Cited by 10Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsQuantum Information and Cryptography

Ising model formulation for highly accurate topological color codes decoding

Open access
Takada, Yugo, Takeuchi, Yusaku, Fujii, Keisuke·2024·Physical Review Research

Abstract

Quantum error correction is an essential ingredient for reliable quantum computation for theoretically provable quantum speedup. Topological color codes, one of the quantum error correction codes, have an advantage against the surface codes in that all Clifford gates can be implemented transversally. However, the hardness of decoding makes the color codes not suitable as the best candidate for experimentally feasible implementation of quantum error correction. Here we propose an Ising model formulation that enables highly accurate decoding of the color codes. In this formulation, we map stabilizer operators to classical spin variables to represent an error satisfying the syndrome. Then we construct an Ising Hamiltonian that counts the number of errors and formulate the decoding problem as an energy minimization problem of an Ising Hamiltonian, which is solved by simulated annealing. In numerical simulations on the (4.8.8) lattice, we find an error threshold of 10.36(5)% for bit-flip noise model, 18.47(5)% for depolarizing noise model, and 2.90(4)% for phenomenological noise model (bit-flip error is located on each of data and measurement qubits), all of which are higher than the thresholds of existing efficient decoding algorithms. Furthermore, we verify that the achieved logical error rates are almost optimal in the sense that they are almost the same as those obtained by exact optimizations by CPLEX with smaller decoding time in many cases. Since the decoding process has been a bottleneck for performance analysis, the proposed decoding method is useful for further exploration of the possibility of the topological color codes. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013092

Cites

44 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MLE can be mapped to a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem.

    “In particular, one first maps MLE to a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem [213–215].”

    From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [215]

    Section B, “Decoding and combinatorial optimization,” says the decoding problem is mapped to unconstrained optimization. But Section III.A formulates it as a three-body Ising model, not a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem. The cited paper therefore supports the unconstrained-optimization aspect, but not the claimed QUBO mapping. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. A. Y. Kitaev, Quantum measurements and the abelian stabilizer problem, arXiv:quant-ph/9511026 (1995). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takada, Y., Takeuchi, Y., & Fujii, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • RIKEN Center for Quantum Computing (JP)
Venue
Physical Review Research
Published
2024-01-24
Volume
6
Issue
1
ISSN
2643-1564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391167845
Cited by
10
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JPMXS0118067394, JPMXS0120319794)
  • Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JPMJPF2014, JPMJMS2061)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum error correction, Ising model, decoding, simulated annealing, error threshold, energy minimization, logical error rate, bit-flip noise, depolarizing noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review