Cited by 17Robot Manipulation and LearningAdvanced Vision and ImagingRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization

A real 3d embodied dataset for robotic active visual learning

Zhao, Qianfan, Zhang, Lu, Wu, Lingxi, Qiao, Hong, Liu, Zhiyong·2022·IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Abstract

Active interaction with environments is one of the striking characteristics of robotic active vision, which allows robots to move to facilitate visual tasks. Recently, several embodied AI platforms have been proposed as the synthetic environments to study robotic active vision, without needing to interact in real world. However, by using synthetic data, model trained on these platforms will suffer performance degradation when applied in reality. In this letter, a real 3D embodied dataset is proposed for robotic active visual learning. The proposed dataset consists of real point cloud data densely collected in 7 real-world indoor scenes. In our embodied dataset, researchers are able to simulate the movements and interactions of robots in indoor environments and obtain real visual data, which will not lead to performance degradation in reality. Furthermore, we proposed a 3D divergency policy that can guide robots to move and collect data to improve visual performance in novel environments. The proposed policy is designed following a simple fact: a good 3D detector should produce consistent 3D detection results for the same object from different viewpoints. Therefore, our policy encourages the robot to explore the area where the detector generates different 3D bounding boxes for the same object and helps the robot improve its visual performance in novel scenes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lra.2022.3157028

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AutoAlignV2 enhances cross-modal feature fusion through deformable feature alignment, making it more effective in small-object detection such as pedestrians and bicycles.

    “AutoAlignV2 [259] enhances cross-modal feature fusion through deformable feature alignment, making it more effective in small-object detection (e.g., pedestrians and bicycles).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Q., Zhang, L., Wu, L., Qiao, H., & Liu, Z.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2022-07
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
6646-6652
ISSN
  • 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-3774
OpenAlex
W4226036061
Cited by
17
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2020AAA0108902)
  • Chinese Academy of Science (XDB32050100)
  • NSFC, China (61627808)
  • Dongguan Core Technology Research Frontier Project (2019622101001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Keywords
embodied AI, 3D object detection, robot exploration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review