Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depth
Open accessAbstract
A key factor in the success of deep neural networks is the ability to scale models to improve performance by varying the architecture depth and width. This simple property of neural network design has resulted in highly effective architectures for a variety of tasks. Nevertheless, there is limited understanding of effects of depth and width on the learned representations. In this paper, we study this fundamental question. We begin by investigating how varying depth and width affects model hidden representations, finding a characteristic block structure in the hidden representations of larger capacity (wider or deeper) models. We demonstrate that this block structure arises when model capacity is large relative to the size of the training set, and is indicative of the underlying layers preserving and propagating the dominant principal component of their representations. This discovery has important ramifications for features learned by different models, namely, representations outside the block structure are often similar across architectures with varying widths and depths, but the block structure is unique to each model. We analyze the output predictions of different model architectures, finding that even when the overall accuracy is similar, wide and deep models exhibit distinctive error patterns and variations across classes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11946 · Cited by 17,072 · see citing works
Zagoruyko, S., & Komodakis, N. (2016) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2016 · doi:10.5244/c.30.87 · Cited by 7,244 · see citing works
Raghu, M., Gilmer, J., Yosinski, J., & Sohl-Dickstein, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.05806 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Do Vision Transformers Work?
Park, N., & Kim, S. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.06709 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
“Feature map similarities of CNNs shows a block structure (Nguyen et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDo Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?
Raghu, M., Unterthiner, T., Kornblith, S., Zhang, C., & Dosovitskiy, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.08810 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Self-citationToward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networks
Räuker, T., Ho, A., Casper, S., & Hadfield-Menell, D. (2023) · 2023 IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml54575.2023.00039 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Revisiting the Platonic Representation Hypothesis: An Aristotelian View
Gröger, F., Wen, S., & Brbić, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.14486
“…the similarity between neural network representations is central to understanding the geometry of learned representation spaces (Raghu et al., 2017; Nguyen et al., 2021), guiding transfer learning decisions (Kornblith et al., 2019; Neyshabur et al., 2020; Gr¨oger et al., 2025), and relating…”
- Authors
- Nguyen, T., Raghu, M., & Kornblith, S.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2010.15327
- OpenAlex
- W3095872829
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- hidden representations, block structure, model capacity, representation learning, error patterns, model architecture comparison, overfitting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review