The DOI matches its DataCite record; 35 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyzing the Performance of Variational Quantum Factoring on a Superconducting Quantum Processor
Open accessAbstract
In the near-term, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms hold great potential for outperforming classical approaches. Understanding how these two computing paradigms work in tandem is critical for identifying areas where such hybrid algorithms could provide a quantum advantage. In this work, we study a QAOA-based quantum optimization algorithm by implementing the Variational Quantum Factoring (VQF) algorithm. We execute experimental demonstrations using a superconducting quantum processor and investigate the trade-off between quantum resources (number of qubits and circuit depth) and the probability that a given biprime is successfully factored. In our experiments, the integers 1099551473989, 3127, and 6557 are factored with 3, 4, and 5 qubits, respectively, using a QAOA ansatz with up to 8 layers and we are able to identify the optimal number of circuit layers for a given instance to maximize success probability. Furthermore, we demonstrate the impact of different noise sources on the performance of QAOA and reveal the coherent error caused by the residual ZZ-coupling between qubits as a dominant source of error in the superconducting quantum processor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dallaire-Demers et al. (2020) redefined an application benchmark as a way to systematically test the limits of quantum processors using exactly solvable VQA instances scalable to larger system sizes.
“Ref. (DallaireDemers et al. , 2020) abstracts this idea to redefine an application benchmark as a way to systematically test the limits of quantum processors using exactly solvable VQA instances that can be scaled to larger system sizes such as the chain length in Ref. (Dallaire-Demers et al. , 2020) or the number of preprocessing steps in Ref. (Karamlou et al. , 2020).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Karamlou et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720
A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552
Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box
Koch, J., Yu, T. M., Gambetta, J., Houck, A. A., Schuster, D. I., Majer, J., Blais, A., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319 · Cited by 3,351
Ammonia as a case study for the spontaneous ionization of a simple hydrogen-bonded compound
Palasyuk, T., Troyan, I. A., Eremets, M. I., Drozd, V., Medvedev, S. A., Zaleski‐Ejgierd, P., Magos–Palasyuk, E., Wang, H., Bonev, S., Dudenko, D., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4460 · Cited by 3,235
Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces
Havlíček, V., Córcoles, A. D., Temme, K., Harrow, A. W., Kandala, A., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0980-2 · Cited by 2,572
Quantum computational advantage using photons
Zhong, H.-S., Wang, H., Deng, Y.-H., Chen, M.-C., Peng, L.-C., Luo, Y.-H., Qin, J., Wu, D., Ding, X., Hu, Y., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe8770 · Cited by 2,405
A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits
Krantz, P., Kjærgaard, M., Yan, F., Orlando, T. P., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D. (2019) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5089550 · Cited by 2,321
A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.4028 · Cited by 1,789
Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware
Schuld, M., Bergholm, V., Gogolin, C., Izaac, J., & Killoran, N. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032331 · Cited by 1,072
Sim, S., Johnson, P. D., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2019) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.201900070 · Cited by 972
Zhou, L., Wang, S.-T., Choi, S., Pichler, H., & Lukin, M. D. (2020) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.021067 · Cited by 913
Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
Collaborators, G. A. Q. A., Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Boixo, S., Broughton, M., Buckley, B. B., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb9811 · Cited by 870
Validating quantum computers using randomized model circuits
Cross, A. W., Bishop, L. S., Sheldon, S., Nation, P. D., & Gambetta, J. M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032328 · Cited by 704
Quantum approximate optimization of non-planar graph problems on a planar superconducting processor
Harrigan, M. P., Sung, K. J., Neeley, M., Satzinger, K. J., Arute, F., Arya, K., Atalaya, J., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Boixo, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-01105-y · Cited by 564
Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling
Wallman, J. J., & Emerson, J. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.052325 · Cited by 535
An introduction to quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation
Gottesman, D. (2010) · Proceedings of symposia in applied mathematics · doi:10.1090/psapm/068/2762145 · Cited by 498
A generative modeling approach for benchmarking and training shallow quantum circuits
Benedetti, M., Garcia-Pintos, D., Perdomo, O., Leyton-Ortega, V., Nam, Y., & Perdomo-Ortiz, A. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0157-8 · Cited by 379
Realization of High-Fidelity CZ and Z Z -Free iSWAP Gates with a Tunable Coupler
Sung, Y., Ding, L., Braumüller, J., Vepsäläinen, A. P., Kannan, B., Kjærgaard, M., Greene, A., Samach, G., McNally, C., Kim, D. K., et al. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021058 · Cited by 342
QAOA for Max-Cut requires hundreds of qubits for quantum speed-up
Guerreschi, G. G., & Matsuura, A. Y. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43176-9 · Cited by 337
Kandala, A., Wei, K. X., Srinivasan, S. J., Magesan, E., Carnevale, S. D., Keefe, G., Klaus, D., Dial, O., & McKay, D. C. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.130501 · Cited by 164
Reducing Unitary and Spectator Errors in Cross Resonance with Optimized Rotary Echoes
Sundaresan, N., Lauer, I., Pritchett, E., Magesan, E., Jurcevic, P., & Gambetta, J. M. (2020) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.1.020318 · Cited by 162
Classical and quantum bounded depth approximation algorithms
Hastings, M. B. (2019) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic19.13-14-3 · Cited by 144
Probing quantum information propagation with out-of-time-ordered correlators
Braumüller, J., Karamlou, A. H., Yanay, Y., Kannan, B., Kim, D. K., Kjærgaard, M., Melville, A. J., Niedzielski, B. M., Sung, Y., Vepsäläinen, A. P., et al. (2021) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01430-w · Cited by 138
Self-citationA Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm Applied to a Bounded Occurrence Constraint Problem
Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6062 · Cited by 131
Biamonte, J. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.052331 · Cited by 124
Anschuetz, E., Olson, J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Cao, Y. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14082-3_7 · Cited by 104
Self-citationImproving the Performance of Deep Quantum Optimization Algorithms with Continuous Gate Sets
Lacroix, N., Hellings, C., Andersen, C. K., Paolo, A. D., Remm, A., Lazar, S., Krinner, S., Norris, G. J., Gabureac, M. S., Heinsoo, J., et al. (2020) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.1.020304 · Cited by 89
Bengtsson, A., Vikstål, P., Warren, C., Svensson, M., Gu, X. Q., Kockum, A. F., Krantz, P., Križan, C., Shiri, D., Svensson, I.-M., et al. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.034010 · Cited by 87
Improving the Performance of Deep Quantum Optimization Algorithms with Continuous Gate Sets
Lacroix, N., Hellings, C., Andersen, C. K., Paolo, A. D., Remm, A., Lazar, S., Krinner, S., Norris, G. J., Gabureac, M. S., Heinsoo, J., et al. (2020) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000464528 · Cited by 59
Quadratization in discrete optimization and quantum mechanicsPreprint
Dattani, N. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.04405 · Cited by 56
Low-Depth Mechanisms for Quantum Optimization
McClean, J. R., Harrigan, M. P., Mohseni, M., Rubin, N. C., Zhang, J., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V., Babbush, R., & Neven, H. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030312 · Cited by 50
Programming a quantum computer with quantum instructionsPreprint
Kjærgaard, M., Schwartz, M. E., Greene, A., Samach, G., Bengtsson, A., O’Keeffe, M. F., McNally, C. M., Braumüller, J., Kim, D. K., Krantz, P., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.08838 · Cited by 37
Burges, C. J. C. (2002) · Cited by 28
An application benchmark for fermionic quantum simulations
Dallaire-Demers, P.-L., Stęchły, M., Gonthier, J. F., Bashige, N. T., Romero, J., & Cao, Y. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.01862 · Cited by 25
Self-citationMeasuring the Capabilities of Quantum Computers
Proctor, T. J., Rudinger, K., Nielsen, E., Young, K. C., & Blume-Kohout, R. (2021) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5197499 · Cited by 12
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 2,231
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices
Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Rungger, I., Booth, G. H., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 · Cited by 1,031
A review on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and its variants
Blekos, K., Brand, D., Ceschini, A., Chou, C.-H., Li, R.-H., Pandya, K., & Summer, A. (2024) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.03.002 · Cited by 551
Quantum Algorithms: A Survey of Applications and End-to-end ComplexitiesPreprint
Dalzell, A. M., McArdle, S., Berta, M., Bienias, P., Chen, C.-F., Gilyén, A., Hann, C. T., Kastoryano, M. J., Khabiboulline, E. T., Kubica, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.18154/rwth-2026-02888 · Cited by 265
NISQ computing: where are we and where do we go?
Lau, J. W. Z., Lim, K. H., Shrotriya, H., & Kwek, L. C. (2022) · AAPPS bulletin · doi:10.1007/s43673-022-00058-z · Cited by 198
Multi-angle quantum approximate optimization algorithm
Herrman, R., Lotshaw, P. C., Ostrowski, J., Humble, T. S., & Siopsis, G. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10555-8 · Cited by 156
Digitized-counterdiabatic quantum approximate optimization algorithm
Chandarana, P., Hegade, N. N., Paul, K., Albarrán-Arriagada, F., Solano, E., del Campo, A., & Chen, X. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013141 · Cited by 122
Huang, H.-L., Xu, X., Guo, C., Tian, G., Wei, S.-J., Sun, X., Bao, W., & Long, G. (2023) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-022-2057-y · Cited by 111
NISQ Computers: A Path to Quantum Supremacy
AbuGhanem, M., & Eleuch, H. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3432330 · Cited by 94
Neural predictor based quantum architecture search
Zhang, S.-X., Hsieh, C.-Y., Zhang, S., & Yao, H. (2021) · Machine Learning: Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ac28dd · Cited by 88
Dalzell, A. M., McArdle, S., Berta, M., Bienias, P., Chen, C.-F., Gilyén, A., Hann, C. T., Kastoryano, M. J., Khabiboulline, E. T., Kubica, A., et al. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009639651 · Cited by 78
Quantum transport and localization in 1d and 2d tight-binding lattices
Karamlou, A. H., Braumüller, J., Yanay, Y., Paolo, A. D., Harrington, P. M., Kannan, B., Kim, D. K., Kjærgaard, M., Melville, A. J., Muschinske, S. E., et al. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00528-0 · Cited by 72
Self-citationScalable Method for Eliminating Residual ZZ Interaction between Superconducting Qubits
Ni, Z., Li, S., Zhang, L., Chu, J., Niu, J., Yan, T., Deng, X., Hu, L., Li, J., Zhong, Y., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.040502 · Cited by 54
Lumia, L., Torta, P., Mbeng, G. B., Santoro, G. E., Ercolessi, E., Burrello, M., & Wauters, M. M. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.020320 · Cited by 36
Tunable coupler to fully decouple and maximally localize superconducting qubits
Heunisch, L., Eichler, C., & Hartmann, M. J. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.064037 · Cited by 33
Digitized adiabatic quantum factorization
Hegade, N. N., Paul, K., Albarrán-Arriagada, F., Chen, X., & Solano, E. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.l050403 · Cited by 29
SoK: Benchmarking the Performance of a Quantum Computer
Wang, J., Guo, G., & Shan, Z. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24101467 · Cited by 27
Squeezing and quantum approximate optimization
Santra, G. C., Jendrzejewski, F., Hauke, P., & Egger, D. J. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.012413 · Cited by 27
The Quantum Cybersecurity Threat May Arrive Sooner Than You Think
Ford, P. (2023) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2022.3227657 · Cited by 22
Fedorov, A. K. (2023) · Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.3389/frqst.2023.1164428 · Cited by 22
Effective prime factorization via quantum annealing by modular locally-structured embedding
Ding, J., Spallitta, G., & Sebastiani, R. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53708-7 · Cited by 22
Suppressing Coherent Two-Qubit Errors via Dynamical Decoupling
Qiu, J., Zhou, Y., Hu, C.-K., Yuan, J., Zhang, L., Chu, J., Huang, W., Liu, W., Luo, K., Ni, Z., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.054047 · Cited by 19
Boosting quantum amplitude exponentially in variational quantum algorithms
Kyaw, T. H., Soley, M. B., Allen, B., Bergold, P., Sun, C., Batista, V. S., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acf4ba · Cited by 17
Resource‐Efficient Adaptive Variational Quantum Algorithm for Combinatorial Optimization Problems
Wu, S., Song, Y., Li, R., Qin, S., Wen, Q., & Gao, F. (2025) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202400484 · Cited by 17
Multilevel variational spectroscopy using a programmable quantum simulator
Han, Z., Lyu, C., Zhou, Y., Yuan, J., Chu, J., Nuerbolati, W., Jia, H. W., Nie, L., Wei, W., Yang, Z., et al. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013015 · Cited by 14
Photonic counterdiabatic quantum optimization algorithm
Chandarana, P., Paul, K., de Andoin, M. G., Ban, Y., Sanz, M., & Chen, X. (2024) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01807-2 · Cited by 12
A First Successful Factorization of RSA-2048 Integer by D-Wave Quantum Computer
Wang, C., Yu, J., Pei, Z., Wang, Q., & Hong, C. (2024) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.26599/tst.2024.9010028 · Cited by 12
Pitfalls of the Sublinear QAOA-Based Factorization Algorithm
Grebnev, S. V., Gavreev, M. A., Kiktenko, E. O., Guglya, A. P., Efimov, A., & Fedorov, A. K. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3336989 · Cited by 11
Demonstration of hardware efficient photonic variational quantum algorithm
Agresti, I., Paul, K., Schiansky, P., Steiner, S., Yin, Z., Pentangelo, C., Piacentini, S., Crespi, A., Ban, Y., Ceccarelli, F., et al. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/d7bb-ybfh · Cited by 9
Sobhani, M., Chai, Y., Hartung, T., & Jansen, K. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.042413 · Cited by 8
Benchmarking hybrid digitized-counterdiabatic quantum optimization
Xu, R., Tang, J., Chandarana, P., Paul, K., Xu, X., Yung, M., & Chen, X. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013147 · Cited by 8
A review of variational quantum algorithms: Insights into fault-tolerant quantum computing
Wang, Z., Huang, J., Ye, R., Li, Q., Ding, Q.-M., Huang, Y., Zhang, T., Zeng, Y., Gao, J., Yuan, X., et al. (2026) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.15302/frontphys.2027.023301 · Cited by 7
Wang, S., Liu, H., Li, Y., Gao, F., Qin, S., & Wen, Q. (2024) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202400201 · Cited by 7
Classically efficient quantum scalable Fermi-Hubbard benchmark
Gard, B., & Meier, A. M. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.042602 · Cited by 7
Hybrid Quantum Algorithms and Quantum Software Development FrameworksPreprint
Ramouthar, R., & Şeker, H. (2023) · doi:10.14293/pr2199.000298.v1 · Cited by 7
Performance-centric roadmap for building a superconducting quantum computer
Barends, R., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2026) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00495-x · Cited by 6
Noise tailoring for robust amplitude estimation
Dalal, A., & Katabarwa, A. (2023) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/acb5bc · Cited by 6
Self-citationExperimenting with D-Wave quantum annealers on prime factorization problems
Ding, J., Spallitta, G., & Sebastiani, R. (2024) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2024.1335369 · Cited by 4
Threats Related to the Use of Quantum Effects in Cryptography
Cherepnev, M. A., & Gracheva, S. S. (2024) · INFORMACIONNYE TEHNOLOGII · doi:10.17587/it.30.417-424 · Cited by 4
Experimental Factoring Integers Using Fixed-Point-QAOA with a Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor
Zalivako, I. V., Chernyavskiy, A. Y., Nikolaeva, A. S., Borisenko, A. S., Semenin, N. V., Galstyan, K. P., Korolkov, A. E., Grebnev, S. V., Kiktenko, E. O., Khabarova, K. Y., et al. (2025) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.2478/qic-2025-0021 · Cited by 4
The status and prospect of quantum-classical combination integer factorization algorithm
Bao, Y. A. N., Wei, S., & Guilu, L. O. N. G. (2025) · Scientia Sinica Informationis · doi:10.1360/ssi-2025-0105 · Cited by 3
Variational simulation of higher-spin systems on qubit-based quantum simulators
Lyu, C., Zou, Z., Xu, X., Yung, M., & Bayat, A. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/lfc9-cjqd · Cited by 3
Vizzuso, M., Passarelli, G., Cantele, G., & Lucignano, P. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.062606 · Cited by 3
Żołnierczyk, O. (2025) · International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications · doi:10.24425/ijet.2025.153542 · Cited by 2
Edge-based quantum approximate optimization algorithm for MAX-CUT problem
Seo, Y., & Heo, J. (2025) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-025-04925-0 · Cited by 2
Unveiling the Threat: Quantum Factorization Techniques and Their Impact on RSA Cryptosystems
Khaled, H., Metawei, M. A., Saif, S. M., Taher, M., & Nassar, S. M. (2025) · International Telecommunications Conference (ITC-Egypt) · doi:10.1109/itc-egypt66095.2025.11186634 · Cited by 2
Photonic variational quantum eigensolver for NISQ-compatible quantum technology
Hu, K.-M., Namkung, M., & Lim, H. (2025) · Nano Convergence · doi:10.1186/s40580-025-00525-x · Cited by 2
Hatwar, J., Aggarwal, N., & Bhowmik, D. (2025) · International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS) · doi:10.1109/comsnets63942.2025.10885675 · Cited by 2
A Survey of Quantum Algorithms for Computer Science
Kumar, A. H., Singh, A. J., & Kumar, S. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-86069-0_29 · Cited by 2
A Modified Order-Finding Algorithm for NISQ Devices
Biswas, D., Dutta, S., Utagi, S., & Mandayam, P. (2024) · International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS) · doi:10.1109/comsnets59351.2024.10426927 · Cited by 1
Near-term applications of superconducting digital quantum simulation
Yao, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024) · Journal of Zhejiang University. Science A · doi:10.1631/jzus.a2400397 · Cited by 1
Hybrid Quantum Algorithms and Quantum Software Development FrameworksPreprint
Ramouthar, R., & Şeker, H. (2023) · AfricArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31730/osf.io/fsw24 · Cited by 1
Experience with quantum annealing computation
(2024) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-5436-4
Enhanced Digitized Adiabatic Quantum Factorization Algorithm Using Null-Space EncodingPreprint
Pellicer, F. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.11747
Concrete implementation of t-out-of-n threshold lattice signatures
Gustafsson, M., & Petersson, M. (2024) · Lund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University)
Cadavid, C. A., Hoyos, P., Jorgenson, J. A., Smajlovic, L., & Vélez, J. D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.02518
Efficient Multi‐Stage Entanglement Distillation for W States
Harraz, S., & Cong, S. (2026) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202500952
Amélioration des algorithmes de crible. Application à la factorisation des entiers
Fleury, A. (2024) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/c43a37f2z61d0z4a1azb4b2z0d762cf6a3ac
QAOA for Hard-to-solve Instances of Maximum Independent Set ProblemPreprint
Li, X., Hu, S., Liu, W., He, X., Wang, D., & Liu, Z. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6669349
Protecting Computer Systems in the Post-Quantum World
Gerlach, T. C. (2026) · Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Can PCE solve the factorisation problem via optimisation?Preprint
Alonso, F., Samprón, C., Veiga, J., & Gómez, A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.23727
Hettiarachchi, A., Dissanayaka, K. D., & Bamunusinghe, J. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3741621
Metadata
- Authors
- Karamlou, A. H., Simon, W. A., Katabarwa, A., Scholten, T. L., Peropadre, B., & Cao, Y.
- Affiliations
- Zapata (United States) (US)
- IBM (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karamlou, Amir H.
- Cao, Yudong
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2056-6387 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2012.07825
- OpenAlex
- W3112212158
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- npj Quantum Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Bulletin of the American Physical Society
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2018265551)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum approximate optimization algorithm, superconducting quantum processors, integer factorization, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, quantum advantage, circuit depth, noise sources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
