6G white paper: Research challenges for trust, security and privacy
Open accessAbstract
The roles of trust, security and privacy are somewhat interconnected, but different facets of next generation networks. The challenges in creating a trustworthy 6G are multidisciplinary spanning technology, regulation, techno-economics, politics and ethics. This white paper addresses their fundamental research challenges in three key areas. Trust: Under the current "open internet" regulation, the telco cloud can be used for trust services only equally for all users. 6G network must support embedded trust for increased level of information security in 6G. Trust modeling, trust policies and trust mechanisms need to be defined. 6G interlinks physical and digital worlds making safety dependent on information security. Therefore, we need trustworthy 6G. Security: In 6G era, the dependence of the economy and societies on IT and the networks will deepen. The role of IT and the networks in national security keeps rising - a continuation of what we see in 5G. The development towards cloud and edge native infrastructures is expected to continue in 6G networks, and we need holistic 6G network security architecture planning. Security automation opens new questions: machine learning can be used to make safer systems, but also more dangerous attacks. Physical layer security techniques can also represent efficient solutions for securing less investigated network segments as first line of defense. Privacy: There is currently no way to unambiguously determine when linked, deidentified datasets cross the threshold to become personally identifiable. Courts in different parts of the world are making decisions about whether privacy is being infringed, while companies are seeking new ways to exploit private data to create new business revenues. As solution alternatives, we may consider blockchain, distributed ledger technologies and differential privacy approaches.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exploring the integration of edge computing units in vehicles proves beneficial for handling computation-intensive tasks and minimizing latency.
“Exploring the integration of edge computing units in vehicles proves beneficial for handling computation-intensive tasks and minimizing latency.”
From Towards 6G V2X Sidelink: Survey of Resource Allocation—Mathematical Formulations, Challenges, and Proposed Solutions (2024) · cites this paper as [141]
Cites
A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problems
Saad, W., Bennis, M., & Chen, M. (2020) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.001.1900287 · Cited by 4,985 · see citing works
NTRU: A ring-based public key cryptosystem
Hoffstein, J., Pipher, J., & Silverman, J. H. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054868 · Cited by 1,947 · see citing works
A Survey on quantum computing technology
Gyongyosi, L., & Imre, S. (2019) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2018.11.002 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Security and Privacy for 6G: A Survey on Prospective Technologies and Challenges
Nguyen, V.-L., Lin, P.-C., Cheng, B.-C., Hwang, R.-H., & Lin, Y.-D. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3108618 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Annu, & Rajalakshmi, P. (2024) · IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/ojvt.2024.3368240 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ylianttila, M., Kantola, R., Gurtov, A., Mucchi, L., Oppermann, I., Yan, Z., Nguyen, T. H., Liu, F., Hewa, T., Liyanage, M., Ijaz, A., Partala, J., Abbas, R., Hecker, A., Jayousi, S., Martinelli, A., Caputo, S., Bechtold, J., Morales, I., Stoica, A., Abreu, G., Shahabuddin, S., Panayirci, E., Haas, H., Kumar, T., Ozparlak, B. O., & Röning, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oulu (FI)
- Linköping University (SE)
- University of Florence (IT)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2004.11665
- OpenAlex
- W3020735853
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cybersecurity and Information Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- 6G, network trust, network security, privacy, trust model, trust policies, network security architecture, security automation, machine learning security, physical layer security, personally identifiable information, de-identified data, blockchain, distributed ledger technology, differential privacy, national security, techno-economic analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review