General tensor network decoding of 2D Pauli codes
Open accessAbstract
In this work we develop a general tensor network decoder for 2D codes. Specifically, we propose a decoder that approximates maximally likelihood decoding for 2D stabiliser and subsystem codes subject to Pauli noise. For a code consisting of $n$ qubits our decoder has a runtime of $O(n\log n+nχ^3)$, where $χ$ is an approximation parameter. We numerically demonstrate the power of this decoder by studying four classes of codes under three noise models, namely regular surface codes, irregular surface codes, subsystem surface codes and colour codes, under bit-flip, phase-flip and depolarising noise. We show that the thresholds yielded by our decoder are state-of-the-art, and numerically consistent with optimal thresholds where available, suggesting that the tensor network decoder well approximates optimal decoding in all these cases. Novel to our decoder is an efficient and effective approximate contraction scheme for arbitrary 2D tensor networks, which may be of independent interest. We have also released an implementation of this algorithm as a stand-alone Julia package: SweepContractor.jl.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For any Jn, k, dK qubit error-correcting code, the quantum Singleton bound is n − k ≥ 2(d − 1).
“For any Jn, k, dK qubit error-correcting code, the quantum Singleton bound is given by the inequality: n− k ≥ 2(d− 1) . (10.4)”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [219]
The quantum Singleton bound establishes a different kind of limit on the parameters of a quantum error-correcting code.
“The quantum Singleton bound establishes a different kind of limit on the parameters of a quantum error-correcting code [24, 78, 219].”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [219]
Tensor network (TN) decoders are among the most powerful known decoding methods, achieving very high accuracy by directly approximating DMLD.
“Tensor network (TN) decoders are among the most powerful known decoding methods, achieving very high accuracy by directly approximating DMLD [199–201].”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [201]
The quantum Gilbert-Varshamov bound provides a lower bound on the performance of the best possible codes, guaranteeing the existence of good quantum codes.
“The quantum Gilbert-Varshamov (GV) bound addresses this by providing a lower bound on the performance of the best possible codes, thereby guaranteeing the existence of”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [219]
Cites
Quantum error correction for quantum memories
Terhal, B. M. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.307 · Cited by 1,354 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations
Fishman, M., White, S., & Stoudenmire, E. M. (2022) · SciPost Physics Codebases · doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.4 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Ising model formulation for highly accurate topological color codes decoding
Takada, Y., Takeuchi, Y., & Fujii, K. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013092 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial
Spencer, D. J., Jain, S. P., Tanggara, A., Sun, Z., Haug, T., Khu, D., & Bharti, K. (2026) · arXiv
- Authors
- Chubb, C. T.
- Corresponding author
- Chubb, Christopher T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2101.04125
- OpenAlex
- W3119235672
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Error Correcting Code Techniques
- Keywords
- subsystem codes, surface code, color codes, Pauli noise, maximum likelihood decoding, decoding threshold, depolarizing noise, quantum error correction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review