PreprintCited by 5Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Efficient classical calculation of the Quantum Natural Gradient

Open access
Jones, Tyson·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Quantum natural gradient has emerged as a superior minimisation technique in quantum variational algorithms. Classically simulating the algorithm running on near-future quantum hardware is paramount in its study, as it is for all variational algorithms. In this case, state-vector simulation of the P-parameter/gate ansatz circuit does not dominate the runtime; instead, calculation of the Fisher information matrix becomes the bottleneck, involving O(P^3) gate evaluations, though this can be reduced to O(P^2) gates by using O(P) temporary state-vectors. This is similar to the gradient calculation subroutine dominating the simulation of quantum gradient descent, which has attracted HPC strategies and bespoke simulation algorithms with asymptotic speedups. We here present a novel simulation strategy to precisely calculate the quantum natural gradient in O(P^2) gates and O(1) state-vectors. While more complicated, our strategy is in the same spirit as that presented for gradients in Reference 6, and involves iteratively evaluating recurrent forms of the Fisher information matrix. Our strategy uses only "apply gate", "clone state" and "inner product" operations which are present in practically all quantum computing simulators. It is furthermore compatible with parallelisation schemes, like hardware acceleration and distribution. Since our scheme leverages a form of the Fisher information matrix for strictly unitary ansatz circuits, it cannot be simply extended to density matrix simulation of quantum natural gradient with non-unitary circuits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2011.02991

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improved classical techniques to calculate the full Fubini-Study metric tensor exist.

    “and improved classical techniques to calculate the full tensor exist (Jones, 2020).”

    From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Jones, 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [4][4] Michael Broughton, Guillaume Verdon, Trevor McCourt, Antonio J Martinez, Jae Hyeon Yoo, Sergei V Isakov, Philip Massey, Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Ramin Halavati, Evan Peters, et al. Tensorflow quantum: A software framework for quantum machine learning. arXiv:2003.02989 , 2020. - · arXiv
  2. [5][5] Gian Giacomo Guerreschi, Justin Hogaboam, Fabio Baruffa, and Nicolas PD Sawaya. Intel quantum simulator: Acloud-ready high-performance simulator of quantum circuits. Quantum Science and Technology , 5(3):034007, 2020. -
  3. [8][8] B´ alint Koczor and Simon C Benjamin. Quantum natural gradient generalised to non-unitary circuits. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.08660 , 2019. - · arXiv
  4. [10][10] Jarrod R McClean, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik. The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms. New Journal of Physics , 18(2):023023, 2016. -
  5. [13][13] Yudong Cao, Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P Olson, Matthias Degroote, Peter D Johnson, M´ aria Kieferov´ a, Ian D Kivlichan, Tim Menke, Borja Peropadre, Nicolas PD Sawaya, et al. Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chemical reviews , 119(19):10856-10915, 2019. -
  6. [17][17] Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba Adam. ADAM: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980 , 4, 2014. - · arXiv
  7. [18][18] Charles George Broyden. The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms 1. general considerations. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics , 6(1):76-90, 1970. -
  8. [19][19] Sam McArdle, Tyson Jones, Suguru Endo, Ying Li, Simon C Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan. Variational ansatz-based quantum simulation of imaginary time evolution. npj Quantum Information , 5(1):1-6, 2019. -
  9. [21][21] Shun-ichi Amari. Neural learning in structured parameter spaces-natural riemannian gradient. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 127-133, 1997. -
  10. [24][24] RP Poplavski˘ ı. Thermodynamic models of information processes. Soviet Physics Uspekhi , 18(3):222, 1975. -
  11. [26][26] Mark Fingerhuth, Tom´ aˇ s Babej, and Peter Wittek. Open source software in quantum computing. PloS one , 13(12):e0208561, 2018. -
  12. [27][27] Tyson Jones, Anna Brown, Ian Bush, and Simon C Benjamin. QuEST and high performance simulation of quantum computers. Scientific reports , 9(1):1-11, 2019. -
  13. [29][29] Mikhail Smelyanskiy, Nicolas PD Sawaya, and Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik. qHiPSTER: The quantum high performance software testing environment. arXiv:1601.07195 , 2016. - · arXiv
  14. [30][30] Vlad Gheorghiu. Quantum++: A modern c++ quantum computing library. Plos one , 13(12):e0208073, 2018. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, T.
Corresponding author
Jones, Tyson
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3096720888
Cited by
5
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
quantum natural gradient, Fisher information matrix, variational quantum algorithms, quantum circuit simulation, hardware acceleration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review