Convolutional Sequence to Sequence Learning
Open accessAbstract
The prevalent approach to sequence to sequence learning maps an input sequence to a variable length output sequence via recurrent neural networks. We introduce an architecture based entirely on convolutional neural networks. Compared to recurrent models, computations over all elements can be fully parallelized during training and optimization is easier since the number of non-linearities is fixed and independent of the input length. Our use of gated linear units eases gradient propagation and we equip each decoder layer with a separate attention module. We outperform the accuracy of the deep LSTM setup of Wu et al. (2016) on both WMT'14 English-German and WMT'14 English-French translation at an order of magnitude faster speed, both on GPU and CPU.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Learned positional embeddings and sinusoidal positional encodings produced nearly identical results.
“We also experimented with using learned positional embeddings [9] instead, and found that the two versions produced nearly identical results (see Table 3 row (E)).”
From Attention Is All You Need (2017) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Our model is equipped with gated linear units (Dauphin et al., 2016) and residual connections (He et al., 2015a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Popular choices for recurrent networks in encoder-decoder models are long short term memory networks (LSTM; Hochreiter & Schmidhuber, 1997) and gated recurrent units (GRU; Cho et al., 2014).”
BackgroundBatch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818 · see citing works
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Popular choices for recurrent networks in encoder-decoder models are long short term memory networks (LSTM; Hochreiter & Schmidhuber, 1997) and gated recurrent units (GRU; Cho et al., 2014).”
BackgroundDelving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741 · cited 7× · see citing works
“Models with many layers often rely on shortcut or residual connections (He et al., 2015a; Zhou et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Sequence to sequence learning has been successful in many tasks such as machine translation, speech recognition (Sutskever et al., 2014; Chorowski et al., 2015) and text summarization (Rush et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialNeural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate
Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0473 · Cited by 16,213 · cited 9× · see citing works
“The dominant approach to date encodes the input sequence with a series of bi-directional recurrent neural networks (RNN) and generates a variable length output with another set of decoder RNNs, both of which interface via a soft-attention mechanism (Bahdanau et al., 2014; Luong et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLayer NormalizationPreprint
Ba, J., Kiros, J., & Hinton, G. E. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06450 · Cited by 13,745 · see citing works
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212 · see citing works
Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation
Luong, T., Pham, H., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1166 · Cited by 8,382 · cited 7× · see citing works
“The dominant approach to date encodes the input sequence with a series of bi-directional recurrent neural networks (RNN) and generates a variable length output with another set of decoder RNNs, both of which interface via a soft-attention mechanism (Bahdanau et al., 2014; Luong et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGoogle's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation
Wu, Y., Schuster, M., Chen, Z., Le, Q. V., Norouzi, M., Macherey, W., Krikun, M., Cao, Y., Gao, Q., Macherey, K., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.08144 · Cited by 5,319 · cited 16× · see citing works
“…et al., 2016) propose a convolutional model based on characters without attention, with 30 layers in the encoder and 30 layers in the decoder, GNMT (Wu et al., 2016) represents the state of the art on this dataset and they use eight encoder LSTMs as well as eight decoder LSTMs, we quote their…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialOn the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks
Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., & Bengio, Y. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.5063 · Cited by 4,310 · cited 1× · see citing works
“1 (Pascanu et al., 2013).”
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Our model is equipped with gated linear units (Dauphin et al., 2016) and residual connections (He et al., 2015a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.1078 · Cited by 3,317 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Popular choices for recurrent networks in encoder-decoder models are long short term memory networks (LSTM; Hochreiter & Schmidhuber, 1997) and gated recurrent units (GRU; Cho et al., 2014).”
BackgroundPixel Recurrent Neural NetworksPreprint
van den Oord, A., Kalchbrenner, N., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1601.06759 · Cited by 3,111 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A similar non-linearity has been introduced in Oord et al. (2016b) who apply tanh to A but Dauphin et al. (2016) shows that GLUs perform better in the context of language modelling.”
BackgroundLanguage Modeling with Gated Convolutional NetworksPreprint
Dauphin, Y., Fan, A., Auli, M., & Grangier, D. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.08083 · Cited by 3,097 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Our model is equipped with gated linear units (Dauphin et al., 2016) and residual connections (He et al., 2015a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationConditional Image Generation with PixelCNN DecodersPreprint
van den Oord, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Vinyals, O., Espeholt, L., Graves, A., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05328 · Cited by 3,066 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A similar non-linearity has been introduced in Oord et al. (2016b) who apply tanh to A but Dauphin et al. (2016) shows that GLUs perform better in the context of language modelling.”
BackgroundA Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarization
Rush, A. M., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1044 · Cited by 2,879 · cited 4× · see citing works
“We also evaluate on a Gigaword test set of 2000 pairs which is identical to the one used by Rush et al. (2015) and we report F1 ROUGE similar to prior work.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPhoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks
Waibel, A., Hanazawa, T., Hinton, G., Shikano, K., & Lang, K. J. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.21701 · Cited by 2,643 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Convolutional neural networks are less common for sequence modeling, despite several advantages (Waibel et al., 1989; LeCun & Bengio, 1995).”
BackgroundAbstractive Text Summarization using Sequence-to-sequence RNNs and Beyond
Nallapati, R., Zhou, B., dos Santos, C., Gulcehre, C., & Xiang, B. (2016) · Proceedings of The 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k16-1028 · Cited by 2,361 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Sequence to sequence learning has been successful in many tasks such as machine translation, speech recognition (Sutskever et al., 2014; Chorowski et al., 2015) and text summarization (Rush et al., 2015; Nallapati et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2016) amongst others.”
BackgroundWeight Normalization: A Simple Reparameterization to Accelerate Training of Deep Neural NetworksPreprint
Salimans, T., & Kingma, D. P. (2016) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.07868 · Cited by 2,284 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We also use weight normalization for all layers except for lookup tables (Salimans & Kingma, 2016).”
MethodAttention-Based Models for Speech Recognition
Chorowski, J., Bahdanau, D., Serdyuk, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.07503 · Cited by 2,021 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Sequence to sequence learning has been successful in many tasks such as machine translation, speech recognition (Sutskever et al., 2014; Chorowski et al., 2015) and text summarization (Rush et al.”
Background(2016) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1147 · Cited by 1,035 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We found adding e j to be beneficial and it resembles key-value memory networks where the keys are the z uj and the values are the z uj + e j (Miller et al., 2016).”
BackgroundNeural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units
Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., & Birch, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1162 · Cited by 974 · cited 5× · see citing works
“In machine translation, this architecture has been demonstrated to outperform traditional phrase-based models by large margins (Sennrich et al., 2016b; Zhou et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2016; § 2).”
MethodInfluentialOutrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer
Shazeer, N., Mirhoseini, A., Maziarz, K., Davis, A., Le, Q., Hinton, G., & Dean, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.06538 · Cited by 933 · see citing works
Japanese and Korean voice search
Schuster, M., & Nakajima, K. (2012) · 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2012.6289079 · Cited by 862 · see citing works
Edinburgh Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT 16
Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., & Birch, A. (2016) · Conference on Machine Translation · doi:10.18653/v1/w16-2323 · Cited by 567 · cited 5× · see citing works
“In machine translation, this architecture has been demonstrated to outperform traditional phrase-based models by large margins (Sennrich et al., 2016b; Zhou et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2016; § 2).”
MethodInfluentialFindings of the 2016 Conference on Machine Translation
Bojar, O., Chatterjee, R., Federmann, C., Graham, Y., Haddow, B., Huck, M., Jimeno Yepes, A., Koehn, P., Logacheva, V., Monz, C., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the First Conference on Machine Translation: Volume 2, Shared Task Papers · doi:10.18653/v1/w16-2301 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Quasi-Recurrent Neural NetworksPreprint
Bradbury, J., Merity, S., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2016) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01576 · Cited by 481 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent work has applied convolutional neural networks to sequence modeling such as Bradbury et al. (2016) who introduce recurrent pooling between a succession of convolutional layers or Kalchbrenner et al. (2016) who tackle neural translation without attention.”
BackgroundA Convolutional Encoder Model for Neural Machine Translation
Gehring, J., Auli, M., Grangier, D., & Dauphin, Y. (2016) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1012 · Cited by 470 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Architec-1 tures which are partially convolutional have shown strong performance on larger tasks but their decoder is still recurrent (Gehring et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNeural Machine Translation in Linear Time
Kalchbrenner, N., Espeholt, L., Simonyan, K., Oord, A. V. D., Graves, A., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.10099 · Cited by 414 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…English to German translation we compare to the following prior work: Luong et al. (2015) is based on a four layer LSTM attention model, ByteNet (Kalchbrenner et al., 2016) propose a convolutional model based on characters without attention, with 30 layers in the encoder and 30 layers in the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDeep Recurrent Models with Fast-Forward Connections for Neural Machine Translation
Zhou, J., Cao, Y., Wang, X., Li, P., & Xu, W. (2016) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00105 · Cited by 216 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Models with many layers often rely on shortcut or residual connections (He et al., 2015a; Zhou et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOver, P., Dang, H., & Harman, D. (2007) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.01.019 · Cited by 209
Montreal Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT’15
Jean, S., Firat, O., Cho, K., Memisevic, R., & Bengio, Y. (2015) · WMT@EMNLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w15-3014 · Cited by 160 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For word-based models, we replace unknown words after generation by looking up the source word with the maximum attention score in a pre-computed dictionary (Jean et al., 2015).”
MethodEncoding Source Language with Convolutional Neural Network for Machine Translation
Meng, F.-D., Lu, Z.-D., Wang, M., Li, H., Jiang, W.-B., & Liu, Q. (2015) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-1003 · Cited by 110 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Gated convolutions have been previously explored for machine translation by Meng et al. (2015) but their evaluation was restricted to a small dataset and the model was used in tandem with a traditional count-based model.”
MethodHa, D., Dai, A., & Le, Q. V. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.09106 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Cutting-off Redundant Repeating Generations for Neural Abstractive Summarization
Suzuki, J., & Nagata, M. (2016) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-2047 · Cited by 90 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The current best models on this task are recurrent neural networks which either optimize the evaluation metric (Shen et al., 2016) or address specific problems of summarization such as avoiding repeated generations (Suzuki & Nagata, 2017).”
BackgroundVocabulary Manipulation for Neural Machine Translation
Mi, H.-T., Wang, Z., & Ittycheriah, A. (2016) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-2021 · Cited by 68 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We use a target vocabulary of 160K words as well as vocabulary selection (Mi et al., 2016; L’Hostis et al., 2016) to decrease the size of the output layer which speeds up training and testing.”
MethodNeural Machine Translation with Recurrent Attention ModelingPreprint
Yang, Z., Hu, Z., Deng, Y., Dyer, C., & Smola, A. (2016) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.05108 · Cited by 53 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Overall, our attention mechanism considers which words we previously attended to (Yang et al., 2016) and performs multiple attention ’hops’ per time step.”
BackgroundVocabulary Selection Strategies for Neural Machine TranslationPreprint
L'Hostis, G., Grangier, D., & Auli, M. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.00072 · Cited by 44 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We use a target vocabulary of 160K words as well as vocabulary selection (Mi et al., 2016; L’Hostis et al., 2016) to decrease the size of the output layer which speeds up training and testing.”
MethodSelf-citationSrivastava (2014) · doi:10.5555/2627435.2670313
Flagged first, then by citations
10 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · see citing works
“We also experimented with using learned positional embeddings [8] instead, and found that the two versions produced nearly identical results (see Table 3 row (E)).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialWang, X., Girshick, R., Gupta, A., & He, K. (2017) · arXiv · Cited by 11,689 · see citing works
“, non-recurrent) networks for modeling sequences in speech and language [36, 54, 15].”
BackgroundWang, X., Girshick, R., Gupta, A., & He, K. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00813 · Cited by 11,596 · see citing works
“, non-recurrent) networks for modeling sequences in speech and language [36, 54, 15].”
BackgroundInstant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding
Müller, T., Evans, A., Schied, C., & Keller, A. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/3528223.3530127 · Cited by 6,584 · see citing works
“For neural networks, input encodings have proven useful in the attention components of recurrent architectures [Gehring et al. 2017] and, subsequently, transformers [Vaswani et al.”
MethodYu, T., Yin, H.-T., & Zhu, Z.-X. (2017) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/505 · Cited by 5,695 · see citing works
“Inspired by [Gehring et al. , 2017], we employ entire convolutional structures on time axis to capture temporal dynamic behaviors of traffic flows.”
BackgroundMethodFiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning LayerPreprint
Perez, E., Strub, F., de Vries, H., Dumoulin, V., & Courville, A. C. (2017) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.07871 · Cited by 5,313 · see citing works
“These methods include LSTMs for sequence modeling (Hochreiter and Schmidhuber 1997), Convolutional Sequence to Sequence for machine translation (Gehring et al. 2017), and even the ImageNet 2017 winning model, Squeeze and Excitation Networks (Hu, Shen, and Sun 2017).”
MethodHan (2023) · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3152247 · Cited by 4,682 · see citing works
“vanilla transformer, learned positional encoding [49] and relative positional encoding [50] are also utilized in various models [10], [15].”
MethodAn Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling
Bai, S., Kolter, J. Z., & Koltun, V. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.01271 · Cited by 4,655 · see citing works
“Particularly inspiring for our work are the recent applications of convolutional architectures to machine translation (Kalchbrenner et al., 2016; Gehring et al., 2017a;b), audio synthesis (van den Oord et al., 2016), and language modeling (Dauphin et al., 2017).”
Backgroundfairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modeling
Ott, M., Edunov, S., Baevski, A., Fan, A., Gross, S., Ng, N., Grangier, D., & Auli, M. (2019) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-4009 · Cited by 3,538 · see citing works
“, 2015), convolutional models (Gehring et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2019) and Transformer (Vaswani et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationRecent Trends in Deep Learning Based Natural Language ProcessingPreprint
Young, T., Hazarika, D., Poria, S., & Cambria, E. (2017) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.02709 · Cited by 3,133 · see citing works
SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching With Graph Neural Networks
Sarlin, P.-E., DeTone, D., Malisiewicz, T., & Rabinovich, A. (2019) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.11763 · Cited by 3,088
“This encoder enables the graph network to later reason about both appearance and position jointly, especially when combined with attention, and is an instance of the “positional encoder” popular in language processing [20, 55].”
BackgroundRecent Trends in Deep Learning Based Natural Language Processing [Review Article]
Young, T., Hazarika, D., Poria, S., & Cambria, E. (2018) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2018.2840738 · Cited by 2,921 · see citing works
Deformable ConvNets V2: More Deformable, Better Results
Zhu, X., Hu, H., Lin, S., & Dai, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00953 · Cited by 2,943 · see citing works
“Relation Networks and Attention Modules are first proposed in natural language processing [13, 14, 3, 35] and physical system modeling [2, 37, 22, 34, 9, 31].”
BackgroundBERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT
Zhang, T., Kishore, V., Wu, F., Weinberger, K. Q., & Artzi, Y. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.09675 · Cited by 2,865 · see citing works
“WMT14 En-De ConvS2S (Gehring et al., 2017) 0.”
TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning
Arik, S. Ö., & Pfister, T. (2019) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.07442 · Cited by 2,830
“Normalization with √ 0.5 helps to stabilize learning by ensuring that the variance throughout the network does not change dramatically (Gehring et al. 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-Attention with Relative Position Representations
Shaw, P., Uszkoreit, J., & Vaswani, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-2074 · Cited by 2,505 · see citing works
“They have been shown to still benefit from position encodings (Gehring et al., 2017), however.”
BackgroundInfluentialFilm: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer
Perez, E., Strub, F., De Vries, H., Dumoulin, V., & Courville, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11671 · Cited by 2,490 · see citing works
GCNet: Non-Local Networks Meet Squeeze-Excitation Networks and Beyond
Cao, Y., Xu, J., Lin, S., Wei, F., & Hu, H. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW) · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2019.00246 · Cited by 2,307 · see citing works
“Self-attention mechanisms have recently been successfully applied in various tasks, such as machine translation [8, 9, 28], graph embedding [29], generative modeling [39], and visual recognition [30, 13, 31, 36].”
MethodRoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding
Su, J., Lu, Y., Pan, S., Murtadha, A., Wen, B., & Liu, Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.09864 · Cited by 1,952 · see citing works
“[2017] was added to the contextual representations, while a trainable absolute position encoding Gehring et al. [2017], Devlin et al. [2019], Lan et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSong, C., Lin, Y.-F., Guo, S., & Wan, H.-Y. (2020) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5438 · Cited by 1,897 · see citing works
“Inspired by the ConvS2S(Gehring et al. 2017), we equip position embedding to the spatial-temporal network series so that the model can take the spatial and temporal information into account, which can enhance the ability to model the spatial-temporal correlations.”
MethodA Survey of the Usages of Deep Learning for Natural Language Processing
Otter, D. W., Medina, J. R., & Kalita, J. K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.2979670 · Cited by 1,836 · see citing works
“State-of-the-art results have also been achieved by using numerous convolutional layers in both the encoder and decoder, allowing information to be viewed in several hierarchical layers rather than a multitude of recurrent steps [234].”
BackgroundMUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformer
Ke, J., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Milanfar, P., & Yang, F. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00510 · Cited by 1,048 · see citing works
“ViT [11] showed that the deterministic and learnable positional embeddings [13] works equally well.”
BackgroundTransformers in Time Series: A SurveyPreprint
Wen, Q., Zhou, T., Zhang, C.-L., Chen, W.-Q., Ma, Z., Yan, J., & Sun, L. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.07125 · Cited by 1,763 · see citing works
“Another way is to learn a set of positional embeddings for each position which is more flexible [Kenton and Toutanova, 2019; Gehring et al., 2017].”
BackgroundOn Layer Normalization in the Transformer ArchitecturePreprint
Xiong, R., Yang, Y., He, D., Zheng, K., Zheng, S., Xing, C., Zhang, H.-S., Lan, Y.-Y., Wang, L.-W., & Liu, T.-Y. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.04745 · Cited by 1,709 · see citing works
“For convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks, a relatively large learning rate is usually set in the beginning, and then decreased along with the optimization process (He et al., 2016; 2017; Sutskever et al., 2014; Gehring et al., 2017; He et al., 2019).”
BackgroundPre-trained models for natural language processing: A survey
Qiu, X., Sun, T., Xu, Y., Shao, Y., Dai, N., & Huang, X. (2020) · Science China Technological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11431-020-1647-3 · Cited by 1,591 · see citing works
“With the development of deep learning, various neural networks have been widely used to solve Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [80, 86, 49], recurrent neural networks (RNNs) [173, 109], graph-based neural networks (GNNs) [159, 174, 124] and attention mechanisms [7,…”
MethodLin, T., Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Qiu, X. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.04554 · Cited by 1,420
“Another way of representing absolute positions is to learn a set of positional embeddings for each position [28, 37].”
BackgroundLi, Z., Wang, W., Li, H., Xie, E., Sima, C., Lu, T., Yu, Q., & Dai, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.17270 · Cited by 1,419 · see citing works
“Following common practices [14], we add learnable positional embedding to BEV queries Q before inputting them to BEVFormer.”
MethodDeep Learning--based Text Classification
Minaee, S., Kalchbrenner, N., Cambria, E., Nikzad-Khasmakhi, N., Asgari-Chenaghlu, M., & Gao, J. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3439726 · Cited by 1,967 · see citing works
Relation Networks for Object DetectionPreprint
Hu, H., Gu, J., Zhang, Z., Dai, J.-F., & Wei, Y.-C. (2017) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.11575 · Cited by 1,386 · see citing works
“In NLP, there is a recent trend of replacing recurrent neural networks by attention models, enabling parallelized implementations and more efficient learning [21, 56, 13].”
BackgroundMethod3D Human Pose Estimation in Video With Temporal Convolutions and Semi-Supervised Training
Pavllo, D., Feichtenhofer, C., Grangier, D., & Auli, M. (2019) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00794 · Cited by 1,321 · see citing works
“On the other hand, convolutional networks have been very successful in modeling temporal information in tasks that were traditionally tackled with RNNs, such as neural machine translation [11], language modeling [7], speech generation [57], and speech recognition [6].”
BackgroundSelf-citationBig Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequences
Zaheer, M., Guruganesh, G., Dubey, A., Ainslie, J., Alberti, C., Ontanon, S., Pham, P., Ravula, A., Wang, Q., Yang, L., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.14062 · Cited by 1,349 · see citing works
“[29] J.”
Hierarchical Neural Story Generation
Fan, A., Lewis, M., & Dauphin, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1082 · Cited by 1,266 · see citing works
“Similar to Gehring et al. (2017), we train using the Nesterov accelerated gradient method (Sutskever et al., 2013) using gradient clipping (Pascanu et al., 2013).”
MethodSelf-citationLin, T., Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Qiu, X. (2022) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.10.001 · Cited by 1,422 · see citing works
Hierarchical Neural Story Generation
Fan, A., Lewis, M., & Dauphin, Y. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.04833 · Cited by 1,242 · see citing works
Self-citationNarayan, S., Cohen, S. B., & Lapata, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1206 · Cited by 1,207 · see citing works
“Recently, a convolutional alternative to sequence modeling has been proposed showing promise for machine translation (Gehring et al., 2017a,b) and story generation (Fan et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization
Maynez, J., Narayan, S., Bohnet, B., & McDonald, R. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.00661 · Cited by 1,185
“The Topic-aware Convolutional Sequence to Sequence model (TCONVS2S) introduced by Narayan et al. (2018a) is an abstractive system which is conditioned on the article’s topics and based entirely on Convolutional Neural Networks (Gehring et al., 2017).”
MethodQANet: Combining Local Convolution with Global Self-Attention for Reading ComprehensionPreprint
Yu, A. W., Dohan, D., Luong, M.-T., Zhao, R., Chen, K., Norouzi, M., & Le, Q. V. (2018) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.09541 · Cited by 1,169 · see citing works
“Recently, attempts have been made to replace the recurrent networks by full convolution or full attention architectures (Kim, 2014; Gehring et al., 2017; Vaswani et al., 2017b; Shen et al., 2017a).”
BackgroundOn Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization
Maynez, J., Narayan, S., Bohnet, B., & McDonald, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.173 · Cited by 1,185 · see citing works
What you can cram into a single $&!#* vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties
Conneau, A., Kruszewski, G., Lample, G., Barrault, L., & Baroni, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1198 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
“Complementing recent evidence that convolutional architectures are on a par with recurrent ones in seq2seq tasks (Gehring et al., 2017), we find that Gated ConvNet’s overall probing task performance is comparable to that of the best LSTM architecture (although, as shown in Appendix, the LSTM has a…”
MethodResultMolecular Transformer: A Model for Uncertainty-Calibrated Chemical Reaction Prediction
Schwaller, P., Laino, T., Gaudin, T., Bolgar, P., Hunter, C. A., Bekas, C., & Lee, A. A. (2019) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.9b00576 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformers
Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., & Sutskever, I. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.10509 · Cited by 1,063 · see citing works
“Other works have investigated attention with multiple ”hops”, such as (Sukhbaatar et al., 2015) and (Gehring et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodMASS: Masked Sequence to Sequence Pre-training for Language GenerationPreprint
Song, K., Tan, X., Qin, T., Lu, J., & Liu, T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.02450 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
“…2018; He et al., 2018; Hassan et al., 2018; Song et al., 2018; Shen et al., 2018), text summarization (Ayana et al., 2016; Suzuki & Nagata, 2017; Gehring et al., 2017), question answering (Yuan et al., 2017; Fedus et al., 2018) and conversational response generation (Shang et al., 2015; Vinyals…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialStand-Alone Self-Attention in Vision Models
Ramachandran, P., Parmar, N., Vaswani, A., Bello, I., Levskaya, A., & Shlens, J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.05909 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
“An emerging theme of augmenting convolution models with self-attention has yielded gains in several vision tasks.”
BackgroundNon-Autoregressive Neural Machine TranslationPreprint
Gu, J., Bradbury, J., Xiong, C., Li, V. O. K., & Socher, R. (2017) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.02281 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
“While several recently proposed models avoid recurrence at train time by leveraging convolutions (Kalchbrenner et al., 2016; Gehring et al., 2017; Kaiser et al., 2017) or self-attention (Vaswani et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialNeural Sign Language Translation
Camgöz, N. C., Hadfield, S., Koller, O., Ney, H., & Bowden, R. (2018) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00812 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
“Since then, various attention based architectures have been proposed for NMT, such as GNMT [60] that combines bi-directional and uni-directional encoders in a deep architecture and [22] which introduced a convolution based seq2seq learning approach.”
LeViT: a Vision Transformer in ConvNet’s Clothing for Faster Inference
Graham, B., El-Nouby, A., Touvron, H., Stock, P., Joulin, A., Jegou, H., & Douze, M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01204 · Cited by 935 · see citing works
“Other works have replaced them with parametric encoding [33] or adopt Fourier-based kernelized versions [22].”
MethodPETR: Position Embedding Transformation for Multi-View 3D Object Detection
Liu, Y.-F., Wang, T.-C., Zhang, X., & Sun, J. (2022) · European Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.05625 · Cited by 929
“In transformer, the features are usually added with position embedding, which provides the position information of the sequence [15,47,11,10,54], image [13,53,27] and video [1,24,52].”
BackgroundA Comprehensive Survey of Deep Learning for Image Captioning
Hossain, M. Z., Sohel, F., Shiratuddin, M. F., & Laga, H. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3295748 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
“Therefore, recently, convolutional architectures are used in other sequence to sequence tasks, e.g., conditional image generation [137] and machine translation [42, 43, 138].”
MethodASTER: An Attentional Scene Text Recognizer with Flexible Rectification
Shi, B., Yang, M.-K., Wang, X.-G., Lyu, P., Yao, C., & Bai, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2848939 · Cited by 873 · see citing works
“Sequence-to-sequence models come in various forms, such as [3], [15], [58].”
BackgroundSign Language Transformers: Joint End-to-End Sign Language Recognition and Translation
Camgöz, N. C., Koller, O., Hadfield, S., & Bowden, R. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01004 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
“Unlike other sequence-to-sequence models [61, 27], transformer networks do not employ recurrence or convolutions, thus lacking the positional information within sequences.”
BackgroundSankar, A., Wu, Y., Gou, L., Zhang, W., & Yang, H. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3336191.3371845 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
“First, we capture the ordering information in the temporal attention module by using position embeddings [5], {p1, .”
MethodResMLP: Feedforward Networks for Image Classification With Data-Efficient Training
Touvron, H., Bojanowski, P., Caron, M., Cord, M., El-Nouby, A., Grave, E., Izacard, G., Joulin, A., Synnaeve, G., Verbeek, J., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3206148 · Cited by 807 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24001 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
“…is important, because that is Although not at the level of professional human performance yet, Facebook’s AI Research team recently improved upon the best machine language translation algorithms available using convolutional neural net sequence prediction techniques (Gehring et al., 2017).”
VATT: Transformers for Multimodal Self-Supervised Learning from Raw Video, Audio and TextPreprint
Akbari, H., Yuan, L., Qian, R., Chuang, W.-H., Chang, S., Cui, Y., & Gong, B. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.11178 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
“ral networks [47, 8] and CNNs [110, 36], to more general architectures constructed upon self-attention.”
BackgroundInfluentialAn Intriguing Failing of Convolutional Neural Networks and the CoordConv Solution
Liu, R., Lehman, J., Molino, P., Such, F. P., Frank, E., Sergeev, A., & Yosinski, J. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.03247 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
“In a similar vein, research on convolutional sequence to sequence learning [7] has used fixed and learned position embeddings at the input layer; in that work, positions were represented via an overcomplete basis that is added to the incoming data rather than being compactly represented and input as separate channels.”
BackgroundDeep Learning for Entity Matching
Mudgal, S., Li, H., Rekatsinas, T., Doan, A., Park, Y., Krishnan, G., Deep, R., Arcaute, E., & Raghavendra, V. (2018) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3183713.3196926 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
“To this end, process H can be built around attention mechanisms (see Section 2) that first learn to compute a soft alignment between two given sequences of words and then perform a word by word comparison [23].”
BackgroundDeep Reinforcement Learning: An Overview
Li, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.07274 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
Neural Speech Synthesis with Transformer Network
Li, N., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Zhao, S., & Liu, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016706 · Cited by 754 · see citing works
“Previous NMT models are dominated by RNN-based (Bahdanau, Cho, and Bengio 2014) or CNN-based (e.g. ConvS2S (Gehring et al. 2017), ByteNet (Kalchbrenner et al. 2016)) neural networks.”
MethodA Simple Convolutional Generative Network for Next Item Recommendation
Yuan, F.-J., Karatzoglou, A., Arapakis, I., Jose, J., & He, X.-N. (2018) · Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3289600.3290975 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
“While effective, these RNN-based models, such as [3, 15], depend on a hidden state of the entire past that cannot fully utilize parallel computation within a sequence [8].”
BackgroundA Survey on Trajectory-Prediction Methods for Autonomous Driving
Huang, Y., Du, J., Yang, Z., Zhou, Z., Zhang, L., & Chen, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2022.3167103 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
“2) Convolutional Neural Network: Recently, CNN has achieved success in many tasks, such as computer vision [88], [89] and machine translation [90].”
BackgroundDong, H.-W., Hsiao, W.-Y., Yang, L.-C., & Yang, Y.-H. (2017) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11312 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
“eration. Moreover, because our model is one type of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), it is supposed to run faster than RNN-based models and is more easily parallelized (van den Oord et al. 2016; Gehring et al. 2017). We dub our model as the multi-track sequential generative adversarial network, or MuseGAN for sho…”
MethodNon-Local Recurrent Network for Image RestorationPreprint
Liu, D., Wen, B., Fan, Y., Loy, C. C., & Huang, T. S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.02919 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
“In addition to image restoration, feature correlations are widely exploited along with neural networks in many other areas, including graphical models [51, 4, 17], relational reasoning [32], machine translation [13, 40] and so on.”
BackgroundPACT: Parameterized Clipping Activation for Quantized Neural Networks
Choi, J., Wang, Z., Venkataramani, S., Chuang, P. I.-J., Srinivasan, V., & Gopalakrishnan, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.06085 · Cited by 703 · see citing works
“We further compare activation quantization performance with 3 previous schemes, DoReFa, LPBN, and HWGQ.”
BackgroundInfluentialPyramid Feature Attention Network for Saliency Detection
Zhao, T., & Wu, X. (2019) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00320 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
“Attention mechanisms have been successfully applied in various tasks such as machine translation [11], object recognition [25], image captioning [3, 36], visual question answering [34, 41] and pose estimation [6].”
MethodWhy Gradient Clipping Accelerates Training: A Theoretical Justification for AdaptivityPreprint
Zhang, J., He, T.-X., Sra, S., & Jadbabaie, A. (2019) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11881 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
“Even though gradient clipping is a standard practice in tasks such as language models (e.g. Merity et al., 2018; Gehring et al., 2017; Peters et al., 2018), it lacks a firm theoretical grounding.”
MethodPay Less Attention with Lightweight and Dynamic ConvolutionsPreprint
Wu, F., Fan, A., Baevski, A., Dauphin, Y., & Auli, M. (2019) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.10430 · Cited by 669 · see citing works
“…in sequence modeling through recurrent neural networks (RNN; Sutskever et al. 2014; Bahdanau et al. 2015; Wu et al. 2016), convolutional networks (CNN; Kalchbrenner et al. 2016; Gehring et al. 2016; 2017; Kaiser et al. 2017) and self-attention models (Paulus et al., 2017; Vaswani et al., 2017).”
MethodSelf-citationKoehn, P. (2020) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.07809 · Cited by 667
“A refinement of this was proposed by Gehring et al. (2017) who use multiple convolutional layers in the encoder and the decoder that do not reduce the length of the encoded sequence but incorporate wider context with each layer.”
Scaling Neural Machine Translation
Ott, M., Edunov, S., Grangier, D., & Auli, M. (2018) · Conference on Machine Translation · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-6301 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
“For En–Fr, we train on WMT’14 and borrow the setup of Gehring et al. (2017) with 36M training sentence pairs.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAn Empirical Study of Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Deep Networks
Zhu, X., Cheng, D., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., & Dai, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00679 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
“In [14], the weight assignment additionally accounts for the inner product of spatial positions encoded in high-dimensional vectors.”
BackgroundInfluentialMask TextSpotter: An End-to-End Trainable Neural Network for Spotting Text with Arbitrary Shapes
Liao, M., Lyu, P., He, M., Yao, C., Wu, W., & Bai, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2937086 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
“Inspired by [14], [73], the position embedding is adopted because the transformation operators in SAM are not positionsensitive.”
Achieving Human Parity on Automatic Chinese to English News TranslationPreprint
Hassan, H., Aue, A., Chen, C., Chowdhary, V., Clark, J., Federmann, C., Huang, X.-D., Junczys-Dowmunt, M., Lewis, W., Li, M., et al. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.05567 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
“f enc is a sentence-level feature extractor and can be implemented as multi-layer bidirectional RNNs [3, 45], a convolutional model (ConvS2S), [16] or a Transformer [38].”
MethodGaAN: Gated Attention Networks for Learning on Large and Spatiotemporal GraphsPreprint
Zhang, J., Shi, X., Xie, J., Ma, H., King, I., & Yeung, D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.07294 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
“…et al., 2017; Hamilton et al., 2017a; Veliˇckovi´c et al., 2018; Li et al., 2018), which generalizes the stan-∗ These two authors contributed equally. dard definition of convolution over a regular grid topology (Gehring et al., 2017; Krizhevsky et al., 2012) to ‘convolution’ over graph structures.”
BackgroundBandi, A., Adapa, P. V. S. R., & Kuchi, Y. E. V. P. K. (2023) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi15080260 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networks
Carlini, N., Liu, C., Erlingsson, Ú., Kos, J., & Song, D. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.08232 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis with Gated Convolutional Networks
Xue, W., & Li, T. (2018) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1234 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
“In language modeling (Dauphin et al., 2017; Kalchbrenner et al., 2016; van den Oord et al., 2016; Gehring et al., 2017), Gated Tanh Units (GTU) and Gated Linear Units (GLU) have shown effectiveness of gating mechanisms.”
MethodDual-path Convolutional Image-Text Embeddings with Instance Loss
Zheng, Z., Zheng, L., Garrett, M., Yang, Y., Xu, M., & Shen, Y.-D. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3383184 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Stanlaw, J. (2019) · Introducing Linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-6168-9 · Cited by 586 · see citing works
XL-Sum: Large-Scale Multilingual Abstractive Summarization for 44 LanguagesPreprint
Hasan, T., Bhattacharjee, A., Islam, M. S., Samin, K., Li, Y.-F., Kang, Y., Rahman, M. S., & Shahriyar, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.13822 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Gehring et al. (2017) proposed convolutional seq2seq models and applied it to perform abstractive summarization.”
MethodImproving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Counting
Bouritsas, G., Frasca, F., Zafeiriou, S. P., & Bronstein, M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3154319 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
“local patches in CNNs for images [29] or positional encodings in language models for sequential data [30], [31], [32].”
BackgroundWang, S., Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Sun, H., & Huang, J. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB) · doi:10.1145/3307339.3342186 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
“Recently, there are several CNNs-based language models having excellent performance on various language modeling tasks [6, 7, 9, 24, 25, 31].”
BackgroundMethodSemantics-Guided Neural Networks for Efficient Skeleton-Based Human Action Recognition
Zhang, P., Lan, C., Zeng, W.-J., Xing, J., Xue, J.-R., & Zheng, N. (2019) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00119 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
“, non-recurrent) convolutional neural networks for modeling sequences in speech, language [34, 10, 53, 48], and skeleton [18, 58, 30, 51] due to their superior performance.”
BackgroundSpatial-Temporal Transformer Networks for Traffic Flow ForecastingPreprint
Xu, M., Dai, W., Liu, C., Gao, X., Lin, W., Qi, G.-J., & Xiong, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.02908 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
“With the development of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), they have shown powerful feature extraction abilities in many applications[9] [13] [14], thus attracting much interests to apply them into traffic forecasting area.”
BackgroundTensor2Tensor for Neural Machine TranslationPreprint
Vaswani, A., Bengio, S., Brevdo, E., Chollet, F., Gomez, A. N., Gouws, S., Jones, L., Kaiser, Ł., Kalchbrenner, N., Parmar, N., et al. (2018) · Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.07416 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
“The same technique was improved in a number of neural translation models recently, including Gehring et al. (2017) and Kaiser et al. (2017). continues in applying the model in more domains and exploring the space of self-attention mechanisms.”
MethodOptimus: an efficient dynamic resource scheduler for deep learning clusters
Peng, Y.-H., Bao, Y., Chen, Y.-R., Wu, C., & Guo, C.-X. (2018) · European Conference on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/3190508.3190517 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
“An example of model fitting when training the Seq2Seq model [33] in Table 1 is given in Fig.”
MethodScene Text Detection and Recognition: The Deep Learning Era
Long, S., He, X. J., & Yao, C. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-020-01369-0 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
“decoder generates output sequence until it hits a stop symbol. We also refer readers to the following papers for recent advances in machine translation: Transformer [151], Convolutional Seq2Seq [31], [32], and the architecture evaluation survey [11]. These sequence modeling modules allow end-to-end gradient-based lear…”
BackgroundInfluentialSpeechBrain: A General-Purpose Speech Toolkit
Ravanelli, M., Parcollet, T., Plantinga, P., Rouhe, A., Cornell, S., Lugosch, L., Subakan, C., Dawalatabad, N., Heba, A., Zhong, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.04624 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
“It includes models such as ConvS2S [60], transformers [61], and wav2vec [62].”
MethodDyTox: Transformers for Continual Learning with DYnamic TOken eXpansion
Douillard, A., Ramé, A., Couairon, G., & Cord, M. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00907 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
“Following [26], a learned positional embedding p ∈ R(N+1)×D is added (element-wise).”
BackgroundFeature-level Deeper Self-Attention Network for Sequential Recommendation
Zhang, T., Zhao, P.-P., Liu, Y., Sheng, V. S., Xu, J.-J., Wang, D., Liu, G., & Zhou, X.-F. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/600 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
MuST-C: a Multilingual Speech Translation Corpus
Gangi, M. A. D., Cattoni, R., Bentivogli, L., Negri, M., & Turchi, M. (2019) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1202 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
“Our SLT architecture is a variant of the system proposed by B´erard et al. (2018), which we re-implemented in the fairseq toolkit (Gehring et al., 2017).”
MethodLeveraging Pre-trained Checkpoints for Sequence Generation Tasks
Rothe, S., Narayan, S., & Severyn, A. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00313 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
“, 2017), ConvS2S (Gehring et al., 2017), MMN (Kim et al.”
The Best of Both Worlds: Combining Recent Advances in Neural Machine Translation
Chen, M., Firat, O., Bapna, A., Johnson, M., Macherey, W., Foster, G. F., Jones, L., Schuster, M., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., et al. (2018) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1008 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
“We further introduce new architectures built with different components borrowed from RNMT+, ConvS2S and Transformer.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSparholt, H., Bogstad, B., Christensen, V., Collie, J., van Gemert, R., Hilborn, R., Horbowy, J., Howell, D., Melnychuk, M. C., Pedersen, S. A., et al. (2018) · 2026 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW) · doi:10.1109/icmew69720.2026.11720756 · Cited by 480
“We add learned absolute position embedding, pu ∈ Rdh×k (Gehring et al., 2017), resulting in a new vector, Hi = Hi +pu.”
Rethinking and Improving Relative Position Encoding for Vision TransformerPreprint
Wu, K., Peng, H.-W., Chen, M., Fu, J.-L., & Chao, H. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.14222 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
“There are several choices of absolute positional encodings, such as the fixed encodings by sine and cosine functions with different frequencies and the learnable encodings through training parameters [7, 23].”
BackgroundMethodDehghani, M., Gouws, S., Vinyals, O., Uszkoreit, J., & Kaiser, Ł. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.03819 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
“Convolutional and fully-attentional feed-forward architectures like the Transformer model have recently emerged as viable alternatives to recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for a range of sequence modeling tasks, notably machine translation [9, 31].”
BackgroundMask-Predict: Parallel Decoding of Conditional Masked Language Models
Ghazvininejad, M., Levy, O., Liu, Y., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1633 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
“The implementation of both the baseline transformer and our CMLM is based on fairseq (Gehring et al., 2017), which efficiently decodes left-to-right transformers by caching the state.”
BackgroundMethodBlockwise Parallel Decoding for Deep Autoregressive ModelsPreprint
Stern, M., Shazeer, N., & Uszkoreit, J. (2018) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.03115 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
“One common feature among recent architectures such as the Transformer and convolutional sequence-to-sequence models is an increased capacity for parallel computation, making them a better fit for today’s massively parallel hardware accelerators (Vaswani et al., 2017; Gehring et al., 2017).”
CoCoNuT: combining context-aware neural translation models using ensemble for program repair
Lutellier, T., Pham, H., Pang, L., Li, Y., Wei, M., & Tan, L. (2020) · International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis · doi:10.1145/3395363.3397369 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
“Figure 6 shows the same bug in both the Java (Figure 6a) and Python (Figure 6b) We compare CoCoNuT with DLFix [42] and SequenceR [13], two state-of-the-art NMT-based APR techniques and three other state-of-the-art NMT architectures (i.e., LSTM [56], Transformer [78], and FConv [20]).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialModeling Point Clouds With Self-Attention and Gumbel Subset Sampling
Yang, J., Zhang, Q., Ni, B., Li, L., Liu, J., Zhou, M., & Tian, Q. (2019) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00344 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
“An attention mechanism [4, 47, 11, 49, 48] uses inputdependent weights to linearly combine the inputs.”
BackgroundNeural Machine Translation: A ReviewPreprint
Stahlberg, F. (2019) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.02047 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
“6.6 for detailed descriptions of GNMT, ConvS2S, and the Transformer).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLogBERT: Log Anomaly Detection via BERT
Guo, H., Yuan, S., & Wu, X. (2021) · 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9534113 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
“In 2017, the Facebook AI team [58] adopted CNN in sequence-to-sequence learning by using convolution kernels to extract the information of sequences.”
Method
- Authors
- Gehring, J., Auli, M., Grangier, D., Yarats, D., & Dauphin, Y. N.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 1243-1252
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1705.03122
- OpenAlex
- W2613904329
- Cited by
- 2,850
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 174 · 2023: 250 · 2022: 285 · 2021: 485 · 2020: 553 · 2019: 603 · 2018: 346 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Machine Learning
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- sequence-to-sequence learning, convolutional neural networks, parallel training, gated linear units, attention mechanism, machine translation, English-German translation, English-French translation, LSTM comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review