The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tianshou: a Highly Modularized Deep Reinforcement Learning Library
Abstract
In this paper, we present Tianshou, a highly modularized Python library for deep reinforcement learning (DRL) that uses PyTorch as its backend. Tianshou intends to be research-friendly by providing a flexible and reliable infrastructure of DRL algorithms. It supports online and offline training with more than 20 classic algorithms through a unified interface. To facilitate related research and prove Tianshou's reliability, we have released Tianshou's benchmark of MuJoCo environments, covering eight classic algorithms with state-of-the-art performance. We open-sourced Tianshou at https://github.com/thu-ml/tianshou/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our architecture also implements a modular reinforcement learning framework (Tianshou [26]).”
From NovelGym: A Flexible Ecosystem for Hybrid Planning and Learning Agents Designed for Open Worlds (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625
Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Graves, A., Antonoglou, I., Wierstra, D., & Riedmiller, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.5602 · Cited by 9,471
Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24270 · Cited by 9,084
Soft actor-critic Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor
Haarnoja, T., Zhou, A., Abbeel, P., & Levine, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.01290 · Cited by 5,594
Cited by
A Brief Overview of ChatGPT: The History, Status Quo and Potential Future Development
Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q.-L., & Tang, Y. (2023) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2023.123618 · Cited by 1,452
A real 3d embodied dataset for robotic active visual learning
Zhao, Q., Zhang, L., Wu, L., Qiao, H., & Liu, Z. (2022) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3157028 · Cited by 17
Wang, S., Yu, L., Gao, C., Zheng, C., Liu, S., Lu, R., Dang, K., Chen, X., Yang, J., Zhang, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01939 · Cited by 14
“In contrast, traditional RL typically formulates each action distribution as Gaussian with a predefined standard deviation (Schulman et al., 2017; Raffin et al., 2021; Weng et al., 2022), resulting in uniform entropy across actions.”
Dizon-Paradis, O., Wormald, S., Capecci, D., Bhandarkar, A., & Woodard, D. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23739099 · Cited by 1
NovelGym: A Flexible Ecosystem for Hybrid Planning and Learning Agents Designed for Open Worlds
Goel, S., Wei, Y., Lymperopoulos, P., Churá, K., Scheutz, M., & Sinapov, J. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems · doi:10.65109/aola8123
Metadata
- Authors
- Weng, J., Chen, H., Yan, D., You, K., Duburcq, A., Zhang, M., Su, Y., Su, H., & Zhu, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- arXiv
- 2107.14171
- References
- 4
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
