PreprintCited by 31Advanced Graph Neural NetworksTopological and Geometric Data AnalysisGraph Theory and Algorithms

Topological Graph Neural Networks

Open access
Horn, Max, De Brouwer, Edward, Moor, Michael, Moreau, Yves, Rieck, Bastian, Borgwardt, Karsten·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a powerful architecture for tackling graph learning tasks, yet have been shown to be oblivious to eminent substructures such as cycles. We present TOGL, a novel layer that incorporates global topological information of a graph using persistent homology. TOGL can be easily integrated into any type of GNN and is strictly more expressive (in terms the Weisfeiler--Lehman graph isomorphism test) than message-passing GNNs. Augmenting GNNs with TOGL leads to improved predictive performance for graph and node classification tasks, both on synthetic data sets, which can be classified by humans using their topology but not by ordinary GNNs, and on real-world data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2102.07835

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The challenges in capturing relationships and dependencies among emotions indicate the necessity for an architecture that is both easy to construct and preserves the structure of the underlying signal in its topology to improve both performance and interpretability.

    “The challenges in capturing relationships and dependencies among emotions indicate the necessity for an architecture that is both easy to construct and preserves the structure of the underlying signal in its topology to improve both performance and interpretability [21], [22].”

    From Emotion Classification With Visibility Graphs (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. C. Bodnar, F. Frasca, Y. Wang, N. Otter, G. F. Montufar, P. Li´ o, and M. Bronstein. Weisfeiler and Lehman go topological: Message passing simplicial networks. In M. Meila and T. Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning , volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 1026-1037. PMLR, 2021.
  2. C. D. Hofer, F. Graf, B. Rieck, M. Niethammer, and R. Kwitt. Graph filtration learning. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 4314--4323. PMLR, 2020.
  3. H. Maron, H. Ben-Hamu, H. Serviansky, and Y. Lipman. Provably powerful graph networks. In H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alch´ e-Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 32, pages 2156-2167. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  4. B. Sanchez-Lengeling, E. Reif, A. Pearce, and A. B. Wiltschko. A gentle introduction to graph neural networks. Distill , 6(9):e33, 2021.
  5. C.-C. Wong and C.-M. Vong. Persistent homology based graph convolution network for fine-grained 3d shape segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 7098-7107, 2021.
  6. K. Xu, W. Hu, J. Leskovec, and S. Jegelka. How powerful are graph neural networks? In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019.
  7. M. Zaheer, S. Kottur, S. Ravanbakhsh, B. Poczos, R. R. Salakhutdinov, and A. J. Smola. Deep sets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 30, pages 3391-3401. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horn, M., De Brouwer, E., Moor, M., Moreau, Y., Rieck, B., & Borgwardt, K.
Affiliations
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
OpenAlex
W3129453535
Cited by
31
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • Vlaams Supercomputer Centrum
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (C14/18/092)
  • KU Leuven (C14/18/092)
  • Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach-Stiftung
  • Vlaamse regering (VR 2019 2203, FWO 06260)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Graph Theory and Algorithms
Keywords
graph neural networks, persistent homology, topological information, graph classification, node classification, Weisfeiler-Lehman test, expressiveness, cycles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review