Multiversal views on language models
Open accessAbstract
The virtuosity of language models like GPT-3 opens a new world of possibility for human-AI collaboration in writing. In this paper, we present a framework in which generative language models are conceptualized as multiverse generators. This framework also applies to human imagination and is core to how we read and write fiction. We call for exploration into this commonality through new forms of interfaces which allow humans to couple their imagination to AI to write, explore, and understand non-linear fiction. We discuss the early insights we have gained from actively pursuing this approach by developing and testing a novel multiversal GPT-3-assisted writing interface.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The tree of possible continuations can be thought of as a multiverse, where each branch represents a distinct narrative path or world.
“This tree can be thought of as a multiverse, where each branch represents a distinct narrative path or a distinct 'world' 18 .”
From Role play with large language models (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [1][1] Espen J Aarseth. "Nonlinearity and literary theory". In: Hyper/text/theory 52 (1994), pp. 761–
- [3][3] Mark Bernstein. "Storyspace 1". In: Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. 2002, pp. 172–181.
- [4][4] Tom B Brown et al. "Language models are few-shot learners". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165 (2020). · arXiv
- [5][5] David Deutsch. The Fabric of Reality. Penguin UK, 1998.
- [6][6] Bryce Seligman DeWitt and Neill Graham. The many worlds interpretation of quantum me- chanics. Vol. 63. Princeton University Press, 2015.
- [8][8] Spencer Jordan. "'An Infinitude of Possible Worlds': Towards a Research Method for Hypertext Fiction". In: New Writing 11.3 (2014), pp. 324–334. 10 https://www.sudowrite.com/ https://www.sudowrite.com/
- [9][9] Love Lagerkvist and Maliheh Ghajargar. "Multiverse: Exploring Human Machine Learning Interaction Through Cybertextual Generative Literature". In: 10th International Conference on the Internet of Things Companion. 2020, pp. 1–6.
- [10][10] M. O. Riedl and R. M. Young. "From linear story generation to branching story graphs". In: IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26.3 (2006), pp. 23–31. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2006. · DOI
- [56]56. [11] Mark Owen Riedl and Vadim Bulitko. "Interactive narrative: An intelligent systems approach". In: Ai Magazine 34.1 (2013), pp. 67–67.
- [12][12] Paul A Roth. "The pasts". In: History and Theory 51.3 (2012), pp. 313–339. 11 https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2006.56 https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2006.56 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role play with large language models
Shanahan, M., McDonell, K., & Reynolds, L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06647-8 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the creativity of large language models
Franceschelli, G., & Musolesi, M. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02127-3 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reynolds, L., & McDonell, K.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2102.06391
- OpenAlex
- W3129207008
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- IUI Workshops
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Literary and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- generative language models, GPT-3, human-AI collaboration, imagination, fiction writing, human-AI co-creation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
