PreprintCited by 7Complex Network Analysis TechniquesKnowledge Management and SharingWork-Family Balance Challenges

Dynamic Silos: Increased Modularity in Intra-organizational Communication Networks during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Open access
Zuzul, Tiona, Pahnke, Emily Cox, Larson, Jonathan, Bourke, Patrick, Caurvina, Nicholas, Shah, Neha Parikh, Amini, Fereshteh, Weston, Jeffrey +4 more·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Workplace communications around the world were drastically altered by Covid-19, related work-from-home orders, and the rise of remote work. To understand these shifts, we analyzed aggregated, anonymized metadata from over 360 billion emails within 4,361 organizations worldwide. By comparing month-to-month and year-over-year metrics, we examined changes in network community structures over 24 months before and after Covid-19. We also examined shifts across multiple communication media (email, instant messages, video calls, and calendaring software) within a single global organization, and compared them to communications shifts that were driven by changes in formal organizational structure. We found that, in 2020, organizations around the world became more siloed than in 2019, evidenced by increased modularity. This shift was concurrent with decreased stability within silos. Collectively, our analyses indicate that following the onset of Covid-19, employees began to shift more dynamically between subcommunities (teams, workgroups or functional areas). At the same time, once in a subcommunity, they limited their communication to other members of that community. We term these network changes dynamic silos. We provide initial insights into the meaning and implications of dynamic silos for the future of work.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2104.00641

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent analyses of telemetry and survey data show that the pandemic affected both the who and the how of collaboration in information firms, with workers spending less time in meetings, communicating more by email, collaborating more with strong ties, and exhibiting more siloed and less stable communication patterns.

    “Recent analyses of telemetry and survey data show that the pandemic has affected both the who and the how of collaboration in information firms-while working remotely during the pandemic, workers are spending less time in meetings 35 , communicating more by email 35 , collaborating more with their strong ties as opposed to their weak ties 36 , and exhibiting patterns of communication that are more”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zuzul, T., Pahnke, E. C., Larson, J., Bourke, P., Caurvina, N., Shah, N. P., Amini, F., Weston, J., Park, Y., Vogelstein, J., White, C., & Priebe, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201478871
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
Keywords
organizational communication networks, network modularity, internal communication, COVID-19 pandemic, remote work, working from home, email metadata, instant messaging, video calls, community structure, organizational structure, future of work, employee communication behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review