Can Language Models Encode Perceptual Structure Without Grounding? A Case Study in Color
Open accessAbstract
Pretrained language models have been shown to encode relational information, such as the relations between entities or concepts in knowledge-bases -- (Paris, Capital, France). However, simple relations of this type can often be recovered heuristically and the extent to which models implicitly reflect topological structure that is grounded in world, such as perceptual structure, is unknown. To explore this question, we conduct a thorough case study on color. Namely, we employ a dataset of monolexemic color terms and color chips represented in CIELAB, a color space with a perceptually meaningful distance metric. Using two methods of evaluating the structural alignment of colors in this space with text-derived color term representations, we find significant correspondence. Analyzing the differences in alignment across the color spectrum, we find that warmer colors are, on average, better aligned to the perceptual color space than cooler ones, suggesting an intriguing connection to findings from recent work on efficient communication in color naming. Further analysis suggests that differences in alignment are, in part, mediated by collocationality and differences in syntactic usage, posing questions as to the relationship between color perception and usage and context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent work suggests that large language models are implicitly recovering high-fidelity representations of the underlying domains they are trained on.
“Recent work suggests a reason: they are implicitly recovering high-fidelity representations of the underlying domains they are trained on [1, 20].”
From Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eight Things to Know about Large Language Models
Bowman, S. R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.00612 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
“Evidence for this claim includes the following results, spanning many established experimental methods and models: • Models’ internal representations of color words closely mirror objective facts about human color perception (Abdou et al., 2021; Patel & Pavlick, 2022; Søgaard, 2023).”
Generating meaning: active inference and the scope and limits of passive AI
Pezzulo, G., Parr, T., Cisek, P., Clark, A., & Friston, K. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.10.002 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Large language models predict human sensory judgments across six modalities
Marjieh, R., Sucholutsky, I., van Rijn, P., Jacoby, N., & Griffiths, T. L. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-72071-1 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Task
Li, K., Hopkins, A. K., Bau, D., Viégas, F., Pfister, H., & Wattenberg, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.13382 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
The Platonic Representation Hypothesis
Huh, M., Cheung, B., Wang, T., & Isola, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.07987 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Model
Vafa, K., Chen, J., Rambachan, A., Kleinberg, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-0846 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Model
Vafa, K., Chen, J. Y., Rambachan, A., Kleinberg, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Robust agents learn causal world models
Richens, J., & Everitt, T. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.10877 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Ivanova, A. A., Sathe, A., Lipkin, B., Kumar, U., Radkani, S., Clark, T. H., Kauf, C., Hu, J., Pramod, R. T., Grand, G., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.09605 · Cited by 2
“Text itself thus contains rich information that reflects grounded world knowledge (Roads and Love, 2020; Abdou et al., 2021; Patel and Pavlick, 2021), and it may be reasonable to predict that LLMs would acquire this domain-specific knowledge from text alone.”
General agents contain world models
Richens, J., Abel, D., Bellot, A., & Everitt, T. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01622 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
From Text to Space: Mapping Abstract Spatial Models in LLMs during a Grid-World Navigation Task
Martorell, N. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.16690
- Authors
- Abdou, M., Kulmizev, A., Hershcovich, D., Frank, S., Pavlick, E., & Søgaard, A.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 109-132
- arXiv
- 2109.06129
- OpenAlex
- W3199748991
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Color Science and Applications
- Keywords
- color perception, color terms, language models, CIELAB color space, perceptual color space, color chips, color naming, relational encoding, topological structure, warm and cool colors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review