Cited by 39Crime Patterns and InterventionsPolicing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Penology

The efficacy of foot patrol in violent places

Novak, Kenneth J., Fox, Andrew M., Carr, Christine M., Spade, David A.·2016·Journal of Experimental Criminology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11292-016-9271-1

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Novak, K. J., Fox, A. M., Carr, C. M., & Spade, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
  • California State University, Fresno (US)
  • Kansas City Missouri Police Department (US)
Corresponding author
Novak, Kenneth J.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Published
2016-08-11
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
465-475
ISSN
  • 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3750
OpenAlex
W2511853111
Cited by
39
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bureau of Justice Assistance (2011-DB-BX-0016)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
foot patrol, hot spots, violent crime, crime displacement, deterrence, police presence, crime prevention, aggravated assault, robbery, urban policing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review