CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 118IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GAdvanced Data and IoT Technologies

6G White Paper on Edge Intelligence

Open access
Peltonen, Ella, Bennis, Mehdi, Capobianco, Michele, Debbah, Merouane, Ding, Aaron, Gil-Castiñeira, Felipe, Jurmu, Marko, Karvonen, Teemu +11 more·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2004.14850arXiv 2004.14850
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this white paper we provide a vision for 6G Edge Intelligence. Moving towards 5G and beyond the future 6G networks, intelligent solutions utilizing data-driven machine learning and artificial intelligence become crucial for several real-world applications including but not limited to, more efficient manufacturing, novel personal smart device environments and experiences, urban computing and autonomous traffic settings. We present edge computing along with other 6G enablers as a key component to establish the future 2030 intelligent Internet technologies as shown in this series of 6G White Papers. In this white paper, we focus in the domains of edge computing infrastructure and platforms, data and edge network management, software development for edge, and real-time and distributed training of ML/AI algorithms, along with security, privacy, pricing, and end-user aspects. We discuss the key enablers and challenges and identify the key research questions for the development of the Intelligent Edge services. As a main outcome of this white paper, we envision a transition from Internet of Things to Intelligent Internet of Intelligent Things and provide a roadmap for development of 6G Intelligent Edge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2004.14850

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because of UAV on-device constraints such as privacy, limited battery capacity, and limited storage capacity, distributed algorithm designs need to be privacy sensitive, energy efficient, low capacity, and not overly complex.

    “As a result of UAV on-device constraints (e.g., privacy, limited battery capacity and limited storage capacity) distributed algorithm designs need to be privacy sensitive, energy efficient, low capacity, and not overly complex.”

    From A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UAVs: Opportunities and Challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

    The paper’s “Developing Distributedly Trained Algorithms” section (p. 16) says that limited batteries, storage and privacy requirements on edge devices call for energy-efficient, low-complexity, low-capacity, privacy-sensitive distributed algorithms. It discusses edge devices generally, not UAVs specifically, so the UAV-specific framing is an extension of the source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • A key challenge of security and privacy with regard to 6G edge AI is guaranteeing the recognition of abnormal behavior according to user requirements and operator criteria.

    “2) Guaranteeing the recognition of abnormal behavior according to user requirements and operator criteria.”

    From A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UAVs: Opportunities and Challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Vision section (p. 7) says future 6G networks will need to recognize unusual or abnormal behavior in real time as part of providing secure services. It does not say that recognition must be guaranteed according to user requirements and operator criteria. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • To make distributed algorithms more reliable and robust when not much data are available, UAVs may have to exchange model parameters, inferred outputs, or raw data with a central server or amongst each other.

    “Additionally, in order to make distributed algorithms more reliable and robust when not much data are available, UAVs may have to exchange model parameters, inferred outputs, or raw data with a central server or amongst each other [12].”

    From A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UAVs: Opportunities and Challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

    In “Developing Distributedly Trained Algorithms” (p. 16), the paper says that, when data are limited, edge devices may exchange raw data, model parameters, or inferred outputs with each other or a central server to improve reliability and robustness. The passage does not specifically address UAVs, so the citing sentence applies the paper’s general point to a narrower setting. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • A key challenge of security and privacy with regard to 6G edge AI is guaranteeing the implementation of security and privacy strategies according to user and system requirements.

    “1) Guaranteeing the implementation of security and privacy strategies according to user and system requirements.”

    From A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UAVs: Opportunities and Challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [2][2] Brian Gaide, Dinesh Gaitonde, Chirag Ravishankar, and Trevor Bauer. 2019. Xilinx Adaptive Compute Acceleration Platform: VersalTM Architecture. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 84-93.
  2. [6][6] Nitinder Mohan, 'Edge Computing Platforms and Protocols'', PhD Thesis. November 2019.
  3. [8][8] J. Park, S. Samarakoon, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah. 'Wireless network intelligence at the edge,' in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 107, no. 11, pp. 2204-2239, Nov. 2019.
  4. [10][10] S. Deng, H. Zhao, J. Yin, H. Dustdar, Edge Intelligence: the Confluence of Edge Computing and Artificial Intelligence', 2020. IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  5. [11][11] G. Zhu, D. Liu, Y. Du, C. You, J. Zhang and K. Huang, 'Towards an intelligent edge: Wireless communication meets machine learning,' preprint arXiv:1809.00343, 2018. · arXiv
  6. [13][13] Hu, P., Dhelim, S., Ning, H., & Qiu, T. (2017). Survey on fog computing: architecture, key technologies, applications and open issues. Journal of network and computer applications, 98, 27-42.
  7. [14][14] Mahadev Satyanarayanan, Paramvir Bahl , Ramon Caceres , Nigel Davies, 'The Case for (VM)based Cloudlets in Mobile Computing'', 2009, IEEE Pervasive Computing,volume 8,issue 4, pages(14-23)
  8. [15][15] Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., et al. (2015). Humanlevel control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529-533.
  9. [17][17] Leppänen, T. (2018). Resource-oriented mobile agent and software framework for the Internet of Things. Dissertation, Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, C Technica, (645).
  10. [18][18] Fortino, G., Russo, W., Savaglio, C., Shen, W., & Zhou, M. (2017). Agent-oriented cooperative smart objects: From IoT system design to implementation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 48(11), 1939-1956.
  11. [19][19] Leppänen, T., Riekki, J., Liu, M., Harjula, E. and Ojala, T. 'Mobile Agents-based Smart Objects for the Internet of Things,' In: Fortino and Trunfio (eds.), Internet of Things based on Smart Objects: Technology, Middleware and Applications, pp. 29-48, ISBN 978-3-319-00491-4, Springer, 2014.
  12. [20][20] Jihong Park, Sumudu Samarakoon, Hamid Shiri, Mohamed K. Abdel-Aziz, Takayuki Nishio, Anis Elgabli, and Mehdi Bennis, 'Extreme URLLC: Vision, Challenges, and Key Enablers,' Jan. 2020, arXiv:2001.09683. · arXiv
  13. [21][21] B. Zhang, A. Davoodi, and Y. H. Hu, 'Exploring energy and accuracy tradeoff in structure simplification of trained deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Circuits Syst., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 836-848, Dec. 2018.
  14. [22][22] P. Vepakomma, O. Gupta, T. Swedish, and R. Raskar, 'Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient data,' Dec. 2018, arXiv:1812.00564. · arXiv
  15. [23][23] J. Konecn ý , H. B. McMahan, D. Ramage, and P. Richtárik, 'Federated optimization: Distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence,' Oct. 2016, arXiv:1610.02527. · arXiv
  16. [24][24] G. E. Hinton, O. Vinyals, and J. Dean, 'Distilling the knowledge in a neural network,' in Proc. NIPS Workshop Deep Learn., Montréal, QC, Canada, Dec. 2014,
  17. [26][26] A. Elgabli, J. Park, A. S. Bedi, M. Bennis, and V. Aggarwal, 'Q-GADMM: Quantized Group ADMM for Communication Efficient Decentralized Machine Learning,' Oct. 2019, arXiv:1910.10453 · arXiv
  18. [27][27] Motlagh, N.H., Lagerspetz, E., Nurmi, P., Li, X., Varjonen, S., Mineraud, J., Siekkinen, M., RebeiroHargrave, A., Hussein, T., Petaja, T. and Kulmala, M., 2020. Toward massive scale air quality monitoring. IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(2), pp.54-59.
  19. [28][28] Xu, D., Li, T., Li, Y., Su, X., Tarkoma, S. and Hui, P., 2020. A Survey on Edge Intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.12172 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peltonen, E., Bennis, M., Capobianco, M., Debbah, M., Ding, A., Gil-Castiñeira, F., Jurmu, M., Karvonen, T., Kelanti, M., Kliks, A., Leppänen, T., Lovén, L., Mikkonen, T., Rao, A., Samarakoon, S., Seppänen, K., Sroka, P., Tarkoma, S., & Yang, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • Huawei Technologies (China) (CN)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Poznań University of Technology (PL)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2004.14850
arXiv
2004.14850
OpenAlex
W3023478069
Cited by
118
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Data and IoT Technologies
Keywords
6G, edge AI, edge computing, distributed learning, real-time training, Internet of Things, urban computing, manufacturing industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review