The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices
Open accessAbstract
Recent technological developments have focused the interest of the quantum computing community on investigating how near-term devices could outperform classical computers for practical applications. A central question that remains open is whether their noise can be overcome or it fundamentally restricts any potential quantum advantage. We present a transparent way of comparing classical algorithms to quantum ones running on near-term quantum devices for a large family of problems that include optimization problems and approximations to the ground state energy of Hamiltonians. Our approach is based on the combination of entropic inequalities that determine how fast the quantum computation state converges to the fixed point of the noise model, together with established classical methods of Gibbs state sampling. The approach is extremely versatile and allows for its application to a large variety of problems, noise models and quantum computing architectures. We use our result to provide estimates for a variety of problems and architectures that have been the focus of recent experiments, such as quantum annealers, variational quantum eigensolvers, and quantum approximate optimization. The bounds we obtain indicate that substantial quantum advantages are unlikely for classical optimization unless the current noise rates are decreased by orders of magnitude or the topology of the problem matches that of the device. This is the case even if the number of qubits increases substantially. We reach similar but less stringent conclusions for quantum Hamiltonian problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In addition, the BP phenomenon has been studied when training randomly initialized perceptron-based quantum neural networks [200, 201]. Here, BPs arise from the significant amount of entanglement created by the perceptrons connecting large number of qubits in visible and hidden layers.”
From Variational quantum algorithms (2021) · cites this paper as [201]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- [2]J. Preskill, Quantum 2 , 79 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · DOI · Paper page
- [3]A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O'Brien, Nature Communications 5 (2014), 10.1038/ncomms5213. · DOI · Paper page
- [6]R. LaRose, A. Tikku, ´ E. O'Neel-Judy, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, npj Quantum Information 5 (2019), 10.1038/s41534-019-0167-6. · DOI · Paper page
- [7]C. Bravo-Prieto, R. LaRose, M. Cerezo, Y. Subasi, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, 'Variational quantum linear solver,' (2019), arXiv:1909.05820 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- [8]S. McArdle, T. Jones, S. Endo, Y. Li, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, npj Quantum Information 5 (2019), 10.1038/s41534-019-0187-2. · DOI · Paper page
- [9]N. Moll, P. Barkoutsos, L. S. Bishop, J. M. Chow, A. Cross, D. J. Egger, S. Filipp, A. Fuhrer, J. M. Gambetta, M. Ganzhorn, et al. , arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.01022 (2017). · arXiv
- [11]D. Wang, O. Higgott, and S. Brierley, Physical review letters 122 , 140504 (2019).
- [12]E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, 'A quantum approximate optimization algorithm,' (2014), arXiv:1411.4028 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- [13]E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser, arXiv preprint quant-ph/0001106 (2000). · arXiv
- [15]A. Lucas, Frontiers in Physics 2 (2014), 10.3389/fphy.2014.00005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2014.00005 · DOI · Paper page
- [16]A. Mller-Hermes, D. S. Fran¸ ca, and M. M. Wolf, Journal of Mathematical Physics 57 , 022202 (2016).
- [18]S. Bubeck, Foundations and Trends R © in Machine Learning 8 , 231 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2200000050 · DOI
- [19]S. Aaronson, X. Chen, E. Hazan, S. Kale, and A. Nayak, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2019 , 124019 (2019).
- 2018 (ACM Press, 2018).
- [21]F. G. Brand˜ ao, A. Kalev, T. Li, C. Y.-Y. Lin, K. M. Svore, and X. Wu, arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.02581 (2017). · arXiv
- [22]F. G. S. L. Brando, R. Kueng, and D. S. Frana, 'Faster quantum and classical sdp approximations for quadratic binary optimization,' (2019), arXiv:1909.04613 [cs.DS]. · arXiv
- [23]A. Youssry, C. Ferrie, and M. Tomamichel, New Journal of Physics 21 , 033006 (2019).
- [24]D. Petz, Communications in Mathematical Physics 114 , 345 (1988). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01225040 · DOI
- [25]D. A. Levin and Y. Peres, Markov chains and mixing times , Vol. 107 (American Mathematical Soc., 2017).
- [26]R. Eldan, F. Koehler, and O. Zeitouni, 'A Spectral Condition for Spectral Gap: Fast Mixing in High-Temperature Ising Models,' (2020), arXiv:2007.08200v1, 2007.08200. · arXiv
- [27]G. A. Kochenberger, J.-K. Hao, Z. L, H. Wang, and F. Glover, Journal of Heuristics 19 , 565 (2011).
- [28]I. Dunning, S. Gupta, and J. Silberholz, INFORMS Journal on Computing 30 , 608 (2018).
- [29]A. Yurtsever, J. A. Tropp, O. Fercoq, M. Udell, and V. Cevher, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.02949 (2019). · arXiv
- [30]E. Crosson and S. Slezak, 'Classical Simulation of High Temperature Quantum Ising Models,' (2020), arXiv:2002.02232v1, 2002.02232. · arXiv
- [31]A. Harrow, S. Mehraban, and M. Soleimanifar, 'Classical algorithms, correlation decay, and complex zeros of partition functions of quantum many-body systems,' (2019), arXiv:1910.09071v1, 1910.09071. · arXiv
- [32]T. Kuwahara, K. Kato, and F. G. Brando, Physical Review Letters 124 (2020), 10.1103/physrevlett.124.220601. · DOI
- [37]S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 , 190601 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.190601 · DOI
- [40]S. Jansen, M.-B. Ruskai, and R. Seiler, Journal of Mathematical Physics 48 , 102111 (2007).
- [41]M. H. S. Amin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 , 220401 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.220401 · DOI
- [42]M. J. Kastoryano and K. Temme, Journal of Mathematical Physics 54 , 052202 (2013).
- [43]R. Olkiewicz and B. Zegarlinski, Journal of Functional Analysis 161 , 246 (1999).
- [44]S. Beigi, N. Datta, and C. Rouz´ e, Communications in Mathematical Physics 376 , 753 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-020-03750-z · DOI
- [46]T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Physical Review A 91 (2015), 10.1103/physreva.91.062320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.91.062320 · DOI
- [49]V. S. Denchev, S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, N. Ding, R. Babbush, V. Smelyanskiy, J. Martinis, and H. Neven, Physical Review X 6 (2016), 10.1103/physrevx.6.031015. · DOI · Paper page
- [50]M. Aramon, G. Rosenberg, E. Valiante, T. Miyazawa, H. Tamura, and H. G. Katzgraber, Frontiers in Physics 7 (2019), 10.3389/fphy.2019.00048. · DOI · Paper page
- [52]I. Bardet and C. Rouz´ e, arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05379 (2018). · arXiv
- [55]M. Mller-Lennert, F. Dupuis, O. Szehr, S. Fehr, and M. Tomamichel, Journal of Mathematical Physics 54 , 122203 (2013).
- [56]N. Datta, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 55 , 2816 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tit.2009.2018325 · DOI
- [58]M. J. Kastoryano, D. Reeb, and M. M. Wolf, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 45 , 075307 (2012).
- [59]L. Lami and M. Huber, Journal of Mathematical Physics 57 , 092201 (2016).
- [60]E. P. Hanson, C. Rouz´ e, and D. S. Fran¸ ca, Annales Henri Poincar´ e (2020), 10.1007/s00023-020-00906-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00023-020-00906-4 · DOI
- [61]A. Harrow and J. Napp, 'Low-depth gradient measurements can improve convergence in variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms,' (2019), arXiv:1901.05374 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- [62]Y. Ge, A. Moln´ ar, and J. I. Cirac, Physical Review Letters 116 (2016), 10.1103/physrevlett.116.080503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.116.080503 · DOI
- [63]E. Farhi, D. Gamarnik, and S. Gutmann, 'The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm Needs to See the Whole Graph: Worst Case Examples,' (2020), arXiv:2005.08747v1, 2005.08747. · arXiv
- [64]S. Bravyi, A. Kliesch, R. Koenig, and E. Tang, 'Obstacles to State Preparation and Variational Optimization from Symmetry Protection,' (2019), arXiv:1910.08980v1, 1910.08980. · arXiv
- [65]M. X. Goemans and D. P. Williamson, Journal of the ACM (JACM) 42 , 1115 (1995).
- [67]M. B. Hastings and T. Koma, Communications in Mathematical Physics 265 , 781 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-006-0030-4 · DOI
- [68]R. Ors, Annals of Physics 349 , 117158 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 · DOI · Paper page
- [69]I. H. Kim and B. Swingle, 'Robust entanglement renormalization on a noisy quantum computer,' (2017), arXiv:1711.07500 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- [70]I. H. Kim, 'Noise-resilient preparation of quantum manybody ground states,' (2017), arXiv:1703.00032 [quantph]. · arXiv
- [71]J. Borregaard, M. Christandl, and D. S. Frana, 'Noise-robust exploration of quantum matter on nearterm quantum devices,' (2019), arXiv:1909.04786v1, 1909.04786. · arXiv
- [72]F. G. S. L. Brandao and K. M. Svore, in 58th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer ScienceFOCS 2017 (IEEE Computer Soc., Los Alamitos, CA, 2017) pp. 415-426.
- [73]M. Christandl and A. Mller-Hermes, Communications in Mathematical Physics 353 , 821 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-017-2885-y · DOI
- [74]A. A. Budini, Physical Review A 64 (2001), 10.1103/physreva.64.052110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.64.052110 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variational quantum algorithms
Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J. R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 · Cited by 3,385
Metadata
- Authors
- Franca, D. S., & Garcia-Patron, R.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1221-1227
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2009.05532
- OpenAlex
- W3086576671
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 12.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Nature Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Villum Fonden (10059)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- noisy quantum devices, quantum advantage, optimization algorithms, variational quantum algorithms, quantum annealing, entropy inequality, noise models, quantum error correction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2009.05532
- The paper
- Franca, D. S., & Garcia-Patron, R. (2020). Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2009.05532