PreprintCited by 3,150Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingMusic and Audio Processing

Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognition

Open access
Gulati, Anmol, Qin, James, Chiu, Chung-Cheng, Parmar, Niki, Zhang, Yu, Yu, Jiahui, Han, Wei, Wang, Shibo +3 more·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Recently Transformer and Convolution neural network (CNN) based models have shown promising results in Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), outperforming Recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Transformer models are good at capturing content-based global interactions, while CNNs exploit local features effectively. In this work, we achieve the best of both worlds by studying how to combine convolution neural networks and transformers to model both local and global dependencies of an audio sequence in a parameter-efficient way. To this regard, we propose the convolution-augmented transformer for speech recognition, named Conformer. Conformer significantly outperforms the previous Transformer and CNN based models achieving state-of-the-art accuracies. On the widely used LibriSpeech benchmark, our model achieves WER of 2.1%/4.3% without using a language model and 1.9%/3.9% with an external language model on test/testother. We also observe competitive performance of 2.7%/6.3% with a small model of only 10M parameters.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2005.08100

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. C.-C. Chiu, T. N. Sainath, Y. Wu, R. Prabhavalkar, P. Nguyen, Z. Chen, A. Kannan, R. J. Weiss, K. Rao, E. Gonina et al., "State- of-the-art speech recognition with sequence-to-sequence models," in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2018, pp. 4774-4778.
  2. K. Rao, H. Sak, and R. Prabhavalkar, "Exploring architectures, data and units for streaming end-to-end speech recognition with rnn-transducer," in 2017 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU). IEEE, 2017, pp. 193-199.
  3. Y. He, T. N. Sainath, R. Prabhavalkar, I. McGraw, R. Alvarez, D. Zhao, D. Rybach, A. Kannan, Y. Wu, R. Pang, Q. Liang, D. Bhatia, Y. Shangguan, B. Li, G. Pundak, K. C. Sim, T. Bagby, S.-Y. Chang, K. Rao, and A. Gruenstein, "Streaming End-to-end Speech Recognition For Mobile Devices," in Proc. ICASSP, 2019.
  4. T. N. Sainath, Y. He, B. Li, A. Narayanan, R. Pang, A. Bruguier, S.-y. Chang, W. Li, R. Alvarez, Z. Chen, and et al., "A streaming on-device end-to-end model surpassing server-side conventional model quality and latency," in ICASSP, 2020.
  5. A. Graves, "Sequence transduction with recurrent neural net- works," arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.3711, 2012. · arXiv
  6. Q. Zhang, H. Lu, H. Sak, A. Tripathi, E. McDermott, S. Koo, and S. Kumar, "Transformer transducer: A streamable speech recog- nition model with transformer encoders and rnn-t loss," in ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2020, pp. 7829-7833.
  7. J. Li, V. Lavrukhin, B. Ginsburg, R. Leary, O. Kuchaiev, J. M. Co- hen, H. Nguyen, and R. T. Gadde, "Jasper: An end-to-end convo- lutional neural acoustic model," arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.03288, 2019. · arXiv
  8. S. Kriman, S. Beliaev, B. Ginsburg, J. Huang, O. Kuchaiev, V. Lavrukhin, R. Leary, J. Li, and Y. Zhang, "Quartznet: Deep automatic speech recognition with 1d time-channel separable con- volutions," arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10261, 2019. · arXiv
  9. W. Han, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Yu, C.-C. Chiu, J. Qin, A. Gulati, R. Pang, and Y. Wu, "Contextnet: Improving convolutional neural networks for automatic speech recognition with global context," arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.03191, 2020. · arXiv
  10. T. N. Sainath, A.-r. Mohamed, B. Kingsbury, and B. Ramabhad- ran, "Deep convolutional neural networks for lvcsr," in 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal process- ing. IEEE, 2013, pp. 8614-8618.
  11. O. Abdel-Hamid, A.-r. Mohamed, H. Jiang, L. Deng, G. Penn, and D. Yu, "Convolutional neural networks for speech recogni- tion," IEEE/ACM Transactions on audio, speech, and language processing, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1533-1545, 2014.
  12. J. Hu, L. Shen, and G. Sun, "Squeeze-and-excitation networks," in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 7132-7141.
  13. I. Bello, B. Zoph, A. Vaswani, J. Shlens, and Q. V. Le, "Attention augmented convolutional networks," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019, pp. 3286- 3295.
  14. B. Yang, L. Wang, D. Wong, L. S. Chao, and Z. Tu, "Convolu- tional self-attention networks," arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.03107, 2019. · arXiv
  15. A. W. Yu, D. Dohan, M.-T. Luong, R. Zhao, K. Chen, M. Norouzi, and Q. V. Le, "Qanet: Combining local convolution with global self-attention for reading comprehension," arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09541, 2018. · arXiv
  16. Z. Wu, Z. Liu, J. Lin, Y. Lin, and S. Han, "Lite transformer with long-short range attention," arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.11886, 2020. · arXiv
  17. Y. Lu, Z. Li, D. He, Z. Sun, B. Dong, T. Qin, L. Wang, and T.-Y. Liu, "Understanding and improving transformer from a multi-particle dynamic system point of view," arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.02762, 2019. · arXiv
  18. S. Karita, N. Chen, T. Hayashi, T. Hori, H. Inaguma, Z. Jiang, M. Someki, N. E. Y. Soplin, R. Yamamoto, X. Wang et al., "A comparative study on transformer vs rnn in speech applications," arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.06317, 2019. · arXiv
  19. Q. Wang, B. Li, T. Xiao, J. Zhu, C. Li, D. F. Wong, and L. S. Chao, "Learning deep transformer models for machine translation," in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Lin- guistics, Jul. 2019, pp. 1810-1822.
  20. T. Q. Nguyen and J. Salazar, "Transformers without tears: Improving the normalization of self-attention," arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.05895, 2019. · arXiv
  21. Y. N. Dauphin, A. Fan, M. Auli, and D. Grangier, "Language modeling with gated convolutional networks," in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70. JMLR. org, 2017, pp. 933-941.
  22. L. Dong, S. Xu, and B. Xu, "Speech-transformer: a no-recurrence sequence-to-sequence model for speech recognition," in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2018, pp. 5884-5888.
  23. P. Ramachandran, B. Zoph, and Q. V. Le, "Searching for activa- tion functions," arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.05941, 2017. · arXiv
  24. V. Panayotov, G. Chen, D. Povey, and S. Khudanpur, "Lib- rispeech: an asr corpus based on public domain audio books," in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2015, pp. 5206-5210.
  25. D. S. Park, W. Chan, Y. Zhang, C.-C. Chiu, B. Zoph, E. D. Cubuk, and Q. V. Le, "Specaugment: A simple data augmen- tation method for automatic speech recognition," arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08779, 2019. · arXiv
  26. D. S. Park, Y. Zhang, C.-C. Chiu, Y. Chen, B. Li, W. Chan, Q. V. Le, and Y. Wu, "Specaugment on large scale datasets," arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.05533, 2019. · arXiv
  27. N. Srivastava, G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov, "Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural net- works from overfitting," Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 15, no. 56, pp. 1929-1958, 2014.
  28. K.-C. Jim, C. L. Giles, and B. G. Horne, "An analysis of noise in recurrent neural networks: convergence and generalization," IEEE Transactions on neural networks, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1424- 1438, 1996.
  29. Y. Wang, A. Mohamed, D. Le, C. Liu, A. Xiao, J. Mahadeokar, H. Huang, A. Tjandra, X. Zhang, F. Zhang et al., "Transformer- based acoustic modeling for hybrid speech recognition," arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09799, 2019. · arXiv
  30. F. Wu, A. Fan, A. Baevski, Y. N. Dauphin, and M. Auli, "Pay less attention with lightweight and dynamic convolutions," arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10430, 2019. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gulati, A., Qin, J., Chiu, C.-C., Parmar, N., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Han, W., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., & Pang, R.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Pages
5036-5040
ISSN
2308-457X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097777922
Cited by
3,150
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 373 · 2025: 666 · 2024: 644 · 2023: 708 · 2022: 424 · 2021: 300 · 2020: 35
FWCI
140.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
conformational isomers, speech recognition, CNN-Transformer hybrid, parameter-efficient models, LibriSpeech, word error rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review