Language Models are Open Knowledge Graphs
Open accessAbstract
This paper shows how to construct knowledge graphs (KGs) from pre-trained language models (e.g., BERT, GPT-2/3), without human supervision. Popular KGs (e.g, Wikidata, NELL) are built in either a supervised or semi-supervised manner, requiring humans to create knowledge. Recent deep language models automatically acquire knowledge from large-scale corpora via pre-training. The stored knowledge has enabled the language models to improve downstream NLP tasks, e.g., answering questions, and writing code and articles. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised method to cast the knowledge contained within language models into KGs. We show that KGs are constructed with a single forward pass of the pre-trained language models (without fine-tuning) over the corpora. We demonstrate the quality of the constructed KGs by comparing to two KGs (Wikidata, TAC KBP) created by humans. Our KGs also provide open factual knowledge that is new in the existing KGs. Our code and KGs will be made publicly available.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Large language models have the ability to retrieve factual knowledge as explicit knowledge bases, presenting an opportunity to construct more comprehensive knowledge graphs within recommender systems.
“The ability of Large Language Models to retrieve factual knowledge as explicit knowledge bases [53-56, 56-61] has been stirred discussed, which presents an opportunity to construct more comprehensive knowledge graphs within recommender systems.”
From When large language models meet personalization: perspectives of challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983 · see citing works
Zhu, Y., Kiros, R., Zemel, R., Salakhutdinov, R., Urtasun, R., Torralba, A., & Fidler, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.11 · Cited by 2,264 · see citing works
Generalization through Memorization: Nearest Neighbor Language Models
Khandelwal, U., Levy, O., Jurafsky, D., Zettlemoyer, L., & Lewis, M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.00172 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Hopfield Networks is All You Need
Ramsauer, H., Schäfl, B., Lehner, J., Seidl, P., Widrich, M., Adler, T., Gruber, L., Holzleitner, M., Pavlović, M., Sandve, G. K., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.02217 · Cited by 236 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(Vaswani et al., 2017) based language models (e.g., BERT and GPT-3), substantial recent work focuses on both visualizing and analyzing the attention (Vig, 2019; Jain & Wallace, 2019; Clark et al., 2019; Michel et al., 2019; Vig et al., 2020; Ramsauer et al., 2020; Hendrycks et al., 2020).”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pre-trained models: Past, present and future
Han, X., Zhang, Z., Ding, N., Gu, Y., Liu, X., Huo, Y., Qiu, J., Yao, Y., Zhang, A., Zhang, L., et al. (2021) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.08.002 · Cited by 994 · see citing works
Self-citationWhen large language models meet personalization: perspectives of challenges and opportunities
Chen, J., Liu, Z., Huang, X., Wu, C., Liu, Q., Jiang, G., Pu, Y., Lei, Y., Chen, X., Wang, X., et al. (2024) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-024-01276-1 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Yang, L., Chen, H., Li, Z., Ding, X., & Wu, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3360454 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
McCoy, R. T., Yao, S., Friedman, D., Hardy, M. D., & Griffiths, T. L. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2322420121 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Playing games with AIs: the limits of GPT-3 and similar large language models
Sobieszek, A., & Price, T. (2022) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-022-09602-0 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model
Li, K., Patel, O., Viégas, F., Pfister, H., & Wattenberg, M. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-1797 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
“Wang et al. (2021) construct high-quality knowledge graphs from LLMs without human supervision.”
BackgroundPopBlends: Strategies for Conceptual Blending with Large Language Models
Wang, S., Petridis, S., Kwon, T., Ma, X., & Chilton, L. B. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580948 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Relational memory-augmented language models
Liu, Q., Yogatama, D., & Blunsom, P. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00476 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
The Life Cycle of Knowledge in Big Language Models: A Survey
Cao, B., Lin, H., Han, X., & Sun, L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.07616 · Cited by 18
Language Models As or For Knowledge Bases
Razniewski, S., Yates, A., Kassner, N., & Weikum, G. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.04888 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, C., Liu, X., & Song, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2010.11967
- OpenAlex
- W3093871960
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- knowledge graph construction, pre-trained language models, BERT, GPT-2, GPT-3, open knowledge, factual knowledge, Wikidata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
