Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 66Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Adaptive pruning-based optimization of parameterized quantum circuits

Open access
Sim, Sukin, Romero, Jonathan, Gonthier, Jerome F., Kunitsa, Alexander A.·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms are powerful tools to maximize the use of Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum devices. While past studies have developed powerful and expressive ansatze, their near-term applications have been limited by the difficulty of optimizing in the vast parameter space. In this work, we propose a heuristic optimization strategy for such ansatze used in variational quantum algorithms, which we call "Parameter-Efficient Circuit Training" (PECT). Instead of optimizing all of the ansatz parameters at once, PECT launches a sequence of variational algorithms, in which each iteration of the algorithm activates and optimizes a subset of the total parameter set. To update the parameter subset between iterations, we adapt the dynamic sparse reparameterization scheme by Mostafa et al. (arXiv:1902.05967). We demonstrate PECT for the Variational Quantum Eigensolver, in which we benchmark unitary coupled-cluster ansatze including UCCSD and k-UpCCGSD, as well as the low-depth circuit ansatz (LDCA), to estimate ground state energies of molecular systems. We additionally use a layerwise variant of PECT to optimize a hardware-efficient circuit for the Sycamore processor to estimate the ground state energy densities of the one-dimensional Fermi-Hubbard model. From our numerical data, we find that PECT can enable optimizations of certain ansatze that were previously difficult to converge and more generally can improve the performance of variational algorithms by reducing the optimization runtime and/or the depth of circuits that encode the solution candidate(s).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2010.00629

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Preskill J 2018 Quantum 2 79 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Peruzzo A, McClean J, Shadbolt P, Yung M-H, Zhou X-Q, Love P J, Aspuru-Guzik A and O'Brien J L 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4213 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Farhi E, Goldstone J and Gutmann S 2014 A quantum approximate optimization algorithm (arXiv:1411.4028) · arXiv
  4. Havlíček V, Córcoles A D, Temme K, Harrow A W, Kandala A, Chow J M and Gambetta J M 2019 Nature 567 209 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Farhi E and Neven H 2018 Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors (arXiv:1802.06002) · arXiv
  6. Schuld M, Bocharov A, Svore K M and Wiebe N 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 032308 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Romero J, Olson J P and Aspuru-Guzik A 2017 Quantum Sci. Technol. 2 045001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dallaire-Demers P-L and Killoran N 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 012324 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lloyd S and Weedbrook C 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 040502 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Zeng J, Wu Y, Liu J G, Wang L and Hu J 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 052306 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Situ H, He Z, Wang Y, Li L and Zheng S 2020 Inf. Sci. 538 193 · DOI
  12. Zhu D et al 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaaw9918 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Romero J and Aspuru-Guzik A 2019 Variational quantum generators: generative adversarial quantum machine learning for continuous distributions (arXiv:1901.00848) · arXiv
  14. McClean J R, Boixo S, Smelyanskiy V N, Babbush R and Neven H 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4812 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Cerezo M, Sone A, Volkoff T, Cincio L and Coles P J 2020 Cost-function-dependent barren plateaus in shallow quantum neural networks (arXiv:2001.00550) · arXiv
  16. Volkoff T and Coles P J 2020 Large gradients via correlation in random parameterized quantum circuits (arXiv:2005.12200) · arXiv
  17. Ostaszewski M, Grant E and Benedetti M 2019 Quantum circuit structure learning (arXiv:1905.09692) · arXiv
  18. Wilson M, Stromwold S, Wudarski F, Hadfield S, Tubman N M and Rieffel E G 2019 Optimizing quantum heuristics with meta-learning (arXiv:1908.03185) · arXiv
  19. Grimsley H R, Economou S E, Barnes E and Mayhall N J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 3007 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Tang H L, Barnes E, Grimsley H R, Mayhall N J and Economou S E 2019 Qubit-ADAPT-VQE: an adaptive algorithm for constructing hardware-efficient ansatze on a quantum processor (arXiv:1911.10205) · arXiv
  21. Stokes J, Izaac J, Killoran N and Carleo G 2020 Quantum 4 269 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rattew A G, Hu S, Pistoia M, Chen R and Wood S 2019 A domain-agnostic, noise-resistant, hardware-efficient evolutionary variational quantum eigensolver (arXiv:1910.09694) · arXiv
  23. Kübler J M, Arrasmith A, Cincio L and Coles P J 2020 Quantum 4 263 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Chivilikhin D, Samarin A, Ulyantsev V, Iorsh I, Oganov A R and Kyriienko O 2020 MoG-VQE: multiobjective genetic variational quantum eigensolver (arXiv:2007.04424) · arXiv
  25. Sung K J, Yao J, Harrigan M P, Rubin N C, Jiang Z, Lin L, Babbush R and McClean J R 2020 Quantum Sci. Technol. 5 044008 · DOI
  26. Wecker D, Hastings M B and Troyer M 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 042303 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Garcia-Saez A and Latorre J I 2018 Addressing hard classical problems with adiabatically assisted variational quantum eigensolvers (arXiv:1806.02287) · arXiv
  28. Skolik A, McClean J R, Mohseni M, van der Smagt P and Leib M 2020 Layerwise learning for quantum neural networks (arXiv:2006.14904) · arXiv
  29. Grant E, Wossnig L, Ostaszewski M and Benedetti M 2019 Quantum 3 214 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Verdon G, Broughton M, McClean J R, Sung K J, Babbush R, Jiang Z, Neven H and Mohseni M 2019 Learning to learn with quantum neural networks via classical neural networks (arXiv:1907.05415) · arXiv
  31. Mitarai K, Yan T and Fujii K 2019 Phys. Rev. Applied 11 044087 · DOI
  32. Cervera-Lierta A, Kottmann J S and Aspuru-Guzik A 2020 The meta-variational quantum eigensolver (Meta-VQE): learning energy profiles of parameterized Hamiltonians for quantum simulation (arXiv:2009.13545) · arXiv
  33. Shen Y, Zhang X, Zhang S, Zhang J-N, Yung M-H and Kim K 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 020501 · DOI
  34. Babbush R, Wiebe N, McClean J, McClain J, Neven H and Chan G K-L 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 011044 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kivlichan I D, McClean J, Wiebe N, Gidney C, Aspuru-Guzik A, Chan G K-L and Babbush R 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 110501 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Barkoutsos P K et al 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 022322 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Dallaire-Demers P-L, Romero J, Veis L, Sim S and Aspuru-Guzik A 2019 Quantum Sci. Technol. 4 045005 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Lee J, Huggins W J, Head-Gordon M and Whaley K B 2019 J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 15 311 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Choquette A, Di Paolo A, Barkoutsos P K, Sénéchal D, Tavernelli I and Blais A 2020 Quantum-optimal-control-inspired ansatz for variational quantum algorithms (arXiv:2008.01098) · arXiv
  40. Yung M-H, Casanova J, Mezzacapo A, McClean J, Lamata L, Aspuru-Guzik A and Solano E 2015 Sci. Rep. 4 3589 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Mostafa H and Wang X 2019 Parameter efficient training of deep convolutional neural networks by dynamic sparse reparameterization (arXiv:1902.05967) · arXiv
  42. Dallaire-Demers P-L, Ste ¸chły M, Gonthier J F, Bashige N T, Romero J and Cao Y 2020 An application benchmark for fermionic quantum simulations (arXiv:2003.01862) · arXiv
  43. Sim S, Johnson P D and Aspuru-Guzik A 2019 Adv. Quantum Technol. 2 1900070 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Rasmussen S E, Loft N J S, Bækkegaard T, Kues M and Zinner N T 2020 Single-qubit rotations in parameterized quantum circuits (arXiv:2005.13548) · arXiv
  45. Romero J, Babbush R, McClean J R, Hempel C, Love P J and Aspuru-Guzik A 2018 Quantum Sci. Technol. 4 014008 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Byrd R H, Lu P, Nocedal J and Zhu C 1995 SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 16 1190 · DOI
  47. Li L, Fan M, Coram M, Riley P and Leichenauer S 2020 Phys. Rev. Research 2 023074 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Motta M, Ye E, McClean J R, Li Z, Minnich A J, Babbush R and Chan G K-L 2018 Low rank representations for quantum simulation of electronic structure (arXiv:1808.02625) · arXiv
  49. Cooper B and Knowles P J 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 133 234102 · DOI
  50. Ma J, Li S and Li W 2006 J. Comput. Chem. 27 39 · DOI
  51. Li X and Paldus J 1998 J. Chem. Phys. 108 637 · DOI
  52. Olsen J, Jo/rgensen P, Koch H, Balkova A and Bartlett R J 1996 J. Chem. Phys. 104 8007 · DOI
  53. Brown F B, Shavitt I and Shepard R 1984 Chem. Phys. Lett. 105 363 · DOI
  54. Sokolov I O, Barkoutsos P K, Ollitrault P J, Greenberg D, Rice J, Pistoia M and Tavernelli I 2020 J. Chem. Phys. 152 124107 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Grimsley H R, Claudino D, Economou S E, Barnes E and Mayhall N J 2020 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16 1 · DOI
  56. Izmaylov A F, Díaz-Tinoco M and Lang R A 2020 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 12980 · DOI
  57. Bengio Y, Lamblin P, Popovici D and Larochelle H 2007 Advances in Neural Information Processing System vol 153
  58. Kandala A, Mezzacapo A, Temme K, Takita M, Brink M, Chow J M and Gambetta J M 2017 Nature 549 242 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Arute F et al 2019 Nature 574 505 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Kennedy J and Eberhart R 1995 Proc. of ICNN'95 -Int. Conf. on Neural Networks vol 4 (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE) 1942-8
  61. Le C 1990 Advances in Neural Information Processing System vol 2
  62. McClean J R et al 2020 Quantum Sci. Technol. 5 034014 · DOI
  63. Parrish R M et al 2017 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13 3185 · DOI
  64. Guerreschi G G, Hogaboam J, Baruffa F and Sawaya N P D 2020 Quantum Sci. Technol. 5 034007 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sim, S., Romero, J., Gonthier, J. F., & Kunitsa, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Zapata (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Sim, Sukin
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
025019-025019
ISSN
2058-9565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3090958492
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quantum Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐FG02‐, FG02-97ER25308)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
adaptive pruning, variational quantum algorithms, variational quantum eigensolver, unitary coupled cluster ansatz, UCCSD, Fermi-Hubbard model, ground state energy estimation, hardware-efficient ansatz, NISQ devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.