An Ultra-low Power RNN Classifier for Always-On Voice Wake-Up Detection Robust to Real-World Scenarios
Open accessAbstract
We present in this paper an ultra-low power (ULP) Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) based classifier for an always-on voice Wake-Up Sensor (WUS) with performances suitable for real-world applications. The purpose of our sensor is to bring down by at least a factor 100 the power consumption in background noise of always-on speech processing algorithms such as Automatic Speech Recognition, Keyword Spotting, Speaker Verification, etc. Unlike the other published approaches, we designed our wake-up sensor to be robust to unseen real-world noises for realistic levels of speech and noise by carefully designing the dataset and the loss function. We also specifically trained it to mark only the speech start rather than adopting a traditional Voice Activity Detection (VAD) approach. We achieve less than 3% No Trigger Rate (NTR) for a duty cycle less than 1% in challenging background noises pooled using a model of an analogue front-end. We demonstrate the superiority of RNNs on this task compared to the other tested approaches, with an estimated power consumption of 45 nW for the RNN itself in 65nm CMOS and a minimal memory footprint of 0.52 kB.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Hardy and Badets (2021) WUS power consumption is 45 nW for the recurrent neural network with 530 Bytes of memory footprint.
“The power consumption of WUS is just 45nW for the recurrent neural network with 530 Bytes of memory footprint.”
From A review on TinyML: State-of-the-art and prospects (2022) · cites this paper as Hardy and Badets, 2021
Digital Implementation (p. 6) reports a 0.52 kB memory footprint, approximately 530 bytes, and predicts 45 nW power consumption after synthesis. The Abstract (p. 1) specifies that 45 nW is an estimate for the RNN itself, not a measured power consumption for the entire WUS. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHardy and Badets (2021) develop a recurrent neural network aware classifier to enable always-on voice detection using a wake-up sensor.
“For example, in (Hardy and Badets, 2021), a recurrent neural network aware classifier is developed to enable always-one voice detection by implying a wake-Up sensor (WUS).”
From A review on TinyML: State-of-the-art and prospects (2022) · cites this paper as Hardy and Badets, 2021
The Hardy and Badets (2021) approach shows less than 3% no trigger rate during less than 1% dirty cycle.
“The approach shows less than 3% no trigger rate (NTR) during less than 1% dirty cycle.”
From A review on TinyML: State-of-the-art and prospects (2022) · cites this paper as Hardy and Badets, 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [5][5] Junyoung Chung, Caglar Gulcehre, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. In NIPS 2014 Workshop on Deep Learning, December 2014 . -
- [21][21] Peiqi Wang, Xinfeng Xie, Lei Deng, Guoqi Li, Dongsheng Wang, and Yuan Xie. 2018. HitNet: Hybrid Ternary Recurrent Neural Network. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 , S. Bengio, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, K. Grauman, N. Cesa-Bianchi and R. Garnett (eds.). Curran Associates, Inc., 604-614. Retrieved from http://papers.nips.cc/paper/7341hitnet-hybrid-ternary-recurrent-neural-network.pdf -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review on TinyML: State-of-the-art and prospects
Ray, P. P. (2022) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.11.019 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Machine Learning for Microcontroller-Class Hardware: A Review
Saha, S. S., Sandha, S. S., & Srivastava, M. B. (2022) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2022.3210773 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Tiny Machine Learning: Progress and Futures [Feature]
Lin, J., Zhu, L., Chen, W.-M., Wang, W.-C., & Han, S. (2023) · IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcas.2023.3302182 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
TinyML Applications, Research Challenges, and Future Research Directions
Oufettoul, H., Chaibi, R., & Motahhir, S. (2024) · Learning and Technology Conference (L&T) · doi:10.1109/lt60077.2024.10469633 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Simulation for a Mems-Based CTRNN Ultra-Low Power Implementation of Human Activity Recognition
Emad-Ud-Din, M., Hasan, M. H., Jafari, R., Pourkamali, S., & Alsaleem, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2021.731076 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Sound Event Detection On A Single MCU: Lightweight, Low-power and Portable
Chen, H., Zhu, M., Zhou, J., Qiao, J., & Liu, B. (2022) · International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD) · doi:10.1109/icsmd57530.2022.10058217 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Salaa, A. S. A., Godasi, G. R., Donthu, R. K., Pasam, R. S., Acharya, A., & Pratap, S. T. (2021) · Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare · doi:10.18410/jebmh/2021/305 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hardy, E., & Badets, F.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2103.04792
- OpenAlex
- W3132582893
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Keywords
- ultra-low power, recurrent neural networks, noise robustness, loss function design, duty cycle, 65 nm CMOS, memory usage, keyword spotting, voice activity detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
