INDCOR white paper 1: A shared vocabulary for IDN (Interactive Digital Narratives)
Open accessAbstract
COST Action 18230 INDCOR (Interactive Narrative Design for Complexity Representations) is an interdisciplinary network of researchers and practitioners intended to further the use of interactive digital narratives (IDN1) to represent highly complex topics. IDN possess crucial advantages in this regard, but more knowledge is needed to realize these advantages in broad usage by media producers and the general public. The lack of a shared vocabulary is a crucial obstacle on the path to a generalized, accessible body of IDN knowledge. This white paper frames the situation from the perspective of INDCOR and describes the creation of an online encyclopedia as a means to overcome this issue. Two similar and successful projects (The Living Handbook of Narratology and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) serve as examples for this effort, showing how community-authored encyclopedias can provide high-quality content. The authors introduce a taxonomy based on an overarching analytical framework (SPP model) as the foundational element of the encyclopedia, and detail editorial procedures for the project, including a peer-review process, designed to assure high academic quality and relevance of encyclopedia entries. Also, a sample entry provides guidance for authors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The SPP model has been related to three separate aspects of complexity: environment, representation, and message.
“The SPP model has been related to three separate aspects of complexity (Koenitz et al., 2020), that of environment (the real-world complexity implemented in the protostory), of representation (the complexity of the artefact) and of message (the complexity of interpretation and interactors' actions resulting in recorded playthroughs and retellings (Eladhari, 2018)).”
From Interactive digital narrative (IDN)—new ways to represent complexity and facilitate digitally empowered citizens (2022) · cites this paper as Koenitz et al., 2020
Section 4.1 (p. 13) says the SPP model provides a framework for contextualizing IDN and complexity, supporting the general connection. But our copy does not identify environment, representation, and message as three separate aspects of complexity; it names system, process, and product as the model’s three categories (p. 10). (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Bopp, J. A., Mekler, E. D. & Opwis, K. (2016). Negative Emotion, Positive Experience: Emotionally Moving Moments in Digital Games. CHI 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858227 · DOI
- Bopp, J. A., Opwis, K. & Mekler, E. D. (2018). 'An Odd Kind of Pleasure' CHI 2018.
- Chen, J. C., & Martin, A. R. (2014). Role-Play Simulations as a Transformative Methodology in Environmental Education. Journal of Transformative Education, 13(1), 85-102. doi:10.1177/1541344614560196 · DOI
- Cupchik, G. C. and Laszlo, J. (1994). The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action. Cognition & Emotion, 8(4):297312.
- Dena, Christy. (2017). 'Finding a Way: Techniques to Avoid Schema Tension in Narrative Design' ToDiGRA. doi:10.26503/todigra.v3i1.63 · DOI
- Fleck, R. & Fitzpatrick, G. (2010). Reflecting on Reflection: Framing a Design Landscape. OzCHI 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952269 · DOI · Paper page
- Giddens, A. (1987).Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Stanford University Press.
- Karhulahti, V.-M. (2012). Double fine adventure and the double hermeneutic videogame (pp.19-26). Presented at the Foundations of Digital Games, New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. http://doi.org/10.1145/2367616.2367619 · DOI · Paper page
- ICIDS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11318. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4\_8 · DOI
- Mateas, M. (2001). A Preliminary Poetics for Interactive Drama and Games. Digital Creativity, 12(3), 140-152. http://doi.org/10.1076/digc.12.3.140.3224 · DOI · Paper page
- Mekler, E. D., Iacovides, I. & Bopp, J. A. (2018). 'A Game that Makes You Question' Exploring the Role of Reflection for the Player Experience. CHI PLAY 2018 . https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242691 · DOI
- Murray, J.H. (1997, 2016): Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Free Press, New York
- Oliver, M. B. & Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research 36, 1, 53-81. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14682958.2009.01368.x · DOI
- Roth, C. (2019). The 'Angstfabriek' Experience: Factoring Fear into Transformative Interactive Narrative Design. In International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (pp. 101-114). Springer, Cham.
- Roth, C. & Koenitz, H. (2016). Evaluating the user experience of interactive digital narrative. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Multimedia Alternate Realities. 3136.
- Roth, C., Van Nuenen, T. & Koenitz, H. (2018). Ludonarrative Hermeneutics: A Way Out and the Narrative Paradox. In R. Rouse, H. Koenitz and M. Haahr (eds.). Interactive Storytelling - 11th International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, ICIDS 2018, Dublin, Ireland, December 5-8, 2018, Proceedings. Cham: Springer. 93-106.
- Rowold, J. (2008). Instrument Development for Esthetic Perception Assessment. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(6):35-40.
- Whitby, M. A, Deterding, C. S. & Iacovides, I. (2019): 'One of the Baddies All Along' Moments that Challenge a Player's Perspective. CHI PLAY 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347192 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koenitz, H., Barbara, J., & Eladhari, M. P. (2022) · New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia · doi:10.1080/13614568.2023.2181503 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“The SPP model has been related to three separate aspects of complexity (Koenitz et al., 2020), that of environment (the real-world complexity implemented in the protostory), of representation (the complexity of the arte-fact) and of message (the complexity of interpretation and interactors ’…”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Koenitz, H., Eladhari, M. P., Louchart, S., & Nack, F.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2010.10135
- OpenAlex
- W6982365685
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RADAR (Glasgow School of Art) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Keywords
- interactive digital narratives, shared vocabulary, online encyclopedias, taxonomy (general classification scheme), peer review, editorial process, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
