PreprintCited by 52Ethics and Social Impacts of AIPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenters

Open access
Chzhen, Evgenii, Denis, Christophe, Hebiri, Mohamed, Oneto, Luca, Pontil, Massimiliano·2020·arXiv

Abstract

We study the problem of learning a real-valued function that satisfies the Demographic Parity constraint. It demands the distribution of the predicted output to be independent of the sensitive attribute. We consider the case that the sensitive attribute is available for prediction. We establish a connection between fair regression and optimal transport theory, based on which we derive a close form expression for the optimal fair predictor. Specifically, we show that the distribution of this optimum is the Wasserstein barycenter of the distributions induced by the standard regression function on the sensitive groups. This result offers an intuitive interpretation of the optimal fair prediction and suggests a simple post-processing algorithm to achieve fairness. We establish risk and distribution-free fairness guarantees for this procedure. Numerical experiments indicate that our method is very effective in learning fair models, with a relative increase in error rate that is inferior to the relative gain in fairness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2006.07286

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

12 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [10][10] F. Calmon, D. Wei, B. Vinzamuri, K. N. Ramamurthy, and K. R. Varshney. Optimized pre-processing for discrimination prevention. In Neural Information Processing Systems , 2017. -
  2. [14][14] P. Cortez and A. Silva. Using data mining to predict secondary school student performance. In FUture BUsiness TEChnology Conference , 2008. -
  3. [17][17] C. Dwork, N. Immorlica, A. T. Kalai, and M. D. M. Leiserson. Decoupled classifiers for group-fair and efficient machine learning. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency , 2018. -
  4. [18][18] R. Fisher. Design of experiments. Br Med J , 1(3923):554-554, 1936. -
  5. [28][28] T. Le Gouic, J.-M. Loubes, and P. Rigollet. Projection to fairness in statistical learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.11720 , 2020. - · arXiv
  6. [40][40] A. W. van der Vaart. Asymptotic statistics , volume 3. Cambridge university press, 2000. -
  7. [47][47] R. Zemel, Y. Wu, K. Swersky, T. Pitassi, and C. Dwork. Learning fair representations. In International Conference on Machine Learning , 2013. -
  8. [48][48] G. Zeni, M. Fontana, and S. Vantini. Conformal prediction: a unified review of theory and new challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07972 , 2020. - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chzhen, E., Denis, C., Hebiri, M., Oneto, L., & Pontil, M.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire de Mathématiques d'Orsay (FR)
  • Laboratoire d’Analyse et de Mathématiques Appliquées (FR)
  • University of Genoa (IT)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
33
Pages
7321-7331
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3102808026
Cited by
46
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • neural information processing systems
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
demographic parity, Wasserstein barycenter, optimal transport, algorithmic fairness, post-processing, risk bounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review