Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenters
Open accessAbstract
We study the problem of learning a real-valued function that satisfies the Demographic Parity constraint. It demands the distribution of the predicted output to be independent of the sensitive attribute. We consider the case that the sensitive attribute is available for prediction. We establish a connection between fair regression and optimal transport theory, based on which we derive a close form expression for the optimal fair predictor. Specifically, we show that the distribution of this optimum is the Wasserstein barycenter of the distributions induced by the standard regression function on the sensitive groups. This result offers an intuitive interpretation of the optimal fair prediction and suggests a simple post-processing algorithm to achieve fairness. We establish risk and distribution-free fairness guarantees for this procedure. Numerical experiments indicate that our method is very effective in learning fair models, with a relative increase in error rate that is inferior to the relative gain in fairness.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A standard choice of target distribution G is given by Chzhen et al. (2020).
“A standard choice is given by Chzhen et al. (2020)”
From Sensitivity-based measures of discrimination in insurance pricing (2026) · cites this paper as Chzhen et al. (2020)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
I., J. (1936) · Nature · doi:10.1038/137252a0 · Cited by 5,993
Topics in Optimal Transportation
Villani, C. (2003) · Graduate studies in mathematics · doi:10.1090/gsm/058 · Cited by 5,426 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The next result establishes that as long as one of the measures in the definition of the Wasserstein-2 distance admits a density, then the optimal coupling in the infimum in Definition 2.1 is deterministic (see e.g., [41, Theorem 2.18] or [38, Theorems 2.5 and 2.9]).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIntroduction to Nonparametric Estimation
Tsybakov, A. (2008) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b13794 · Cited by 3,687 · see citing works
Graphical Methods for Data Analysis
Healy, M., Chambers, J., Cleveland, W., Kleiner, B., & Tukey, P. (1983) · doi:10.1201/9781351072304 · Cited by 3,294 · cited 1×
“This step is also known as jittering , often used for data visualization [11] for tie-breaking.”
BackgroundEquality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…field to designing methods that satisfy “fairness” requirements, while still optimizing prediction performance, see for example [5, 10, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 32, 45–47 In this paper we study the problem of learning a real-valued regression function which among those complying with the…”
MethodOptimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians
Santambrogio, F. (2015) · Progress in nonlinear differential equations and their applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20828-2 · Cited by 2,322 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The next result is standard and can be found for instance in [2, Section 6.1] or [38, Section 5.5.5].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Tight Constant in the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz Inequality
Massart, P. (1990) · The Annals of Probability · doi:10.1214/aop/1176990746 · Cited by 1,121 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(8) is built upon the well-known Dvoretzky–Kiefer–Wolfowitz inequality [33, Corollary 1].”
MethodBarycenters in the Wasserstein Space
Agueh, M., & Carlier, G. (2011) · SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis · doi:10.1137/100805741 · Cited by 1,100 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The next result is standard and can be found for instance in [2, Section 6.1] or [38, Section 5.5.5].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKusner, M. J., Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06856 · Cited by 995 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…methods that satisfy “fairness” requirements, while still optimizing prediction performance, see for example [5, 10, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 32, 45–47 In this paper we study the problem of learning a real-valued regression function which among those complying with the Demographic…”
MethodHIGH-DIMENSIONAL GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS AND THE LASSO
van de Geer, S. A. (2008) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053607000000929 · Cited by 793 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We refer to [3, 15, 29, 30, 39] for various examples of estimators and additional assumptions such that the bound in Assumption 4.3 is satisfied.”
BackgroundInfluentialZafar, M. B., Valera, I., Gomez Rodriguez, M., & Gummadi, K. P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052660 · Cited by 632 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Therefore, a substantial effort is being devoted in the field to designing methods that satisfy “fairness” requirements, while still optimizing prediction performance, see for example [5, 10, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 32, 45–47, 49] and references therein.”
BackgroundFair Clustering Through FairletsPreprint
Chierichetti, F., Kumar, R., Lattanzi, S., & Vassilvitskii, S. (2018) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.05733 · Cited by 578 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…in the field to designing methods that satisfy “fairness” requirements, while still optimizing prediction performance, see for example [5, 10, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 32, 45–47 In this paper we study the problem of learning a real-valued regression function which among those…”
MethodFast learning rates for plug-in classifiers
Audibert, J.-Y., & Tsybakov, A. (2005) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053606000001217 · Cited by 529 · cited 4× · see citing works
“We refer to [3, 15, 29, 30, 39] for various examples of estimators and additional assumptions such that the bound in Assumption 4.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialDistribution‐free prediction bands for non‐parametric regression
Lei, J., & Wasserman, L. (2014) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/rssb.12021 · Cited by 525 · cited 3× · see citing works
“We refer to [3, 15, 29, 30, 39] for various examples of estimators and additional assumptions such that the bound in Assumption 4.3 is satisfied.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEmpirical Risk Minimization under Fairness ConstraintsPreprint
Donini, M., Oneto, L., Ben-David, S., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Pontil, M. (2018) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.08626 · Cited by 522 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We employ the 2-steps 10-fold CV procedure considered by [16] to select the best hyperparameters with the training set.”
MethodSelf-citationThe Large-Sample Power of Tests Based on Permutations of Observations
Hoeffding, W. (1952) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729436 · Cited by 379 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similar proof techniques are also used in randomization inference via permutations [18, 21], conformal prediction [30, 42], knockoff estimation [4] to name a few.”
MethodAvoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoning
Kilbertus, N., Rojas-Carulla, M., Parascandolo, G., Hardt, M., Janzing, D., & Schölkopf, B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02744 · Cited by 358 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…methods that satisfy “fairness” requirements, while still optimizing prediction performance, see for example [5, 10, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 32, 45–47 In this paper we study the problem of learning a real-valued regression function which among those complying with the Demographic…”
MethodOne-dimensional empirical measures, order statistics, and Kantorovich transport distances
Bobkov, S., & Ledoux, M. (2019) · Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/memo/1259 · Cited by 336
Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based AlgorithmsPreprint
Agarwal, A., Dudík, M., & Wu, Z. S. (2019) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.12843 · Cited by 321 · cited 10× · see citing works
“Demographic Parity requires the probability distribution of the predicted output to be independent of the sensitive attribute and has been used extensively in the literature, both in the context of classification and regression [1, 12, 19, 23, 34].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAlgorithmic Learning in a Random World
Vovk, V., Gammerman, A., & Shafer, G. (2022) · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06649-8 · Cited by 296 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similar proof techniques are also used in randomization inference via permutations [18, 21], conformal prediction [30, 42], knockoff estimation [4] to name a few.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLi, Q., & Racine, J. S. (2008) · Journal of Business and Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/073500107000000250 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Distribution Free Prediction Sets
Lei, J., Robins, J., & Wasserman, L. (2013) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.751873 · Cited by 282 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Our distribution-free fairness guarantees share similarities with contributions on prediction sets [30, 31] and conformal prediction literature [42, 48] as they also rely on results on rank statistics.”
BackgroundInfluentialWasserstein Fair ClassificationPreprint
Jiang, R., Pacchiano, A., Stepleton, T., Jiang, H., & Chiappa, S. (2019) · Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.12059 · Cited by 225 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In this work we use the following definition of (strong) Demographic Parity, which was previously used in the context of regression by [1, 12, 24].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialObtaining Fairness using Optimal Transport TheoryPreprint
del Barrio, E., Gamboa, F., Gordaliza, P., & Loubes, J.-M. (2018) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.03195 · Cited by 223 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Demographic Parity requires the probability distribution of the predicted output to be independent of the sensitive attribute and has been used extensively in the literature, both in the context of classification and regression [1, 12, 19, 23, 34].”
BackgroundMethodA knockoff filter for high-dimensional selective inference
Barber, R. F., & Candès, E. (2016) · Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/18-aos1755 · Cited by 212 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similar proof techniques are also used in randomization inference via permutations [18, 21], conformal prediction [30, 42], knockoff estimation [4] to name a few.”
MethodA data-driven software tool for enabling cooperative information sharing among police departments
Redmond, M., & Baveja, A. (2002) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00264-8 · Cited by 211 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and test it against the state-of-the-art alternatives, we consider five benchmark datasets, CRIME, LAW, NLSY, STUD, and UNIV, which are briefly described below: Communities&Crime (CRIME) contains socio-economic, law enforcement, and crime data about communities in the US [37] with 1994 examples.”
BackgroundOn the relation between accuracy and fairness in binary classificationPreprint
Žliobaitė, I. (2015) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1505.05723 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Bandits
Joseph, M., Kearns, M., Morgenstern, J., & Roth, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.07139 · Cited by 199 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…designing methods that satisfy “fairness” requirements, while still optimizing prediction performance, see for example [5, 10, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 32, 45–47 In this paper we study the problem of learning a real-valued regression function which among those complying with the…”
MethodA Convex Framework for Fair Regression
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Joseph, M., Kearns, M., Morgenstern, J., Neel, S., & Roth, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02409 · Cited by 198 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the case of linear models we consider the following methods: Linear RLS plus [6] (RLS+Berk), Linear RLS plus [34] (RLS+Oneto), and Linear RLS plus Our Method (RLS+Ours), where RLS is the abbreviation of Regularized Least Squares.”
MethodBeyond Parity: Fairness Objectives for Collaborative Filtering
Yao, S., & Huang, B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.08804 · Cited by 169 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Therefore, a substantial effort is being devoted in the field to designing methods that satisfy “fairness” requirements, while still optimizing prediction performance, see for example [5, 10, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 32, 45–47, 49] and references therein.”
BackgroundControlling Attribute Effect in Linear Regression
Calders, T., Karim, A., Kamiran, F., Ali, W., & Zhang, X.-L. (2013) · 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2013.114 · Cited by 162 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Following [9], we made a binary sensitive attribute s as to the percentage of black population, which yielded 970 instances of s =1 with a mean crime rate 0 .”
MethodDevroye, L. (1978) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1978.1055865 · Cited by 142 · cited 1×
“We refer to [3, 15, 29, 30, 39] for various examples of estimators and additional assumptions such that the bound in Assumption 4.3 is satisfied.”
BackgroundInfluentialClassification with confidence
Lei, J. (2014) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asu038 · Cited by 131 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We refer to [3, 15, 29, 30, 39] for various examples of estimators and additional assumptions such that the bound in Assumption 4.”
BackgroundA statistical framework for fair predictive algorithmsPreprint
Lum, K., & Johndrow, J. E. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.08077 · Cited by 124 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…methods that satisfy “fairness” requirements, while still optimizing prediction performance, see for example [5, 10, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 32, 45–47 In this paper we study the problem of learning a real-valued regression function which among those complying with the Demographic Parity…”
MethodPérez-Suay, A., Laparra, V., Mateo-García, G., Mũnoz-Marí, J., Gómez-Chova, L., & Camps-Valls, G. (2017) · ECML/PKDD · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71249-9_21 · Cited by 101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the case of non-linear models we compare to the following methods. i) For Kernel RLS (KRLS): KRLS plus [34] (KRLS+Oneto), KRLS plus [35] (KRLS+Perez), KRLS plus Our Method (KRLS+Ours); ii) For Random Forests (RF): RF plus [36] (RF+Raff), RF plus [1] 5 (RF+Agar), and RF plus Our Method (RF+Ours).”
MethodRepairing without Retraining: Avoiding Disparate Impact with Counterfactual DistributionsPreprint
Wang, H., Ustun, B., & Calmon, F. (2019) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.10501 · Cited by 100 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Connections between algorithmic fairness and Optimal Transport, and in particular the problem of Wasserstein barycenters, has been studied in [12, 19, 23, 43] but mainly in the context of classification.”
BackgroundFair Forests: Regularized Tree Induction to Minimize Model Bias
Raff, E., Sylvester, J., & Mills, S. (2017) · AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278742 · Cited by 79 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the case of non-linear models we compare to the following methods. i) For Kernel RLS (KRLS): KRLS plus [34] (KRLS+Oneto), KRLS plus [35] (KRLS+Perez), KRLS plus Our Method (KRLS+Ours); ii) For Random Forests (RF): RF plus [36] (RF+Raff), RF plus [1] 5 (RF+Agar), and RF plus Our Method (RF+Ours).”
MethodGeneral Fair Empirical Risk Minimization
Oneto, L., Donini, M., & Pontil, M. (2019) · IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network · doi:10.1109/ijcnn48605.2020.9206819 · Cited by 50 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Demographic Parity requires the probability distribution of the predicted output to be independent of the sensitive attribute and has been used extensively in the literature, both in the context of classification and regression [1, 12, 19, 23, 34].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationA general approach to fairness with optimal transport
Silvia, C., Ray, J., Tom, S., Aldo, P., Heinrich, J., & John, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5771 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Fair Learning in Markovian EnvironmentsPreprint
Jabbari, S., Joseph, M., Kearns, M., Morgenstern, J. H., & Roth, A. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.03071 · Cited by 35 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…to designing methods that satisfy “fairness” requirements, while still optimizing prediction performance, see for example [5, 10, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 32, 45–47 In this paper we study the problem of learning a real-valued regression function which among those complying with the…”
MethodComparing Fairness Criteria Based on Social OutcomePreprint
Komiyama, J., & Shimao, H. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.05112 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Analogously to [26] we model a virtual company’s hiring decision assuming that the company does not have access to the applicants’ academic scores.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
12 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- [10][10] F. Calmon, D. Wei, B. Vinzamuri, K. N. Ramamurthy, and K. R. Varshney. Optimized pre-processing for discrimination prevention. In Neural Information Processing Systems , 2017. -
- [14][14] P. Cortez and A. Silva. Using data mining to predict secondary school student performance. In FUture BUsiness TEChnology Conference , 2008. -
- [17][17] C. Dwork, N. Immorlica, A. T. Kalai, and M. D. M. Leiserson. Decoupled classifiers for group-fair and efficient machine learning. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency , 2018. -
- [18][18] R. Fisher. Design of experiments. Br Med J , 1(3923):554-554, 1936. -
- [28][28] T. Le Gouic, J.-M. Loubes, and P. Rigollet. Projection to fairness in statistical learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.11720 , 2020. - · arXiv
- [40][40] A. W. van der Vaart. Asymptotic statistics , volume 3. Cambridge university press, 2000. -
- [47][47] R. Zemel, Y. Wu, K. Swersky, T. Pitassi, and C. Dwork. Learning fair representations. In International Conference on Machine Learning , 2013. -
- [48][48] G. Zeni, M. Fontana, and S. Vantini. Conformal prediction: a unified review of theory and new challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07972 , 2020. - · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Survey
Hort, M., Chen, Z., Zhang, J. M., Harman, M., & Sarro, F. (2023) · ACM Journal on Responsible Computing · doi:10.1145/3631326 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
“…2019 JSAI Kim et al. [180] 2020 ICML Jiang et al. [181] 2020 UAI Savani et al. [355] 2020 NeurIPS Chzhen et al. [356] 2020 NeurIPS Chzhen et al. [266] 2020 NeurIPS Awasthi et al. [357] 2020 PMLR Chzhen and Schreuder [271] 2020 arxiv Schreuder and Chzhen [358] 2021 UAI Kanamori and Arimura [359]…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA sociotechnical view of algorithmic fairness
Dolata, M., Feuerriegel, S., & Schwabe, G. (2021) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12370 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Algorithmic fairness datasets: the story so far
Fabris, A., Messina, S., Silvello, G., & Susto, G. A. (2022) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-022-00854-z · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair RepresentationsPreprint
Zhao, H., & Gordon, G. J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08386 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
What is fair? Proxy discrimination vs. demographic disparities in insurance pricing
Lindholm, M., Richman, R., Tsanakas, A., & Wüthrich, M. V. (2024) · Scandinavian Actuarial Journal · doi:10.1080/03461238.2024.2364741 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Fairness guarantee in multi-class classificationPreprint
Denis, C., Élie, R., Hebiri, M., & Hu, F. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.13642 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationBlack, E., Naidu, R. C. A., Ghani, R., Rodolfa, K. T., Ho, D. E., & Heidari, H. (2023) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623259 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Fairness improvement for black-box classifiers with Gaussian process
Nguyen, D., Gupta, S., Rana, S., Shilton, A. P., & Venkatesh, S. (2021) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.095 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Berk, R. A., Kuchibhotla, A. K., & Tchetgen, E. T. (2022) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-033021-120649 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
A minimax framework for quantifying risk-fairness trade-off in regression
Chzhen, E., & Schreuder, N. (2022) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/22-aos2198 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“More recently, statistical and learning guarantees for fair regression were derived (Agarwal et al., 2019, Chiappa et al., 2020, Chzhen et al., 2020a,b, Fitzsimons et al., 2019, Le Gouic et al., 2020, Plečko and Meinshausen, 2019).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationUnderstanding and Mitigating Accuracy Disparity in RegressionPreprint
Chi, J., Zhao, H., Gordon, G. J., & Tian, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.12013 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Review
Feng, Q., Du, M., Zou, N., & Hu, X. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.14397 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“DP can also be applied to the regression model rather than to the classification model [37]: • General Demographic Parity (GDP) [75] extends the demographic parity on the continuous sensitive attribute: where E [ˆ y | s ] is the local average prediction of the model conditioned on the sensitive…”
Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Survey
Feng, Q., Du, M., Zou, N., & Hu, X. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2024.3361836 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“DP can also be applied to the regression model rather than to the classification model [37] sup | 2) General demographic parity (GDP) [75] extends the DP on the continuous sensitive attribute where E [ˆ y | s ] is the local average prediction of the model conditioned on the sensitive attribute and E…”
OTClean: Data Cleaning for Conditional Independence Violations using Optimal Transport
Pirhadi, A., Moslemi, M. H., Cloninger, A., Milani, M., & Salimi, B. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/3654963 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Counterfactual Situation Testing: Uncovering Discrimination under Fairness given the Difference
Ruggieri, S., & Álvarez, J. M. (2023) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623222 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“See [16, 17] on a similar, more formal critique on individual fairness [20] notions.”
BackgroundA Sequentially Fair Mechanism for Multiple Sensitive Attributes
Hu, F., Ratz, P., & Arthur Charpentier, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i11.29143 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Prior research conducted by (Chzhen et al. 2020b; Gouic, Loubes, and Rigollet 2020) demonstrates that, Therefore, f B represents the optimal fair predictor in terms of minimizing unfairness-risk.”
MethodInfluentialThreshold-Independent Fair Matching through Score Calibration
Moslemi, M. H., & Milani, M. (2024) · doi:10.1145/3665601.3669845 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Li, L., Srivastava, N., Rong, J., Pianta, G., Varanasi, R., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3636555.3636920 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Fairness-Aware Regression Robust to Adversarial Attacks
Jin, Y., & Lai, L. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2023.3328111 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“To this end various algorithms have been developed to find fair machine models (FML) that satisfy different fairness measures [4], [5], [6], [7].”
MethodFair Regression under Sample Selection Bias
Du, W., Wu, X., & Tong, H. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10021107 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“[10] focused on demographic parity that requires the distribution of the predicted output independent of the sensitive attribute.”
BackgroundDistributed Optimization with Quantization for Computing Wasserstein Barycenters
Krawtschenko, R., Uribe, C. A., Gasnikov, A. V., & Dvurechensky, P. E. (2025) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc57313.2025.11312762 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“WB has been applied in diverse areas: image morphing [6], atmospheric data averaging [7], graph learning [8], fairness [9], clustering [10], Bayesian learning [11], stain normalization [12], forecast aggregation [13], multi-media fusion [14], multilingual alignment [15], COVID-19 pattern clustering…”
Fairness with Continuous Optimal TransportPreprint
Chiappa, S., & Pacchiano, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.02084 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“…of demographic parity as well as other criteria (Black, S., and Fredrikson 2019; Del Barrio et al. 2019; Johndrow and Lum 2019; Risser et al. 2019; Wang, Ustun, and Calmon 2019; Chzhen et al. 2020; Del Barrio, Gordaliza, and Loubes 2020; Le Gouic and Loubes 2020; Yurochkin, Bower, and Sun 2020).”
Fair Link Prediction With Overlapping Groups
Pal, M., Sikdar, S., & Ganguly, N. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3479702 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“This approach has been followed in articles such as [39], [40], [41], [42], and [43].”
Fair and optimal prediction via post‐processing
Zhao, H. (2024) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12191 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Benchmarking the Fairness of Image Upsampling Methods
Laszkiewicz, M., Daunhawer, I., Vogt, J. E., Fischer, A., & Lederer, J. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658921 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Research in that field has led to several approaches, such as fair representation learning [4, 50, 63, 67], constrained optimization [1, 42], adversarial training [13], and post-processing methods [10, 17].”
BackgroundIntroduction to Optimal Transport
Ryzhov, I. O., Pasupathy, R., & Honnappa, H. (2024) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc63780.2024.10838746 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Chzhen et al. (2020) considers the following situation.”
Towards Return Parity in Markov Decision ProcessesPreprint
Chi, J., Shen, J. G., Dai, X., Zhang, W., Tian, Y., & Zhao, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.10476 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…demographic parity (Dwork et al., 2012) and equalized odds (Hardt et al., 2016)) in the settings of classification (Hardt et al., 2016; Zafar et al., 2017; Zhao and Gordon, 2019; Jiang et al., 2020) and regression (Komiyama et al., 2018; Agarwal et al., 2019; Chzhen et al., 2020; Chi et al., 2021).”
Fairness under Covariate Shift: Improving Fairness-Accuracy Tradeoff with Few Unlabeled Test Samples
Havaldar, S., Chauhan, J., Shanmugam, K., Nandy, J., & Raghuveer, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i11.29124 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Under-Performance of Adversarial Debiasing under Covariate Shift : We study the variation of the performance of a State of The Art Method, namely Adversarial Debias-ing (Zhang, Lemoine, and Mitchell 2018) against the magnitude of shift (cid:13) on the Adult dataset.”
MethodCounterfactual Situation Testing: From Single to Multidimensional Discrimination
Álvarez, J. M., & Ruggieri, S. (2025) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.17935 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“For a formal discussion on effort and its role on individual fairness (Dwork et al., 2012), see Chzhen and Schreuder (2022) and Chzhen et al. (2020).”
Fair Data Representation for Machine Learning at the Pareto Frontier
Xu, S., & Strohmer, T. (2022) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.00292 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“It follows from [12, 18] that the optimal fair regression outcome can be characterized by the Wasserstein-2 barycenter.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAdversarially Robust Fairness-Aware Regression
Jin, Y., & Lai, L. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10094637 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“To this end various algorithms have been developed to find fair machine models (FML) that satisfy different fairness measures [2, 3, 4, 5].”
MethodFairWASP: Fast and Optimal Fair Wasserstein Pre-processing
Xiong, Z., Dalmasso, N., Mishler, A., Potluru, V. K., Balch, T. R., & Veloso, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i14.29545 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Finally, the Wasserstein distance has been used to express fairness constraints in several in-processing methods (Chzhen et al. 2020; Chzhen and Schreuder 2022).”
MethodApproximate Wasserstein attraction flows for dynamic mass transport over networks
Arque, F., Uribe, C. A., & Ocampo‐Martínez, C. (2022) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110432 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Email addresses: ferran.arque@upc.edu (Ferran Arqué), cauribe@rice.edu (César A. Uribe), carlos.ocampo@upc.edu (Carlos Ocampo-Martinez). ization (Cuturi et al. 2020) or fair regression (Chzhen et al. 2020).”
Fairguard: Harness Logic-based Fairness Rules in Smart Cities
Zhao, Y., An, Z., Gao, X., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Ma, M. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI) · doi:10.1145/3576842.3582371 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“For example, [36] proposes a fair classifier that maximizes fairness with accuracy constraints and [6] develops a fair regression model evaluated with Demographic Parity and formulas the objective as solving for the Wasserstein barycenter.”
MethodOptimization hierarchy for fair statistical decision problems
Aswani, A. J., & Olfat, M. (2022) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/22-aos2217 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Another set of approaches [26, 43] involves applying projections based on the Wasserstein distance in order to explicitly solve an empirical risk minimization problem with a fairness constraint.”
BackgroundMethodShould Bank Stress Tests Be Fair?Preprint
Glasserman, P., & Li, M. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4158738 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“(i) Pooled: bias(s) = E[YS ]− E[Ys] + β>Pool(µs − µ̄); (ii) PTF in (18): bias(s) = E[YS ]− E[Ys]; (iii) Conditional expectation: bias(s) = E[ŶC(Xs)]− E[Ys]; (iv) FEO: bias(s) = E[YS ]− E[Ys] + β>F (µs − µ̄); (v) SEO: bias(s) = E[YS ]− E[Ys].”
BackgroundInfluentialA Canonical Data Transformation for Achieving Inter- and Within-Group Fairness
Lazri, Z. M., Brugere, I., Tian, X., Dachman-Soled, D., Polychroniadou, A., Dervovic, D., & Wu, M. H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3416040 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…is encapsulated in the more strict definition of threshold-invariant fairness defined by Chen et al. [8] (also coined strong demographic parity by Jiang et al. [29]), and has been employed in a variety of works to enforce inter-group-fair classification [8,26,29,38,39] and regression [38,40].”
BackgroundOptimal Transport for Fairness: Archival Data Repair using Small Research Data Sets
Langbridge, A., Quinn, A., & Shorten, R. N. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW) · doi:10.1109/icdew61823.2024.00036 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“An optimal transport (OT)-based repair provides a compelling setting for this problem, and there are many works which consider OT for data repair [4], [20], [21].”
Chzhen, E., & Schreuder, N. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.07158 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Chzhen et al. (2020); Le Gouic et al. (2020) showed that under mild additional assumptions1 on the distribution P, the optimal fair prediction g∗ can be obtained for all (x, s) ∈ Rp × {1, 2} as g∗(x, s) = ( p1G −1 1 + p2G −1 2 ) ◦Gs ( E[Y”
InfluentialSelf-citationFLEA: Provably Fair Multisource Learning from Unreliable Training DataPreprint
Iofinova, E., Konstantinov, N., & Lampert, C. H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Positivity-free Policy Learning with Observational DataPreprint
Zhao, P., Chambaz, A., Josse, J., & Yang, S. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06969 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“In many decision-making scenarios, such as hiring, recommendation systems, and criminal justice, concerns have been raised regarding the fairness of decisions from the learning process (Chzhen et al., 2020).”
BackgroundSensitivity-based measures of discrimination in insurance pricing
Lindholm, M., Richman, R., Tsanakas, A., & Wüthrich, M. V. (2026) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2026.01.021 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Fair Game: Auditing & debiasing AI algorithms over time
Basu, D., & Das, U. (2025) · Cambridge Forum on AI Law and Governance · doi:10.1017/cfl.2025.8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hung, K. M., Beaudrot, L. H., Finneran, A. E., Zalles, A. G., & Uribe, C. A. (2025) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.70130 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Fair Sparse Regression with Clustering: An Invex Relaxation for a Combinatorial ProblemPreprint
Barik, A., & Honorio, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.09704 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Agarwal (2019), Fitzsimons (2019) and Chzhen et al. (2020) studied 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021), Sydney, Australia. demographic parity.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCosts and Benefits of Wasserstein Fair Regression.Preprint
Zhao, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Costs and Benefits of Fair Regression
Zhao, H. (2024) · doi:10.55277/researchhub.mz9wqvk1
“Recently, Chzhen et al. (2020a) and Le Gouic et al. (2020) concurrently with each other derived an analytic bound to characterize the price of statistical parity in regression using Wasserstein barycentres when the learner can take the sensitive attribute explicitly as an input.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPopulation Dynamics for Discrete Wasserstein Gradient Flows over Networks
Díaz-García, G., Uribe, C. A., & Quijano, N. (2021) · LatinX in AI at International Conference on Machine Learning (LXAI) · doi:10.52591/lxai202107243
Formal Logic-Guided Harnessing Heterogeneous Fairness Rules in Smart Cities
An, Z., Zhao, Y., Gao, X., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Ma, M. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1145/3737293
“For example, Zafar et al. [42] proposes a fair classifier that maximizes fairness with accuracy constraints and Chzhen et al. [43] develops a fair regression model evaluated with Demographic Parity and formulas the objective as solving for the Wasserstein barycenter.”
DPTree and DPForest: tree-based methods fulfilling demographic parity
Simon, P.-A., Denuit, M. M., & Trufin, J. (2025) · Annals of Actuarial Science · doi:10.1017/s1748499525100092
“(2020), Chzhen et al .”
임장원, Islam, R., Raghavan, D., Omofojoye, B., Rodriguez, A. D., Kiarashi, Y., Hershenberg, R., Clifford, G. D., & Kwon, H. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.06.18.26355980
“…identify the most informative features in free movements and social interactions associated with MoCA and Mini-BESTest scores, as well as the demographic biases (sex and race) of the model and bias mitigation analysis for developing a demographically fair model within a fair ML framework [28,51].”
A Multivariate Energy-Based Fairness Adjuster for Premiums
Jamotton, C., & Hainaut, D. (2026) · North American Actuarial Journal · doi:10.1080/10920277.2026.2705183
- Authors
- Chzhen, E., Denis, C., Hebiri, M., Oneto, L., & Pontil, M.
- Affiliations
- Laboratoire de Mathématiques d'Orsay (FR)
- Laboratoire d’Analyse et de Mathématiques Appliquées (FR)
- University of Genoa (IT)
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 33
- Pages
- 7321-7331
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2006.07286
- OpenAlex
- W3102808026
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- demographic parity, Wasserstein barycenter, optimal transport, algorithmic fairness, post-processing, risk bounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review