The DOI matches its DataCite record.
End-to-end Interpretable Neural Motion Planner
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we propose a neural motion planner (NMP) for learning to drive autonomously in complex urban scenarios that include traffic-light handling, yielding, and interactions with multiple road-users. Towards this goal, we design a holistic model that takes as input raw LIDAR data and a HD map and produces interpretable intermediate representations in the form of 3D detections and their future trajectories, as well as a cost volume defining the goodness of each position that the self-driving car can take within the planning horizon. We then sample a set of diverse physically possible trajectories and choose the one with the minimum learned cost. Importantly, our cost volume is able to naturally capture multi-modality. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in real-world driving data captured in several cities in North America. Our experiments show that the learned cost volume can generate safer planning than all the baselines.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Autonomous vehicles can be trained to operate securely by adhering to traffic regulations such as relinquishing, interacting with other pedestrians, and obeying road signs.
“In accordance with the proposal put forth by Zeng et al., autonomous vehicles can be trained to operate securely by adhering to traffic regulations such as relinquishing, interacting with the other pedestrians, and obeying road signs [95].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [95]
Justifications never ensure that system categorical imperatives are achieved.
“we emphasize that justifications never ensure that system categorical imperatives are achieved [65], [66].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [66]
The L-1 and L-2 ranges used in movement predictions help determine whether faulty movements result from inaccurate pace or directional estimations.
“The L-1 and L-2 ranges used in movement predictions help to determine if faulty movements are indeed the result of inaccurate pace or directional estimations.”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [95]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Chamola, V., Hassija, V., Sulthana, A. R., Ghosh, D., Dhingra, D., & Sikdar, B. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294569 · Cited by 352
“In accordance with the proposal put forth by Zeng et al., autonomous vehicles can be trained to operate securely by adhering to traffic regulations such as relinquishing, interacting with the other pedestrians, and obeying road signs [95].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeng, W., Luo, W., Suo, S., Sadat, A., Yang, B., Casas, S., & Urtasun, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 8652-8661
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2101.06679
- OpenAlex
- W2968008415
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 73
- FWCI
- 46.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- autonomous driving, LiDAR, HD maps, 3D object detection, trajectory prediction, cost volume, yielding, multi-user interaction, urban driving, trajectory sampling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review