PreprintCited by 70Categorization, perception, and languageTopic ModelingColor Science and Applications

Can Language Models Encode Perceptual Structure Without Grounding? A Case Study in Color

Open access
Abdou, Mostafa, Kulmizev, Artur, Hershcovich, Daniel, Frank, Stella, Pavlick, Ellie, Søgaard, Anders·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Pretrained language models have been shown to encode relational information, such as the relations between entities or concepts in knowledge-bases -- (Paris, Capital, France). However, simple relations of this type can often be recovered heuristically and the extent to which models implicitly reflect topological structure that is grounded in world, such as perceptual structure, is unknown. To explore this question, we conduct a thorough case study on color. Namely, we employ a dataset of monolexemic color terms and color chips represented in CIELAB, a color space with a perceptually meaningful distance metric. Using two methods of evaluating the structural alignment of colors in this space with text-derived color term representations, we find significant correspondence. Analyzing the differences in alignment across the color spectrum, we find that warmer colors are, on average, better aligned to the perceptual color space than cooler ones, suggesting an intriguing connection to findings from recent work on efficient communication in color naming. Further analysis suggests that differences in alignment are, in part, mediated by collocationality and differences in syntactic usage, posing questions as to the relationship between color perception and usage and context.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2109.06129

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent work suggests that large language models are implicitly recovering high-fidelity representations of the underlying domains they are trained on.

    “Recent work suggests a reason: they are implicitly recovering high-fidelity representations of the underlying domains they are trained on [1, 20].”

    From Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdou, M., Kulmizev, A., Hershcovich, D., Frank, S., Pavlick, E., & Søgaard, A.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Pages
109-132
OpenAlex
W3199748991
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
12.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
  • Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Color Science and Applications
Keywords
color perception, color terms, language models, CIELAB color space, perceptual color space, color chips, color naming, relational encoding, topological structure, warm and cool colors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review