PreprintCited by 225Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCryptography and Data Security

When Federated Learning Meets Blockchain: A New Distributed Learning Paradigm

Open access
Ma, Chuan, Li, Jun, Ding, Ming, Shi, Long, Wang, Taotao, Han, Zhu, Poor, H. Vincent·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Motivated by the explosive computing capabilities at end user equipments, as well as the growing privacy concerns over sharing sensitive raw data, a new machine learning paradigm, named federated learning (FL) has emerged. By training models locally at each client and aggregating learning models at a central server, FL has the capability to avoid sharing data directly, thereby reducing privacy leakage. However, the traditional FL framework heavily relies on a single central server and may fall apart if such a server behaves maliciously. To address this single point of failure issue, this work investigates a blockchain assisted decentralized FL (BLADE-FL) framework, which can well prevent the malicious clients from poisoning the learning process, and further provides a self-motivated and reliable learning environment for clients. In detail, the model aggregation process is fully decentralized and the tasks of training for FL and mining for blockchain are integrated into each participant. In addition, we investigate the unique issues in this framework and provide analytical and experimental results to shed light on possible solutions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2009.09338

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In FLchain, a lazy node may plagiarize other clients' ML models without real training during the block verification process.

    “Another unique challenge in FLchain is the plagiarism issue during the block verification process, where a lazy node may plagiarize the other clients' ML models without real training [93].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, C., Li, J., Ding, M., Shi, L., Wang, T., Han, Z., & Poor, H. V.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
26-33
ISSN
1556-603X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087463235
Cited by
225
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
15.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2128368, 2039716, 2107216)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62002170, 61872184)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20210331)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (30919011274)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
federated learning, blockchain, decentralized machine learning, model aggregation, malicious clients, data poisoning, privacy preservation, resource allocation, differential privacy, pseudonoise sequences, watermarking, blockchain mining, single point of failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review