., Sheehan, J., Shen, Z., Stilson, B., Wade, A., Wang, K., Wang, N. X. R., Wilhelm, C., Xie, B., Raymond, D., Weld, D. S., Etzioni, O., & Kohlmeier, S.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2004.10706
arXiv
2004.10706
References
11
Type
Preprint
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review