CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 14Crime Patterns and InterventionsPolicing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Penology

Policing Chronic and Temporary Hot Spots of Violent Crime: A Controlled Field Experiment

Open access
Fitzpatrick, Dylan J., Gorr, Wilpen L., Neill, Daniel B.·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2011.06019arXiv 2011.06019
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Hot-spot-based policing programs aim to deter crime through increased proactive patrols at high-crime locations. While most hot spot programs target easily identified chronic hot spots, we introduce models for predicting temporary hot spots to address effectiveness and equity objectives for crime prevention, and present findings from a crossover experiment evaluating application of hot spot predictions to prevent serious violent crime in Pittsburgh, PA. Over a 12-month experimental period, the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police assigned uniformed patrol officers to weekly predicted chronic and temporary hot spots of serious violent crimes comprising 0.5 percent of the city's area. We find statistically and practically significant reductions in serious violent crime counts within treatment hot spots as compared to control hot spots, with an overall reduction of 25.3 percent in the FBI-classified Part 1 Violent (P1V) crimes of homicide, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, and a 39.7 percent reduction of African-American and other non-white victims of P1V crimes. We find that temporary hot spots increase spatial dispersion of patrols and have a greater percentage reduction in P1V crimes than chronic hot spots but fewer total number of crimes prevented. Only foot patrols, not car patrols, had statistically significant crime reductions in hot spots. We find no evidence of crime displacement; instead, we find weakly statistically significant spillover of crime prevention benefits to adjacent areas. In addition, we find no evidence that the community-oriented hot spot patrols produced over-policing arrests of minority or other populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2011.06019

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fitzpatrick et al. (2020) found that when violent crime hot spots received additional police presence through a community-oriented approach, there was no evidence of over-policing of minorities or other populations.

    “For example, Fitzpatrick et al. (2020) found that when violent crime hot spots received additional police presence through a community-oriented approach, there was no evidence of over-policing of minorities or other populations.”

    From ‘Led by Intelligence': A Scoping Review on the Experimental Evaluation of Intelligence-Led Policing (2024) · cites this paper as Fitzpatrick et al., 2020

    The paper reports no evidence that community-oriented hot-spot patrols produced over-policing arrests of minority or other populations (p. 1), supporting the claim about the patrol approach and its measured outcome. The claim omits the arrest-specific limit: the Discussion (p. 5) says further study is needed to rule out other potential harms from increased police contact. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • One included study combined both retrospective hot spot methods and machine learning techniques to capture both chronic and dynamic hot spots.

    “Notably, one study combined both retrospective hot spot methods and machine learning techniques to capture both chronic and dynamic hot spots (Fitzpatrick et al., 2020).”

    From ‘Led by Intelligence': A Scoping Review on the Experimental Evaluation of Intelligence-Led Policing (2024) · cites this paper as Fitzpatrick et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [1]1. D Weisburd, JE Eck, What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? The ANNALS Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci . 593 , 42-65 (2004).
  2. [2]2. National Research Council, Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence eds. W Skogan, K Frydl. (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC), (2004).
  3. [10]10. JE Eck, D Weisburd, Crime places in crime theory in Crime and Place . (Monsey: Criminal Justice Press) Vol. 4, pp. 1-33 (1995).
  4. [18]18. WB Braga, A.A., C Schnell, Can policing disorder reduce crime? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crim. Justice Policy Rev . 52 (2015).
  5. [21]21. C Telep, D Weisburd, C Gill, Z Vitter, D Teichman, Displacement of crime and diffusion of crime control benefits in large-scale geographic areas: A systematic review. J. Exp. Criminol . 10 , 515-548 (2014).
  6. [23]23. G Cordner, The challenge of community policing: Testing and promises , ed. D Rosenbaum. (Sage Publications), pp. 182-191 (1994).
  7. [29]29. D Weisburd, E Groff, S Yang, The criminology of place: street segments and our understanding of the crime problem . (Oxford University Press), (2011).
  8. [31]31. WGorr, Y Lee, Unraveling the Crime Time-Space Connection, New Directions in Theory and Policy , eds. D Weisburd, JE Eck. (Taylor and Francis Group, Abingdon) Vol. 22, (2017).
  9. [33]33. S Johnson, K Bowers, D Birks, K Pease, Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in Geographic Criminology eds. D Weisburd, W Bernasco, G Bruinsma. (Springer), (2009).
  10. [36]36. D Weisburd, ER Groff, SM Yang, The Criminology of Place: Street Segments and Our Understanding of the Crime Problem . (Oxford University Press), (2012).
  11. [42]42. W Skogan, M Maxfield, Coping with crime: individual and neighborhood reactions. (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA), p. 272 (1981).
  12. [43]43. M Moore, R Trojanowicz, Policing and the fear of crime. (National Institute of Justice, Washington), pp. 1-7 (1988).
  13. [47]47. CE Rasmussen, CK Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning . (MIT Press.), (2005).
  14. [48]48. Y Saatçi, Ph.D. thesis (University of Cambridge) (2011).
  15. [50]50. A Olligschlaeger, Crime mapping and Crime Prevention , eds. D Weisburd, T McEwen. (Criminal Justice Press) Vol. 8, pp. 315-347 (2019).
  16. [51]51. D Weisburd, W Bernasco, GJN Bruinsma, eds., Putting Crime in its Place: Units of Analysis in Geographic Criminology . (Springer New York), (2009).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fitzpatrick, D. J., Gorr, W. L., & Neill, D. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • New York University (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2011.06019
arXiv
2011.06019
OpenAlex
W3099269662
Cited by
14
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
hot spot policing, foot patrol, crime displacement, spillover effects, racial disparities in crime, African American victims, community policing, crime prevention, Pittsburgh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review