The DOI matches its DataCite record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection
Open accessAbstract
There are a huge number of features which are said to improve Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) accuracy. Practical testing of combinations of such features on large datasets, and theoretical justification of the result, is required. Some features operate on certain models exclusively and for certain problems exclusively, or only for small-scale datasets; while some features, such as batch-normalization and residual-connections, are applicable to the majority of models, tasks, and datasets. We assume that such universal features include Weighted-Residual-Connections (WRC), Cross-Stage-Partial-connections (CSP), Cross mini-Batch Normalization (CmBN), Self-adversarial-training (SAT) and Mish-activation. We use new features: WRC, CSP, CmBN, SAT, Mish activation, Mosaic data augmentation, CmBN, DropBlock regularization, and CIoU loss, and combine some of them to achieve state-of-the-art results: 43.5% AP (65.7% AP50) for the MS COCO dataset at a realtime speed of ~65 FPS on Tesla V100. Source code is at https://github.com/AlexeyAB/darknet
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This version is faster and more accurate than all the previous versions.”
From Object detection using YOLO: challenges, architectural successors, datasets and applications (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In general, the analyses show that the YOLO family [52,71,104,112] of network architectures and MobileNet and its derivative-based [40,53] and EfficientNet-Lite [56] backbones are very suitable for deployment with a lower number of parameters while retaining higher performance.”
From A survey on deep learning-based monocular spacecraft pose estimation: Current state, limitations and prospects (2023) · cites this paper as [71]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When applying the proposed quantization method to representative one-stage object detectors, You Only Look Once v3 and v4 (YOLOv3 and YOLOv4), detection accuracy similar to the original networks ( i.e. , YOLOv3 and YOLOv4) with a single-precision oating-point format (32-bit) is maintained despite expressing weights with only about 20% of the bits compared to a single-precision oating-point”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The latest version introduces significant improvements in architecture and training methods, making it versatile choice for a wide range of computer vision tasks, especially in complex and dynamic environments like public transport vehicles [69,76].”
From A Review of Passenger Counting in Public Transport Concepts with Solution Proposal Based on Image Processing and Machine Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [76]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Based on the latest object detection network YOLOV4 [19] in the YOLO series, the proposed Edge YOLO is more suitable for edge computing scenarios based on 5G for traffic safety monitoring and driving assistance.”
From Edge YOLO: Real-Time Intelligent Object Detection System Based on Edge-Cloud Cooperation in Autonomous Vehicles (2022) · cites this paper as [19]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the YOLO series models v2-v5 [144-147] are some of the most advanced object detection methods based on DNN, which have good performance in terms of speed and precision.”
From A survey of model compression strategies for object detection (2023) · cites this paper as [147]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The OD approaches most explored seem to be those that emerged from the beginning (year 2015) such as YOLO versions [23-26], SSD [27], and Faster R-CNN [33].”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Authors of YOLOv4 [36], introduced a plethora of advanced techniques and sophisticated methodologies, distinguishing YOLOv4 as a faster and more accurate object detector tailored for production systems compared to its predecessors.”
From YOLOv1 to v8: Unveiling Each Variant–A Comprehensive Review of YOLO (2024) · cites this paper as [36]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The hierarchical design and the shifted window approach also prove beneficial for all-MLP architectures.”
From Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows (2021) · cites this paper as [61]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In particular, through the comparison result with Gaussian YOLOv3-tiny [13], which enhances the accuracy of a small-scale network, it can be seen that effectively reducing the size of a large-scale network is more ef cient than improving the performance of a smallscale network.”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [16][16] Golnaz Ghiasi, Tsung-Yi Lin, and Quoc V Le. DropBlock: Aregularization method for convolutional networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) , pages 10727-10737, 2018. 3 -
- [18][18] Ross Girshick. Fast R-CNN. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages 1440-1448, 2015. 2 -
- [20][20] Jianyuan Guo, Kai Han, Yunhe Wang, Chao Zhang, Zhaohui Yang, Han Wu, Xinghao Chen, and Chang Xu. HitDetector: Hierarchical trinity architecture search for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2020. 2 -
- [23][23] Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Doll´ ar, and Ross Girshick. Mask R-CNN. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages 2961-2969, 2017. 2 -
- [53][53] Ningning Ma, Xiangyu Zhang, Hai-Tao Zheng, and Jian Sun. ShuffleNetV2: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pages 116-131, 2018. 2 -
- [54][54] Andrew L Maas, Awni Y Hannun, and Andrew Y Ng. Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , volume 30, page 3, 2013. 4 -
- [55][55] Diganta Misra. Mish: A self regularized nonmonotonic neural activation function. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08681 , 2019. 4 - · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., & Guo, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00986 · Cited by 35,534
YOLOv7: Trainable Bag-of-Freebies Sets New State-of-the-Art for Real-Time Object Detectors
Wang, C.-Y., Bochkovskiy, A., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00721 · Cited by 13,198
Self-citationYOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors
Wang, C.-Y., Bochkovskiy, A., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.02696 · Cited by 13,205
Self-citationDETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detection
Zhao, Y., Lv, W., Xu, S., Wei, J., Wang, G., Dang, Q., Liu, Y., & Chen, J. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01605 · Cited by 5,020
“YOLO detectors can be classified into two categories: anchor-based [1, 10, 14, 24, 27, 28, 34, 35] and anchor-free [9, 11, 15, 37], which achieve a reasonable trade-off between speed and accuracy and are widely used in various practical scenarios.”
BackgroundMethodObject Detection in 20 Years: A Survey
Zou, Z., Chen, K., Shi, Z., Guo, Y., & Ye, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2023.3238524 · Cited by 3,689
“YOLO’s subsequent versions [21], [22], [51] and the latter proposed SSD [23] have paid more attention to this problem.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.-Y., & Liao, H.-Y. M.
- Affiliations
- Academia Sinica (TW)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2004.10934
- OpenAlex
- W3018757597
- Cited by
- 10,307
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 251 · 2025: 1093 · 2024: 2124 · 2023: 2621 · 2022: 2229 · 2021: 1681 · 2020: 307
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- YOLOv4, object detection, real-time detection, Mish activation function, Mosaic data augmentation, CIoU loss, dark web, MS COCO
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
