Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 0

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Black holes to white holes II: quasi-classical scenarios for white hole evolution

Bardeen, James M.·2020·arXiv

Abstract

This paper considers a wider range of "quasi-classical" models for the non-singular transition from an evaporating black hole to a white hole and the evolution of the white hole than were considered in Paper I. The quantum evolution of the geometry outside a collapsing shell is described by a smoothly evolving spherically symmetric effective metric, with a transition from trapped surfaces in the black hole to anti-trapped surfaces in the white hole at a spacelike hypersurface on which the circumferential radius has a minimum Planck-scale value. Rather than focusing on a specific model for the effective metric and the corresponding effective stress-energy tensor, I consider the general properties of such a transition and the end of the black hole following from the assumption of a smooth geometry. Alternative scenarios for the evolution of the white hole, which avoid the prolonged emission of negative energy from the white hole of the Paper I scenario, are explored. If such a transition, suggested by Loop Quantum Gravity, can be firmly established, the conventional holographic interpretation of the fine-grained entropy of a black hole must be abandoned. It would also be a counter-example to the generalized second law and quantum singularity theorems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2007.00190

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Bardeen, J. M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
References
3
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.