CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 5Bayesian Modeling and Causal InferencePhilosophy and History of ScienceAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

A Topological Perspective on Causal Inference

Open access
Ibeling, Duligur, Icard, Thomas·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2107.08558arXiv 2107.08558
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper presents a topological learning-theoretic perspective on causal inference by introducing a series of topologies defined on general spaces of structural causal models (SCMs). As an illustration of the framework we prove a topological causal hierarchy theorem, showing that substantive assumption-free causal inference is possible only in a meager set of SCMs. Thanks to a known correspondence between open sets in the weak topology and statistically verifiable hypotheses, our results show that inductive assumptions sufficient to license valid causal inferences are statistically unverifiable in principle. Similar to no-free-lunch theorems for statistical inference, the present results clarify the inevitability of substantial assumptions for causal inference. An additional benefit of our topological approach is that it easily accommodates SCMs with infinitely many variables. We finally suggest that the framework may be helpful for the positive project of exploring and assessing alternative causal-inductive assumptions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2107.08558

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CHT is concerned with the collapse (or lack thereof) of the causal hierarchy; for example, that observational data is insufficient for identifying all causal queries.

    “Secondly, the CHT is concerned with the collapse (or lack thereof) of the causal hierarchy. For example, that observational data is insufficient for identifying all causal queries.”

    From Robust agents learn causal world models (2024) · cites this paper as Ibeling & Icard, 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [7][7] V. I. Bogachev. Measure Theory . Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. -
  2. [16][16] K. Genin. The Topology of Statistical Inquiry . PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2018. -
  3. [17][17] K. Genin. Statistical undecidability in linear, non-gaussian models in the presence of latent confounders. In Proceedings of NeurIPS , 2021. -
  4. [19][19] K. Genin and C. Mayo-Wilson. Statistical decidability in linear, non-Gaussian models. In Causal Discovery & Causality-Inspired Machine Learning , NeurIPS, 2020. -
  5. [24][24] J. L. Kelley. General Topology . Springer, 1975. -
  6. [28][28] L. Midolo and G. De Marco. Right inverses of linear maps on convex sets. Topology and its Applications , 156(7):1186-1191, 2009. -
  7. [32][32] J. Pearl. Causality . Cambridge University Press, 2009. -
  8. [40][40] P. Spirtes, C. Glymour, and R. Scheines. Causation, Prediction, and Search . MIT Press, 2001. -
  9. [42][42] Z. Tavares, J. Koppel, X. Zhang, R. Das, and A. S. Lezama. A language for counterfactual generative models. In Proceedings of ICML , 2021. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Ibeling, D., & Icard, T.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Volume
34
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2107.08558
arXiv
2107.08558
OpenAlex
W3185796555
Cited by
4
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
causal inference, structural causal models, weak topology, meager sets, no free lunch theorem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review