YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement
Open accessAbstract
We present some updates to YOLO! We made a bunch of little design changes to make it better. We also trained this new network that's pretty swell. It's a little bigger than last time but more accurate. It's still fast though, don't worry. At 320x320 YOLOv3 runs in 22 ms at 28.2 mAP, as accurate as SSD but three times faster. When we look at the old .5 IOU mAP detection metric YOLOv3 is quite good. It achieves 57.9 mAP@50 in 51 ms on a Titan X, compared to 57.5 mAP@50 in 198 ms by RetinaNet, similar performance but 3.8x faster. As always, all the code is online at https://pjreddie.com/yolo/
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EfficientDet-D7 outperforms the previous best detector by 4 AP while being 2.7x smaller and using 7.4x fewer FLOPs.
“outperforming previous best detector [45] by 4 AP while being 2.7x smaller and using 7.4x fewer FLOPs.”
From EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation identifies YOLOv3 as the “previous best detector,” but Section 3 (p. 3) says YOLOv3 was “quite a bit behind” RetinaNet on COCO AP. The paper also does not report the EfficientDet-D7 comparison or its quoted size and FLOP ratios. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe YOLO family, MobileNet and its derivative-based backbones, and EfficientNet-Lite backbones are very suitable for deployment with a lower number of parameters while retaining higher performance.
“In general, the analyses show that the YOLO family [52,71,104,112] of network architectures and MobileNet and its derivative-based [40,53] and EfficientNet-Lite [56] backbones are very suitable for deployment with a lower number of parameters while retaining higher performance.”
From A survey on deep learning-based monocular spacecraft pose estimation: Current state, limitations and prospects (2023) · cites this paper as [104]
Section 3 (p. 3) reports that YOLOv3 is faster than several detection systems while retaining strong AP50 performance. Section 2.4 (p. 3) reports fewer floating-point operations for its Darknet-53 backbone than for compared ResNets, but neither passage establishes a lower parameter count or deployment suitability for the YOLO family as a whole. The MobileNet and EfficientNet-Lite claims have separate citations and are not assessed against this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLater, CE loss is typically used for classification in object detection.
“Later, CE loss (CrossEntropy) is typically used [21, 23, 47].”
From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
Section 2.2, “Class Prediction” (p. 2), says YOLOv3 uses binary cross-entropy loss for class predictions, supporting its use for classification in an object detector. The passage describes YOLOv3 specifically; it does not establish that cross-entropy loss is typically used across object detection. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOn relatively low-accuracy regime, EfficientDet-D0 achieves similar accuracy as YOLOv3 with 28x fewer FLOPs.
“On relatively low-accuracy regime, our EfficientDet-D0 achieves similar accuracy as YOLOv3 with 28x fewer FLOPs.”
From EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
The Abstract (p. 1) reports YOLOv3’s accuracy, including 28.2 mAP at 320 × 320, which supports its use as an accuracy baseline. The paper does not report EfficientDet-D0’s accuracy or FLOPs, so it cannot substantiate the claimed similar accuracy or 28-fold FLOP difference. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWhen applied to YOLOv3 and YOLOv4 on COCO, the proposed quantization method maintains detection accuracy similar to the original 32-bit floating-point networks while expressing weights with only about 20% of the bits (approximately 80% weight parameter reduction), with a negligible decrease in mAP.
“When applying the proposed quantization method to representative one-stage object detectors, You Only Look Once v3 and v4 (YOLOv3 and YOLOv4), detection accuracy similar to the original networks ( i.e. , YOLOv3 and YOLOv4) with a single-precision oating-point format (32-bit) is maintained despite expressing weights with only about 20% of the bits compared to a single-precision oating-point”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
YOLOv3 addressed shortcomings of predecessors by rectifying localisation errors and optimising detection efficiency for smaller objects.
“YOLOv3 [33], addressed the shortcomings observed in its predecessors by concentrating on rectifying localisation errors and optimising detection efficiency, particularly for smaller objects.”
From YOLOv1 to v8: Unveiling Each Variant–A Comprehensive Review of YOLO (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Section 3 (p. 3) reports that YOLOv3 is fast and that multi-scale predictions reversed earlier poor performance on small objects. It does not support the claim that YOLOv3 rectified localisation errors: the same section says its performance drops at higher IoU thresholds because it struggles to align boxes precisely with objects. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredYOLO v3 is trained and evaluated on COCO and provides improved performance.
“The third version of YOLO tries to overcome aforementioned drawbacks and provides an efficient way for detecting objects with an improved performance while trained and evaluated on the COCO dataset [55].”
From Object detection using YOLO: challenges, architectural successors, datasets and applications (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
Under a similar accuracy constraint, EfficientDet uses 28x fewer FLOPs than YOLOv3, 30x fewer FLOPs than RetinaNet, and 19x fewer FLOPs than ResNet-based NAS-FPN.
“Under similar accuracy constraint, our EfficientDet uses 28x fewer FLOPs than YOLOv3 [34], 30x fewer FLOPs than RetinaNet [24], and 19x fewer FLOPs than the recent ResNet based NAS-FPN [10].”
From EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
On high-accuracy regime, EfficientDet consistently outperforms recent object detectors [10, 45] with much fewer parameters and FLOPs.
“On high-accuracy regime, our EfficientDet also consistently outperforms recent object detectors [10, 45] with much fewer parameters and FLOPs.”
From EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [45]
YOLO series models v2-v5 are some of the most advanced object detection methods based on DNN, which have good performance in terms of speed and precision.
“the YOLO series models v2-v5 [144-147] are some of the most advanced object detection methods based on DNN, which have good performance in terms of speed and precision.”
From A survey of model compression strategies for object detection (2023) · cites this paper as [146]
The proposed technique can be easily applied to various object detectors including YOLOv3 and YOLOv4.
“The proposed technique can be easily applied to various object detectors including YOLOv3 [10] and YOLOv4 [11].”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
The proposed technique can be easily applied to various object detectors including YOLOv3 and YOLOv4.
“The proposed technique can be easily applied to various object detectors including YOLOv3 [10] and YOLOv4 [11].”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
[73] used Faster R-CNN and YOLOv3 to detect cars for traffic monitoring purpose.
“Moreover, [73] used Faster R-CNN [84] and YOLOv3 [25] to detect cars for traffic monitoring purpose.”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [25]
Results of ISPDM increased over base YOLOv3, Faster R-CNN, and SSD frameworks.
“Results increased over base YOLOv3 [25], Faster R-CNN [84] and SSD [82] frameworks.”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [25]
The SA-CF strategy provides scarce performance when compared with SSD, YOLO9000, and YOLOv3 frameworks.
“Nonetheless, this strategy provides scarce performance when compared with SSD [82], You Only Look Once (YOLO)9000 [83], and YOLOv3 [25] frameworks.”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [25]
The object detection approaches most explored seem to be those that emerged from the beginning (year 2015) such as YOLO versions, SSD, and Faster R-CNN.
“The OD approaches most explored seem to be those that emerged from the beginning (year 2015) such as YOLO versions [23-26], SSD [27], and Faster R-CNN [33].”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
YOLO V3 offers a good equilibrium between speed and accuracy and can detect objects at three different scales.
“Compared to other algorithms, YOLO V3 offers a good equilibrium between speed and accuracy and can detect objects at three different scales.”
From Edge-Computing Video Analytics for Real-Time Traffic Monitoring in a Smart City (2019) · cites this paper as [37]
The latest AmoebaNet-based NAS-FPN detector requires 167M parameters and 3045B FLOPs, 30x more than RetinaNet, to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy.
“For example, the latest AmoebaNet-based NASFPN detector [45] requires 167M parameters and 3045B FLOPs (30x more than RetinaNet [24]) to achieve state-ofthe-art accuracy.”
From EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [45]
The comparison table in §4 (p. 3) reports RetinaNet accuracy, and the Abstract (p. 1) compares RetinaNet’s speed with YOLOv3. Searches for AmoebaNet, NAS-FPN, 167M parameters, and 3045B FLOPs found no passage addressing the claimed detector or its 30× FLOP comparison. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCompared to YOLOv3-tiny, Gaussian YOLOv3-tiny, and Nayak et al., the weight size of the proposed network is approximately one-third larger, but the mAP of the proposed network is higher by 21.42, 15.22, and 26.43, respectively.
“Compared to YOLOv3-tiny [10], Gaussian YOLOv3-tiny [13], and Nayak et al. [41], the weight size of the proposed network is approximately one-third larger, but the mAP of the proposed network is much higher than that of YOLOv3-tiny [10], Gaussian YOLOv3-tiny [13], and Nayak et al. [41] by 21.42, 15.22, and 26.43, respectively.”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
The Abstract (p. 1) reports results for YOLOv3, and the performance discussion (p. 3) compares YOLOv3 with other detectors. Searches for YOLOv3-tiny, model weight size, and the stated mAP differences found no passage addressing the cited YOLOv3-tiny comparison. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHigh dimensional images like X-rays and CT images can be detected by 3D CNN.
“In addition, high dimensional images, like X-rays and CT images, can be detected by 3D CNN.”
From A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [156]
Section 2.3 (p. 2) describes YOLOv3 predicting bounding boxes with a three-dimensional output tensor, not a 3D CNN processing medical images. Searches for X-rays, CT images, and volumetric or 3D convolution found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredYOLOv3's design is promising regarding the detection of smaller objects compared to its predecessors.
“We evaluate its latest extension YOLOv3 [34], as in comparison with its predecessors, its design is promising regarding the detection of smaller objects.”
From EuroCity Persons: A Novel Benchmark for Person Detection in Traffic Scenes (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196 · see citing works
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., & Dollár, P. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.02002 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- [2][2] M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. International journal of computer vision , 88(2):303338, 2010. 6 -
- [3][3] C.-Y. Fu, W. Liu, A. Ranga, A. Tyagi, and A. C. Berg. Dssd: Deconvolutional single shot detector. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06659 , 2017. 3 - · arXiv
- [4][4] D. Gordon, A. Kembhavi, M. Rastegari, J. Redmon, D. Fox, and A. Farhadi. Iqa: Visual question answering in interactive environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.03316 , 2017. 1 - · arXiv
- [8][8] T.-Y. Lin, P. Dollar, R. Girshick, K. He, B. Hariharan, and S. Belongie. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 2117-2125, 2017. 2, 3 -
- [10][10] T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Doll´ ar, and C. L. Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European conference on computer vision , pages 740-755. Springer, 2014. 2 -
- [11][11] W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.Y. Fu, and A. C. Berg. Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. In European conference on computer vision , pages 21-37. Springer, 2016. 3 -
- [15][15] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi. Yolo9000: Better, faster, stronger. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017 IEEE Conference on , pages 6517-6525. IEEE, 2017. 1, 2, 3 -
- [16][16] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi. Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv , 2018. 4 -
- [17][17] S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.01497 , 2015. 2 - · arXiv
- [18][18] O. Russakovsky, L.-J. Li, and L. Fei-Fei. Best of both worlds: human-machine collaboration for object annotation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 2121-2131, 2015. 4 -
- [20][20] A. Shrivastava, R. Sukthankar, J. Malik, and A. Gupta. Beyond skip connections: Top-down modulation for object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.06851 , 2016. 3 - · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
YOLOv7: Trainable Bag-of-Freebies Sets New State-of-the-Art for Real-Time Object Detectors
Wang, C.-Y., Bochkovskiy, A., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00721 · Cited by 13,198 · see citing works
“Another real-time object detectors are developed for GPU [20, 79, 94], they mostly use ResNet [25], DarkNet [60], or DLA [85], and then use the CSPNet [77] strategy to optimize the architecture.”
MethodYOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection
Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.-Y., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.10934 · Cited by 10,307 · see citing works
FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detection
Tian, Z., Shen, C., Chen, H., & He, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00972 · Cited by 7,013 · see citing works
Generalized Intersection Over Union: A Metric and a Loss for Bounding Box Regression
Rezatofighi, H., Tsoi, N., Gwak, J., Sadeghian, A., Reid, I., & Savarese, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00075 · Cited by 6,612 · see citing works
A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospects
Li, Z., Liu, F., Yang, W., Peng, S., & Zhou, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3084827 · Cited by 5,273 · see citing works
CSPNet: A New Backbone that can Enhance Learning Capability of CNN
Wang, C.-Y., Mark Liao, H.-Y., Wu, Y.-H., Chen, P.-Y., Hsieh, J.-W., & Yeh, I.-H. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00203 · Cited by 5,265 · see citing works
DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detection
Zhao, Y., Lv, W., Xu, S., Wei, J., Wang, G., Dang, Q., Liu, Y., & Chen, J. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01605 · Cited by 5,020 · see citing works
Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey
Zou, Z., Chen, K., Shi, Z., Guo, Y., & Ye, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2023.3238524 · Cited by 3,689 · see citing works
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 2,720 · see citing works
“Choi et al. [153] proposed a Gaussian-based model to predict the localization uncertainty in YOLOv3 [154].”
SemanticKITTI: A Dataset for Semantic Scene Understanding of LiDAR Sequences
Behley, J., Garbade, M., Milioto, A., Quenzel, J., Behnke, S., Stachniss, C., & Gall, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00939 · Cited by 2,294 · see citing works
Object detection in optical remote sensing images: A survey and a new benchmark
Li, K., Wan, G., Cheng, G., Meng, L., & Han, J. (2020) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.023 · Cited by 2,317 · see citing works
A Survey of Autonomous Driving: <i>Common Practices and Emerging Technologies</i>
Yurtsever, E., Lambert, J., Carballo, A., & Takeda, K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2983149 · Cited by 1,889 · see citing works
“More recent versions of this method, YOLOv2, YOLO9000 [137] and YOLOv3 [123] briefly took over the PASCAL VOC and MS COCO benchmarks while maintaining low computation and memory cost.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving
Grigorescu, S., Trasnea, B., Cocias, T., & Macesanu, G. (2020) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21918 · Cited by 1,809 · see citing works
YOLOv6: A Single-Stage Object Detection Framework for Industrial Applications
Li, C., Li, L., Jiang, H., Weng, K., Geng, Y., Li, L., Ke, Z., Li, Q., Cheng, M., Nie, W., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.02976 · Cited by 1,792 · see citing works
Object detection using YOLO: challenges, architectural successors, datasets and applications
Diwan, T., Anirudh, G., & Tembhurne, J. V. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13644-y · Cited by 1,549 · see citing works
Detection and tracking meet drones challenge
Zhu, P., Wen, L., Du, D., Bian, X., Fan, H., Hu, Q., & Ling, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3119563 · Cited by 1,336 · see citing works
RepPoints: Point Set Representation for Object Detection
Yang, Z., Liu, S., Hu, H., Wang, L., & Lin, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00975 · Cited by 1,307 · see citing works
StrongSORT: Make DeepSORT Great Again
Du, Y., Zhao, Z., Song, Y., Zhao, Y., Su, F., Gong, T., & Meng, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2023.3240881 · Cited by 1,191 · see citing works
“…[60, 3, 55, 4, 32, 21] follow the tracking-by-detection paradigm, which localizes targets first and then associates them with information on appearance, motion, etc. Benefiting from the rapid development of object detection [39, 38, 18], separate trackers have been widely applied in MOT tasks.”
Bottom-Up Object Detection by Grouping Extreme and Center Points
Zhou, X., Zhuo, J., & Krahenbuhl, P. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00094 · Cited by 1,088 · see citing works
Conditional DETR for Fast Training Convergence
Meng, D., Chen, X., Fan, Z., Zeng, G., Li, H., Yuan, Y., Sun, L., & Wang, J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00363 · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
DN-DETR: Accelerate DETR Training by Introducing Query DeNoising
Li, F., Zhang, H., Liu, S., Guo, J., Ni, L. M., & Zhang, L. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01325 · Cited by 1,102 · see citing works
Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regression
Zheng, Z., Wang, P., Liu, W., Li, J., Ye, R., & Ren, D. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.08287 · Cited by 5,313 · see citing works
DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection
Zhang, H., Li, F., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Su, H., Zhu, J., Ni, L. M., & Shum, H.-Y. (2022) · arXiv · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
“One-stage models such as YOLO v2 [28] and YOLO v3 [29] directly output offsets relative to predefined anchors.”
MethodUA-DETRAC: A New Benchmark and Protocol for Multi-Object Detection and Tracking
Wen, L., Du, D., Cai, Z., Lei, Z., Chang, M.-C., Qi, H., Lim, J., Yang, M.-H., & Lyu, S. (2020) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2020.102907 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Objects365: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Dataset for Object Detection
Shao, S., Li, Z., Zhang, T., Peng, C., Yu, G., Zhang, X., Li, J., & Sun, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00852 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
Deep learning in video multi-object tracking: A survey
Ciaparrone, G., Luque Sánchez, F., Tabik, S., Troiano, L., Tagliaferri, R., & Herrera, F. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.023 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Ego4D: Around the World in 3,000 Hours of Egocentric Video
Grauman, K., Westbury, A., Byrne, E., Chavis, Z., Furnari, A., Girdhar, R., Hamburger, J., Jiang, H., Liu, M., Liu, X., et al. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01842 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
YOLO-LITE: A Real-Time Object Detection Algorithm Optimized for Non-GPU Computers
Huang, R., Pedoeem, J., & Chen, C. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8621865 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
A review of object detection based on deep learning
Xiao, Y., Tian, Z., Yu, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Du, S., & Lan, X. (2020) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-020-08976-6 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
QueryDet: Cascaded Sparse Query for Accelerating High-Resolution Small Object Detection
Yang, C., Huang, Z., & Wang, N. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01330 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
“Deep Learning based object detection can be mainly divided into two streams: the R-CNN based two-stage detectors [13, 12, 43, 28, 3] and the one-stage detectors [18, 39, 40, 41, 31, 68] pioneered by YOLO and SSD.”
BackgroundMethodEfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection
Tan, M., Pang, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · Cited by 9,841 · see citing works
“32.4 2.5B YOLOv3[26] 33.0 71B(28x) EfficientDet-D1 38.3 6.0B RetinaNet[17] 37.0 97B(16x) MaskRCNN[8] 37.9 149B(25x) EfficientDet-D5 ‡ 49.8 136B AmoebaNet+NAS-FPN[37] ‡ 48.6 1317B(9.7x) EfficientDet-D7 † 51.0 326B AmoebaNet+NAS-FPN[37] †‡ 50.7 3045B(9.3x) † Notplotted, ‡ trainedwithauto-augmentation[37].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialData Augmentation Using Random Image Cropping and Patching for Deep CNNs
Takahashi, R., Matsubara, T., & Uehara, K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2019.2935128 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
YOLOv1 to v8: Unveiling Each Variant–A Comprehensive Review of YOLO
Hussain, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3378568 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
YOLOP: You Only Look Once for Panoptic Driving Perception
Wu, D., Liao, M.-W., Zhang, W.-T., Wang, X.-G., Bai, X., Cheng, W.-Q., & Liu, W.-Y. (2022) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-022-1339-y · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Badgujar, C. M., Poulose, A., & Gan, H. (2024) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2024.109090 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Vision-based vehicle detection and counting system using deep learning in highway scenes
Song, H., Liang, H., Li, H., Dai, Z., & Yun, X. (2019) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1186/s12544-019-0390-4 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
A review on modern defect detection models using DCNNs – Deep convolutional neural networks
Tulbure, A.-A., Tulbure, A.-A., & Dulf, E.-H. (2022) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2021.03.015 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Progressive Domain Adaptation for Object Detection
Hsu, H.-K., Yao, C.-H., Tsai, Y.-H., Hung, W.-C., Tseng, H.-Y., Singh, M., & Yang, M.-H. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv45572.2020.9093358 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Liang, S., Wu, H., Zhen, L., Hua, Q., Garg, S., Kaddoum, G., Hassan, M. M., & Yu, K. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3158253 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learning
Sevilla, J., Heim, L., Ho, A., Besiroglu, T., Hobbhahn, M., & Villalobos, P. (2022) · 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9891914 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Segmentation-Driven 6D Object Pose Estimation
Hu, Y., Hugonot, J., Fua, P., & Salzmann, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00350 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
A comprehensive review on deep learning-based methods for video anomaly detection
Nayak, R., Pati, U. C., & Das, S. K. (2021) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2020.104078 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Complexer-YOLO: Real-Time 3D Object Detection and Tracking on Semantic Point Clouds
Simon, M., Amende, K., Kraus, A., Honer, J., Samann, T., Kaulbersch, H., Milz, S., & Gross, H. M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2019.00158 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
EuroCity Persons: A Novel Benchmark for Person Detection in Traffic Scenes
Braun, M., Krebs, S., Flohr, F., & Gavrila, D. M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2897684 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
End-of-life or second-life options for retired electric vehicle batteries
Zhu, J., Mathews, I., Ren, D., Li, W., Cogswell, D., Xing, B., Sedlatschek, T., Kantareddy, S. N. R., Yi, M., Gao, T., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100537 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Spacecraft pose estimation dataset (speed)
Sharma, S., Park, T. H., & D'Amico, S. (2026) · Stanford Digital Repository · doi:10.25740/dz692fn7184 · Cited by 304
Satellite Pose Estimation Challenge: Dataset, Competition Design, and Results
Kisantal, M., Sharma, S., Park, T. H., Izzo, D., Martens, M., & D'Amico, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.2020.2989063 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Combining EfficientNet and Vision Transformers for Video Deepfake Detection
Coccomini, D. A., Messina, N., Gennaro, C., & Falchi, F. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06433-3_19 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Carranza-García, M., Torres-Mateo, J., Lara-Benítez, P., & García-Gutiérrez, J. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13010089 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence
Sun, Z., Sandoval, L., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Mousavi, S. M., Wang, J., Lin, C., Cristea, N., Tong, D., Carande, W. H., Ma, X., et al. (2022) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
SentiNet: Detecting Localized Universal Attacks Against Deep Learning Systems
Chou, E., Tramer, F., & Pellegrino, G. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) · doi:10.1109/spw50608.2020.00025 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
David, E., Madec, S., Sadeghi-Tehran, P., Aasen, H., Zheng, B., Liu, S., Kirchgessner, N., Ishikawa, G., Nagasawa, K., Badhon, M. A., et al. (2020) · Plant Phenomics · doi:10.34133/2020/3521852 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Video Coding for Machines: A Paradigm of Collaborative Compression and Intelligent Analytics
Duan, L., Liu, J., Yang, W., Huang, T., & Gao, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2020.3016485 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
NAS-FCOS: Fast Neural Architecture Search for Object Detection
Wang, N., Gao, Y., Chen, H., Wang, P., Tian, Z., Shen, C., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01196 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Ke, R., Zhuang, Y., Pu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.2984197 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Auto-FPN: Automatic Network Architecture Adaptation for Object Detection Beyond Classification
Xu, A., Yao, A., Li, A., Liang, A., & Zhang, A. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00675 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Implicit identity leakage: The stumbling block to improving deepfake detection generalization
Dong, S., Wang, J., Ji, R., Liang, J., Fan, H., & Ge, Z. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00389 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Review of the State of the Art of Deep Learning for Plant Diseases: A Broad Analysis and Discussion
Hasan, R. I., Yusuf, S. M., & Alzubaidi, L. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9101302 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
End-to-End Object Detection with Fully Convolutional Network
Wang, J., Song, L., Li, Z., Sun, H., Sun, J., & Zheng, N. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01559 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
“Modern onestage [22, 25, 31, 38, 29, 7] or two-stage detectors [33, 21, 2] heavily rely on the anchors or anchor-based proposals.”
BackgroundMazzia, V., Khaliq, A., Salvetti, F., & Chiaberge, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2964608 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Edge-Computing Video Analytics for Real-Time Traffic Monitoring in a Smart City
Barthélemy, J., Verstaevel, N., Forehead, H., & Perez, P. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19092048 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
IoU-aware single-stage object detector for accurate localization
Wu, S., Li, X., & Wang, X. (2020) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2020.103911 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Attention Mask R-CNN for ship detection and segmentation from remote sensing images
Nie, X., Duan, M., Ding, H., Hu, B., & Wong, E. K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2964540 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning-Based Crack Detection Approaches
Hamishebahar, Y., Guan, H., So, S., & Jo, J. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12031374 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Computer-aided detection of COVID-19 from X-ray images using multi-CNN and Bayesnet classifier
Abraham, B., & Nair, M. S. (2020) · Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2020.08.005 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Bringing ai to edge: from deep learning’s perspective
Liu, D., Kong, H., Luo, X., Liu, W., & Subramaniam, R. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.04.141 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
“To boost the efficiency of object detection on resource-limited devices, some works strive to reduce the computational complexity of backbone part of object detection models, like Tiny-dsod [58] for DSOD [69], Tiny-SSD [59] for SSD [65], and Tiny-YOLO [57] for YOLO.”
BackgroundA survey on deep transfer learning to edge computing for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic
Sufian, A., Ghosh, A., Sadiq, A. S., & Smarandache, F. (2020) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2020.101830 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Improved YOLO-V3 with DenseNet for Multi-Scale Remote Sensing Target Detection
Xu, D., & Wu, Y. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20154276 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Li, W., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2022) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi11070385 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
OpenEI: An Open Framework for Edge Intelligence
Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Lu, S., Liu, L., xu, L., & Shi, W. (2019) · 2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2019.00182 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“Since the algorithms will be deployed on the vehicle, which is a resource-constrained and real-time EC system, the algorithm should consider not only precision but also latency, as the end-to-end deep learning algorithm YOLOv3 [68].”
MethodPyTorchFI: A Runtime Perturbation Tool for DNNs
Mahmoud, A., Aggarwal, N., Nobbe, A., Vicarte, J. R. S., Adve, S. V., Fletcher, C. W., Frosio, I., & Hari, S. K. S. (2020) · 2020 50th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN-W) · doi:10.1109/dsn-w50199.2020.00014 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
T-YOLO: Tiny Vehicle Detection Based on YOLO and Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Networks
Padilla Carrasco, D., Rashwan, H. A., García, M. Á., & Puig, D. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3137638 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Transformer for object detection: Review and benchmark
Li, Y., Miao, N., Ma, L., Shuang, F., & Huang, X. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107021 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Multimodal Sentiment Detection Based on Multi-channel Graph Neural Networks
Yang, X., Feng, S., Zhang, Y., & Wang, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.28 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Melanoma Lesion Detection and Segmentation Using YOLOv4-DarkNet and Active Contour
Albahli, S., Nida, N., Irtaza, A., Yousaf, M. H., & Mahmood, M. T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3035345 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
ATRW: A Benchmark for Amur Tiger Re-identification in the Wild
Li, S., Li, J., Tang, H., Qian, R., & Lin, W. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3394171.3413569 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System
Bisio, I., Garibotto, C., Haleem, H., Lavagetto, F., & Sciarrone, A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207282 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
A deep learning model for steel surface defect detection
Li, Z., Wei, X., Hassaballah, M., Li, Y., & Jiang, X. (2024) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-023-01180-7 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Anchor Box Optimization for Object Detection
Zhong, Y., Wang, J., Peng, J., & Zhang, L. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv45572.2020.9093498 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Characterizing the deployment of deep neural networks on commercial edge devices
Hadidi, R., Cao, J., Xie, Y., Asgari, B., Krishna, T., & Kim, H. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC) · doi:10.1109/iiswc47752.2019.9041955 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
OmniDet: Surround View Cameras Based Multi-Task Visual Perception Network for Autonomous Driving
Ravi Kumar, V., Yogamani, S., Rashed, H., Sitsu, G., Witt, C., Leang, I., Milz, S., & Mader, P. (2021) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3062324 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
“We adapted the YOLOv3 [19] decoder to output polygons and other representations listed above for a uniform comparison.”
MethodLi, Y., Han, Z., Xu, H., Liu, L., Li, X., & Zhang, K. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9183781 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Pauly, L., Rharbaoui, W., Shneider, C., Rathinam, A., Gaudillière, V., & Aouada, D. (2023) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.08.001 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Intelligent Traffic-Monitoring System Based on YOLO and Convolutional Fuzzy Neural Networks
Lin, C.-J., & Jhang, J.-Y. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3147866 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Torney, C. J., Lloyd‐Jones, D. J., Chevallier, M., Moyer, D. C., Maliti, H. T., Mwita, M., Kohi, E. M., & Hopcraft, G. C. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13165 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
PP-PicoDet: A Better Real-Time Object Detector on Mobile Devices
Yu, G., Chang, Q., Lv, W., Xu, C., Cui, C., Ji, W., Dang, Q., Deng, K., Wang, G., Du, Y., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.00902 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“The one-stage object detectors[18, 19, 1, 2, 3, 20, 21, 4] are also anchor-based detectors, which have a better balance between speed and accuracy, thus have been widely used in practice.”
BackgroundDeep learning-based spacecraft relative navigation methods: A survey
Song, J., Rondao, D., & Aouf, N. (2022) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.10.025 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
YOLOv3-DPFIN: A Dual-Path Feature Fusion Neural Network for Robust Real-Time Sonar Target Detection
Kong, W., Hong, J., Jia, M., Yao, J., Cong, W., Hu, H., & Zhang, H. (2020) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2019.2960796 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
YOLOv3 and YOLOv4: Multiple Object Detection for Surveillance Applications
Kumar B., C., Punitha, R., & Mohana (2020) · 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT) · doi:10.1109/icssit48917.2020.9214094 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Simultaneously Detecting and Counting Dense Vehicles From Drone Images
Li, W., Li, H., Wu, Q., Chen, X., & Ngan, K. N. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2019.2899548 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
LiDAR Panoptic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving
Milioto, A., Behley, J., McCool, C., & Stachniss, C. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros45743.2020.9340837 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Device-Circuit-Architecture Co-Exploration for Computing-in-Memory Neural Accelerators
Jiang, W., Lou, Q., Yan, Z., Yang, L., Hu, J., Hu, X. S., & Shi, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2020.2991575 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
A rapid recognition method for electronic components based on the improved yolo-v3 network
Huang, R., Gu, J., Sun, X., Hou, Y., & Uddin, S. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8080825 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Object Detection with Transformers: A Review
Shehzadi, T., Hashmi, K. A., Liwicki, M., Stricker, D., & Afzal, M. Z. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25196025 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Using deep transfer learning to detect scoliosis and spondylolisthesis from x-ray images
Fraiwan, M., Audat, Z., Fraiwan, L., & Manasreh, T. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267851 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Domain-Specific Suppression for Adaptive Object Detection
Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, S., Li, M., Xia, Y., Zhang, X., & Liu, S. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00948 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
An explainable and efficient deep learning framework for video anomaly detection
Wu, C., Shao, S., Tunc, C., Satam, P., & Hariri, S. (2022) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-021-03439-5 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Agents and robots for collaborating and supporting physicians in healthcare scenarios
Lanza, F., Seidita, V., & Chella, A. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103483 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3054879 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“5 presents the mAP results of the original YOLOv4 network [10] and the quantized YOLOv4 network with the various options.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialParking Time Violation Tracking Using YOLOv8 and Tracking Algorithms
Sharma, N., Baral, S., Paing, M. P., & Chawuthai, R. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23135843 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Redmon, J., & Farhadi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- ORCID
- Farhadi, Ali
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1804.02767
- OpenAlex
- W2796347433
- Cited by
- 17,141
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 204 · 2025: 1024 · 2024: 2199 · 2023: 3036 · 2022: 2907 · 2021: 3494 · 2020: 2657 · 2019: 1446 · 2018: 170 · 2017: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- YOLOv3, object detection, real-time detection, Single Shot MultiBox Detector, detection accuracy, inference speed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
