The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Infinite attention: NNGP and NTK for deep attention networks
Open accessAbstract
There is a growing amount of literature on the relationship between wide neural networks (NNs) and Gaussian processes (GPs), identifying an equivalence between the two for a variety of NN architectures. This equivalence enables, for instance, accurate approximation of the behaviour of wide Bayesian NNs without MCMC or variational approximations, or characterisation of the distribution of randomly initialised wide NNs optimised by gradient descent without ever running an optimiser. We provide a rigorous extension of these results to NNs involving attention layers, showing that unlike single-head attention, which induces non-Gaussian behaviour, multi-head attention architectures behave as GPs as the number of heads tends to infinity. We further discuss the effects of positional encodings and layer normalisation, and propose modifications of the attention mechanism which lead to improved results for both finite and infinitely wide NNs. We evaluate attention kernels empirically, leading to a moderate improvement upon the previous state-of-the-art on CIFAR-10 for GPs without trainable kernels and advanced data preprocessing. Finally, we introduce new features to the Neural Tangents library (Novak et al., 2020) allowing applications of NNGP/NTK models, with and without attention, to variable-length sequences, with an example on the IMDb reviews dataset.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The formulations for self-attention and the ensemble averaging for proximate data points are identical.
“We note that the formulations for self-attention and the ensemble averaging for proximate data points are identical.”
From How Do Vision Transformers Work? (2022) · cites this paper as Hron et al., 2020
NTK theoretically implies that the loss landscape of a ViT is convex and flat when the number of heads or embedding dimensions per head goes to infinity.
“Neural tangent kernel (NTK) (Jacot et al., 2018) theoretically implies that the loss landscape of a ViT is convex and flat when the number of heads or the number of embedding dimensions per head goes to infinity (Hron et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020).”
From How Do Vision Transformers Work? (2022) · cites this paper as Hron et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
Convolutional Sequence to Sequence Learning
Gehring, J., Auli, M., Grangier, D., Yarats, D., & Dauphin, Y. N. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.03122 · Cited by 2,850 · cited 3×
“…wide attention architectures, two practical considerations have to be addressed: (i) the d−1/2 scaling induced kernel in Equation (9) involves an analytically intractable integral E[ζ(G`1(x))ζ(G`1(x′))]; (ii) incorporation of positional encodings (Gehring et al., 2017; Vaswani et al., 2017).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Do Vision Transformers Work?
Park, N., & Kim, S. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.06709 · Cited by 356
“Neural tangent kernel (NTK) (Jacot et al., 2018) theoretically implies that the loss landscape of a ViT is convex and flat when the number of heads or the number of embedding dimensions per head goes to infinity (Hron et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020).”
BackgroundRepresentations and generalization in artificial and brain neural networks
Li, Q., Sorscher, B., & Sompolinsky, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2311805121 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Hron, J., Bahri, Y., Sohl-Dickstein, J., & Novak, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Google (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Hron, Jiri
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 4376-4386
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2006.10540
- OpenAlex
- W3034979923
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Machine Learning
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- infinite-width neural networks, neural tangent kernel, attention mechanism, multi-head attention, positional encoding, variable-length sequences, Bayesian neural networks, gradient descent dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review