CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 7Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisData Management and AlgorithmsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

An individual-level ground truth dataset for home location detection

Open access
Pappalardo, Luca, Ferres, Leo, Sacasa, Manuel, Cattuto, Ciro, Bravo, Loreto·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2010.08814arXiv 2010.08814
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Home detection, assigning a phone device to its home antenna, is a ubiquitous part of most studies in the literature on mobile phone data. Despite its widespread use, home detection relies on a few assumptions that are difficult to check without ground truth, i.e., where the individual that owns the device resides. In this paper, we provide an unprecedented evaluation of the accuracy of home detection algorithms on a group of sixty-five participants for whom we know their exact home address and the antennas that might serve them. Besides, we analyze not only Call Detail Records (CDRs) but also two other mobile phone streams: eXtended Detail Records (XDRs, the ``data'' channel) and Control Plane Records (CPRs, the network stream). These data streams vary not only in their temporal granularity but also they differ in the data generation mechanism', e.g., CDRs are purely human-triggered while CPR is purely machine-triggered events. Finally, we quantify the amount of data that is needed for each stream to carry out successful home detection for each stream. We find that the choice of stream and the algorithm heavily influences home detection, with an hour-of-day algorithm for the XDRs performing the best, and with CPRs performing best for the amount of data needed to perform home detection. Our work is useful for researchers and practitioners in order to minimize data requests and to maximize the accuracy of home antenna location.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2010.08814

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. [1][1] Rein Ahas, Siiri Silm, Olle Järv, Erki Saluveer, and Margus Tiru. Using mobile positioning data to model locations meaningful to users of mobile phones. Journal of Urban Technology, 17(1):3–27, 2010.
  2. [3][3] Mariano G. Beiró, Loreto Bravo, Diego Caro, Ciro Cattuto, Leo Ferres, and Eduardo Graells-Garrido. Shopping mall attraction and social mixing at a city scale. EPJ Data Science, 7(1), 2018.
  3. [4][4] Joshua E. Blumenstock. Inferring patterns of internal migration from mo- bile phone call records: evidence from rwanda. Information Technology for Development, 18(2):107–125, 2012.
  4. [5][5] Eunjoon Cho, Seth A Myers, and Jure Leskovec. Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 1082–1090, 2011.
  5. [7][7] Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye, Sébastien Gambs, Vincent Blondel, Geoffrey Canright, Nicolas de Cordes, Sébastien Deletaille, Kenth Engø-Monsen, Manuel Garcia-Herranz, Jake Kendall, Cameron Kerry, Gautier Krings, Emmanuel Letouzé, Miguel Luengo-Oroz, Nuria Oliver, Luc Rocher, Alex Rutherford, Zbigniew Smoreda, Jessica Steele, Erik Wetter, Alex "Sandy" Pentland, and Linus Bengtsson. On the privacy-conscientious use of mobile phone data. Scientific Data, 5(1):180286, 2018.
  6. [9][9] Pierre Deville, Catherine Linard, Samuel Martin, Marius Gilbert, For- rest R. Stevens, Andrea E. Gaughan, Vincent D. Blondel, and Andrew J. Tatem. Dynamic population mapping using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(45):15888–15893, 2014.
  7. [10][10] Nathan Eagle, Michael Macy, and Rob Claxton. Network diversity and economic development. Science, 328(5981):1029–1031, 2010.
  8. [11][11] Marco Fiore, Panagiota Katsikouli, Elli Zavou, Mathieu Cunche, Franccoise Fessant, Dominique Le Hello, Ulrich Matchi Aivodji, Baptiste Olivier, Tony Quertier, and Razvan Stanica. Privacy in trajectory micro-data publishing : a survey. arXiv: Cryptography and Security, 2019.
  9. [12][12] Vanessa Frias-Martinez, Jesus Virseda, Alberto Rubio, and Enrique Frias- Martinez. Towards large scale technology impact analyses: Automatic res- idential localization from mobile phone-call data. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ICTD '10, pages 11:1–11:10, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
  10. [13][13] Vanessa Frias-Martinez, Jesus Virseda-Jerez, and Enrique Frias-Martinez. On the relation between socio-economic status and physical mobility. In- formation Technology for Development, 18(2):91–106, 2012.
  11. [14][14] Lorenzo Gabrielli, Barbara Furletti, Roberto Trasarti, Fosca Giannotti, and Dino Pedreschi. City users' classification with mobile phone data. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pages 1007–1012, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, nov 2015. IEEE Computer Society.
  12. [17][17] Soranan Hankaew, Santu Phithakkitnukoon, Merkebe G. Demissie, Lina Kattan, Zbigniew Smoreda, and Carlo Ratti. Inferring and modeling mi- gration flows using mobile phone network data. IEEE Access, 7:164746– 164758, 2019.
  13. [18][18] Ghazaleh Khodabandelou, Vincent Gauthier, Mounim A. El-Yacoubi, and Marco Fiore. Population estimation from mobile network traffic metadata. In 2016 IEEE 17th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mo- bile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pages 1–9, 2016.
  14. [19][19] Shengjie Lai, Elisabeth zu Erbach-Schoenberg, Carla Pezzulo, Nick W. Ruktanonchai, Alessandro Sorichetta, Jessica Steele, Tracey Li, Claire A. Dooley, and Andrew J. Tatem. Exploring the use of mobile phone data for national migration statistics. Palgrave Communications, 5(1):34, 2019.
  15. [20][20] Mingxiao Li, Song Gao, Feng Lu, Huan Tong, and Hengcai Zhang. Dynamic estimation of individual exposure levels to air pollution using trajectories reconstructed from mobile phone data. International Journal of Environ- mental Research and Public Health, 16(22):4522, Nov 2019.
  16. [21][21] Alejandro Llorente, Manuel Garcia-Herranz, Manuel Cebrian, and Esteban Moro. Social media fingerprints of unemployment. PLOS ONE, 10(5):1–13, 05 2015.
  17. [23][23] Shaojun Luo, Flaviano Morone, Carlos Sarraute, Matías Travizano, and Hernán A Makse. Inferring personal economic status from social network location. Nature communications, 8(1):1–7, 2017.
  18. [24][24] Huina Mao, Xin Shuai, Yong-Yeol Ahn, and Johan Bollen. Quantifying socio-economic indicators in developing countries from mobile phone com- munication data: applications to côte d'ivoire. EPJ Data Science, 4(1):15, 2015.
  19. [25][25] Stefano Marchetti, Caterina Giusti, Monica Pratesi, Nicola Salvati, Fosca Giannotti, Dino Pedreschi, Salvatore Rinzivillo, Luca Pappalardo, and Lorenzo Gabrielli. Small area model-based estimators using big data sources. Journal of Official Statistics, 31(2):263–281, 2015.
  20. [27][27] Luca Pappalardo, Dino Pedreschi, Zbigniew Smoreda, and Fosca Gian- notti. Using big data to study the link between human mobility and socio- economic development. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pages 871–878. IEEE, 2015.
  21. [29][29] Luca Pappalardo, Maarten Vanhoof, Lorenzo Gabrielli, Zbigniew Smoreda, Dino Pedreschi, and Fosca Giannotti. An analytical framework to nowcast well-being using mobile phone data. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 2(1):75–92, Dec 2016.
  22. [30][30] Roberto Pellungrini, Luca Pappalardo, Francesca Pratesi, and Anna Mon- reale. A data mining approach to assess privacy risk in human mobility data. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., 9(3):31:1–31:27, December 2017.
  23. [31][31] Roberto Pellungrini, Luca Pappalardo, Filippo Simini, and Anna Mon- reale. Modeling adversarial behavior against mobility data privacy. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pages 1–14, 2020.
  24. [32][32] Santi Phithakkitnukoon, Zbigniew Smoreda, and Patrick Olivier. Socio- geography of human mobility: A study using longitudinal mobile phone data. PLOS ONE, 7(6):1–9, 06 2012.
  25. [33][33] Simone Piaggesi, Laetitia Gauvin, Michele Tizzoni, Ciro Cattuto, Natalia Adler, Stefaan Verhulst, Andrew Young, Rhiannan Price, Leo Ferres, and André Panisson. Predicting city poverty using satellite imagery. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 90–96, 2019.
  26. [34][34] Miguel Picornell, Tomás Ruiz, Rafael Borge, Pedro García-Albertos, David de la Paz, and Julio Lumbreras. Population dynamics based on mobile phone data to improve air pollution exposure assessments. Journal of Ex- posure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 29(2):278–291, 2019.
  27. [35][35] Hadrien Salat, Zbigniew Smoreda, and Markus Schläpfer. A method to es- timate population densities and electricity consumption from mobile phone data in developing countries. PLOS ONE, 15(6):1–11, 06 2020.
  28. [36][36] Sanja Šćepanović, Igor Mishkovski, Pan Hui, Jukka K Nurminen, and Antti Ylä-Jääski. Mobile phone call data as a regional socio-economic proxy indicator. PloS one, 10(4):e0124160, 2015.
  29. [37][37] Chaoming Song, Tal Koren, Pu Wang, and Albert-László Barabási. Mod- elling the scaling properties of human mobility. Nature Physics, 6(10):818– 823, 2010.
  30. [38][38] Peter Struijs, Barteld Braaksma, and Piet JH Daas. Official statistics and big data. Big Data & Society, 1(1):2053951714538417, 2014.
  31. [39][39] Maarten Vanhoof, Clement Lee, and Zbigniew Smoreda. Performance and Sensitivities of Home Detection on Mobile Phone Data, chapter 8, pages 245–271. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2020.
  32. [40][40] Maarten Vanhoof, Fernando Reis, Thomas Ploetz, and Zbigniew Smoreda. Assessing the quality of home detection from mobile phone data for official statistics. Journal of Official Statistics, 34(4):935 – 960, 2018.
  33. [41][41] Vasiliki Voukelatou, Lorenzo Gabrielli, Ioanna Miliou, Stefano Cresci, Ra- jesh Sharma, Maurizio Tesconi, and Luca Pappalardo. Measuring objec- tive and subjective well-being: dimensions and data sources. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pappalardo, L., Ferres, L., Sacasa, M., Cattuto, C., & Bravo, L.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2010.08814
arXiv
2010.08814
OpenAlex
W3092935261
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Data Management and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
mobile phone data, call detail records, ground truth dataset, temporal granularity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review