PreprintCited by 106Cybersecurity and Information SystemsSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

6G white paper: Research challenges for trust, security and privacy

Open access
Ylianttila, Mika, Kantola, Raimo, Gurtov, Andrei, Mucchi, Lozenzo, Oppermann, Ian, Yan, Zheng, Nguyen, Tri Hong, Liu, Fei +19 more·2020·arXiv

Abstract

The roles of trust, security and privacy are somewhat interconnected, but different facets of next generation networks. The challenges in creating a trustworthy 6G are multidisciplinary spanning technology, regulation, techno-economics, politics and ethics. This white paper addresses their fundamental research challenges in three key areas. Trust: Under the current "open internet" regulation, the telco cloud can be used for trust services only equally for all users. 6G network must support embedded trust for increased level of information security in 6G. Trust modeling, trust policies and trust mechanisms need to be defined. 6G interlinks physical and digital worlds making safety dependent on information security. Therefore, we need trustworthy 6G. Security: In 6G era, the dependence of the economy and societies on IT and the networks will deepen. The role of IT and the networks in national security keeps rising - a continuation of what we see in 5G. The development towards cloud and edge native infrastructures is expected to continue in 6G networks, and we need holistic 6G network security architecture planning. Security automation opens new questions: machine learning can be used to make safer systems, but also more dangerous attacks. Physical layer security techniques can also represent efficient solutions for securing less investigated network segments as first line of defense. Privacy: There is currently no way to unambiguously determine when linked, deidentified datasets cross the threshold to become personally identifiable. Courts in different parts of the world are making decisions about whether privacy is being infringed, while companies are seeking new ways to exploit private data to create new business revenues. As solution alternatives, we may consider blockchain, distributed ledger technologies and differential privacy approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2004.11665

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ylianttila, M., Kantola, R., Gurtov, A., Mucchi, L., Oppermann, I., Yan, Z., Nguyen, T. H., Liu, F., Hewa, T., Liyanage, M., Ijaz, A., Partala, J., Abbas, R., Hecker, A., Jayousi, S., Martinelli, A., Caputo, S., Bechtold, J., Morales, I., Stoica, A., Abreu, G., Shahabuddin, S., Panayirci, E., Haas, H., Kumar, T., Ozparlak, B. O., & Röning, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3020735853
Cited by
106
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cybersecurity and Information Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
6G, network trust, network security, privacy, trust model, trust policies, network security architecture, security automation, machine learning security, physical layer security, personally identifiable information, de-identified data, blockchain, distributed ledger technology, differential privacy, national security, techno-economic analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review