From transistor to trapped-ion computers for quantum chemistry
Open accessAbstract
Over the last few decades, quantum chemistry has progressed through the development of computational methods based on modern digital computers. However, these methods can hardly fulfill the exponentially-growing resource requirements when applied to large quantum systems. As pointed out by Feynman, this restriction is intrinsic to all computational models based on classical physics. Recently, the rapid advancement of trapped-ion technologies has opened new possibilities for quantum control and quantum simulations. Here, we present an efficient toolkit that exploits both the internal and motional degrees of freedom of trapped ions for solving problems in quantum chemistry, including molecular electronic structure, molecular dynamics and vibronic coupling. We focus on applications that go beyond the capacity of classical computers, but may be realizable on state-of-the-art trapped-ion systems. These results allow us to envision a new paradigm of quantum chemistry that shifts from the current transistor to a near-future trapped-ion-based technology.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper proposes a trapped-ion quantum-simulation toolkit for quantum chemistry, combining quantum-assisted variational optimization, unitary coupled-cluster states, and phonon-mode simulation. It estimates that near-term trapped-ion systems can simulate problems such as H₂ electronic structure within decoherence times and beyond classical capacity.
Key findings
- The toolkit has two main components: a hybrid quantum-classical “quantum-assisted optimization” for ground-state energies/eigenvectors, and optimized use of trapped-ion phonon modes for molecular vibrations and spin-boson/fermion-boson problems.
- For implementing the unitary coupled-cluster ansatz, the standard quantum-circuit treatment needs as many as 2N two-qubit gates for N fermionic modes, whereas the proposed protocol needs only two Mølmer-Sørensen gates.
- For H₂ in a minimal STO-3G basis (two electrons, four spin-orbitals, H–H separation 0.75 Å), the Hamiltonian has 12 terms (4 local operations and 8 non-local interactions); dynamics requires 16 MS gates per Trotter step, with estimated total simulation times of about 800 μs, 1.6 ms, and 2.4 ms for n = 1, 2, and 3, within ~30 ms decoherence times.
- Trapped-ion context cited: up to 100 quantum logic gates have been realized for six qubits, quantum simulators involving 300 ions have been demonstrated, state preparation/single- and two-qubit gates/detection fidelities are above 99%, and one-qubit measurement fidelity is 99.99%.
Methods
- Theoretical proposal for digital-analog trapped-ion quantum simulation of electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and vibronic coupling, using Jordan-Wigner transformation, Mølmer-Sørensen gates, Suzuki-Trotter expansion, and phase estimation with one extra ancilla ion.
- Quantum-assisted optimization prepares parameterized UCC states, measures Hamiltonian expectation values in polynomial pieces, and updates parameters via classical optimization algorithms such as gradient descent, Nelder-Mead, or quasi-Newton methods.
- Numerical investigation estimates resources and fidelity loss for H₂ in a minimal STO-3G basis, comparing simulated and exact state fidelities and energy for the initial state |↑↑↓↓〉 across Trotter steps n = 1, 2, 3.
Limitations
- Stated: increasing Trotter steps reduces digital approximation error but accumulates single-gate error, creating a tradeoff; classical approximate UCC can break down when the reference state is not a good solution.
- Stated/assumed: convergence of the UCC optimization assumes the parametrization gives a smooth energy function E(T(k)) that converges for large k.
- Evident: the numerical demonstration is limited to H₂ in a minimal basis and resource estimates; no experimental trapped-ion implementation is reported, and near-future two-qubit gate infidelities of 10⁻⁴ are predicted rather than demonstrated.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 23 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning
After Jordan-Wigner transformation, the electronic Hamiltonian in second quantization becomes highly nonlocal in terms of Pauli operators.
“Consequently, the electronic Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) becomes highly nonlocal in terms of the Pauli operators {σx, σy, σz}, i.e.,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The quantum resources for measurements can be significantly reduced by dividing the measurement of the Hamiltonian into a polynomial number of small pieces.
“Practically, the quantum resources for the measurements can be significantly reduced when we divide the measurement of the Hamiltonian into a polynomial number of small pieces 〈Hi〉 (cf Eq. (2)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The authors have developed a novel protocol to measure correlation functions of observables in trapped ions that will be crucial for the quantum simulation of quantum chemistry.
“Furthermore, we have also developed a novel protocol to measure correlation functions of observables in trapped ions that will be crucial for the quantum simulation of quantum chemistry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For the H2 molecule in a minimal STO-3G basis, the Hamiltonian is made up of 12 terms, including 4 local ion operations and 8 non-local interactions.
“The Hamiltonian is made up of 12 terms, that include 4 local ion operations and 8 non-local interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The energy of the system for the initial state |↑↑↓↓〉 can be retrieved with a small error within a reduced number of digital steps.
“Again, one can observe how the energy can be retrieved with a small error within a reduced number of digital steps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingcitation
Total simulation times are within the decoherence times for trapped-ion setups, of about 30 ms.
“Thus total simulation times are within the decoherence times for trapped-ion setups, of about 30 ms32.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Häffner, H., Roos, C. F. & Blatt, R. Quantum computing with trapped ions. Phys. Rep. 469, 155–203 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
The method for measuring arbitrarily-nonlocal spin operators requires the measurement of one qubit only.
“Note that the application of this method requires the measurement of one qubit only, making this technique especially suited for trapped ion systems where the fidelity of the measurement of one qubit is 99.99%48.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Myerson, A. H. et al. High-Fidelity Readout of Trapped-Ion Qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 200502 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
Each non-local term for the H2 Hamiltonian can be done as a combination of two Mølmer-Sørensen (MS) gates and local rotations.
“Each of the non-local terms can be done as a combination of two Mølmer-Sørensen (MS) gates and local rotations, as described in Table 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
As system size scales up, all known quantum chemistry methods on classical computers suffer limitations that make them fail to maintain accuracy with finite resources.
“However, as the system size scales up, all of the methods known so far suffer from limitations that make them fail to maintain accuracy with a finite amount of resources3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Head-Gordon, M. & Artacho, E. Chemistry on the computer. Phys. Today, 61, 58 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Second quantized fermionic Hamiltonians are efficiently simulatable in trapped ions.
“This kind of second quantized fermionic Hamiltonians are efficiently simulatable in trapped ions23.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Casanova, J., Mezzacapo, A., Lamata, L. & Solano, E. Quantum Simulation of Interacting Fermion Lattice Models in Trapped Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 190502 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The performance of quantum-assisted optimization depends crucially on the choice of variational states and efficient measurement methods.
“The performance of quantum-assisted optimization depends crucially on (a) the choice of the variational states, and (b) efficient measurement methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The fidelity of the measurement of one qubit in trapped ion systems is 99.99%.
“Note that the application of this method requires the measurement of one qubit only, making this technique especially suited for trapped ion systems where the fidelity of the measurement of one qubit is 99.99%48.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Myerson, A. H. et al. High-Fidelity Readout of Trapped-Ion Qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 200502 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The local rotation RN(φ) can include motional degrees of freedom of the ions for simulating arbitrary fermionic Hamiltonians coupled linearly to bosonic operators.
“Furthermore, the local rotation RN(ϕ) can also include motional degrees of freedom of the ions for simulating arbitrary fermionic Hamiltonians coupled linearly to bosonic operators ak and .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Trapped ions can be exploited to solve dynamical problems involving linearly or non-linearly coupled oscillators, e.g., spin-boson models, that are difficult to solve either analytically or numerically with a classical computer.
“Consequently, trapped ions can be exploited to solve dynamical problems involving linearly or non-linearly coupled oscillators, e.g., spin-boson models4142, that are difficult to solve either analytically or numerically with a classical computer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] Leggett, A. et al. Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system. Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 185 (1987). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Mostame, S. et al. Quantum simulator of an open quantum system using superconducting qubits: exciton transport in photosynthetic complexes. New J. Phys. 14, 105013 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
With combinations of Mølmer-Sørensen gates, one can obtain dynamics associated with the electronic Hamiltonian He and simulate arbitrary quantum chemistry systems.
“With combinations of this kind of gates, one can obtain dynamics as the associated one to He in Eq. (2), that will allow one to simulate arbitrary quantum chemistry systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The method can be extended to include bosonic operators in the resulting expectation values.
“This method can be further extended to include bosonic operators in the resulting expectation values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Quantum phase estimation with one extra ancilla qubit can extract eigenvalues of the electronic Hamiltonian.
“In fact, locating these eigenvalues can be achieved by the phase estimation method utilizing one extra ancilla qubit12 corresponding, in our case, to one additional ion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Li, Z. et al. Solving quantum ground-state problems with nuclear magnetic resonance. Sci. Rep. 1, 88 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
The key challenge for implementing UCC on a classical computer is that the computational resource grows exponentially.
“The key challenge for implementing UCC on a classical computer is that the computational resource grows exponentially.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Implementing UCC on a trapped-ion quantum computer can overcome the problem of approximate UCC breaking down.
“We explain below how implementing UCC on a trapped-ion quantum computer can overcome this problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The technique allows obtaining a diverse range of correlations between bosonic and internal degrees of freedom.
“This technique allows us to obtain a diverse range of correlations between bosonic and internal degrees of freedom.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The phonon degrees of freedom in trapped-ion systems provide a natural platform for addressing spin-boson or fermion-boson-type problems through quantum simulation.
“The phonon degrees of freedom in trapped-ion systems provide a natural platform for addressing spin-boson or fermion-boson-type problems through quantum simulation233637383940.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [23] Casanova, J., Mezzacapo, A., Lamata, L. & Solano, E. Quantum Simulation of Interacting Fermion Lattice Models in Trapped Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 190502 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Lamata, L., León, J., Schätz, T. & Solano, E. Dirac Equation and Quantum Relativistic Effects in a Single Trapped Ion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 253005 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [37] Gerritsma, R. et al. Quantum simulation of the Dirac equation. Nature 463, 68–71 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 10
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationUnitary coupled-cluster (UCC) states are particularly suitable for being the input state for quantum-assisted optimization, and each quantum state can be prepared efficiently with standard techniques in trapped ions.
“We found that the unitary coupled-cluster (UCC) states35 are particularly suitable for being the input state for quantum-assisted optimization, where each quantum state |ψλ〉 can be prepared efficiently with standard techniques in trapped ions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Taube, A. G. & Bartlett, R. J. New perspectives on unitary coupled-cluster theory. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 106, 3393–3401 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe total simulation time is about 800 μs for the n = 1 protocol, 1.6 ms for n = 2, and 2.4 ms for n = 3.
“the total simulation time can be assumed of about 800 μs for the n = 1 protocol, 1.6 ms and 2.4 ms for the n = 2 and n = 3 protocols.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenEfficient measurement methods for the electronic Hamiltonian He are available for trapped ion systems.
“Furthermore, efficient measurement methods for He are also available for trapped ion systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe standard quantum-circuit treatment for implementing each non-local operator involves as many as 2N two-qubit gates for simulating N fermionic modes; in our protocol one needs only two Mølmer-Sørensen gates.
“It is remarkable that the standard quantum-circuit treatment (e.g. see Ref.47) for implementing each involves as many as 2N two-qubit gates for simulating N fermionic modes; in our protocol one needs only two Mølmer-Sørensen gates, which are straightforwardly implementable with current trapped-ion technology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Whitfield, J. D., Biamonte, J. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Simulation of electronic structure Hamiltonians using quantum computers. Mol. Phys. 109, 735750 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTo implement the dynamics for the H2 Hamiltonian, one needs 16 MS gates per Trotter step and a certain number of local rotations.
“Therefore, to implement the dynamics, one needs 16 MS gates per Trotter step and a certain number of local rotations upon the ions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationUp to 100 quantum logic gates have been realized for six qubits with trapped ions.
“Up to 100 quantum logic gates have been realized for six qubits with trapped ions22”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Lanyon, B. P. et al. Universal digital quantum simulation with trapped ions. Science 334, 57–61 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe fidelities of state preparation, single- and two-qubit gates, and detection in trapped-ion systems are all above 99%.
“The fidelities of state preparation, single- and two-qubit gates, and detection, are all above 99%32.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Häffner, H., Roos, C. F. & Blatt, R. Quantum computing with trapped ions. Phys. Rep. 469, 155–203 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA quantum computer can efficiently solve problems of quantum systems.
“As envisioned by Feynman4, one should be able to efficiently solve problems of quantum systems with a quantum computer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Feynman, R. P. Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467–488 (1982). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTrapped-ion systems offer high-precision control over both the internal degrees of freedom of individual ions and the phonon degrees of freedom of collective motions, and high-fidelity initialization and measurement.
“The power of trapped ions for quantum simulation is manifested by the high-precision control over both the internal degrees of freedom of the individual ions and the phonon degrees of freedom of the collective motions of the trapped ions, and the high-fidelity initialization and measurement3233.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [32] Häffner, H., Roos, C. F. & Blatt, R. Quantum computing with trapped ions. Phys. Rep. 469, 155–203 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C. & Wineland, D. Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions.. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 281–324 (2003). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe number of terms in the electronic Hamiltonian He scales polynomially in N, and the integrals {hpq, hpqrs} can be numerically calculated by a classical computer with polynomial resources.
“Therefore, the number of terms in He scales polynomially in N, and the integrals {hpq, hpqrs} can be numerically calculated by a classical computer with polynomial resources9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Aspuru-Guzik, A., Dutoi, A. D., Love, P. J. & Head-Gordon, M. Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies. Science 309, 1704–7 (2005). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationQuantum simulators involving 300 ions have been demonstrated.
“and quantum simulators involving 300 ions have been demonstrated34.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Britton, J. W. et al. Engineered two-dimensional Ising interactions in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hundreds of spins. Nature 484, 489–492 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe simulation of the electronic Hamiltonian can still be made efficient with trapped ions.
“Nevertheless, the simulation can still be made efficient with trapped ions, as we shall discuss below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe proposed quantum simulation toolkit for quantum chemistry with trapped ions has advantages: efficient electronic simulation, the possibility of interacting electronic and vibrational degrees of freedom, and increasing scalability provided by trapped-ion systems.
“This paradigm in quantum simulations has several advantages: an efficient electronic simulation, the possibility of interacting electronic and vibrational degrees of freedom, and the increasing scalability provided by trapped-ion systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAfter locating the local minima of the ground and excited states, vibronic coupling for the electronic structure can be further studied.
“After locating the local minima of the ground and excited states, vibronic coupling for the electronic structure can be further studied (see Supplementary Material).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTrapped-ion two-qubit gates are predicted to achieve in the near future infidelities of 10^-4, making the use of these protocols feasible.
“Trapped-ion two-qubit gates are predicted to achieve in the near future infidelities of 10−4, thus making the use of these protocols feasible50.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Kirchmair, G. et al. Deterministic entanglement of ions in thermal states of motion. New J. Phys. 11, 023002 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningQuantum simulations of quantum chemistry problems could reach realistic conditions for finite bosonic and fermionic mode numbers.
“It is noteworthy to mention that, contrary to the continuous of modes required for full-fledged quantum field theories, quantum simulations of quantum chemistry problems could reach realistic conditions for finite bosonic and fermionic mode numbers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe energy obtained from UCC is a variational upper bound of the exact ground-state energy.
“The energy obtained from UCC, namely is a variational upper bound of the exact ground-state energy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningApproximate UCC methods rely on the assumption that the reference state |Φ〉 is a good solution, and in many cases this assumption is not valid and the use of approximate UCC breaks down.
“Naturally, one has to rely on approximate methods3546 to truncate the series and keep track of finite numbers of terms. Therefore, in order to make good approximations by perturbative methods, i.e., assuming T is small, one implicitly assumes that the reference state |Φ〉 is a good solution to the problem. However, in many cases, such an assumption is not valid and the use of approximate UCC breaks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [35] Taube, A. G. & Bartlett, R. J. New perspectives on unitary coupled-cluster theory. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 106, 3393–3401 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [46] Kutzelnigg, W. Error analysis and improvements of coupled-cluster theory. Theor. Chim. Acta 80, 349–386 (1991). source
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The parametrization of UCC gives a smooth function for E(T(k)).
“Finally, as a valid assumption for general cases, we assume our parametrization of UCC gives a smooth function for E (T(k)).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The UCC ansatz adds quantum correlations to the Hartree-Fock approximation and is inefficient to represent on a classical computer.
“They arose from the quantum chemistry-specific observation that the unitary coupled cluster (UCC) ansatz (Taube and Bartlett, 2006), which adds quantum correlations to the Hartree-Fock approximation, is inefficient to represent on a classical computer (Yung et al. , 2014).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Yung et al., 2014
In practice, it has been observed that δ = 10^-10 is more than sufficient to retain quantitatively accurate results in molecular calculation with GTOs.
“In practice, it has been observed that δ = 10 -10 is more than sufficient to retain quantitatively accurate results in molecular calculation with GTOs 79,306,347 .”
From Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing (2019) · cites this paper as [347]
Electronic structure Hamiltonians by definition have O(N^4) terms; in a local basis the number of non-negligible terms scales as O(N^2), and advanced techniques can evaluate these contributions in O(N) time.
“As noted before, the electronic structure Hamiltonians by definition have O ( N 4 ) terms, however, in a local basis the number of non-negligible terms scale as O ( N 2 ) and advanced techniques can evaluate these contributions in O ( N ) time. This is the basis of linear scaling methods employed in quantum chemistry 79,347 .”
From Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing (2019) · cites this paper as [347]
Quantum algorithms can be expressed as polynomial-sized quantum circuits built from two-qubit unitary gates.
“It is well-known that quantum algorithms can be expressed as polynomial-sized quantum circuits built from two-qubit unitary gates [15].”
From Validating quantum computers using randomized model circuits (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691 · see citing works
Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system
Leggett, A. J., Chakravarty, S., Dorsey, A. T., Fisher, M. P. A., Garg, A., & Zwerger, W. (1987) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.59.1 · Cited by 5,109 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, spin-boson models [41, 42], that are difficult to solve either analytically or numerically with a classical computer.”
BackgroundA variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552 · see citing works
Self-citationLloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We can generate the UCC state by simulating a pseudo time evolution through Suzuki-Trotter expansion on the evolution operator eT−T † [21].”
MethodQuantum dynamics of single trapped ions
Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.281 · Cited by 2,739 · see citing works
Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems
Dirac, P. A. M. (1929) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1929.0094 · Cited by 1,786 · see citing works
Simulated Quantum Computation of Molecular Energies
Aspuru-Guzik, A., Dutoi, A. D., Love, P. J., & Head-Gordon, M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113479 · Cited by 1,418 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum computing with trapped ions
HAFFNER, H., ROOS, C., & BLATT, R. (2008) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.09.003 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
Multiparticle Entanglement of Hot Trapped Ions
Mølmer, K., & Sørensen, A. S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1835 · Cited by 995 · see citing works
An Introduction to Quantum Computing
Kaye, P., Laflamme, R., & Mosca, M. (2007) · Quantum information & computation · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198570004.001.0001 · Cited by 968 · see citing works
Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Walther, P. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2253 · Cited by 952 · see citing works
Self-citationCharge and Energy Transfer Dynamics in Molecular Systems
May, V., & Kühn, O. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527633791 · Cited by 947 · see citing works
Britton, J. W., Sawyer, B. C., Keith, A. C., Wang, C.-C. J., Freericks, J. K., Uys, H., Biercuk, M. J., & Bollinger, J. J. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10981 · Cited by 941 · see citing works
Simulating Physics with Computers
Feynman, R. P. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429500459-11 · Cited by 870 · see citing works
Quantum Algorithm Providing Exponential Speed Increase for Finding Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Abrams, D. S., & Lloyd, S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.5162 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Towards quantum chemistry on a quantum computer
Lanyon, B. P., Whitfield, J. D., Gillett, G. G., Goggin, M. E., Almeida, M. P., Kassal, I., Biamonte, J. D., Mohseni, M., Powell, B. J., Barbieri, M., et al. (2010) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.483 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum simulation of the Dirac equation
Gerritsma, R., Kirchmair, G., Zähringer, F., Solano, E., Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08688 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Self-citationUniversal Digital Quantum Simulation with Trapped Ions
Lanyon, B. P., Hempel, C., Nigg, D., Müller, M., Gerritsma, R., Zähringer, F., Schindler, P., Barreiro, J. T., Rambach, M., Kirchmair, G., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208001 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Simulation of electronic structure Hamiltonians using quantum computers
Whitfield, J. D., Biamonte, J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2011) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2011.552441 · Cited by 472 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[47]) for implementing each e−iHlt/n involves as many as 2N two-qubit gates for simulating N fermionic modes; in our protocol one needs only two Mølmer-Sørensen gates, which are straightforwardly implementable with current trapped-ion technology.”
MethodSelf-citationSimulating quantum systems on a quantum computer
Zalka, C. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0162 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Polynomial-time quantum algorithm for the simulation of chemical dynamics
Kassal, I., Jordan, S. P., Love, P. J., Mohseni, M., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808245105 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Self-citationSimulating Chemistry Using Quantum Computers
Kassal, I., Whitfield, J. D., Perdomo-Ortiz, A., Yung, M.-H., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2011) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103512 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum algorithms for fermionic simulations
Ortiz, G., Gubernatis, J. E., Knill, E., & Laflamme, R. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.022319 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
High-Fidelity Readout of Trapped-Ion Qubits
Myerson, A. H., Szwer, D. J., Webster, S. C., Allcock, D. T. C., Curtis, M. J., Imreh, G., Sherman, J. A., Stacey, D. N., Steane, A. M., & Lucas, D. M. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.200502 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Temme, K., Osborne, T. J., Vollbrecht, K. G., Poulin, D., & Verstraete, F. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09770 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Dirac Equation and Quantum Relativistic Effects in a Single Trapped Ion
Lamata, L., León, J., Schätz, T., & Solano, E. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.253005 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citationNew perspectives on unitary coupled‐cluster theory
Taube, A. G., & Bartlett, R. J. (2006) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.21198 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Simulation of Electronic Structure Hamiltonians Using Quantum Computers
Whitfield, J. D., Biamonte, J., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2011) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Self-citationPoulin, D., & Wocjan, P. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.220502 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Error analysis and improvements of coupled-cluster theory
Kutzelnigg, W. (1991) · Theoretica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1007/bf01117418 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
A quantum–quantum Metropolis algorithm
Yung, M., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1111758109 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationSimulating open quantum systems: from many-body interactions to stabilizer pumping
Müller, M., Hammerer, K., Zhou, Y. L., Roos, C. F., & Zoller, P. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/8/085007 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Deterministic entanglement of ions in thermal states of motion
Kirchmair, G., Benhelm, J., Zähringer, F., Gerritsma, R., Roos, C. F., & Blatt, R. (2009) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/2/023002 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Simulating Ising spin glasses on a quantum computer
Lidar, D. A., & Biham, O. (1997) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.56.3661 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Quantum Simulation of Interacting Fermion Lattice Models in Trapped Ions
Casanova, J., Mezzacapo, A., Lamata, L., & Solano, E. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.190502 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationCalculating the thermal rate constant with exponential speedup on a quantum computer
Lidar, D. A., & Wang, H. (1999) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.59.2429 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Preparing Ground States of Quantum Many-Body Systems on a Quantum Computer
Poulin, D., & Wocjan, P. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.130503 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Polynomial-Time Simulation of Pairing Models on a Quantum Computer
Wu, L.-A., Byrd, M., & Lidar, D. A. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.057904 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Mostame, S., Rebentrost, P., Eisfeld, A., Kerman, A. J., Tsomokos, D. I., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/105013 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum Simulation of Quantum Field Theories in Trapped Ions
Casanova, J., Lamata, L., Egusquiza, I. L., Gerritsma, R., Roos, C. F., García‐Ripoll, J. J., & Solano, E. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.260501 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationSimulating Sparse Hamiltonians with Star Decompositions
Childs, A. M., & Kothari, R. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18073-6_8 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Quantum algorithm for molecular properties and geometry optimization
Kassal, I., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2009) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3266959 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationDigital Quantum Simulation of the Holstein Model in Trapped Ions
Mezzacapo, A., Casanova, J., Lamata, L., & Solano, E. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.200501 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationComputational complexity in electronic structure
Whitfield, J. D., Love, P. J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2013) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c2cp42695a · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationHead-Gordon, M., & Artacho, E. (2008) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2911179 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Demon-like algorithmic quantum cooling and its realization with quantum optics
Xu, J., Yung, M., Xu, X.-Y., Boixo, S., Zhou, Z.-W., Li, C., Aspuru‐Guzik, A., & Guo, G. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.354 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationPreparing Thermal States of Quantum Systems by Dimension Reduction
Bilgin, E., & Boixo, S. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.170405 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Solving Quantum Ground-State Problems with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Li, Z., Yung, M.-H., Chen, H., Lu, D., Whitfield, J. D., Peng, X., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Du, J. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00088 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationDigital quantum simulation of the statistical mechanics of a frustrated magnet
Zhang, J., Yung, M., Laflamme, R., Aspuru‐Guzik, A., & Baugh, J. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1860 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum algorithm for approximating partition functions
Wocjan, P., Chiang, C.-F., Nagaj, D., & Abeyesinghe, A. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.022340 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Introduction to Quantum Algorithms for Physics and Chemistry
Yung, M. H., Whitfield, J. D., Boixo, S., Tempel, D. G., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2014) · Advances in chemical physics · doi:10.1002/9781118742631.ch03 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationSimulation of classical thermal states on a quantum computer: A transfer-matrix approach
Yung, M., Nagaj, D., Whitfield, J. D., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.060302 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficiency of free-energy calculations of spin lattices by spectral quantum algorithms
Master, C. P., Yamaguchi, F., & Yamamoto, Y. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.032311 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Back to The Future: A Roadmap for Quantum Simulation From Vintage Quantum Chemistry
Love, P. J. (2014) · Advances in chemical physics · doi:10.1002/9781118742631.ch02 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Back to the Future: A roadmap for quantum simulation from vintage quantum chemistryPreprint
Love, P. J. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1208.5524 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Introduction to Quantum Algorithms for Physics and ChemistryPreprint
Yung, M.-H., Whitfield, J. D., Boixo, S., Tempel, D. G., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1203.1331
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets
Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Temme, K., Takita, M., Brink, M., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23879 · Cited by 2,982 · see citing works
Self-citationBarren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes
McClean, J. R., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., & Neven, H. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4 · Cited by 2,329 · see citing works
Self-citationThe theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms
McClean, J. R., Romero, J., Babbush, R., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023023 · Cited by 2,227 · see citing works
Self-citationNoisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 1,726 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum computational chemistry
McArdle, S., Endo, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015003 · Cited by 1,621 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing
Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J. P., Degroote, M., Johnson, P. D., Kieferová, M., Kivlichan, I. D., Menke, T., Peropadre, B., Sawaya, N. P. D., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00803 · Cited by 1,560 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing
Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J., Degroote, M., Johnson, P., Kieferová, M., Kivlichan, I., Menke, T., Peropadre, B., Sawaya, N., et al. (n.d.) · OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
Self-citationScalable Quantum Simulation of Molecular Energies
O’Malley, P. J. J., Babbush, R., Kivlichan, I. D., Romero, J., McClean, J. R., Barends, R., Kelly, J., Roushan, P., Tranter, A., Ding, N., et al. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.031007 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review
Wendin, G. P. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa7e1a · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor
Kandala, A., Temme, K., Corcoles, A. D., Mezzacapo, A., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1040-7 · Cited by 870 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum Algorithms for Quantum Chemistry and Quantum Materials Science
Bauer, B., Bravyi, S., Motta, M., & Chan, G. K.-L. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00829 · Cited by 848 · see citing works
Programmable Quantum Simulations of Spin Systems with Trapped Ions
Monroe, C., Campbell, W. C., Duan, L. M., Gong, Z. X., Gorshkov, A. V., Hess, P., Islam, R., Kim, K., Linke, N., Pagano, G., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.07845 · Cited by 806
Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions
Monroe, C. R., Campbell, W. C., Duan, L.-M., Gong, Z., Gorshkov, A. V., Hess, P., Islam, R., Kim, K., Linke, N. M., Pagano, G., et al. (2021) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.025001 · Cited by 807 · see citing works
Strategies for quantum computing molecular energies using the unitary coupled cluster ansatz
Romero, J., Babbush, R., McClean, J. R., Hempel, C., Love, P. J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aad3e4 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Self-citationValidating quantum computers using randomized model circuits
Cross, A. W., Bishop, L. S., Sheldon, S., Nation, P. D., & Gambetta, J. M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032328 · Cited by 704 · see citing works
Quantum Chemistry Calculations on a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator
Hempel, C., Maier, C., Romero, J., McClean, J., Monz, T., Shen, H., Jurcevic, P., Lanyon, B. P., Love, P., Babbush, R., et al. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031022 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Self-citationHybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms and Quantum Error Mitigation
Endo, S., Cai, Z., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2021) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.90.032001 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Hybrid quantum-classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and determination of excited states
McClean, J. R., Kimchi-Schwartz, M. E., Carter, J., & de Jong, W. A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.042308 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Self-citationOpenFermion: the electronic structure package for quantum computers
McClean, J. R., Rubin, N. C., Sung, K. J., Kivlichan, I., Bonet-Monroig, X., Cao, Y., Dai, C., Fried, E., Gidney, C., Gimby, B., et al. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab8ebc · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Self-citationTang, H. L., Shkolnikov, V. O., Barron, G. S., Grimsley, H. R., Mayhall, N. J., Barnes, E., & Economou, S. E. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020310 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Compact Ion-Trap Quantum Computing Demonstrator
Pogorelov, I., Feldker, T., Marciniak, C. D., Postler, L., Jacob, G., Krieglsteiner, O., Podlesnic, V., Meth, M., Negnevitsky, V., Stadler, M., et al. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020343 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Barkoutsos, P. K., Gonthier, J. F., Sokolov, I., Moll, N., Salis, G., Fuhrer, A., Ganzhorn, M., Egger, D. J., Troyer, M., Mezzacapo, A., et al. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.022322 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Self-citationStrawberry Fields: A Software Platform for Photonic Quantum Computing
Killoran, N., Izaac, J., Quesada, N., Bergholm, V., Amy, M., & Weedbrook, C. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-03-11-129 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Layerwise learning for quantum neural networks
Skolik, A., McClean, J. R., Mohseni, M., van der Smagt, P., & Leib, M. (2021) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-020-00036-4 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Self-citationGate-count estimates for performing quantum chemistry on small quantum computers
Wecker, D., Bauer, B., Clark, B. K., Hastings, M. B., & Troyer, M. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022305 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Quantum implementation of the unitary coupled cluster for simulating molecular electronic structure
Shen, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Zhang, J.-N., Yung, M., & Kim, K. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.020501 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasurement optimization in the variational quantum eigensolver using a minimum clique cover
Verteletskyi, V., Yen, T.-C., & Izmaylov, A. F. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5141458 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Amplitude estimation without phase estimation
Suzuki, Y., Uno, S., Raymond, R., Tanaka, T., Onodera, T., & Yamamoto, N. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-019-2565-2 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Error-Mitigated Digital Quantum Simulation
McArdle, S., Yuan, X., & Benjamin, S. C. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.180501 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Optimizing Variational Quantum Algorithms Using Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle
Yang, Z.-C., Rahmani, A., Shabani, A., Neven, H., & Chamon, C. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.021027 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Quantum equation of motion for computing molecular excitation energies on a noisy quantum processor
Ollitrault, P. J., Kandala, A., Chen, C.-F., Barkoutsos, P. K., Mezzacapo, A., Pistoia, M., Sheldon, S., Woerner, S., Gambetta, J. M., & Tavernelli, I. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043140 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Self-citationChemical basis of Trotter-Suzuki errors in quantum chemistry simulation
Babbush, R., McClean, J., Wecker, D., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Wiebe, N. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022311 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationAdiabatic Quantum Simulation of Quantum Chemistry
Babbush, R., Love, P. J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06603 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Self-citationA Multireference Quantum Krylov Algorithm for Strongly Correlated Electrons
Stair, N. H., Huang, R., & Evangelista, F. A. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01125 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Izmaylov, A. F., Yen, T.-C., Lang, R. A., & Verteletskyi, V. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00791 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Entanglement devised barren plateau mitigation
Patti, T. L., Najafi, K., Gao, X., & Yelin, S. F. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033090 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Variational quantum eigensolver with fewer qubits
Liu, J.-G., Zhang, Y.-H., Wan, Y., & Wang, L. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.023025 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Quantum equation of motion for computing molecular excitation energies on a noisy quantum processor
Ollitrault, P. J., Kandala, A., Chen, C.-F., Barkoutsos, P. K., Mezzacapo, A., Pistoia, M., Sheldon, S., Woerner, S., Gambetta, J., & Tavernelli, I. (2020) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000467868 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationSokolov, I. O., Barkoutsos, P. K., Ollitrault, P. J., Greenberg, D., Rice, J., Pistoia, M., & Tavernelli, I. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5141835 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Global entangling gates on arbitrary ion qubits
Lu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, K., Chen, W., Shen, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, J.-N., & Kim, K. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1428-4 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
SupermarQ: A Scalable Quantum Benchmark Suite
Tomesh, T., Gokhale, P., Omole, V., Ravi, G. S., Smith, K. N., Viszlai, J., Wu, X.-C., Hardavellas, N., Martonosi, M., & Chong, F. T. (2022) · IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) · doi:10.1109/hpca53966.2022.00050 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era and beyond
Callison, A., & Chancellor, N. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.010101 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Exponentially more precise quantum simulation of fermions in second quantization
Babbush, R., Berry, D. W., Kivlichan, I. D., Wei, A. Y., Love, P. J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/3/033032 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationTensorCircuit: a Quantum Software Framework for the NISQ Era
Zhang, S., Allcock, J., Wan, Z., Liu, S., Sun, J., Yu, H., Yang, X.-H., Qiu, J., Ye, Z., Chen, Y., et al. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-02-912 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
High-Performance Computing with Quantum Processing Units
Britt, K. A., & Humble, T. S. (2017) · ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3007651 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Quantum simulation of quantum field theory in the light-front formulation
Kreshchuk, M., Kirby, W. M., Goldstein, G. R., Beauchemin, P. H., & Love, P. J. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.032418 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
A comprehensive review of quantum machine learning: from NISQ to fault tolerance
Wang, Y., & Liu, J. (2024) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad7f69 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Digital quantum simulation of molecular vibrations
McArdle, S., Mayorov, A., Shan, X., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2019) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c9sc01313j · Cited by 96 · see citing works
A Full Quantum Eigensolver for Quantum Chemistry Simulations
Wei, S., Li, H., & Long, G. (2020) · Research · doi:10.34133/2020/1486935 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Digital-analog quantum simulations with superconducting circuits
Lamata, L., Parra-Rodriguez, A., Sanz, M., & Solano, E. (2018) · Advances in Physics X · doi:10.1080/23746149.2018.1457981 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationSugisaki, K., Nakazawa, S., Toyota, K., Sato, K., Shiomi, D., & Takui, T. (2018) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.8b00788 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Adiabatic state preparation study of methylene
Veis, L., & Pittner, J. (2014) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4880755 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Neural predictor based quantum architecture search
Zhang, S.-X., Hsieh, C.-Y., Zhang, S., & Yao, H. (2021) · Machine Learning: Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ac28dd · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Hardware efficient quantum algorithms for vibrational structure calculations
Ollitrault, P. J., Baiardi, A., Reiher, M., & Tavernelli, I. (2020) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d0sc01908a · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Babbush, R., Berry, D. W., Sanders, Y. R., Kivlichan, I., Scherer, A., Wei, A. Y., Love, P. J., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2017) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa9463 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationSimulating quantum materials with digital quantum computers
Oftelie, L. B., Urbánek, M., Metcalf, M., Carter, J. T., Kemper, A. F., & de Jong, W. A. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac1ca6 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Gate-free state preparation for fast variational quantum eigensolver simulations
Meitei, O. R., Gard, B., Barron, G. S., Pappas, D. P., Economou, S. E., Barnes, E., & Mayhall, N. J. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00493-0 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Nonadiabatic Molecular Quantum Dynamics with Quantum Computers
Ollitrault, P. J., Mazzola, G., & Tavernelli, I. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.260511 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Efficient evaluation of quantum observables using entangled measurements
Hamamura, I., & Imamichi, T. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-0284-2 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Automatic spin-chain learning to explore the quantum speed limit
Zhang, X., Cui, Z.-W., Wang, X., & Yung, M. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.052333 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationUniversal quantum circuits for quantum chemistry
Arrazola, J. M., Matteo, O. D., Quesada, N., Jahangiri, S., Delgado, A., & Killoran, N. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-06-20-742 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Cao, C., Hu, J., Zhang, W., Xu, X., Chen, D., Yu, F., Li, J., Hu, H., Lv, D., & Yung, M. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.062452 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient Quantum Algorithm for Computing n -time Correlation Functions
Pedernales, J. S., Candia, R. D., Egusquiza, I. L., Casanova, J., & Solano, E. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.020505 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationXia, R., & Kais, S. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abbc74 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Adaptive pruning-based optimization of parameterized quantum circuits
Sim, S., Romero, J., Gonthier, J. F., & Kunitsa, A. A. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abe107 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Analog quantum simulation of chemical dynamics
MacDonell, R. J., Dickerson, C. E., Birch, C. J. T., Kumar, A., Edmunds, C., Biercuk, M. J., Hempel, C., & Kassal, I. (2021) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d1sc02142g · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Reinforcement learning for optimization of variational quantum circuit architecturesPreprint
Ostaszewski, M., Trenkwalder, L. M., Masarczyk, W., Scerri, E., & Dunjko, V. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.16089 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Ab initio methods for polariton chemistry
Foley, J. J., McTague, J., & DePrince, A. E. (2023) · Chemical Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0167243 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Simulating Many-Body Systems with a Projective Quantum Eigensolver
Stair, N. H., & Evangelista, F. A. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030301 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Initial State Preparation for Quantum Chemistry on Quantum Computers
Fomichev, S., Hejazi, K., Zini, M. S., Kiser, M., Fraxanet, J., Casares, P. A. M., Delgado, A., Huh, J., Voigt, A.-C., Mueller, J. E., et al. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.040339 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Sugisaki, K., Yamamoto, S., Nakazawa, S., Toyota, K., Sato, K., Shiomi, D., & Takui, T. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.6b04932 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Veis, L., Višňák, J., Nishizawa, H., Nakai, H., & Pittner, J. (2016) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.25176 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Efficient quantum simulation of fermionic and bosonic models in trapped ions
Lamata, L., Mezzacapo, A., Casanova, J., & Solano, E. (2014) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt9 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum Computing: An Overview Across the System StackPreprint
Resch, S., & Karpuzcu, U. R. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.07240 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Variational Quantum Simulation for Quantum Chemistry
Li, Y., Hu, J., Zhang, X., Song, Z., & Yung, M. (2019) · Advanced Theory and Simulations · doi:10.1002/adts.201800182 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, K., Shi, Y., Xiao, L., Wang, J. B., Joglekar, Y. N., & Xue, P. (2020) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.396228 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
qTorch: The quantum tensor contraction handler
Fried, E., Sawaya, N. P. D., Cao, Y., Kivlichan, I., Romero, J., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208510 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum-classical simulation of two-site dynamical mean-field theory on noisy quantum hardware
Keen, T., Maier, T., Johnston, S., & Lougovski, P. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab7d4c · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Abrupt transitions in variational quantum circuit training
Campos, E., Nasrallah, A., & Biamonte, J. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.032607 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Multilevel 2-D Quantum Wavelet Transforms
Li, H.-S., Fan, P., Peng, H., Song, S., & Long, G. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2021.3049509 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Contextuality Test of the Nonclassicality of Variational Quantum Eigensolvers
Kirby, W. M., & Love, P. J. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.200501 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Equation-of-Motion Theory to Calculate Accurate Band Structures with a Quantum Computer
Fan, Y., Liu, J., Li, Z., & Yang, J. (2021) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02153 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Variational quantum eigensolvers by variance minimization
Zhang, D.-B., Chen, B.-L., Yuan, Z.-H., & Yin, T. (2022) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac8a8d · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Quantum Machine-Learning for Eigenstate Filtration in Two-Dimensional Materials
Sajjan, M., Sureshbabu, S. H., & Kais, S. (2021) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c06246 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Emulating weak localization using a solid-state quantum circuit
Chen, Y., Roushan, P., Sank, D., Neill, C., Lucero, E. A., Mariantoni, M., Barends, R., Chiaro, B., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6184 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Constructing quantum circuits with global gates
van de Wetering, J. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abf1b3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Selected topics of quantum computing for nuclear physics*
Zhang, D.-B., Xing, H., Yan, H., Wang, E., & Zhu, S.-L. (2020) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abd761 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Leveraging Small-Scale Quantum Computers with Unitarily Downfolded Hamiltonians
Huang, R., Li, C., & Evangelista, F. A. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.020313 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Ab initio molecular dynamics on quantum computers
Fedorov, D. A., Otten, M., Gray, S. K., & Alexeev, Y. (2021) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0046930 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Variational quantum attacks threaten advanced encryption standard based symmetric cryptography
Wang, Z., Wei, S., Long, G., & Hanzo, L. (2022) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-022-3511-5 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Sugisaki, K., Yamamoto, S., Nakazawa, S., Toyota, K., Sato, K., Shiomi, D., & Takui, T. (2018) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cpletx.2018.100002 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Contextual Subspace Variational Quantum Eigensolver
Kirby, W. M., Tranter, A., & Love, P. J. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-05-14-456 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Sugisaki, K., Sakai, C., Toyota, K., Sato, K., Shiomi, D., & Takui, T. (2021) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d1cp03156b · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Sugisaki, K., Kato, T., Minato, Y., Okuwaki, K., & Mochizuki, Y. (2022) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d1cp04318h · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Zhang, T., Li, C., & Evangelista, F. A. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00353 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Digital-Analog Quantum Simulations Using the Cross-Resonance Effect
Gonzalez-Raya, T., Asensio-Perea, R., Martin, A., Céleri, L. C., Sanz, M., Lougovski, P., & Dumitrescu, E. F. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020328 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Error-mitigated photonic variational quantum eigensolver using a single-photon ququart
Lee, D., Lee, J., Hong, S., Lim, H., Cho, Y., Han, S.-W., Shin, H., Rehman, J. U., & Kim, Y. (2021) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.441163 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Fermionic models with superconducting circuits
Heras, U. L., García-Álvarez, L., Mezzacapo, A., Solano, E., & Lamata, L. (2015) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-015-0021-5 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationStair, N. H., & Evangelista, F. A. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0014928 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Deep reinforcement learning for universal quantum state preparation via dynamic pulse control
He, R.-H., Wang, R., Nie, S.-S., Wu, J., Zhang, J., & Wang, Z.-M. (2021) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-021-00119-6 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yung, M.-H., Casanova, J., Mezzacapo, A., McClean, J., Lamata, L., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Solano, E.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of the Basque Country (ES)
- Ikerbasque (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Solano, E.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2014-01-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3589-3589
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5378044
- OpenAlex
- W2157120748
- Semantic Scholar
- 7ba2e32f72c284933a6502c4c926734a6eb62368
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 11.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Communities in ADDI (Universidad del Pais Vasco) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DE-FG02-97ER25308, 1037992)
- U.S. Department of Defense
- U.S. Department of Energy (DEFG0297ER25308, DE‐FG02‐, FG02-97ER25308)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61061130540, 61033001)
- Eusko Jaurlaritza (IT-472-10, IT472, UPV/EHU UFI 11/55)
- Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (11/55, UPV/EHU UFI 11/55, UFI 11/55)
- Defense Threat Reduction Agency (HDTRA1-10-1-0046, HDTRA1)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (61033001, 2011CBA00301, 2011CBA00300, 2011CBA00301, 2011CBA00300)
- Division of Chemistry
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA 9550-12-1-0046, FA9550-, FA9550-12, FA9550‐12‐1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- trapped-ion quantum computing, molecular electronic structure, molecular dynamics, vibronic coupling, quantum control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review