PreprintCited by 122Robot Manipulation and Learning3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisReinforcement Learning in Robotics

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synergies Between Affordance and Geometry: 6-DoF Grasp Detection via Implicit Representations

Open access

Abstract

Grasp detection in clutter requires the robot to reason about the 3D scene from incomplete and noisy perception. In this work, we draw insight that 3D reconstruction and grasp learning are two intimately connected tasks, both of which require a fine-grained understanding of local geometry details. We thus propose to utilize the synergies between grasp affordance and 3D reconstruction through multi-task learning of a shared representation. Our model takes advantage of deep implicit functions, a continuous and memory-efficient representation, to enable differentiable training of both tasks. We train the model on self-supervised grasp trials data in simulation. Evaluation is conducted on a clutter removal task, where the robot clears cluttered objects by grasping them one at a time. The experimental results in simulation and on the real robot have demonstrated that the use of implicit neural representations and joint learning of grasp affordance and 3D reconstruction have led to state-of-the-art grasping results. Our method outperforms baselines by over 10% in terms of grasp success rate. Additional results and videos can be found at https://sites.google.com/view/rpl-giga2021

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2104.01542

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Jeannette Bohg and Danica Kragic. Learning grasping points with shape context. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 58(4):362-377, 2010.
  2. Jeannette Bohg, Matthew Johnson-Roberson, Beatriz León, Javier Felip, Xavi Gratal, Niklas Bergström, Dan- ica Kragic, and Antonio Morales. Mind the gap-robotic grasping under incomplete observation. In IEEE Inter- national Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 686-693, 2011.
  3. Jeannette Bohg, Antonio Morales, Tamim Asfour, and Danica Kragic. Data-driven grasp synthesis-a survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 30(2):289-309, 2013.
  4. Michel Breyer, Jen Jen Chung, Lionel Ott, Siegwart Roland, and Nieto Juan. Volumetric grasping network: Real-time 6 dof grasp detection in clutter. In Conference on Robot Learning, 2020.
  5. Berk Calli, Arjun Singh, Aaron Walsman, Siddhartha Srinivasa, Pieter Abbeel, and Aaron M Dollar. The ycb object and model set: Towards common benchmarks for manipulation research. In International Conference on Advanced Robotics, pages 510-517. IEEE, 2015.
  6. Zhiqin Chen and Hao Zhang. Learning implicit fields for generative shape modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5939-5948, 2019.
  7. Julian Chibane, Thiemo Alldieck, and Gerard Pons-Moll. Implicit functions in feature space for 3d shape recon- struction and completion. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6970- 6981, 2020.
  8. Brian Curless and Marc Levoy. A volumetric method for building complex models from range images. In An- nual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pages 303-312, 1996.
  9. Dan Ding, Yun-Hui Liu, and Shuguo Wang. Computing 3-d optimal form-closure grasps. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 4, pages 3573-3578. IEEE, 2000.
  10. Kuan Fang, Yuke Zhu, Animesh Garg, Andrey Kurenkov, Viraj Mehta, Li Fei-Fei, and Silvio Savarese. Learn- ing task-oriented grasping for tool manipulation from simulated self-supervision. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 39(2-3):202-216, 2020.
  11. Carlo Ferrari and John F Canny. Planning optimal grasps. In ICRA, volume 3, pages 2290-2295, 1992.
  12. David Fischinger, Markus Vincze, and Yun Jiang. Learn- ing grasps for unknown objects in cluttered scenes. In 2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pages 609-616. IEEE, 2013.
  13. Kyle Genova, Forrester Cole, Avneesh Sud, Aaron Sarna, and Thomas Funkhouser. Local deep implicit functions for 3d shape. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4857-4866, 2020.
  14. Marcus Gualtieri, Andreas Ten Pas, Kate Saenko, and Robert Platt. High precision grasp pose detection in dense clutter. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 598-605, 2016.
  15. Stephen James, Paul Wohlhart, Mrinal Kalakrishnan, Dmitry Kalashnikov, Alex Irpan, Julian Ibarz, Sergey Levine, Raia Hadsell, and Konstantinos Bousmalis. Sim- to-real via sim-to-sim: Data-efficient robotic grasping via randomized-to-canonical adaptation networks. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12627-12637, 2019.
  16. Yun Jiang, Stephen Moseson, and Ashutosh Saxena. Efficient grasping from rgbd images: Learning using a new rectangle representation. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3304- 3311, 2011.
  17. Dmitry Kalashnikov, Alex Irpan, Peter Pastor, Julian Ibarz, Alexander Herzog, Eric Jang, Deirdre Quillen, Ethan Holly, Mrinal Kalakrishnan, Vincent Vanhoucke, et al. Qt-opt: Scalable deep reinforcement learning for vision-based robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.10293, 2018. · arXiv
  18. Daniel Kappler, Jeannette Bohg, and Stefan Schaal. Leveraging big data for grasp planning. In IEEE Inter- national Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 4304-4311, 2015.
  19. Alexander Kasper, Zhixing Xue, and Rüdiger Dill- mann. The kit object models database: An object model database for object recognition, localization and manip- ulation in service robotics. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 31(8):927-934, 2012.
  20. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014. · arXiv
  21. Ulrich Klank, Dejan Pangercic, Radu Bogdan Rusu, and Michael Beetz. Real-time cad model matching for mobile manipulation and grasping. In 2009 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pages 290-296. IEEE, 2009.
  22. Mia Kokic, Johannes A Stork, Joshua A Haustein, and Danica Kragic. Affordance detection for task-specific grasping using deep learning. In International Confer- ence on Humanoid Robotics, pages 91-98. IEEE, 2017.
  23. Danica Kragic, Andrew T Miller, and Peter K Allen. Real-time tracking meets online grasp planning. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 3, pages 2460-2465, 2001.
  24. Hongzhuo Liang, Xiaojian Ma, Shuang Li, Michael Görner, Song Tang, Bin Fang, Fuchun Sun, and Jianwei Zhang. Pointnetgpd: Detecting grasp configurations from point sets. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3629-3635, 2019.
  25. Lingjie Liu, Jiatao Gu, Kyaw Zaw Lin, Tat-Seng Chua, and Christian Theobalt. Neural sparse voxel fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.11571, 2020. · arXiv
  26. Yun-Hui Liu. Qualitative test and force optimization of 3-d frictional form-closure grasps using linear program- ming. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 15(1):163-173, 1999.
  27. William E Lorensen and Harvey E Cline. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3d surface construction algo- rithm. ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics, 21(4):163- 169, 1987.
  28. Jeffrey Mahler, Jacky Liang, Sherdil Niyaz, Michael Laskey, Richard Doan, Xinyu Liu, Juan Aparicio Ojea, and Ken Goldberg. Dex-net 2.0: Deep learning to plan robust grasps with synthetic point clouds and analytic grasp metrics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.09312, 2017. · arXiv
  29. Lars Mescheder, Michael Oechsle, Michael Niemeyer, Sebastian Nowozin, and Andreas Geiger. Occupancy networks: Learning 3d reconstruction in function space. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4460-4470, 2019.
  30. Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 405-421. Springer, 2020.
  31. Brian Mirtich and John Canny. Easily computable optimum grasps in 2-d and 3-d. In Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 739-747. IEEE, 1994.
  32. Douglas Morrison, Peter Corke, and Jürgen Leitner. Closing the loop for robotic grasping: A real-time, generative grasp synthesis approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.05172, 2018. · arXiv
  33. Arsalan Mousavian, Clemens Eppner, and Dieter Fox. 6-dof graspnet: Variational grasp generation for object manipulation. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2901-2910, 2019.
  34. Chavdar Papazov and Darius Burschka. An efficient ransac for 3d object recognition in noisy and occluded scenes. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pages 135-148, 2010.
  35. Jeong Joon Park, Peter Florence, Julian Straub, Richard Newcombe, and Steven Lovegrove. Deepsdf: Learning continuous signed distance functions for shape repre- sentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 165- 174, 2019.
  36. Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zem- ing Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32:8026-8037, 2019.
  37. Songyou Peng, Michael Niemeyer, Lars Mescheder, Marc Pollefeys, and Andreas Geiger. Convolutional occupancy networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04618, 2020. · arXiv
  38. Lerrel Pinto and Abhinav Gupta. Supersizing self- supervision: Learning to grasp from 50k tries and 700 robot hours. In 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 3406-3413. IEEE, 2016.
  39. Christoph Pohl, Kevin Hitzler, Raphael Grimm, Antonio Zea, Uwe D Hanebeck, and Tamim Asfour. Affordance- based grasping and manipulation in real world applica- tions. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 9569-9576, 2020.
  40. Jean Ponce, Steve Sullivan, J-D Boissonnat, and J-P Merlet. On characterizing and computing three-and four- finger force-closure grasps of polyhedral objects. In [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 821-827. IEEE, 1993.
  41. Ana Huamán Quispe, Benoît Milville, Marco A Gutiérrez, Can Erdogan, Mike Stilman, Henrik Chris- tensen, and Heni Ben Amor. Exploiting symmetries and extrusions for grasping household objects. In Interna- tional Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3702-3708, 2015.
  42. Alberto Rodriguez, Matthew T Mason, and Steve Ferry. From caging to grasping. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 31(7), 2012.
  43. Anis Sahbani, Sahar El-Khoury, and Philippe Bidaud. An overview of 3d object grasp synthesis algorithms. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 60(3):326-336, 2012.
  44. Arjun Singh, James Sha, Karthik S Narayan, Tudor Achim, and Pieter Abbeel. Bigbird: A large-scale 3d database of object instances. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 509-516, 2014.
  45. Vincent Sitzmann, Julien NP Martel, Alexander W Bergman, David B Lindell, and Gordon Wetzstein. Implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.09661, 2020. · arXiv
  46. Andreas ten Pas, Marcus Gualtieri, Kate Saenko, and Robert Platt. Grasp pose detection in point clouds. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 36(13-14): 1455-1473, 2017.
  47. Mark Van der Merwe, Qingkai Lu, Balakumar Sundar- alingam, Martin Matak, and Tucker Hermans. Learning continuous 3d reconstructions for geometrically aware grasping. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2020.
  48. Qiangeng Xu, Weiyue Wang, Duygu Ceylan, Radomir Mech, and Ulrich Neumann. Disn: Deep implicit surface network for high-quality single-view 3d reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10711, 2019. · arXiv
  49. Xinchen Yan, Jasmined Hsu, Mohammad Khansari, Yun- fei Bai, Arkanath Pathak, Abhinav Gupta, James David- son, and Honglak Lee. Learning 6-dof grasping inter- action via deep geometry-aware 3d representations. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automa- tion, pages 3766-3773, 2018.
  50. Lin Yen-Chen, Andy Zeng, Shuran Song, Phillip Isola, and Tsung-Yi Lin. Learning to see before learning to act: Visual pre-training for manipulation. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 7286-7293. IEEE, 2020.
  51. Qian-Yi Zhou, Jaesik Park, and Vladlen Koltun. Open3D: A modern library for 3D data processing. arXiv:1801.09847, 2018. · arXiv
  52. Xiangyang Zhu and Han Ding. Planning force-closure grasps on 3-d objects. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 2, pages 1258- 1263, 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, Z., Zhu, Y., Svetlik, M., Fang, K., & Zhu, Y.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
OpenAlex
W3175388581
Cited by
122
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 2
FWCI
31.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Robotics: Science and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1955523)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
grasp detection, implicit neural representations, 3D reconstruction, grasp affordances, multi-task learning, shared representations, clutter suppression, robotic manipulation, grasp success rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review