PreprintCited by 50Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene expression and cancer classificationSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

A Variational Information Bottleneck Approach to Multi-Omics Data Integration

Open access
Lee, Changhee, van der Schaar, Mihaela·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Integration of data from multiple omics techniques is becoming increasingly important in biomedical research. Due to non-uniformity and technical limitations in omics platforms, such integrative analyses on multiple omics, which we refer to as views, involve learning from incomplete observations with various view-missing patterns. This is challenging because i) complex interactions within and across observed views need to be properly addressed for optimal predictive power and ii) observations with various view-missing patterns need to be flexibly integrated. To address such challenges, we propose a deep variational information bottleneck (IB) approach for incomplete multi-view observations. Our method applies the IB framework on marginal and joint representations of the observed views to focus on intra-view and inter-view interactions that are relevant for the target. Most importantly, by modeling the joint representations as a product of marginal representations, we can efficiently learn from observed views with various view-missing patterns. Experiments on real-world datasets show that our method consistently achieves gain from data integration and outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2102.03014

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Robustness to missing modalities can be achieved in homogeneous intermediate fusion.

    “Robustness to missing modalities can also be achieved in homogeneous intermediate fusion, as shown by [63].”
  • Different approaches have been proposed for missing modalities, such as multi-task learning, generative models and multimodal dropout.

    “Different approaches have been proposed, such as multi-task learning [70], generative models [63] and multimodal dropout [78, 101].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, C., & van der Schaar, M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Pages
1513-1521
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128101433
Cited by
50
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
multi-omics integration, variational information bottleneck, missing data, multi-view learning, joint representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review