The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Unified approach to data-driven quantum error mitigation
Open accessAbstract
Achieving near-term quantum advantage will require effective methods for mitigating hardware noise. Data-driven approaches to error mitigation are promising, with popular examples including zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) and Clifford data regression (CDR). Here we propose a novel, scalable error mitigation method that conceptually unifies ZNE and CDR. Our approach, called variable-noise Clifford data regression (vnCDR), significantly outperforms these individual methods in numerical benchmarks. vnCDR generates training data first via near-Clifford circuits (which are classically simulable) and second by varying the noise levels in these circuits. We employ a noise model obtained from IBM's Ourense quantum computer to benchmark our method. For the problem of estimating the energy of an 8-qubit Ising model system, vnCDR improves the absolute energy error by a factor of 33 over the unmitigated results and by factors 20 and 1.8 over ZNE and CDR, respectively. For the problem of correcting observables from random quantum circuits with 64 qubits, vnCDR improves the error by factors of 2.7 and 1.5 over ZNE and CDR, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent approach suggests merging zero-noise extrapolation with learning-based methods for near-Clifford circuits.
“A recent approach suggests merging zero noise extrapolation with learningbased methods for near-Clifford circuits (Lowe et al. , 2020).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Lowe et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- [1]Bela Bauer, Sergey Bravyi, Mario Motta, and Garnet Kin Chan, 'Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and quantum materials science,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.03685 (2020). · arXiv
- [3]Samson Wang, Enrico Fontana, Marco Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Akira Sone, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J Coles, 'Noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.14384 (2020). · arXiv
- [5]Suguru Endo, Simon C Benjamin, and Ying Li, 'Practical quantum error mitigation for near-future applications,' Physical Review X 8 , 031027 (2018).
- [6]Lukasz Cincio, Yi˘ git Suba¸ sı, Andrew T Sornborger, and Patrick J Coles, 'Learning the quantum algorithm for state overlap,' New Journal of Physics 20 , 113022 (2018).
- [7]Prakash Murali, Jonathan M. Baker, Ali JavadiAbhari, Frederic T. Chong, and Margaret Martonosi, 'Noise-adaptive compiler mappings for noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers,' ASPLOS '19, 1015-1029 (2019).
- [10]Jarrod R McClean, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik, 'The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms,' New Journal of Physics 18 , 023023 (2016).
- [11]M Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, Ryan Babbush, Simon C Benjamin, Suguru Endo, Keisuke Fujii, Jarrod R McClean, Kosuke Mitarai, Xiao Yuan, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J Coles, 'Variational quantum algorithms,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.09265 (2020). · arXiv
- [14]Kunal Sharma, Sumeet Khatri, Marco Cerezo, and Patrick J Coles, 'Noise resilience of variational quantum compiling,' New Journal of Physics 22 , 043006 (2020). also supported by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) under project numbers 20190659PRD4 and 20210116DR, respectively. PJC also acknowledges initial support from the LANL ASC Beyond Moore's Law project. LC was also initially supported by the U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, under the Quantum Computing Application Teams program.
- [17]M Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Andrew Arrasmith, and Patrick J Coles, 'Variational quantum state eigensolver,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.01372 (2020). · arXiv
- [18]Thomas E O'Brien, Stefano Polla, Nicholas C Rubin, William J Huggins, Sam McArdle, Sergio Boixo, Jarrod R McClean, and Ryan Babbush, 'Error mitigation via verified phase estimation,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02538 (2020). · arXiv
- [21]Matthew Otten and Stephen K Gray, 'Recovering noise-free quantum observables,' Physical Review A 99 , 012338 (2019).
- [22]Tudor Giurgica-Tiron, Yousef Hindy, Ryan LaRose, Andrea Mari, and William J Zeng, 'Digital zero noise extrapolation for quantum error mitigation,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10921 (2020). · arXiv
- [23]Zhenyu Cai, 'Multi-exponential error extrapolation and combining error mitigation techniques for nisq applications,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.01265 (2020). · arXiv
- [25]Armands Strikis, Dayue Qin, Yanzhu Chen, Simon C Benjamin, and Ying Li, 'Learning-based quantum error mitigation,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07601 (2020). · arXiv
- [26]Piotr Czarnik, Andrew Arrasmith, Patrick J Coles, and Lukasz Cincio, 'Error mitigation with clifford quantum-circuit data,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10189 (2020). · arXiv
- [27]Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville, Deep Learning (MIT Press, 2016) http://www. deeplearningbook.org .
- [30]Lewis Fry Richardson and J. Arthur Gaunt, 'VIII. the deferred approach to the limit,' Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character 226 , 299-361 (1927). http://dx.doi.org/%2010.1098/rsta.1927.0008 · DOI
- [32]Joseph Vovrosh, Kiran E. Khosla, Sean Greenaway, Christopher Self, Myungshik Kim, and Johannes Knolle, 'Efficient mitigation of depolarizing errors in quantum simulations,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.01690 (2021). · arXiv
- [33]Miroslav Urbanek, Benjamin Nachman, Vincent R. Pascuzzi, Andre He, Christian W. Bauer, and Wibe A. de Jong, 'Mitigating depolarizing noise on quantum computers with noise-estimation circuits,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.08591 (2021). · arXiv
- [38]Abhijith J., Adetokunbo Adedoyin, John Ambrosiano, Petr Anisimov, Andreas B¨ artschi, William Casper, Gopinath Chennupati, Carleton Coffrin, Hristo Djidjev, David Gunter, Satish Karra, Nathan Lemons, Shizeng Lin, Alexander Malyzhenkov, David Mascarenas, Susan Mniszewski, Balu Nadiga, Daniel O'Malley, Diane Oyen, Scott Pakin, Lakshman Prasad, Randy Roberts, Phillip Romero, Nandakishore Santhi, Nikolai Sinitsyn, Pieter J. Swart, James G. Wendelberger, Boram Yoon, Richard Zamora, Wei Zhu, Stephan Eidenbenz, Patrick J. Coles, Marc Vuffray, and Andrey Y. Lokhov, 'Quantum algorithm implementations for beginners,' (2018), arXiv:1804.03719 [cs.ET]. · arXiv
- [40]Ulrich Schollw¨ ock, 'The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,' Annals of Physics 326 , 96-192 (2011).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variational quantum algorithms
Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J. R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 · Cited by 3,385
“Finally, zero-noise extrapolation can be merged with this regression to have an extrapolation to zero-noise whose form is tuned via the Clifford data, reducing the risk of blind extrapolations [213].”
MethodSelf-citationNoisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 2,231
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowe, A., Gordon, M. H., Czarnik, P., Arrasmith, A., Coles, P. J., & Cincio, L.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2011.01157
- OpenAlex
- W3136656277
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Bulletin of the American Physical Society
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum error mitigation, zero-noise extrapolation, device noise, random quantum circuits, quantum advantage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
